Developmental bioelectricity is the study of the endogenous role of bioelectrical signaling in all cell types. Resting potentials and other aspects of ionic cell physiology are known to be important regulatory parameters in embryogenesis, regeneration, and cancer. However, relevant quantitative measurement and genetic phenotyping data are distributed throughout wide-ranging literature, hampering experimental design and hypothesis generation. Here, we analyze published studies on bioelectrics and transcriptomic and genomic/phenotypic databases to provide a novel synthesis of what is known in three important aspects of bioelectrics research. First, we provide a comprehensive list of channelopathies—ion channel and pump gene mutations—in a range of important model systems with developmental patterning phenotypes, illustrating the breadth of channel types, tissues, and phyla (including man) in which bioelectric signaling is a critical endogenous aspect of embryogenesis. Second, we perform a novel bioinformatic analysis of transcriptomic data during regeneration in diverse taxa that reveals an electrogenic protein to be the one common factor specifically expressed in regeneration blastemas across Kingdoms. Finally, we analyze data on distinct Vmem signatures in normal and cancer cells, revealing a specific bioelectrical signature corresponding to some types of malignancies. These analyses shed light on fundamental questions in developmental bioelectricity and suggest new avenues for research in this exciting field.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
FunkR.Ion gradients in tissue and organ biology. Biol Syst, 2013; 2:105.
2.
BatesE.Ion channels in development and cancer. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol, 2015; 31:231–247.
3.
McLaughlinKA, LevinM. Bioelectric signaling in regeneration: Mechanisms of ionic controls of growth and form. Dev Biol, 2018; 433:177–189.
4.
LevinM, PezzuloG, FinkelsteinJM. Endogenous bioelectric signaling networks: exploiting voltage gradients for control of growth and form. Annu Rev Biomed Eng, 2017; 19:353–387.
5.
MathewsJ, LevinM. Gap junctional signaling in pattern regulation: Physiological network connectivity instructs growth and form. Dev Neurobiol, 2017; 77:643–673.
6.
FunkRH.Endogenous electric fields as guiding cue for cell migration. Front Physiol, 2015; 6:143.
7.
ZhaoM.Electrical fields in wound healing—An overriding signal that directs cell migration. Semin Cell Dev Biol, 2009; 20:674–682.
8.
GeorgeLF, PradhanSJ, MitchellD, et al.Ion channel contributions to wing development in Drosophila melanogaster. G3 (Bethesda), 2019; 9:999–1008.
9.
PaiVP, LemireJM, PareJF, et al.Endogenous gradients of resting potential instructively pattern embryonic neural tissue via notch signaling and regulation of proliferation. J Neurosci, 2015; 35:4366–4385.
10.
AdamsDS, UzelSG, AkagiJ, et al.Bioelectric signalling via potassium channels: A mechanism for craniofacial dysmorphogenesis in KCNJ2-associated Andersen-Tawil Syndrome. J Physiol, 2016; 594:3245–3270.
11.
DurantF, MorokumaJ, FieldsC, et al.Long-term, stochastic editing of regenerative anatomy via targeting endogenous bioelectric gradients. Biophys J, 2017; 112:2231–2243.
12.
PerathonerS, DaaneJM, HenrionU, et al.Bioelectric signaling regulates size in zebrafish fins. PLoS Genet, 2014; 10:e1004080.
13.
LevinM, MartyniukCJ. The bioelectric code: An ancient computational medium for dynamic control of growth and form. Biosystems, 2018; 164:76–93.
14.
LevinM.Morphogenetic fields in embryogenesis, regeneration, and cancer: Non-local control of complex patterning. Biosystems, 2012; 109:243–261.
15.
MathewsJ, LevinM. The body electric 2.0: Recent advances in developmental bioelectricity for regenerative and synthetic bioengineering. Curr Opin Biotechnol, 2018; 52:134–144.
16.
Hernandez-DiazS, LevinM. Alteration of bioelectrically-controlled processes in the embryo: A teratogenic mechanism for anticonvulsants. Reprod Toxicol, 2014; 47:111–114.
17.
LevinM.The wisdom of the body: Future techniques and approaches to morphogenetic fields in regenerative medicine, developmental biology and cancer. Regen Med, 2011; 6:667–673.
18.
ReidB, ZhaoM. The electrical response to injury: Molecular mechanisms and wound healing. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle), 2014; 3:184–201.
19.
BatesEA.A potential molecular target for morphological defects of fetal alcohol syndrome: Kir2.1. Curr Opin Genet Dev, 2013; 23:324–329.
PitcairnE, HarrisH, EpineyJ, et al.Coordinating heart morphogenesis: A novel role for Hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated (HCN) channels during cardiogenesis in Xenopus laevis. Commun Integr Biol, 2017; 10:e1309488.
22.
LevinM, ThorlinT, RobinsonKR, et al.Asymmetries in H+/K+-ATPase and cell membrane potentials comprise a very early step in left-right patterning. Cell, 2002; 111:77–89.
23.
MooreD, WalkerSI, LevinM. Cancer as a disorder of patterning information: Computational and biophysical perspectives on the cancer problem. Converg Sci Phys Oncol, 2017; 3:043001.
24.
RubinH.Cancer as a dynamic developmental disorder. Cancer Res, 1985; 45:2935–2942.
25.
SonnenscheinC, SotoAM. The Society of Cells: Cancer Control of Cell Proliferation. Oxford, New York: Springer, 1999: xiv, 154.
26.
BurrHS.Biologic organization and the cancer problem. Yale J Biol Med, 1940; 12:277–282.
27.
ConeCD, TongierM. Control of somatic cell mitosis by simulated changes in the transmembrane potential level. Oncology, 1971; 25:168–182.
28.
ConeCD.Unified theory on the basic mechanism of normal mitotic control and oncogenesis. J Theor Biol, 1971; 30:151–181.
29.
LobikinM, ChernetB, LoboD, et al.Resting potential, oncogene-induced tumorigenesis, and metastasis: The bioelectric basis of cancer in vivo. Phys Biol, 2012; 9:065002.
30.
DjamgozMB, CoombesRC, SchwabA. Ion transport and cancer: From initiation to metastasis. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 2014; 369:20130092.
31.
ChernetBT, AdamsDS, LobikinM, et al.Use of genetically encoded, light-gated ion translocators to control tumorigenesis. Oncotarget, 2016; 7:19575–19588.
32.
GentileS.hERG1 potassium channel in cancer cells: A tool to reprogram immortality. Eur Biophys J, 2016; 45:649–655.
33.
BirnbaumKD, AlvaradoAS. Slicing across kingdoms: Regeneration in plants and animals. Cell, 2008; 132:697–710.
34.
MadenM.The evolution of regeneration—Where does that leave mammals?. Int J Dev Biol, 2018; 62:369–372.
