During the early period of reading development, children gain phonological (letter-to-sound mapping) and semantic knowledge (storage and retrieval of word meaning). Their reading ability changes rapidly, accompanied by learning-induced brain plasticity as they learn to read. This study aims at identifying the neural bases of phonological and semantic processing in early childhood by using a combination of univariate and multivariate pattern analysis. Nineteen typically developing children between the age of five and seven performed visual word-level phonological (rhyming) and semantic (related meaning) judgment tasks during functional magnetic resonance imaging scans. Our multivariate analysis showed that young children with good reading ability have already recruited the left hemispheric regions in the brain for phonological processing, including the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), superior and middle temporal gyrus, and fusiform gyrus. In addition, our multivariate results suggested that different sub-regions of the left IFG were recruited for the two tasks. Our results suggested the left lateralization of frontotemporal regions for phonological processing and semantic processing. In addition, we observed bilateral activations of parietal regions for semantic processing during early childhood. Our findings indicate that the neural bases of reading have already begun to be shaped in early childhood for typically developing children, which can be used as a control baseline for comparison of children at risk for reading difficulties.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BachS, BrandeisD, HofstetterC, MartinE, RichardsonU, BremS. 2010. Early emergence of deviant frontal fMRI activity for phonological processes in poor beginning readers. Neuroimage, 53:682–693.
2.
BinderJR.2016. fMRI of language systems. In: FilippiM (ed.) fMRI Techniques and Protocols. New York, NY: Humana Press; p. 355.
3.
BinderJR, DesaiRH. 2011. The neurobiology of semantic memory. Trends Cogn Sci, 15:527–536.
4.
BinderJR, MedlerDA, DesaiR, ConantLL, LiebenthalE. 2005. Some neurophysiological constraints on models of word naming. Neuroimage, 27:677–693.
5.
BitanT, BurmanDD, ChouTL, LuD, ConeNE, CaoF, et al.2007a. The interaction between orthographic and phonological information in children: an fMRI study. Hum Brain Mapp, 28:880–891.
6.
BitanT, BurmanDD, LuD, ConeNE, GitelmanDR, MesulamM-M, BoothJR. 2006. Weaker top-down modulation from the left inferior frontal gyrus in children. Neuroimage, 33:991–998.
7.
BitanT, CheonJ, LuD, BurmanDD, GitelmanDR, MesulamM-M, BoothJR. 2007b. Developmental changes in activation and effective connectivity in phonological processing. Neuroimage, 38:564–575.
8.
BlumenfeldHK, BoothJR, BurmanDD. 2006. Differential prefrontal–temporal neural correlates of semantic processing in children. Brain Lang, 99:226–235.
9.
BoothJR, BurmanDD, MeyerJR, GitelmanDR, ParrishTB, MesulamMM. 2004. Development of brain mechanisms for processing orthographic and phonologic representations. J Cogn Neurosci, 16:1234–1249.
10.
BoothJR, BurmanDD, MeyerJR, LeiZ, ChoyJ, GitelmanDR, et al.2003. Modality-specific and-independent developmental differences in the neural substrate for lexical processing. J Neurolinguist, 16:383–405.
11.
BoothJR, BurmanDD, Van SantenFW, HarasakiY, GitelmanDR, ParrishTB, MesulamMM. 2001. The development of specialized brain systems in reading and oral-language. Child Neuropsychol, 7:119–141.
12.
BoothJR, ChoS, BurmanDD, BitanT. 2007. Neural correlates of mapping from phonology to orthography in children performing an auditory spelling task. Dev Sci, 10:441–451.
13.
CaoF, BitanT, BoothJR. 2008. Effective brain connectivity in children with reading difficulties during phonological processing. Brain Lang, 107:91–101.
14.
CaoF, BitanT, ChouTL, BurmanDD, BoothJR. 2006. Deficient orthographic and phonological representations in children with dyslexia revealed by brain activation patterns. J Child Psychol Psychiatry, 47:1041–1050.
15.
CaoF, PengD, LiuL, JinZ, FanN, DengY, BoothJR. 2009. Developmental differences of neurocognitive networks for phonological and semantic processing in Chinese word reading. Hum Brain Mapp, 30:797–809.
16.
