A kombucha is a sugared tea fermented by a symbiotic community of over 20 species of bacteria and yeasts. The community produces and inhabits cellulosic gelatinous zoogleal mats.
Methods:
We studied electrical activity of the kombucha mats using pairs of differential electrodes.
Results:
We discovered that the mats produce action potential like spikes of electrical potential. The spikes are often grouped in the trains of spikes. Characteristics of the spikes and trains of spikes are presented.
Conclusion:
We demonstrated that electrical responses of kombucha mats to chemical, electrical, and optical stimulation are distinctive and therefore the mats can be used as sensors, or even unconventional computing devices.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
VargasBK, FabricioMF, AyubMAZ. Health effects and probiotic and prebiotic potential of kombucha: A bibliometric and systematic review. Food Biosci, 2021; 44101332.
2.
IvanišováE, MeňhartováK, TerentjevaM, et al.The evaluation of chemical, antioxidant, antimicrobial and sensory properties of kombucha tea beverage. J Food Sci Technol, 2020; 57(5):1840–1846.
3.
CoelhoRMD, de AlmeidaAL, do AmaralRQG, et al.Kombucha. Int J Gastron Food Sci, 2020; 22:100272.
4.
Villarreal-SotoSA, BeaufortS, BouajilaJ, et al.Understanding kombucha tea fermentation: A review. J Food Sci, 2018; 83(3):580–588.
5.
KappJM, SumnerW. Kombucha: A systematic review of the empirical evidence of human health benefit. Ann Epidemiol, 2019; 30:66–70.
6.
DufresneC, FarnworthE. Tea, kombucha, and health: A review. Food Res Int, 2000; 33(6):409–421.
7.
JayabalanR, WaisundaraVY. Kombucha as a functional beverage. In: Functional and Medicinal Beverages. (GrumezescuAH, HolbanAM. eds.) Elsevier, 2019; pp. 413–446.
8.
ZiemlewskaA, Nizioł-ŁukaszewskaZ, BujakT, et al, Effect of fermentation time on the content of bioactive compounds with cosmetic and dermatological properties in kombucha yerba mate extracts. Sci Rep, 2021; 11(1):1–15.
9.
SilvaKA, UekaneTM, de MirandaJF, et al.Kombucha beverage from non-conventional edible plant infusion and green tea: Characterization, toxicity, antioxidant activities and antimicrobial properties. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol, 2021; 34:102032.
10.
ValiyanF, KoohsariH, FadaviA. Use of response surface methodology to investigate the effect of several fermentation conditions on the antibacterial activity of several kombucha beverages. J Food Sci Technol, 2021; 58(5):1877–1891.
11.
AhmedRF, HikalMS, Abou-TalebKA. Biological, chemical and antioxidant activities of different types kombucha. Ann Agric Sci, 2020; 65(1):35–41.
12.
MayA, NarayananS, AlcockJ, et al.Kombucha: A novel model system for cooperation and conflict in a complex multi-species microbial ecosystem. PeerJ, 2019; 7:e7565.
13.
TeohAL, HeardG, CoxJ. Yeast ecology of kombucha fermentation. Int J Food Microbiol, 2004; 95(2):119–126.
14.
KurtzmanCP, RobnettCJ, Basehoar-PowersE. Zygosaccharomyces kombuchaensis, a new ascosporogenous yeast from ‘kombucha tea’. FEMS Yeast Res, 2001; 1(2):133–138.
15.
JarrellJ, CalT, BennettJ. The kombucha consortia of yeasts and bacteria. Mycologist, 2000; 14(4):166–170.
16.
KumarSD, NarayanG, HassarajaniS. Determination of anionic minerals in black and kombucha tea using ion chromatography. Food Chem, 2008; 111(3):784–788.
17.
Bauer-PetrovskaB, Petrushevska-ToziL. Mineral and water soluble vitamin content in the kombucha drink. Int J Food Sci Technol, 2000; 35(2):201–205.
18.
JakubczykK, GutowskaI, AntoniewiczJ, et al.Evaluation of fluoride and selected chemical parameters in kombucha derived from white, green, black and red tea. Biol Trace Elem Res, 2021; 199(9):3547–3552.
19.
WoodJ.Are microbes the future of fashion?. Microbiologist, 2017; 18(2):
20.
LaavanyaD, ShirkoleS, BalasubramanianP. Current challenges, applications and future perspectives of scoby cellulose of kombucha fermentation. J Cleaner Prod, 2021; 295:126454.
21.
DomskieneJ, SederaviciuteF, SimonaityteJ. Kombucha bacterial cellulose for sustainable fashion. Int J Clothing Sci Technol, 2019; 31(5):644–652.
22.