35.
LarkinJW, ZhaiX, KikuchiK, et al.Signal percolation within a bacterial community. Cell Syst, 2018; 7:137–145.e3.
36.
LiuJ, Martinez-CorralR, PrindleA, et al.Coupling between distant biofilms and emergence of nutrient time-sharing. Science, 2017; 356:638–642.
37.
PrindleA, LiuJ, AsallyM, et al.Ion channels enable electrical communication in bacterial communities. Nature, 2015; 527:59–63.
38.
LevinM, SelbergJ, RolandiM. Endogenous bioelectrics in development, cancer, and regeneration: Drugs and bioelectronic devices as electroceuticals for regenerative medicine. iScience, 2019; 22:519–533.
39.
WhitedJL, LevinM. Bioelectrical controls of morphogenesis: From ancient mechanisms of cell coordination to biomedical opportunities. Curr Opin Genet Dev, 2019; 57:61–69.
40.
MarinoAA, IlievIG, SchwalkeMA, et al.Association between cell membrane potential and breast cancer. Tumour Biol, 1994; 15:82–89.
41.
BinggeliR, WeinsteinRC. Deficits in elevating membrane potential of rat fibrosarcoma cells after cell contact. Cancer Res, 1985; 45:235–241.
42.
PeredaAE, CurtiS, HogeG, et al.Gap junction-mediated electrical transmission: Regulatory mechanisms and plasticity. Biochim Biophys Acta, 2013; 1828:134–146.
43.
Palacios-PradoN, BukauskasFF. Heterotypic gap junction channels as voltage-sensitive valves for intercellular signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2009; 106:14855–14860.
HoweDG, BradfordYM, ConlinT, et al.ZFIN, the Zebrafish Model Organism Database: Increased support for mutants and transgenics. Nucleic Acids Res, 2013; 41:D854–D860.
47.
ThurmondJ, GoodmanJL, StreletsVB, et al.FlyBase 2.0: The next generation. Nucleic Acids Res, 2019; 47:D759–D765.
48.
Mummery-WidmerJL, YamazakiM, StoegerT, et al.Genome-wide analysis of Notch signalling in Drosophila by transgenic RNAi. Nature, 2009; 458:987–992.
49.
WuCH, TsaiMH, HoCC, et al.De novo transcriptome sequencing of axolotl blastema for identification of differentially expressed genes during limb regeneration. BMC Genomics, 2013; 14:434.
50.
KaoD, FelixD, AboobakerA. The planarian regeneration transcriptome reveals a shared but temporally shifted regulatory program between opposing head and tail scenarios. BMC Genomics, 2013; 14:797.
BarrettT, WilhiteSE, LedouxP, et al.NCBI GEO: Archive for functional genomics data sets—Update. Nucleic Acids Res, 2013; 41:D991–D995.
53.
Huerta-CepasJ, ForslundK, CoelhoLP, et al.Fast genome-wide functional annotation through orthology assignment by eggNOG-Mapper. Mol Biol Evol, 2017; 34:2115–2122.
54.
Huerta-CepasJ, SzklarczykD, ForslundK, et al.eggNOG 4.5: A hierarchical orthology framework with improved functional annotations for eukaryotic, prokaryotic and viral sequences. Nucleic Acids Res, 2016; 44:D286–D293.
55.
LiberzonA, BirgerC, ThorvaldsdottirH, et al.The Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB) hallmark gene set collection. Cell Syst, 2015; 1:417–425.
56.
KhareS, NickJA, ZhangY, et al.A KCNC3 mutation causes a neurodevelopmental, non-progressive SCA13 subtype associated with dominant negative effects and aberrant EGFR trafficking. PLoS One, 2017; 12:e0173565.
57.
PaiVP, AwS, ShomratT, et al.Transmembrane voltage potential controls embryonic eye patterning in Xenopus laevis. Development, 2012; 139:313–323.
58.
AdamsDS, MasiA, LevinM. H+ pump-dependent changes in membrane voltage are an early mechanism necessary and sufficient to induce Xenopus tail regeneration. Development, 2007; 134:1323–1335.
59.
TsengAS, BeaneWS, LemireJM, et al.Induction of vertebrate regeneration by a transient sodium current. J Neurosci, 2010; 30:13192–13200.
60.
ChernetBT, FieldsC, LevinM. Long-range gap junctional signaling controls oncogene-mediated tumorigenesis in Xenopus laevis embryos. Front Physiol, 2015; 5:519.
61.
ChernetBT, LevinM. Transmembrane voltage potential of somatic cells controls oncogene-mediated tumorigenesis at long-range. Oncotarget, 2014; 5:3287–3306.
62.
ChernetBT, LevinM. Transmembrane voltage potential is an essential cellular parameter for the detection and control of tumor development in a Xenopus model. Dis Model Mech, 2013; 6:595–607.
63.
BonnetS, ArcherSL, Allalunis-TurnerJ, et al.A mitochondria-K+ channel axis is suppressed in cancer and its normalization promotes apoptosis and inhibits cancer growth. Cancer Cell, 2007; 11:37–51.
64.
Gomez-VarelaD, Zwick-WallaschE, KnotgenH, et al.Monoclonal antibody blockade of the human Eag1 potassium channel function exerts antitumor activity. Cancer Res, 2007; 67:7343–7349.
65.
IsbilenB, FraserSP, DjamgozMB. Docosahexaenoic acid (omega-3) blocks voltage-gated sodium channel activity and migration of MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cells. Int J Biochem Cell Biol, 2006; 38:2173–2182.
66.
OhkuboT, YamazakiJ. T-type voltage-activated calcium channel Cav3.1, but not Cav3.2, is involved in the inhibition of proliferation and apoptosis in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. Int J Oncol, 2012; 41:267–275.
67.
WangH, ZhangY, CaoL, et al.HERG K+ channel, a regulator of tumor cell apoptosis and proliferation. Cancer Res, 2002; 62:4843–4848.
68.
WarnierM, RoudbarakiM, DerouicheS, et al.CACNA2D2 promotes tumorigenesis by stimulating cell proliferation and angiogenesis. Oncogene, 2015; 34:5383–5394.
69.
BeaneWS, MorokumaJ, AdamsDS, et al.A Chemical genetics approach reveals H,K-ATPase-mediated membrane voltage is required for planarian head regeneration. Chem Biol, 2011; 18:77–89.
70.
VandenbergLN, MorrieRD, AdamsDS. V-ATPase-dependent ectodermal voltage and pH regionalization are required for craniofacial morphogenesis. Dev Dyn, 2011; 240:1889–1904.
71.
YeminiE, JucikasT, GrundyLJ, et al.A database of Caenorhabditis elegans behavioral phenotypes. Nat Methods, 2013; 10:877–879.
72.