ColtheartM, RastleK, PerryC, LangdonR, ZieglerJ. 2001. DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychol Rev, 108:204.
17.
DevlinJT, MatthewsPM, RushworthMFS. 2003. Semantic processing in the left inferior prefrontal cortex: a combined functional magnetic resonance imaging and transcranial magnetic stimulation study. J Cogn Neurosci, 15:71–84.
18.
FonovV, EvansAC, BotteronK, AlmliCR, McKinstryRC, CollinsDL. 2011. Unbiased average age-appropriate atlases for pediatric studies. Neuroimage, 54:313–327.
19.
FriedericiAD, GierhanSM. 2013. The language network. Curr Opin Neurobiol, 23:250–254.
20.
GaillardWD, BalsamoLM, IbrahimZ, SachsBC, XuB. 2003. fMRI identifies regional specialization of neural networks for reading in young children, 60:94–100.
21.
GoswamiU.2008. Reading, complexity and the brain. Literacy, 42:67–74.
22.
GoughPM, NobreAC, DevlinJT. 2005. Dissociating linguistic processes in the left inferior frontal cortex with transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Neurosci, 25:8010–8016.
23.
HarmMW, SeidenbergMS. 2004. Computing the meanings of words in reading: cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. Psychol Rev, 111:662–720.
24.
HickokG, PoeppelD. 2007. The cortical organization of speech processing. Nat Rev Neurosci, 8:393–402.
25.
HoeftF, HernandezA, McmillonG, Taylor-HillH, MartindaleJL, MeylerA, et al.2006. Neural basis of dyslexia: a comparison between dyslexic and nondyslexic children equated for reading ability. J Neurosci, 26:10700–10708.
26.
HoeftF, UenoT, ReissAL, MeylerA, Whitfield-GabrieliS, GloverGH, et al.2007. Prediction of children's reading skills using behavioral, functional, and structural neuroimaging measures. Behav Neurosci, 121:602–613.
27.
ImK, RaschleNM, SmithSA, Ellen GrantP, GaabN. 2016. Atypical sulcal pattern in children with developmental dyslexia and at-risk kindergarteners. Cereb Cortex, 26:1138–1148.
28.
JobardG, CrivelloF, Tzourio-MazoyerN. 2003. Evaluation of the dual route theory of reading: a metanalysis of 35 neuroimaging studies. Neuroimage, 20:693–712.
29.
KaufmanAS.2004. Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test–Second Edition (KBIT-2). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
30.
KriegeskorteN, GoebelR, BandettiniP. 2006. Information-based functional brain mapping. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 7:3863–3868.
31.
LandiN, MenclWE, FrostSJ, SandakR, PughKR. 2010. An fMRI study of multimodal semantic and phonological processing in reading disabled adolescents. Ann Dyslexia, 60:102–121.
32.
LangerN, PeysakhovichB, ZukJ, DrottarM, SlivaDD, SmithS, et al.2015. White matter alterations in infants at risk for developmental dyslexia. Cereb Cortex, 27:1027–1036.
33.
LeachJL, HollandSK. 2010. Functional MRI in children: clinical and research applications. Pediatr Radiol, 40:31–49.
34.
LevyJ, PernetC, TreserrasS, BoulanouarK, AubryF, DémonetJ-F, CelsisP. 2009. Testing for the dual-route cascade reading model in the brain: an fMRI effective connectivity account of an efficient reading style. PLoS One, 4:e6675.
35.
LiH, QuJ, ChenC, ChenY, XueG, ZhangL, LuC, MeiL. 2018. Lexical learning in a new language leads to neural pattern similarity with word reading in native language. Hum Brain Mapp, 40:98–109.
36.
LiuX, GaoY, DiQ, HuJ, LuC, NanY, BoothJR, LiuL. 2018. Differences between child and adult large-scale functional brain networks for reading tasks. Hum Brain Mapp, 39:662–679.
37.
McCandlissBD, CohenL, DehaeneS. 2003. The visual word form area: expertise for reading in the fusiform gyrus. Trends Cogn Sci, 7:293–299.
38.
McDermottKB, PetersenSE, WatsonJM, OjemannJG. 2003. A procedure for identifying regions preferentially activated by attention to semantic and phonological relations using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neuropsychologia, 41:293–303.
39.
