Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is one of the most common neurological disorders for which a subset of patients develops persistent postconcussive symptoms. Previous studies discovered abnormalities and disruptions in the brain functional networks of mTBI patients principally using static functional connectivity measures which assume that neural communication across the brain is static during resting state conditions. In this study, we examine the differences in dynamic neural communication between mTBI and control participants through the application of a combination of dynamic functional analysis and graph theoretic algorithms. Resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging data was obtained on 47 mTBI patients at the acute stage of injury and 30 demographically matched healthy control participants. Results show unique alterations in both the static and dynamic functional connectivity at the acute stage in mTBI patients who suffer persistent symptoms (≥6 months after injury). In addition, mTBI patients with postconcussion syndrome demonstrated a unique allocation of time in various brain states compared to both control participants and mTBI patients with favorable outcomes. These findings suggest that global damage to the overall communication across the brain in the acute stage may contribute to chronic mTBI symptoms. Dynamic functional analysis is a powerful tool that provides insights into the brain states and the innovative analysis methodology utilized may hold the potential to delineate patients predisposed to poor outcomes upon early presentation following injury.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllenEA, DamarajuE, PlisSM, ErhardtEB, EicheleT, CalhounVD. 2014. Tracking whole-brain connectivity dynamics in the resting state. Cereb Cortex, 24:663–676.
2.
CalhounVD, MillerR, PearlsonG, AdaliT. 2014. The chronnectome: time-varying connectivity networks as the next frontier in fMRI data discovery. Neuron, 84:262–274.
3.
ChangC, GloverGH. 2010. Time-frequency dynamics of resting-state brain connectivity measured with fMRI. Neuroimage, 50:81–98.
4.
CherkasskyBV, GoldbergAV, RadzikT. 1996. Shortest paths algorithms: theory and experimental evaluation. Math Program, 73:129–174.
5.
CoxRW. 1996. AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Comput Biomed Res, 29:162–173.
6.
DamarajuE, AllenEA, BelgerA, FordJM, McEwenS, MathalonDH, et al.2014. Dynamic functional connectivity analysis reveals transient states of dysconnectivity in schizophrenia. Neuroimage Clin, 5:298–308.
7.
DingH, TrajcevskiG, ScheuermannP, WangX, KeoghE. 2008. Querying and mining of time series data: experimental comparison of representations and distance measures. Proceedings VLDB Endowment, 1:1542–1552.
8.
DischingerPC, RybGE, KuferaJA, AumanKM. 2009. Early predictors of postconcussive syndrome in a population of trauma patients with mild traumatic brain injury. J Trauma, 66:289–296; discussion 296–297.
9.
FaulM, XuL, WaldM, CoronadoV. 2010. Traumatic Brain Injury in the United States: Emergency Department Visits, Hospitalizations, and Deaths. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
10.
GeY, PatelMB, ChenQ, GrossmanEJ, ZhangK, MilesL, et al.2009. Assessment of thalamic perfusion in patients with mild traumatic brain injury by true FISP arterial spin labelling MR imaging at 3T. Brain Inj, 23:666–674.
11.
GilbertN, BernierRA, CalhounVD, BrennerE, GrossnerE, RajtmajerSM, et al. (2018) Diminished neural network dynamics after moderate and severe traumatic brain injury. PLoS One, 13:e0197419.
12.
HillaryFG, GenovaHM, MedagliaJD, FitzpatrickNM, ChiouKS, WardeckerBM, et al.2010. The nature of processing speed deficits in traumatic brain injury: is less brain more?. Brain Imaging Behav, 4:141–154.
HutchisonRM, WomelsdorfT, AllenEA, BandettiniPA, CalhounVD, CorbettaM, et al.2013. Dynamic functional connectivity: promise, issues, and interpretations. Neuroimage, 80:360–378.
15.
HyvarinenA. 1999. Fast ICA for noisy data using Gaussian moments. In: Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems VLSI (Cat. No.99CH36349), Orlando, FL, 1999, pp. 57–61.
16.
IrajiA, BensonRR, WelchRD, O'NeilBJ, WoodardJL, AyazSI, et al.2015. Resting state functional connectivity in mild traumatic brain injury at the acute stage: independent component and seed based analyses. J Neurotrauma, 32:1031–1045.
17.
IsometsaE. 2014. Suicidal behaviour in mood disorders—who, when, and why?. Can J Psychiatry, 59:120–130.
18.
JohanssonB, BerglundP, RonnbackL. 2009. Mental fatigue and impaired information processing after mild and moderate traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj, 23:1027–1040.
19.
JohnsonB, ZhangK, GayM, HorovitzS, HallettM, SebastianelliW, SlobounovS. 2012. Alteration of brain default network in subacute phase of injury in concussed individuals: resting-state fMRI study. Neuroimage, 59:511–518.
20.
KassRE, RafteryAE. 1995. Bayes factors. J Am Stat Assoc, 90:773–795.
21.
KimJ, WhyteJ, PatelS, AvantsB, EuropaE, WangJ, et al.2010. Resting cerebral blood flow alterations in chronic traumatic brain injury: an arterial spin labeling perfusion FMRI study. J Neurotrauma, 27:1399–1411.
22.
KimJ, WhyteJ, PatelS, EuropaE, SlatteryJ, CoslettHB, DetreJA. 2012. A perfusion fMRI study of the neural correlates of sustained-attention and working-memory deficits in chronic traumatic brain injury. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 26:870–880.
23.
KingNS, CrawfordS, WendenFJ, MossNE, WadeDT. 1995. The Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire: a measure of symptoms commonly experienced after head injury and its reliability. J Neurol, 242:587–592.
24.