KoniPA, KhannaR, ChangMC, et al.Compensatory anion currents in Kv1.3 channel-deficient thymocytes. J Biol Chem, 2003; 278:39443–39451.
73.
KimEZ, VienneJ, RosbashM, et al.Non-reciprocal homeostatic compensation in Drosophila potassium channel mutants. J Neurophysiol, 2017; 117:2125–2136.
74.
LevinM.Isolation and community: A review of the role of gap-junctional communication in embryonic patterning. J Membr Biol, 2002; 185:177–192.
75.
GokeyJJ, DasguptaA, AmackJD. The V-ATPase accessory protein Atp6ap1b mediates dorsal forerunner cell proliferation and left-right asymmetry in zebrafish. Dev Biol, 2015; 407:115–130.
76.
AdamsDS, RobinsonKR, FukumotoT, et al.Early, H+-V-ATPase-dependent proton flux is necessary for consistent left-right patterning of non-mammalian vertebrates. Development, 2006; 133:1657–1671.
77.
NuckelsRJ, NgA, DarlandT, et al.The vacuolar-ATPase complex regulates retinoblast proliferation and survival, photoreceptor morphogenesis, and pigmentation in the zebrafish eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2009; 50:893–905.
78.
Fraire-ZamoraJJ, SimonsM. The vacuolar ATPase is required for ERK-dependent wound healing in the Drosophila embryo. Wound Repair Regen, 2018; 26:102–107.
79.
LangeC, PrenningerS, KnucklesP, et al.The H(+) vacuolar ATPase maintains neural stem cells in the developing mouse cortex. Stem Cells Dev, 2011; 20:843–850.
HintonA, BondS, ForgacM. V-ATPase functions in normal and disease processes. Pflugers Arch, 2009; 457:589–598.
82.
FinbowME, HarrisonM, JonesP. Ductin—A proton pump component, a gap junction channel and a neurotransmitter release channel. Bioessays, 1995; 17:247–255.
83.
DunlopJ, JonesPC, FinbowME. Membrane insertion and assembly of ductin: A polytopic channel with dual orientations. EMBO J, 1995; 14:3609–3616.
84.
BruzzoneR, GoodenoughDA. Gap junctions: Ductin or connexins—Which component is the critical one?. Bioessays, 1995; 17:744–745.
85.
FinbowME, GoodwinSF, MeagherL, et al.Evidence that the 16 kDa proteolipid (subunit c) of the vacuolar H(+)-ATPase and ductin from gap junctions are the same polypeptide in Drosophila and Manduca: Molecular cloning of the Vha16k gene from Drosophila. J Cell Sci, 1994; 107 (Pt 7):1817–1824.
86.
FinbowME, PittsJD. Is the gap junction channel—The connexon—Made of connexin or ductin?. J Cell Sci, 1993; 106:463–471.
87.
ConeCD, ConeCM. Induction of mitosis in mature neurons in central nervous system by sustained depolarization. Science, 1976; 192:155–158.
88.
ConeCD.The role of the surface electrical transmembrane potential in normal and malignant mitogenesis. Ann NY Acad Sci, 1974; 238:420–435.
89.
BorthwickKJ, KandemirN, TopalogluR, et al.A phenocopy of CAII deficiency: A novel genetic explanation for inherited infantile osteopetrosis with distal renal tubular acidosis. J Med Genet, 2003; 40:115–121.
90.
TamirisaS, PapagiannouliF, RempelE, et al.Decoding the regulatory logic of the Drosophila male stem cell system. Cell Rep, 2018; 24:3072–3086.
91.
MasottiA, UvaP, Davis-KeppenL, et al.Keppen-Lubinsky syndrome is caused by mutations in the inwardly rectifying K(+) channel encoded by KCNJ6. Am J Hum Genet, 2015; 96:295–300.
92.
KortumF, CaputoV, BauerCK, et al.Mutations in KCNH1 and ATP6V1B2 cause Zimmermann-Laband syndrome. Nat Genet, 2015; 47:661–667.
93.
SimonsC, RashLD, CrawfordJ, et al.Mutations in the voltage-gated potassium channel gene KCNH1 cause Temple-Baraitser syndrome and epilepsy. Nat Genet, 2015; 47:73–77.
94.
LabonneJD, GravesTD, ShenY, et al.A microdeletion at Xq22.2 implicates a glycine receptor GLRA4 involved in intellectual disability, behavioral problems and craniofacial anomalies. BMC Neurol, 2016; 16:132.
95.
HirakiY, MiyatakeS, HayashidaniM, et al.Aortic aneurysm and craniosynostosis in a family with Cantu syndrome. Am J Med Genet A, 2014; 164A:231–236.
96.
CooperPE, ReutterH, WoelfleJ, et al.Cantu syndrome resulting from activating mutation in the KCNJ8 gene. Hum Mutat, 2014; 35:809–813.
97.
BrownsteinCA, TowneMC, LuquetteLJ, et al.Mutation of KCNJ8 in a patient with Cantu syndrome with unique vascular abnormalities—Support for the role of K(ATP) channels in this condition. Eur J Med Genet, 2013; 56:678–682.
98.
ChongJX, McMillinMJ, ShivelyKM, et al.De novo mutations in NALCN cause a syndrome characterized by congenital contractures of the limbs and face, hypotonia, and developmental delay. Am J Hum Genet, 2015; 96:462–473.
99.
UzunS, GokceS, WagnerK. Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator gene mutations in infertile males with congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens. Tohoku J Exp Med, 2005; 207:279–285.
100.
WilschanskiM, DupuisA, EllisL, et al.Mutations in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator gene and in vivo transepithelial potentials. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2006; 174:787–794.
101.
SmithRS, KennyCJ, GaneshV, et al.Sodium channel SCN3A (NaV1.3) regulation of human cerebral cortical folding and oral motor development. Neuron, 2018; 99:905–913.e907.
102.
HutsonMR, KeyteAL, Hernandez-MoralesM, et al.Temperature-activated ion channels in neural crest cells confer maternal fever-associated birth defects. Sci Signal, 2017; 10:pii: eaal4055.
103.
PoirierK, ViotG, LombardiL, et al.Loss of Function of KCNC1 is associated with intellectual disability without seizures. Eur J Hum Genet, 2017; 25:560–564.
104.
VealeEL, HassanM, WalshY, et al.Recovery of current through mutated TASK3 potassium channels underlying Birk Barel syndrome. Mol Pharmacol, 2014; 85:397–407.
105.
BarelO, ShalevSA, OfirR, et al.Maternally inherited Birk Barel mental retardation dysmorphism syndrome caused by a mutation in the genomically imprinted potassium channel KCNK9. Am J Hum Genet, 2008; 83:193–199.
106.
BandoY, HiranoT, TagawaY. Dysfunction of KCNK potassium channels impairs neuronal migration in the developing mouse cerebral cortex. Cereb Cortex, 2014; 24:1017–1029.