MazaikaPK, HoeftF, GloverGH, ReissAL. 2009. Methods and software for fMRI analysis of clinical subjects. Neuroimage, 47:S58.
OldfieldRC.1971. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9:97–113.
42.
OosterhofNN, ConnollyAC, HaxbyJV. 2016. CoSMoMVPA: multi-modal multivariate pattern analysis of neuroimaging data in Matlab/GNU octave. Front Neuroinform, 10:27.
43.
ParviainenT, HeleniusP, PoskipartaE, NiemiP, SalmelinR. 2006. Cortical sequence of word perception in beginning readers. J Neurosci, 26:6052–6061.
44.
PoldrackRA, FarahMJ. 2015. Progress and challenges in probing the human brain. Nature, 526:371–379.
45.
PoldrackRA, WagnerAD, PrullMW, DesmondJE, GloverGH, GabrieliJDE. 1999. Functional specialization for semantic and phonological processing in the left inferior prefrontal cortex. Neuroimage, 10:15–35.
46.
PriceCJ.2012. A review and synthesis of the first 20 years of PET and fMRI studies of heard speech, spoken language and reading. Neuroimage, 62:816–847.
47.
RaschleNM, SteringPL, MeissnerSN, GaabN. 2014. Altered neuronal response during rapid auditory processing and its relation to phonological processing in prereading children at familial risk for dyslexia. Cereb Cortex, 24:2489–2501.
48.
RaschleNM, ZukJ, GaabN. 2012. Functional characteristics of developmental dyslexia in left-hemispheric posterior brain regions predate reading onset. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 109:2156–2161.
49.
TurkeltaubPE, GareauL, FlowersDL, ZeffiroTA, EdenGF. 2003. Development of neural mechanisms for reading. Nat Neurosci, 6:767–773.
50.
VigneauM, BeaucousinV, HervéP.-Y., JobardG, PetitL, CrivelloF, et al.2011. What is right-hemisphere contribution to phonological, lexico-semantic, and sentence processing? Insights from a meta-analysis. Neuroimage, 54:577–593.
51.
WangJ, JoanisseMF, BoothJR. 2018. Reading skill related to left ventral occipitotemporal cortex during a phonological awareness task in 5–6-year old children. Dev Cogn Neurosci, 30:116–122.
52.
WangY, MauerMV, RaneyT, PeysakhovichB, BeckerBLC, SlivaDD, GaabN. 2016. Development of tract-specific white matter pathways during early reading development in at-risk children and typical controls. Cereb Cortex, 27:2469–2485.
53.
WeissY, CweigenbergHG, BoothJR. 2018. Neural specialization of phonological and semantic processing in young children. Hum Brain Mapp, 39:4334–4348.
54.
WiigEH, SecordWA, SemelE. 2013. Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals: CELF-5. San Antonio, TX: Pearson.
55.
WilkeM, HollandSK, MyserosJS, SchmithorstVJ, BallWS. 2003. Functional magnetic resonance imaging in pediatrics. Neuropediatrics, 34:225–233.
56.
WilsonM.1988. MRC psycholinguistic database: machine-usable dictionary, version 2.00. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput, 20:6–10.
57.
WoodcockRW.2011. Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests: WRMT-III. San Antonio, TX: Pearson.
58.
YamadaY, StevensC, DowM, HarnBA, ChardDJ, NevilleHJ. 2011. Emergence of the neural network for reading in five-year-old beginning readers of different levels of pre-literacy abilities: an fMRI study. Neuroimage, 57:704–713.
59.
YoungerJW, Tucker-DrobE, BoothJR. 2017. Longitudinal changes in reading network connectivity related to skill improvement. Neuroimage, 158:90–98.
60.
YuX, RaneyT, PerdueMV, ZukJ, Ozernov-PalchikO, BeckerBLC, RaschleNM, GaabN. 2018. Emergence of the neural network underlying phonological processing from the prereading to the emergent reading stage: a longitudinal study. Hum Brain Mapp, 39:2047–2063.
61.
ZukJ, YuX, SanfilippoJ, FiguccioM. J., DunstanJ, CarruthersC, et al.2019. White matter in infancy is prospectively associated with language outcome in kindergarten. bioRxiv [Epub ahead of print]; DOI: 10.1101/781914.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
