Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) has regularly been associated with cognitive, social, and behavioral problems. The fact that many different cognitive and behavioral impairments have been observed in NF1 suggests that networks of brain regions are involved rather than specific brain regions. Here, we examined whether functional connectivity was different in NF1 and, if so, whether associations were present with cognitive, social, and behavioral outcomes. Fourteen NF1 patients (8 male, age: M=12.49, SD=2.65) and 30 healthy controls (HC; 23 male, age: M=12.30, SD=2.94; p=0.835) were included. Functional connectivity was assessed using functional resting-state scanning. We analyzed brain regions that have been associated with cognitive and social functions: the bilateral ventral anterior cingulate cortex (vACC), the bilateral amygdala, the bilateral orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), and the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC). For NF1 patients, connection strengths between brain regions showing HC-NF1 differences were correlated with parent reports of cognitive, social, and behavioral functioning. Compared to HC, patients showed differences in functional connectivity between the left vACC and the frontal cortex, insula, and subcortical areas (caudate, putamen), between the left amygdala and the frontal cortex, insula, supramarginal gyrus, and PCC/precuneus, and between the left OFC and frontal and subcortical areas (caudate, pallidum). In patients, indications were found for associations between increased frontofrontal and temporofrontal functional connectivity with cognitive, social, and behavioral deficits (r-range=0.536–0.851). NF1 patients showed differences in functional connectivity between areas associated with cognitive and social functioning when compared to controls. This, plus the fact that connectivity strengths in these networks were associated with worse cognitive, social, and behavioral outcomes, suggests a neuropathological basis for the widespread deficits observed in NF1.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AchenbachT. 1992. Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist/2-3 and 1992 Profile. Burlington, VT: Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont.
2.
AdolphsR, TranelD, DamasioAR. 1998. The human amygdala in social judgment. Nature, 393:470–474.
3.
AdolphsR, TranelD, DamasioH, DamasioA. 1994. Impaired recognition of emotion in facial expressions following bilateral damage to the human amygdala. Nature, 372:669–672.
4.
BartonB, NorthK. 2004. Social skills of children with neurofibromatosis type 1. Dev Med Child Neurol, 46:553–563.
5.
BeerJS, JohnOP, ScabiniD, KnightRT. 2006. Orbitofrontal cortex and social behavior: integrating self-monitoring and emotion-cognition interactions. J Cogn Neurosci, 18:871–879.
6.
BeyerF, MünteTF, GöttlichM, KrämerUM. 2014. Orbitofrontal cortex reactivity to angry facial expression in a social interaction correlates with aggressive behavior. Cereb Cortex pii:bhu10.
7.
BillingsleyRL, JacksonEF, SlopisJM, SwankPR, MahankaliS. 2004. Functional MRI of visual–spatial processing in neurofibromatosis, type I. Neuropsychologia, 42:395–404.
8.
BiswalB, YetkinFZ, HaughtonVM, HydeJS. 1995. Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo-planar MRI. Magn Reson Med, 34:537–541.
9.
BurgessPW, DumontheilI, GilbertSJ. 2007. The gateway hypothesis of rostral prefrontal cortex (area 10) function. Trends Cogn Sci, 11:290–298.
10.
BushG, LuuP, PosnerM. 2000. Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex. Trends Cogn Sci, 4:215–222.
11.
ChabernaudC, MennesM, KardelPG, GaillardWD, KalbfleischML, VanmeterJW, PackerRJ, MilhamMP, CastellanosFX, AcostaMT. 2012. Lovastatin regulates brain spontaneous low-frequency brain activity in neurofibromatosis type 1. Neurosci Lett, 515:28–33.
12.
Clements-StephensAM, RimrodtSL, GaurP, CuttingLE. 2008. Visuospatial processing in children with neurofibromatosis type 1. Neuropsychologia, 46:690–697.
13.
ColeMW, SchneiderW. 2007. The cognitive control network: integrated cortical regions with dissociable functions. Neuroimage, 37:343–360.
14.
ConstantinoJ. 2005. Social Responsiveness Scale. Los Angeles. Western Psychological Service.
15.
CoudéFX, MignotC, LyonnetS, MunnichA, 2006. Academic impairment is the most frequent complication of neurofibromatosis type-1 (NF1) in children. Behav Genet, 36:660–664.
16.
CuttingLE, CooperKL, KothCW, MostofskySH, KatesWR, DencklaMB, KaufmannWE. 2002. Megalencephaly in NF1: predominantly white matter contribution and mitigation by ADHD. Neurology, 59:1388–1394.
17.