107.
GloynAL, PearsonER, AntcliffJF, et al.Activating mutations in the gene encoding the ATP-sensitive potassium-channel subunit Kir6.2 and permanent neonatal diabetes. N Eng J Med, 2004; 350:1838–1849.
108.
LeeMP, RavenelJD, HuRJ, et al.Targeted disruption of the Kvlqt1 gene causes deafness and gastric hyperplasia in mice. J Clin Invest, 2000; 106:1447–1455.
109.
WeksbergR, NishikawaJ, CaluseriuO, et al.Tumor development in the Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome is associated with a variety of constitutional molecular 11p15 alterations including imprinting defects of KCNQ1OT1. Hum Mol Genet, 2001; 10:2989–3000.
110.
MooreES, WardRE, EscobarLF, et al.Heterogeneity in Wiedemann-Beckwith syndrome: Anthropometric evidence. Am J Med Genet, 2000; 90:283–290.
111.
WenH, WeigerTM, FergusonTS, et al.A Drosophila KCNQ channel essential for early embryonic development. J Neurosci, 2005; 25:10147–10156.
112.
RivasA, FrancisHW. Inner ear abnormalities in a Kcnq1 (Kvlqt1) knockout mouse: A model of Jervell and Lange-Nielsen syndrome. Otol Neurotol, 2005; 26:415–424.
113.
CasimiroMC, KnollmannBC, YamoahEN, et al.Targeted point mutagenesis of mouse Kcnq1: Phenotypic analysis of mice with point mutations that cause Romano-Ward syndrome in humans. Genomics, 2004; 84:555–564.
114.
ChouabeC, NeyroudN, GuicheneyP, et al.Properties of KvLQT1 K+ channel mutations in Romano-Ward and Jervell and Lange-Nielsen inherited cardiac arrhythmias. EMBO J, 1997; 16:5472–5479.
DahalGR, RawsonJ, GassawayB, et al.An inwardly rectifying K+ channel is required for patterning. Development, 2012; 139:3653–3664.
117.
YoonG, OberoiS, Tristani-FirouziM, et al.Andersen-Tawil syndrome: Prospective cohort analysis and expansion of the phenotype. Am J Med Genet A, 2006; 140:312–321.
118.
FakhroKA, ChoiM, WareSM, et al.Rare copy number variations in congenital heart disease patients identify unique genes in left-right patterning. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2011; 108:2915–2920.
119.
SplawskiI, TimothyKW, SharpeLM, et al.Ca(V)1.2 calcium channel dysfunction causes a multisystem disorder including arrhythmia and autism. Cell, 2004; 119:19–31.
120.
Britz-CunninghamSH, ShahMM, ZuppanCW, et al.Mutations of the Connexin43 gap-junction gene in patients with heart malformations and defects of laterality. N Engl J Med, 1995; 332:1323–1329.
121.
DebeerP, Van EschH, HuysmansC, et al.Novel GJA1 mutations in patients with oculo-dento-digital dysplasia (ODDD). Eur J Med Genet, 2005; 48:377–387.
122.
PizzutiA, FlexE, MingarelliR, et al.A homozygous GJA1 gene mutation causes a Hallermann-Streiff/ODDD spectrum phenotype. Hum Mutat, 2004; 23:286.
123.
VillanuevaS, BurgosJ, Lopez-CayuqueoKI, et al.Cleft palate, moderate lung developmental retardation and early postnatal lethality in mice deficient in the Kir7.1 inwardly rectifying K+ channel. PLoS One, 2015; 10:e0139284.
124.
ZhengJ, TrudeauMC. Handbook of Ion Channels. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2015; xx, 671.
125.
DuqueA, GazulaVR, KaczmarekLK. Expression of Kv1.3 potassium channels regulates density of cortical interneurons. Dev Neurobiol, 2013; 73:841–855.
126.
StobrawaSM, BreiderhoffT, TakamoriS, et al.Disruption of ClC-3, a chloride channel expressed on synaptic vesicles, leads to a loss of the hippocampus. Neuron, 2001; 29:185–196.
127.
ChristensenAH, ChatelainFC, HuttnerIG, et al.The two-pore domain potassium channel, TWIK-1, has a role in the regulation of heart rate and atrial size. J Mol Cell Cardiol, 2016; 97:24–35.
128.
PeterssonS, PerssonAS, JohansenJE, et al.Truncation of the Shaker-like voltage-gated potassium channel, Kv1.1, causes megencephaly. Eur J Neurosci, 2003; 18:3231–3240.
129.
ZhouY, ZhuJ, LvY, et al.Kir6.2 deficiency promotes mesencephalic neural precursor cell differentiation via regulating miR-133b/GDNF in a Parkinson's disease mouse model. Mol Neurobiol, 2018; 55:8550–8562.
130.
TakagiT, NishioH, YagiT, et al.Phenotypic analysis of vertigo 2 Jackson mice with a Kcnq1 potassium channel mutation. Exp Anim, 2007; 56:295–300.
131.
ThanBL, GoosJA, SarverAL, et al.The role of KCNQ1 in mouse and human gastrointestinal cancers. Oncogene, 2014; 33:3861–3868.
132.
BelusMT, RogersMA, ElzubeirA, et al.Kir2.1 is important for efficient BMP signaling in mammalian face development. Dev Biol, 2018; 444Suppl 1:S297–S307.
133.
CuliatCT, StubbsLJ, WoychikRP, et al.Deficiency of the beta 3 subunit of the type A gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor causes cleft palate in mice. Nat Genet, 1995; 11:344–346.
134.
WeeEL, ZimmermanEF. GABA uptake in embryonic palate mesenchymal cells of two mouse strains. Neurochem Res, 1985; 10:1673–1688.
135.
HomanicsGE, DeLoreyTM, FirestoneLL, et al.Mice devoid of gamma-aminobutyrate type A receptor beta3 subunit have epilepsy, cleft palate, and hypersensitive behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1997; 94:4143–4148.
136.
MaisonSF, RosahlTW, HomanicsGE, et al.Functional role of GABAergic innervation of the cochlea: Phenotypic analysis of mice lacking GABA(A) receptor subunits alpha 1, alpha 2, alpha 5, alpha 6, beta 2, beta 3, or delta. J Neurosci, 2006; 26:10315–10326.
137.
DeLoreyTM, SahbaieP, HashemiE, et al.Gabrb3 gene deficient mice exhibit impaired social and exploratory behaviors, deficits in non-selective attention and hypoplasia of cerebellar vermal lobules: A potential model of autism spectrum disorder. Behav Brain Res, 2008; 187:207–220.
138.
RockJR, FuttnerCR, HarfeBD. The transmembrane protein TMEM16A is required for normal development of the murine trachea. Dev Biol, 2008; 321:141–149.