BetlejI, Salerno-KochanR, KrajewskiKJ, et al.The influence of culture medium components on the physical and mechanical properties of cellulose synthesized by kombucha microorganisms. BioResources, 2020; 15(2):3125–3135.
23.
KamińskiK, JaroszM, GrudzieńJ, et al.Hydrogel bacterial cellulose: A path to improved materials for new eco-friendly textiles. Cellulose, 2020; 27(9):5353–5365.
24.
MinhNT, NganHN. Vegan leather: An eco-friendly material for sustainable fashion towards environmental awareness. In: AIP Conference Proceedings, Vol. 2406. AIP Publishing LLC, 2021; p. 060019.
25.
ZhangY, HsuLHH, JiangX. Living electronics. Nano Res, 2020; 13(5):1205–1213.
26.
ZacharoffLA, El-NaggarMY. Redox conduction in biofilms: From respiration to living electronic. Curr Opin Electrochem, 2017; 4(1):182–189.
27.
Irimia-VladuM.“green” electronics: Biodegradable and biocompatible materials and devices for sustainable future. Chem Soc Rev, 2014; 43(2):588–610.
28.
AdamatzkyA. Advances in Physarum. Machines: Sensing and Computing with Slime Mould, Vol. 21. Springer: London, New York, Singapore; 2016.
AdamatzkyA, HardingS, ErokhinV, et al.Computers from plants we never made: Speculations. In: Inspired by nature. (StepneyS, AdamatzkyA. eds.) Springer: London, New York, Singapore; 2018; pp. 357–387.
31.
PhillipsN, MayneR, AdamatzkyA. Chlorella sensors in liquid marbles and droplets. Sens Bio-Sens Res, 2022; 36:100491.
32.
ChiolerioA, AdamatzkyA. Acetobacter biofilm: Electronic characterization and reactive transduction of pressure. ACS Biomater Sci Eng, 2021; 7(4):1651–1662.
LevinM.Molecular bioelectricity in developmental biology: New tools and recent discoveries: Control of cell behavior and pattern formation by transmembrane potential gradients. Bioessays, 2012; 34(3):205–217.
35.
LevinM.Molecular bioelectricity: How endogenous voltage potentials control cell behavior and instruct pattern regulation in vivo. Mol Biol Cell, 2014; 25(24):3835–3850.
36.
LevinM.The computational boundary of a “self”: Developmental bioelectricity drives multicellularity and scale-free cognition. Front Psychol, 2019; 10:2688.
HardingS, KoutníkJ, SchmidhuberJ, et al.Discovering boolean gates in slime mould. In: Inspired by Nature. (StepneyS, AdamatzkyA. eds.) Springer: London, New York, Singapore; 2018; pp. 323–337.
56.
RobertsN, AdamatzkyA. Mining logical circuits in fungi. arXiv, 2021; arXiv:2108.05336.
BeasleyAE, AbdelouahabM-S, LoziR, et al.Mem-fractive properties of mushrooms. Bioinspiration Biomimetics, 2022; 16(6):066026.
59.
JoSH, ChangT, EbongI, et al.Nanoscale memristor device as synapse in neuromorphic systems. Nano Lett, 2010; 10(4):1297–1301.
60.
IndiveriG, Linares-BarrancoB, LegensteinR, et al.Integration of nanoscale memristor synapses in neuromorphic computing architectures. Nanotechnology, 2013; 24(38):384010.
61.
ChenC, ChenJ, BaoH, et al.Coexisting multi-stable patterns in memristor synapse-coupled hopfield neural network with two neurons. Nonlinear Dyn, 2019; 95(4):3385–3399.
62.
AdhikariSP, YangC, KimH, et al.Memristor bridge synapse-based neural network and its learning. IEEE Trans Neural Networks Learn Syst, 2012; 23(9):1426–1435.
63.
AdamatzkyA, CostelloBDL, AsaiT.Reaction-Diffusion Computers. Elsevier: New Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 2005.
64.
AdamatzkyA, de Lacy CostelloB, ShirakawaT. Universal computation with limited resources: Belousov–zhabotinsky and physarum computers. Int J Bifurcation Chaos, 2008; 18(08):2373–2389.
65.
AdamatzkyA, Costello DLB. Experimental logical gates in a reaction-diffusion medium: The xor gate and beyond. Phys Rev E, 2002; 66(4):046112.
66.
HolleyJ, JahanI, CostelloBDL, et al.Logical and arithmetic circuits in belousov-zhabotinsky encapsulated disks. Phys Rev E, 2011; 84(5):056110.
67.
GoreckiJ, GoreckaJN, IgarashiY. Information processing with structured excitable medium. Nat Comput, 2009; 8(3):473–492.