DamoiseauxJS, RomboutsSARB, BarkhofF, ScheltensP, StamCJ, SmithSM, BeckmannCF. 2006. Consistent resting-state networks across healthy subjects. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 103:13848–13853.
18.
Ferraz-FilhoJRL, da RochaAJ, MunizMP, SouzaAS, Goloni-BertolloEM, Pavarino-BertelliEC. 2011. Diffusion tensor MR imaging in neurofibromatosis type 1: expanding the knowledge of microstructural brain abnormalities. Pediatr Radiol, 42:449–454.
19.
Ferraz-FilhoJRL, José da RochaA, MunizMP, SouzaAS, Goloni-BertolloEM, Pavarino-BertelliEC. 2012. Unidentified bright objects in neurofibromatosis type 1: conventional MRI in the follow-up and correlation of microstructural lesions on diffusion tensor images. Eur J Paediatr Neurol, 16:42–47.
20.
FilippiniN, MacIntoshBJ, HoughMG, GoodwinGM, FrisoniGB, SmithSM, MatthewsPM, BeckmannCF, MackayCE. 2009. Distinct patterns of brain activity in young carriers of the APOE-epsilon4 allele. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 106:7209–7214.
21.
GasquoinePG. 2013. Localization of function in anterior cingulate cortex: from psychosurgery to functional neuroimaging. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 37:340–348.
22.
GilbertSJ, HensonRNA, SimonsJS. 2010. The scale of functional specialization within human prefrontal cortex. J Neurosci, 30:1233–1237.
GioiaG, IsquithP, GuyS, KenworthyL. 2000. Test review: behavior rating inventory of executive function. Child Neuropsychol, 6:235–238.
25.
GreiciusMD, KrasnowB, ReissAL, MenonV. 2003. Functional connectivity in the resting brain: a network analysis of the default mode hypothesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 100:253–258.
26.
GreshamFM, ElliottSN. 1990. Social Skills Rating System manual. Circle Pines, MN, American Guidance Service.
27.
GreshamFM, MacMillanDL, BocianKM. 1996. Learning disabilities, low achievement, and mild mental retardation: more alike than different?. J Learn Disabil, 29:570–581.
28.
GreveDN, FischlB. 2010. Accurate and robust brain image alignment using boundary-based registration. Neuroimage, 48:63–72.
HuijbregtsS, JahjaR, De SonnevilleL, de BreijS, Swaab-BarneveldH. 2010. Social information processing in children and adolescents with neurofibromatosis type 1. Dev Med Child Neurol, 52:620–625.
31.
HuijbregtsSCJ, de SonnevilleLMJ. 2011. Does cognitive impairment explain behavioral and social problems of children with neurofibromatosis type 1?. Behav Genet, 41:430–436.
32.
HymanSL, Arthur ShoresE, NorthKN. 2006. Learning disabilities in children with neurofibromatosis type 1: subtypes, cognitive profile, and attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder. Dev Med Child Neurol, 48:973–977.
33.
HymanSL, ShoresA, NorthKN. 2005. The nature and frequency of cognitive deficits in children with neurofibromatosis type 1. Neurology, 65:1037–1044.
34.
JackowskiAP, de Araújo FilhoGM, de AlmeidaAG, de AraújoCM, ReisM, NeryF, BatistaIR, SilvaI, LacerdaALT. 2012. The involvement of the orbitofrontal cortex in psychiatric disorders: an update of neuroimaging findings. Rev Bras Psiquiatr, 34:207–212.
35.
JenkinsonM, BannisterP, BradyM, SmithS. 2002. Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. Neuroimage, 17:825–841.
36.
LammC, SingerT. 2010. The role of anterior insular cortex in social emotions. Brain Struct Funct, 214:579–591.
37.
LeechR, SharpDJ. 2014. The role of the posterior cingulate cortex in cognition and disease. Brain, 137,(Pt 1)::12–32.
38.
MarsRB, NeubertF-X, NoonanMP, SalletJ, ToniI, RushworthMFS. 2012. On the relationship between the ‘default mode network’ and the ‘social brain’. Front Hum Neurosci, 6:189.
39.
MurrayRJ, BroschT, SanderD. 2014. The functional profile of the human amygdala in affective processing: insights from intracranial recordings. Cortex, 60:10–33.
40.
NagaiM, KishiK, KatoS. 2007. Insular cortex and neuropsychiatric disorders: a review of recent literature. Eur Psychiatry, 22:387–394.
41.
National Institutes of Health. 1988. Consensus development conference statement. Neurofibromatosis. Arch Neurol, 45:575–578.