139.
RakicP, SidmanRL. Sequence of developmental abnormalities leading to granule cell deficit in cerebellar cortex of weaver mutant mice. J Comp Neurol, 1973; 152:103–132.
140.
RakicP, SidmanRL. Weaver mutant mouse cerebellum: Defective neuronal migration secondary to abnormality of Bergmann glia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1973; 70:240–244.
141.
HattenME, LiemRK, MasonCA. Weaver mouse cerebellar granule neurons fail to migrate on wild-type astroglial processes in vitro. J Neurosci Nurs, 1986; 6:2676–2683.
142.
PatilN, CoxDR, BhatD, et al.A potassium channel mutation in weaver mice implicates membrane excitability in granule cell differentiation. Nat Genet, 1995; 11:126–129.
143.
TengGQ, ZhaoX, Lees-MillerJP, et al.Homozygous missense N629D hERG (KCNH2) potassium channel mutation causes developmental defects in the right ventricle and its outflow tract and embryonic lethality. Circ Res, 2008; 103:1483–1491.
144.
TurJ, ChapalamaduguKC, PadawerT, et al.Deletion of Kvbeta1.1 subunit leads to electrical and haemodynamic changes causing cardiac hypertrophy in female murine hearts. Exp Physiol, 2016; 101:494–508.
145.
DickinsonME, FlennikenAM, JiX, et al.High-throughput discovery of novel developmental phenotypes. Nature, 2016; 537:508–514.
146.
BlanzJ, SchweizerM, AubersonM, et al.Leukoencephalopathy upon disruption of the chloride channel ClC-2. J Neurosci, 2007; 27:6581–6589.
147.
WangSS, DevuystO, CourtoyPJ, et al.Mice lacking renal chloride channel, CLC-5, are a model for Dent's disease, a nephrolithiasis disorder associated with defective receptor-mediated endocytosis. Hum Mol Genet, 2000; 9:2937–2945.
148.
KovalLM, ZverkovaAS, GrailheR, et al.Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors alpha4beta2 and alpha7 regulate myelo- and erythropoiesis within the bone marrow. Int J Biochem Cell Biol, 2008; 40:980–990.
149.
LinH, HsuFC, BaumannBH, et al.Cortical parvalbumin GABAergic deficits with alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor deletion: Implications for schizophrenia. Mol Cell Neurosci, 2014; 61:163–175.
150.
MallonAM, IyerV, MelvinD, et al.Accessing data from the International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium: State of the art and future plans. Mamm Genome, 2012; 23:641–652.
151.
TakahashiM, KuboT, MizoguchiA, et al.Spontaneous muscle action potentials fail to develop without fetal-type acetylcholine receptors. EMBO Rep, 2002; 3:674–681.
152.
ChangB, WangX, HawesNL, et al.A Gja8 (Cx50) point mutation causes an alteration of alpha 3 connexin (Cx46) in semi-dominant cataracts of Lop10 mice. Hum Mol Genet, 2002; 11:507–513.
153.
WhiteTW.Unique and redundant connexin contributions to lens development. Science, 2002; 295:319–320.
154.
FrankM, EibergerB, Janssen-BienholdU, et al.Neuronal connexin-36 can functionally replace connexin-45 in mouse retina but not in the developing heart. J Cell Sci, 2010; 123:3605–3615.
155.
KumaiM, NishiiK, NakamuraK, et al.Loss of connexin45 causes a cushion defect in early cardiogenesis. Development, 2000; 127:3501–3512.
156.
NishiiK, KumaiM, EgashiraK, et al.Mice lacking connexin45 conditionally in cardiac myocytes display embryonic lethality similar to that of germline knockout mice without endocardial cushion defect. Cell Commun Adhes, 2003; 10:365–369.
157.
NishiiK, KumaiM, ShibataY. Regulation of the epithelial-mesenchymal transformation through gap junction channels in heart development. Trends Cardiovasc Med, 2001; 11:213–218.
158.
ArayaR, EckardtD, RiquelmeMA, et al.Presence and importance of connexin43 during myogenesis. Cell Commun Adhes, 2003; 10:451–456.
159.
CivitelliR.Cell-cell communication in the osteoblast/osteocyte lineage. Arch Biochem Biophys, 2008; 473:188–192.
160.
DobrowolskiR, HertigG, LechnerH, et al.Loss of connexin43-mediated gap junctional coupling in the mesenchyme of limb buds leads to altered expression of morphogens in mice. Hum Mol Genet, 2009; 18:2899–2911.
161.
EwartJL, CohenMF, MeyerRA, et al.Heart and neural tube defects in transgenic mice overexpressing the Cx43 gap junction gene. Development, 1997; 124:1281–1292.
162.
LecandaF, WarlowPM, SheikhS, et al.Connexin43 deficiency causes delayed ossification, craniofacial abnormalities, and osteoblast dysfunction. J Cell Biol, 2000; 151:931–944.
163.
ReaumeAG, de SousaPA, KulkarniS, et al.Cardiac malformation in neonatal mice lacking connexin43. Science, 1995; 267:1831–1834.
164.
DavyA, BushJO, SorianoP. Inhibition of gap junction communication at ectopic Eph/ephrin boundaries underlies craniofrontonasal syndrome. PLoS Biol, 2006; 4:e315.
165.
KanadyJD, DellingerMT, MungerSJ, et al.Connexin37 and Connexin43 deficiencies in mice disrupt lymphatic valve development and result in lymphatic disorders including lymphedema and chylothorax. Dev Biol, 2011; 354:253–266.
166.
KanadyJD, MungerSJ, WitteMH, et al.Combining Foxc2 and Connexin37 deletions in mice leads to severe defects in lymphatic vascular growth and remodeling. Dev Biol, 2015; 405:33–46.
167.
ChangQ, TangW, KimY, et al.Timed conditional null of connexin26 in mice reveals temporary requirements of connexin26 in key cochlear developmental events before the onset of hearing. Neurobiol Dis, 2015; 73:418–427.
168.
PizardA, BurgonPG, PaulDL, et al.Connexin 40, a target of transcription factor tbx5, patterns wrist, digits, and sternum. Mol Cell Biol, 2005; 25:5073–5083.
169.
OhSK, ShinJO, BaekJI, et al.Pannexin 3 is required for normal progression of skeletal development in vertebrates. FASEB J, 2015; 29:4473–4484.
170.
MeierH, ChaiCK. Spastic, an hereditary neurological mutation in the mouse characterized by vertebral arthropathy and leptomeningeal cyst formation. Exp Med Surg, 1970; 28:24–38.
171.
YinW, KimHT, WangS, et al.The potassium channel KCNJ13 is essential for smooth muscle cytoskeletal organization during mouse tracheal tubulogenesis. Nat Commun, 2018; 9:2815.
