Our previous study provided some evidence for the relationship between abnormal structural connectivity and poor balance performance in young traumatic axonal injury (TAI) patients. An enhanced understanding of the functional connectivity following TAI may allow targeted treatments geared toward improving brain function and postural control. Twelve patients with TAI and 28 normally developing children (aged 9–19 years) performed the sensory organization test (SOT) protocol of the EquiTest (Neurocom). All participants were scanned using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging series along with anatomical scans. We applied “functional connectivity density mapping” (FCDM), a voxel-wise data-driven method that calculates individual functional connectivity maps to obtain both short-range and long-range FCD. Findings revealed that the TAI group scored generally lower than the control group on the SOT, especially when proprioceptive feedback was compromised. Between-group maps noted significantly decreased long-range FCD in the TAI group in frontal and subcortical regions and significantly increased short-range FCD in frontal regions, left inferior parietal, and cerebellar lobules. Moreover, lower balance levels in TAI patients were associated with a lower long-range FCD in left putamen and cerebellar vermis. These findings suggest that long-range connections may be more vulnerable to TAI than short-range connections. Moreover, higher values of short-range FCD may suggest adaptive mechanisms in the TAI group. Finally, this study supports the view that FCDM is a valuable tool for selectively predicting functional motor deficits in TAI patients.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BasfordJR, ChouLS, KaufmanKR, BreyRH, WalkerA, MalecJF, et al.2003. An assessment of gait and balance deficits after traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 84:343–349.
2.
BurgessPW, DumontheilI, GilbertSJ. 2007. The gateway hypothesis of rostral prefrontal cortex (area 10) function. Trends Cogn Sci, 11:290–298.
3.
CaeyenberghsK, LeemansA, De DeckerC, HeitgerM, DrijkoningenD, LindenCV, et al.2012. Brain connectivity and postural control in young traumatic brain injury patients: a diffusion MRI based network analysis. Neuroimage Clin, 1:106–115.
4.
CaeyenberghsK, LeemansA, GeurtsM, TaymansT, LindenCV, Smits-EngelsmanBC, et al.2010. Brain-behavior relationships in young traumatic brain injury patients: DTI metrics are highly correlated with postural control. Hum Brain Mapp, 31:992–1002.
5.
CaeyenberghsK, LeemansA, LeunissenI, GooijersJ, MichielsK, SunaertS, et al.2014. Altered structural networks and executive deficits in traumatic brain injury patients. Brain Struct Funct, 219:193–209.
6.
CaeyenberghsK, WenderothN, Smits-EngelsmanBC, SunaertS, SwinnenSP. 2009. Neural correlates of motor dysfunction in children with traumatic brain injury: exploration of compensatory recruitment patterns. Brain, 132:684–694.
CoffmanKA, DumRP, StrickPL. 2011. Cerebellar vermis is a target of projections from the motor areas in the cerebral cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 108:16068–16073.
9.
CordesD, HaughtonVM, ArfanakisK, CarewJD, TurskiPA, MoritzCH, et al.2001. Frequencies contributing to functional connectivity in the cerebral cortex in “resting-state” data. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 22:1326–1333.
10.
DuarteM, ZatsiorskyVM. 2002. Effects of body lean and visual information on the equilibrium maintenance during stance. Exp Brain Res, 146:60–69.
11.
FoersterBU, TomasiD, CaparelliEC. 2005. Magnetic field shift due to mechanical vibration in functional magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med, 54:1261–1267.
12.
GagnonI, ForgetR, SullivanSJ, FriedmanD. 1998. Motor performance following a mild traumatic brain injury in children: an exploratory study. Brain Injury, 12:843–853.
13.
GagnonI, FriedmanD, SwaineB, ForgetR. 2001. Balance findings in a child before and after a mild head injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil, 16:595–602.
14.
GagnonI, SwaineB, FriedmanD, ForgetR. 2004. Children show decreased dynamic balance after mild traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 85:444–452.
15.
GeorgeR, GriffinJW. 1994. Delayed macrophage responses and myelin clearance during Wallerian degeneration in the central nervous system: the dorsal radiculotomy model. Exp Neurol, 129:225–236.
16.
GeurtsACH, KnoopJA, van LimbeekJ. 1999. Is postural control associated with mental functioning in the persistent postconcussion syndrome?. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 80:144–149.
17.
GeurtsACH, RibbersGM, KnoopJA, vanLimbeekJ. 1996. Identification of static and dynamic postural instability following traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 77:639–644.
18.