42.
NicholsTE, HolmesAP. 2002. Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: a primer with examples. Hum Brain Mapp, 15:1–25.
43.
NieuwenhuysR. 2012. The insular cortex: a review. Prog Brain Res, 195:123–163.
44.
NorthK, JoyP, YuilleD, CocksN, MobbsE, HutchinsP, McHughK, de SilvaM. 1994. Specific learning disability in children with neurofibromatosis type 1: significance of MRI abnormalities. Neurology, 44:878–883.
45.
PassamontiL, FairchildG, GoodyerIM, HurfordG, HaganCC, RoweJB, CalderAJ. 2010. Neural abnormalities in early-onset and adolescence-onset conduct disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 67:729–738.
46.
PayneJM, HymanSL, ShoresEA, NorthKN. 2011. Assessment of executive function and attention in children with neurofibromatosis type 1: relationships between cognitive measures and real-world behavior. Child Neuropsychol, 17:313–329.
47.
PayneJM, MoharirMD, WebsterR, NorthKN. 2010. Brain structure and function in neurofibromatosis type 1: current concepts and future directions. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 81:304–309.
48.
PhanKL, WagerT, TaylorSF, LiberzonI. 2002. Functional neuroanatomy of emotion: a meta-analysis of emotion activation studies in PET and fMRI. Neuroimage, 16:331–348.
49.
RowbothamI, Pit-ten CateIM, Sonuga-BarkeEJS, HuijbregtsSCJ. 2009. Cognitive control in adolescents with neurofibromatosis type 1. Neuropsychology, 23:50–60.
50.
RoyA, RoulinJ-L, CharbonnierV, AllainP, FasottiL, BarbarotS, StalderJ-F, TerrienA, Le GallD. 2010. Executive dysfunction in children with neurofibromatosis type 1: a study of action planning. J Int Neuropsychol Soc, 16:1056–1063.
51.
Salimi-KhorshidiG, DouaudG, BeckmannCF, GlasserMF, GriffantiL, SmithSM. 2014. Automatic denoising of functional MRI data: combining independent component analysis and hierarchical fusion of classifiers. Neuroimage, 90:449–468.
52.
SalmiJ, RoineU, GlereanE, LahnakoskiJ, Nieminen-von WendtT, TaniP, LeppämäkiS, NummenmaaL, JääskeläinenIP, CarlsonS, RintahakaP, SamsM. 2013. The brains of high functioning autistic individuals do not synchronize with those of others. Neuroimage Clin, 3:489–497.
SmithSM, FoxPT, MillerKL, GlahnDC, FoxPM, MackayCE, FilippiniN, WatkinsKE, ToroR, LairdAR, BeckmannCF. 2009. Correspondence of the brain's functional architecture during activation and rest. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 106:13040–13045.
55.
SmithSM, JenkinsonM, WoolrichMW, BeckmannCF, BehrensTEJ, Johansen-BergH, BannisterPR, De LucaM, DrobnjakI, FlitneyDE, NiazyRK, SaundersJ, VickersJ, ZhangY, De StefanoN, BradyJM, MatthewsPM. 2004. Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage, 23(Suppl 1)S208–S219.
56.
SteenRG, TaylorJS, LangstonJW, GlassJO, BrewerVR, ReddickWE, MagesR, PivnickEK. 2001. Prospective evaluation of the brain in asymptomatic children with neurofibromatosis type 1: relationship of macrocephaly to T1 relaxation changes and structural brain abnormalities. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 22:810–817.
57.
ViolanteIR, RibeiroMJ, CunhaG, BernardinoI, DuarteJV, RamosF, SaraivaJ, SilvaE, Castelo-BrancoM. 2012. Abnormal brain activation in neurofibromatosis type 1: a link between visual processing and the default mode network. PLoS One, 7:e38785.
58.
ViolanteIR, RibeiroMJ, SilvaED, Castelo-BrancoM. 2013. Gyrification, cortical and subcortical morphometry in neurofibromatosis type 1: an uneven profile of developmental abnormalities. J Neurodev Disord, 5:3.
59.
WechslerD, PetermannF, PetermannU. 2011. Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children—Fourth Edition.
60.
WheatonMG, FitzgeraldDA, PhanKL, KlumppH. 2014. Perceptual load modulates anterior cingulate cortex response to threat distractors in generalized social anxiety disorder. Biol Psychol, 101C:13–17.
61.
WilsonB, AldermanN, BurgessP, EmslieH, EvansJ. 1996. The Behavioural Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome. Bury St Edmunds, UK: Thames Valley Company.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