172.
PradervandS, WangQ, BurnierM, et al.A mouse model for Liddle's syndrome. J Am Soc Nephrol, 1999; 10:2527–2533.
173.
BettGC, LisA, WersingerSR, et al.A mouse model of Timothy syndrome: A complex autistic disorder resulting from a point mutation in Cav1.2. N Am J Med Sci (Boston), 2012; 5:135–140.
174.
FuY, WestenbroekRE, YuFH, et al.Deletion of the distal C terminus of CaV1.2 channels leads to loss of beta-adrenergic regulation and heart failure in vivo. J Biol Chem, 2011; 286:12617–12626.
175.
PatelN, SmithLL, FaqeihE, et al.ZBTB42 mutation defines a novel lethal congenital contracture syndrome (LCCS6). Hum Mol Genet, 2014; 23:6584–6593.
176.
ChopraSS, StroudDM, WatanabeH, et al.Voltage-gated sodium channels are required for heart development in zebrafish. Circ Res, 2010; 106:1342–1350.
177.
ShuX, ChengK, PatelN, et al.Na,K-ATPase is essential for embryonic heart development in the zebrafish. Development, 2003; 130:6165–6173.
178.
LiIC, ChenYC, WangYY, et al.Zebrafish Adar2 Edits the Q/R site of AMPA receptor Subunit gria2alpha transcript to ensure normal development of nervous system and cranial neural crest cells. PLoS One, 2014; 9:e97133.
179.
DoganliC, Kjaer-SorensenK, KnoeckelC, et al.The alpha2Na+/K+-ATPase is critical for skeletal and heart muscle function in zebrafish. J Cell Sci, 2012; 125:6166–6175.
180.
ShuX, HuangJ, DongY, et al.Na,K-ATPase alpha2 and Ncx4a regulate zebrafish left-right patterning. Development, 2007; 134:1921–1930.
181.
LamasonRL, MohideenMA, MestJR, et al.SLC24A5, a putative cation exchanger, affects pigmentation in zebrafish and humans. Science, 2005; 310:1782–1786.
182.
LiuF, XiaW, HuJ, et al.Solute carrier family 26 member a2 (slc26a2) regulates otic development and hair cell survival in zebrafish. PLoS One, 2015; 10:e0136832.
183.
PrudentJ, PopgeorgievN, BonneauB, et al.Bcl-wav and the mitochondrial calcium uniporter drive gastrula morphogenesis in zebrafish. Nat Commun, 2013; 4:2330.
184.
ChernyavskayaY, EbertAM, MilliganE, et al.Voltage-gated calcium channel CACNB2 (beta2.1) protein is required in the heart for control of cell proliferation and heart tube integrity. Dev Dyn, 2012; 241:648–662.
185.
KucenasS, CoxJA, SotoF, et al.Ectodermal P2X receptor function plays a pivotal role in craniofacial development of the zebrafish. Purinergic Signal, 2009; 5:395–407.
186.
DelcourtN, QuevedoC, NonneC, et al.Targeted identification of sialoglycoproteins in hypoxic endothelial cells and validation in zebrafish reveal roles for proteins in angiogenesis. J Biol Chem, 2015; 290:3405–3417.
187.
FaucherreA, KissaK, NargeotJ, et al.Piezo1 plays a role in erythrocyte volume homeostasis. Haematologica, 2014; 99:70–75.
188.
EbertAM, HumeGL, WarrenKS, et al.Calcium extrusion is critical for cardiac morphogenesis and rhythm in embryonic zebrafish hearts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2005; 102:17705–17710.
189.
ShimizuH, LangenbacherAD, HuangJ, et al.The Calcineurin-FoxO-MuRF1 signaling pathway regulates myofibril integrity in cardiomyocytes. Elife, 2017; 6:pii: e27955.
190.
ChoksiSP, BabuD, LauD, et al.Systematic discovery of novel ciliary genes through functional genomics in the zebrafish. Development, 2014; 141:3410–3419.
191.
LiangB, SokaM, ChristensenAH, et al.Genetic variation in the two-pore domain potassium channel, TASK-1, may contribute to an atrial substrate for arrhythmogenesis. J Mol Cell Cardiol, 2014; 67:69–76.
192.
ShimH, KimJH, KimCY, et al.Function-driven discovery of disease genes in zebrafish using an integrated genomics big data resource. Nucleic Acids Res, 2016; 44:9611–9623.
193.
ShenH, BocksteinsE, KondrychynI, et al.Functional antagonism of voltage-gated K+ channel alpha-subunits in the developing brain ventricular system. Development, 2016; 143:4249–4260.
194.
MahmoodF, MozereM, ZdebikAA, et al.Generation and validation of a zebrafish model of EAST (epilepsy, ataxia, sensorineural deafness and tubulopathy) syndrome. Dis Model Mech, 2013; 6:652–660.
195.
AndersenND, RamachandranKV, BaoMM, et al.Calcium signaling regulates ventricular hypertrophy during development independent of contraction or blood flow. J Mol Cell Cardiol, 2015; 80:1–9.
IwashitaM, WatanabeM, IshiiM, et al.Pigment pattern in jaguar/obelix zebrafish is caused by a Kir7.1 Mutation: Implications for the regulation of melanosome movement. PLoS Genet, 2006; 2:e197.
201.
ZhouH, ClaphamDE. Mammalian MagT1 and TUSC3 are required for cellular magnesium uptake and vertebrate embryonic development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2009; 106:15750–15755.
202.
LiaoH, ChenY, LiY, et al.CFTR is required for the migration of primordial germ cells during zebrafish early embryogenesis. Reproduction, 2018; 156:261–268.
203.
IrionU, FrohnhoferHG, KraussJ, et al.Gap junctions composed of connexins 41.8 and 39.4 are essential for colour pattern formation in zebrafish. Elife, 2014; 3:e05125.
204.
WatanabeM, IwashitaM, IshiiM, et al.Spot pattern of leopard Danio is caused by mutation in the zebrafish connexin41.8 gene. EMBO Rep, 2006; 7:893–897.
205.
Hoptak-SolgaAD, NielsenS, JainI, et al.Connexin43 (GJA1) is required in the population of dividing cells during fin regeneration. Dev Biol, 2008; 317:541–548.
206.
IovineMK, HigginsEP, HindesA, et al.Mutations in connexin43 (GJA1) perturb bone growth in zebrafish fins. Dev Biol, 2005; 278:208–219.
207.
SimsKJr., EbleDM, IovineMK.Connexin43 regulates joint location in zebrafish fins. Dev Biol, 2009; 327:410–418.
208.
RobuME, LarsonJD, NaseviciusA, et al.p53 activation by knockdown technologies. PLoS Genet, 2007; 3:e78.
209.