LehmannD. 1990. Brain electric microstates and cognition; the atoms of thought. In: Roy JohnE (ed.) Machinery of the Mind. Boston, MA: Birkhuser; pp. 209–224.
25.
LeonardiN, Van De VilleD. 2015. On spurious and real fluctuations of dynamic functional connectivity during rest. Neuroimage, 104:430–436.
26.
MayerAR, LingJM, AllenEA, KlimajSD, YeoRA, HanlonFM. 2015. Static and dynamic intrinsic connectivity following mild traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma, 32:1046–1055.
27.
MayerAR, MannellMV, LingJ, ElgieR, GasparovicC, PhillipsJP, et al.2009. Auditory orienting and inhibition of return in mild traumatic brain injury: a FMRI study. Hum Brain Mapp, 30:4152–4166.
McMahonP, HricikA, YueJK, PuccioAM, InoueT, LingsmaHF, et al.2014. Symptomatology and functional outcome in mild traumatic brain injury: results from the prospective TRACK-TBI study. J Neurotrauma, 31:26–33.
30.
MinatiL, ZacaD, D'IncertiL, JovicichJ. 2014. Fast computation of voxel-level brain connectivity maps from resting-state functional MRI using l(1)-norm as approximation of Pearson's temporal correlation: proof-of-concept and example vector hardware implementation. Med Eng Phys, 36:1212–1217.
31.
OsbornAJ, MathiasJL, Fairweather-SchmidtAK. 2014. Depression following adult, non-penetrating traumatic brain injury: a meta-analysis examining methodological variables and sample characteristics. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 47C:1–15.
32.
PedregosaF, VaroquauxG, GramfortA, MichelV, ThirionB, GriselO, et al.2011. Scikit-learn: maching learning in python. J Mach Learn Res, 12:2825–2830.
33.
PettieS, RamachandranV. 2002. An optimal minimum spanning tree algorithm. J Assoc Comput Mach, 49:16–34.
34.
ReesPM. 2003. Contemporary issues in mild traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 84:1885–1894.
35.
RyaliS, ChenT, SupekarK, MenonV. 2012. Estimation of functional connectivity in fMRI data using stability selection-based sparse partial correlation with elastic net penalty. Neuroimage, 59:3852–3861.
36.
RyaliS, SupekarK, AbramsDA, MenonV. 2010. Sparse logistic regression for whole-brain classification of fMRI data. Neuroimage, 51:752–764.
37.
SairHI, Yahyavi-Firouz-AbadiN, CalhounVD, AiranRD, AgarwalS, IntrapiromkulJ, et al.2016. Presurgical brain mapping of the language network in patients with brain tumors using resting-state fMRI: comparison with task fMRI. Hum Brain Mapp, 37:913–923.
38.
SaramakiJ, KivelaM, OnnelaJP, KaskiK, KerteszJ. 2007. Generalizations of the clustering coefficient to weighted complex networks. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys, 75:027105.
39.
SchwarzGE. 1978. Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Stat, 6:461–464.
40.
SoursC, ChenH, RoysS, ZhuoJ, VarshneyA, GullapalliRP. 2015a. Investigation of multiple frequency ranges using discrete wavelet decomposition of resting state functional connectivity in mild traumatic brain injury patients. Brain Connect, 5:442–450.
41.
SoursC, RosenbergJ, KaneR, RoysS, ZhuoJ, ShanmuganathanK, GullapalliRP. 2015b. Associations between interhemispheric functional connectivity and the Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM) in civilian mild TBI. Brain Imaging Behav, 9:190–203.
42.
SoursC, ZhuoJ, JanowichJ, AarabiB, ShanmuganathanK, GullapalliRP. 2013. Default mode network interference in mild traumatic brain injury—a pilot resting state study. Brain Res, 1537:201–215.
43.
SPM8. 2009. Statistical Parametric Mapping. Wellcome Department of Imaging Neuroscience, University College London, United Kingdom.
TieY, RigoloL, NortonIH, HuangRY, WuW, OrringerD, et al.2014. Defining language networks from resting-state fMRI for surgical planning—a feasibility study. Hum Brain Mapp, 35:1018–1030.
48.
van den HeuvelMP, MandlRC, KahnRS, Hulshoff PolHE. 2009. Functionally linked resting-state networks reflect the underlying structural connectivity architecture of the human brain. Hum Brain Mapp, 30:3127–3141.
49.
VaroquauxG, KellerM, PolineJ, CiuciuP, ThirionB. 2010a. ICA-based sparse features recovery from fMRI datasets. In: Proceedings of 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging. Rotterdam, Netherlands, 2010. pp. 1177.
50.
VaroquauxG, SadaghianiS, PinelP, KleinschmidtA, PolineJB, ThirionB. 2010b. A group model for stable multi-subject ICA on fMRI datasets. Neuroimage, 51:288–299.
51.
VergaraVM, MayerAR, DamarajuE, CalhounVD. 2017a. The effect of preprocessing in dynamic functional network connectivity used to classify mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Behav, 7:e000809.
52.
VergaraVM, MayerAR, DamarajuE, KiehlKA, CalhounV. 2017b. Detection of mild traumatic brain injury by machine learning classification using resting state functional network connectivity and fractional anisotropy. J Neurotrauma, 34:1045–1053.
WattsDJ, StrogatzSH. 1998. Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature, 393:440–442.
55.
World Health Organization. 2010. International Classification of Disease, 10th Review. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
56.
ZaleskyA, BreakspearM. (2015). Towards a statistical test for functional connectivity dynamics. Neuroimage, 114:466–470.
57.
ZhouY, MilhamMP, LuiYW, MilesL, ReaumeJ, SodicksonDK, et al.2012. Default-mode network disruption in mild traumatic brain injury. Radiology, 265:882–892.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