GobleDJ, CoxonJP, Van ImpeA, GeurtsM, Van HeckeW, SunaertS, et al.2012. The neural basis of central proprioceptive processing in older versus younger adults: an important sensory role for right putamen. Hum Brain Mapp, 33:895–908.
19.
GraybielAM. 1990. The basal ganglia and the initiation of movement. Rev Neurol (Paris), 146:570–574.
20.
GuskiewiczKM, RiemannBL, PerrinDH, NashnerLM. 1997. Alternative approaches to the assessment of mild head injury in athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 29:S213–S221.
21.
HulkowerMB, PoliakDB, RosenbaumSB, ZimmermanME, LiptonML. 2013. A decade of DTI in traumatic brain injury: 10 years and 100 articles later. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 34:2064–2074.
22.
IngersollCD, ArmstrongCW. 1992. The effects of closed-head injury on postural sway. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 24:739–743.
23.
KaufmanKR, BreyRH, ChouLS, RabatinA, BrownAW, BasfordJR. 2006. Comparison of subjective and objective measurements of balance disorders following traumatic brain injury. Med Eng Phys, 28:234–239.
24.
KeightleyML, SinghSR, ChenJK, GagnonI, LeonardG, PetridesM, et al.2014. A functional magnetic resonance imaging study of working memory in youth after sports-related concussion: is it still working?. J Neurotrauma, 31:437–451.
25.
LehmannJF, BoswellS, PriceR, BurleighA, DelateurBJ, JaffeKM, et al.1990. Quantitative-evaluation of sway as an indicator of functional balance in posttraumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 71:955–962.
26.
MalecJF, BrownAW, LeibsonCL, FlaadaJT, MandrekarJN, DiehlNN, PerkinsPK. 2007. The mayo classification system for traumatic brain injury severity. J Neurotrauma, 24:1417–1424.
27.
NeistadtME. 1994. Perceptual retraining for adults with diffuse brain injury. Am J Occup Ther, 48:225–233.
28.
OliveiraLF, SimpsonDM, NadalJ. 1996. Calculation of area of stabilometric signals using principal component analysis. Physiol Meas, 17:305–312.
29.
O'ReillyJX, BeckmannCF, TomassiniV, RamnaniN, Johansen-BergH. 2010. Distinct and overlapping functional zones in the cerebellum defined by resting state functional connectivity. Cereb Cortex, 20:953–965.
30.
PalaciosEM, Sala-LlonchR, JunqueC, RoigT, TormosJM, BargalloN, et al.2013. Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging activity and connectivity and cognitive outcome in traumatic brain injury. JAMA Neurol, 70:845–851.
Shumway-CookA, HorakFB. 1986. Assessing the influence of sensory interaction of balance. Suggestion from the field. Phys Ther, 66:1548–1550.
46.
SongXW, DongZY, LongXY, LiSF, ZuoXN, ZhuCZ, et al.2011. REST: a toolkit for resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data processing. PLoS One, 6:e25031.
47.
StoodleyCJ, SchmahmannJD. 2009. Functional topography in the human cerebellum: a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Neuroimage, 44:489–501.
48.
TangL, GeY, SodicksonDK, MilesL, ZhouY, ReaumeJ, et al.2011. Thalamic resting-state functional networks: disruption in patients with mild traumatic brain injury. Radiology, 260:831–840.
49.
TomasiD, VolkowND. 2010. Functional connectivity density mapping. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 107:9885–9890.
50.
TomasiD, VolkowND. 2011. Functional connectivity hubs in the human brain. Neuroimage, 57:908–917.
51.
TomasiD, VolkowND. 2012a. Abnormal functional connectivity in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Biol Psychiatry, 71:443–450.
UngerleiderLG, CourtneySM, HaxbyJV. 1998. A neural system for human visual working memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 95:883–890.
55.
Van ImpeA, CoxonJP, GobleDJ, DoumasM, SwinnenSP. 2012. White matter fractional anisotropy predicts balance performance in older adults. Neurobiol Aging, 33:1900–1912.
56.
WangT, LiQ, GuoM, PengY, LiQ, QinW, YuC. 2014. Abnormal functional connectivity density in children with anisometropic amblyopia at resting-state. Brain Res, 1563:41–51.
57.
WardBD. 2000. Simultaneous inference for FMRI data.
58.
WarrenM. 1993. A hierarchical model for evaluation and treatment of visual perceptual dysfunction in adult acquired brain injury, Part 2. Am J Occup Ther, 47:55–66.
59.
WeinerKS, Grill-SpectorK. 2011. Not one extrastriate body area: using anatomical landmarks, hMT+, and visual field maps to parcellate limb-selective activations in human lateral occipitotemporal cortex. Neuroimage, 56:2183–2199.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