HermleT, GuidaMC, BeckS, et al.Drosophila ATP6AP2/VhaPRR functions both as a novel planar cell polarity core protein and a regulator of endosomal trafficking. EMBO J, 2013; 32:245–259.
210.
HermleT, SaltukogluD, GrunewaldJ, et al.Regulation of Frizzled-dependent planar polarity signaling by a V-ATPase subunit. Curr Biol, 2010; 20:1269–1276.
211.
RujanoMA, Cannata SerioM, PanasyukG, et al.Mutations in the X-linked ATP6AP2 cause a glycosylation disorder with autophagic defects. J Exp Med, 2017; 214:3707–3729.
212.
DjianeA, KrejciA, BernardF, et al.Dissecting the mechanisms of Notch induced hyperplasia. EMBO J, 2013; 32:60–71.
213.
DohertyD, JanLY, JanYN. The Drosophila neurogenic gene big brain, which encodes a membrane-associated protein, acts cell autonomously and can act synergistically with Notch and Delta. Development, 1997; 124:3881–3893.
214.
HartensteinAY, RugendorffA, TepassU, et al.The function of the neurogenic genes during epithelial development in the Drosophila embryo. Development, 1992; 116:1203–1220.
215.
RaoY, BodmerR, JanLY, et al.The big brain gene of Drosophila functions to control the number of neuronal precursors in the peripheral nervous system. Development, 1992; 116:31–40.
216.
CharrouxB, RoyetJ. Mutations in the Drosophila ortholog of the vertebrate Golgi pH regulator (GPHR) protein disturb endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi organization and affect systemic growth. Biol Open, 2014; 3:72–80.
217.
BauerR, LehmannC, FussB, et al.The Drosophila gap junction channel gene innexin 2 controls foregut development in response to Wingless signalling. J Cell Sci, 2002; 115:1859–1867.
218.
BauerR, LehmannC, MartiniJ, et al.Gap junction channel protein innexin 2 is essential for epithelial morphogenesis in the Drosophila embryo. Mol Biol Cell, 2004; 15:2992–3004.
219.
LehmannC, LechnerH, LoerB, et al.Heteromerization of innexin gap junction proteins regulates epithelial tissue organization in Drosophila. Mol Biol Cell, 2006; 17:1676–1685.
220.
RichardM, HochM. Drosophila eye size is determined by Innexin 2-dependent Decapentaplegic signalling. Dev Biol, 2015; 408:26–40.
221.
SmendziukCM, MessenbergA, VoglAW, et al.Bi-directional gap junction-mediated soma-germline communication is essential for spermatogenesis. Development, 2015; 142:2598–2609.
222.
GiulianiF, GiulianiG, BauerR, et al.Innexin 3, a new gene required for dorsal closure in Drosophila embryo. PLoS One, 2013; 8:e69212.
223.
MaslyJP, JonesCD, NoorMA, et al.Gene transposition as a cause of hybrid sterility in Drosophila. Science, 2006; 313:1448–1450.
224.
OcorrK, ReevesNL, WessellsRJ, et al.KCNQ potassium channel mutations cause cardiac arrhythmias in Drosophila that mimic the effects of aging. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2007; 104:3943–3948.
225.
HumphreyJA, HammingKS, ThackerCM, et al.A putative cation channel and its novel regulator: Cross-species conservation of effects on general anesthesia. Curr Biol, 2007; 17:624–629.
226.
SimonsM, GaultWJ, GotthardtD, et al.Electrochemical cues regulate assembly of the Frizzled/Dishevelled complex at the plasma membrane during planar epithelial polarization. Nat Cell Biol, 2009; 11:286–294.
227.
PaulSM, TernetM, SalvaterraPM, et al.The Na+/K+ ATPase is required for septate junction function and epithelial tube-size control in the Drosophila tracheal system. Development, 2003; 130:4963–4974.
228.
SchwabeT, BaintonRJ, FetterRD, et al.GPCR signaling is required for blood-brain barrier formation in drosophila. Cell, 2005; 123:133–144.
229.
LipshitzHD, KankelDR. Specificity of gene action during central nervous system development in Drosophila melanogaster: Analysis of the lethal (1) optic ganglion reduced locus. Dev Biol, 1985; 108:56–77.
230.
HattoriY, UsuiT, SatohD, et al.Sensory-neuron subtype-specific transcriptional programs controlling dendrite morphogenesis: Genome-wide analysis of Abrupt and Knot/Collier. Dev Cell, 2013; 27:530–544.
231.
PathakT, AgrawalT, RichhariyaS, et al.Store-operated calcium entry through Orai is required for transcriptional maturation of the flight circuit in Drosophila. J Neurosci, 2015; 35:13784–13799.
232.
PathakT, TrivediD, HasanG. CRISPR-Cas-induced mutants identify a requirement for dSTIM in larval dopaminergic cells of Drosophila melanogaster. G3 (Bethesda), 2017; 7:923–933.
233.
WegmanLJ, AinsleyJA, JohnsonWA. Developmental timing of a sensory-mediated larval surfacing behavior correlates with cessation of feeding and determination of final adult size. Dev Biol, 2010; 345:170–179.
234.
HeviaCF, Lopez-VareaA, EstebanN, et al.A search for genes mediating the growth-promoting function of TGFbeta in the Drosophila melanogaster Wing Disc. Genetics, 2017; 206:231–249.
235.
AbrahamDM, WolfMJ. Disruption of sarcoendoplasmic reticulum calcium ATPase function in Drosophila leads to cardiac dysfunction. PLoS One, 2013; 8:e77785.
236.
PerizG, FortiniME. Ca(2+)-ATPase function is required for intracellular trafficking of the Notch receptor in Drosophila. EMBO J, 1999; 18:5983–5993.
237.
PeabodyNC, DiaoF, LuanH, et al.Bursicon functions within the Drosophila CNS to modulate wing expansion behavior, hormone secretion, and cell death. J Neurosci, 2008; 28:14379–14391.
238.
LuanH, LemonWC, PeabodyNC, et al.Functional dissection of a neuronal network required for cuticle tanning and wing expansion in Drosophila. J Neurosci, 2006; 26:573–584.
239.
EidJP, AriasAM, RobertsonH, et al.The Drosophila STIM1 orthologue, dSTIM, has roles in cell fate specification and tissue patterning. BMC Dev Biol, 2008; 8:104.
240.
GeorgievP, OkkenhaugH, DrewsA, et al.TRPM channels mediate zinc homeostasis and cellular growth during Drosophila larval development. Cell Metab, 2010; 12:386–397.
241.
HofmannT, ChubanovV, ChenX, et al.Drosophila TRPM channel is essential for the control of extracellular magnesium levels. PLoS One, 2010; 5:e10519.
242.
SandstromDJ.Extracellular protons reduce quantal content and prolong synaptic currents at the Drosophila larval neuromuscular junction. J Neurogenet, 2011; 25:104–114.
243.
WongCO, PalmieriM, LiJ, et al.Diminished MTORC1-dependent JNK activation underlies the neurodevelopmental defects associated with lysosomal dysfunction. Cell Rep, 2015; 12:2009–2020.
244.
SmithHK, LuoL, O'HalloranD, et al.Defining specificity determinants of cGMP mediated gustatory sensory transduction in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics, 2013; 194:885–901.
245.
AveryL.The genetics of feeding in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics, 1993; 133:897–917.
246.
ShephardF, AdenleAA, JacobsonLA, et al.Identification and functional clustering of genes regulating muscle protein degradation from amongst the known C. elegans muscle mutants. PLoS One, 2011; 6:e24686.
247.
WatsonE, MacNeilLT, ArdaHE, et al.Integration of metabolic and gene regulatory networks modulates the C. elegans dietary response. Cell, 2013; 153:253–266.
248.
TroemelER, SagastiA, BargmannCI. Lateral signaling mediated by axon contact and calcium entry regulates asymmetric odorant receptor expression in C. elegans. Cell, 1999; 99:387–398.
249.
KamathRS, FraserAG, DongY, et al.Systematic functional analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome using RNAi. Nature, 2003; 421:231–237.
250.
TrentC, TsuingN, HorvitzHR. Egg-laying defective mutants of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics, 1983; 104:619–647.
251.
KwokTC, HuiK, KosteleckiW, et al.A genetic screen for dihydropyridine (DHP)-resistant worms reveals new residues required for DHP-blockage of mammalian calcium channels. PLoS Genet, 2008; 4:e1000067.
252.
BerryKL, BulowHE, HallDH, et al.A C. elegans CLIC-like protein required for intracellular tube formation and maintenance. Science, 2003; 302:2134–2137.
253.
DavisMW, FleischhauerR, DentJA, et al.A mutation in the C. elegans EXP-2 potassium channel that alters feeding behavior. Science, 1999; 286:2501–2504.
254.
HuJ, BarrMM. ATP-2 interacts with the PLAT domain of LOV-1 and is involved in Caenorhabditis elegans polycystin signaling. Mol Biol Cell, 2005; 16:458–469.
255.
GhoshS, SternbergPW. Spatial and molecular cues for cell outgrowth during C. elegans uterine development. Dev Biol, 2014; 396:121–135.
256.
SarinS, O'MearaMM, FlowersEB, et al.Genetic screens for Caenorhabditis elegans mutants defective in left/right asymmetric neuronal fate specification. Genetics, 2007; 176:2109–2130.
257.
KomatsuH, MoriI, RheeJS, et al.Mutations in a cyclic nucleotide-gated channel lead to abnormal thermosensation and chemosensation in C. elegans. Neuron, 1996; 17:707–718.
258.
ChenCH, LeeA, LiaoCP, et al.RHGF-1/PDZ-RhoGEF and retrograde DLK-1 signaling drive neuronal remodeling on microtubule disassembly. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2014; 111:16568–16573.
259.
TavernarakisN, ShrefflerW, WangS, et al.unc-8, a DEG/ENaC family member, encodes a subunit of a candidate mechanically gated channel that modulates C. elegans locomotion. Neuron, 1997; 18:107–119.
260.
ZhuH, DuerrJS, VaroquiH, et al.Analysis of point mutants in the Caenorhabditis elegans vesicular acetylcholine transporter reveals domains involved in substrate translocation. J Biol Chem, 2001; 276:41580–41587.
261.
GreenRA, KaoHL, AudhyaA, et al.A high-resolution C. elegans essential gene network based on phenotypic profiling of a complex tissue. Cell, 2011; 145:470–482.
262.
ChuangCF, VanhovenMK, FetterRD, et al.An innexin-dependent cell network establishes left-right neuronal asymmetry in C. elegans. Cell, 2007; 129:787–799.
263.
BellemerA, HirataT, RomeroMF, et al.Two types of chloride transporters are required for GABA(A) receptor-mediated inhibition in C. elegans. EMBO J, 2011; 30:1852–1863.
264.
ChenS, SpenceAM, SchachterH. Isolation of null alleles of the Caenorhabditis elegans gly-12, gly-13 and gly-14 genes, all of which encode UDP-GlcNAc: Alpha-3-D-mannoside beta1,2-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase I activity. Biochimie, 2003; 85:391–401.
265.
ParkEC, HorvitzHR. Mutations with dominant effects on the behavior and morphology of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics, 1986; 113:821–852.
266.
AxangC, RauthanM, HallDH, et al.Developmental genetics of the C. elegans pharyngeal neurons NSML and NSMR. BMC Dev Biol, 2008; 8:38.
267.
YehE, NgS, ZhangM, et al.A putative cation channel, NCA-1, and a novel protein, UNC-80, transmit neuronal activity in C. elegans. PLoS Biol, 2008; 6:e55.
268.
SedenskyMM, MeneelyPM. Genetic analysis of halothane sensitivity in Caenorhabditis elegans. Science, 1987; 236:952–954.
269.
SchmitzC, KingeP, HutterH. Axon guidance genes identified in a large-scale RNAi screen using the RNAi-hypersensitive Caenorhabditis elegans strain nre-1(hd20) lin-15b(hd126). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2007; 104:834–839.
270.
TakayamaK, MutoA, KikuchiY. Leucine/glutamine and v-ATPase/lysosomal acidification via mTORC1 activation are required for position-dependent regeneration. Sci Rep, 2018; 8:8278.
271.
MonteiroJ, AiresR, BeckerJD, et al.V-ATPase proton pumping activity is required for adult zebrafish appendage regeneration. PLoS One, 2014; 9:e92594.
272.
FinbowME, PittsJD. Structure of the ductin channel. Biosci Rep, 1998; 18:287–297.
273.
PietrantonioPV, GillSS. Ductin, a component of the V-ATPase, is developmentally regulated in Heliothis virescens midgut, and anti-ductin antibodies label lateral membranes. Cell Tissue Res, 1997; 289:97–108.
274.
BanerjiR, EbleDM, IovineMK, et al.Esco2 regulates cx43 expression during skeletal regeneration in the zebrafish fin. Dev Dyn, 2016; 245:7–21.
275.
MeierC, RosenkranzK. Cx43 expression and function in the nervous system-implications for stem cell mediated regeneration. Front Physiol, 2014; 5:106.
276.
OviedoNJ, MorokumaJ, WalentekP, et al.Long-range neural and gap junction protein-mediated cues control polarity during planarian regeneration. Dev Biol, 2010; 339:188–199.
277.
OviedoNJ, LevinM. smedinx-11 is a planarian stem cell gap junction gene required for regeneration and homeostasis. Development, 2007; 134:3121–3131.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
