This article describes the effects of nanosecond pulsed electric fields (nsPEFs) on the structure and enzyme activity of three types of proteins.
Materials and Methods:
Intense (up to 300 kV/cm) 5-ns-long electrical pulses were applied for 500 times at 3 Hz to solutions of lysozyme, albumin, and urease. We analyzed covalent bonds (peptide bonds and disulfide bonds) of lysozyme and albumin, and also the tertiary and quaternary structures of urease as well as urease activity.
Results:
The results indicated deformation of both the quaternary and tertiary structures of urease upon exposure to an electric field with an amplitude of 250 kV/cm or higher, whereas no structural changes were observed in lysozyme or albumin, even at 300 kV/cm. The enzyme activity of urease also decreased at field strengths of 250 kV/cm or higher.
Conclusion:
Our experiments demonstrated that intense nsPEFs physically affected the conformation and function of some types of proteins. Such intense electric fields often occur in cell membranes when exposed to a moderate pulsed electric field.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
GianulisEC, LeeJ, JiangC, et al.Electroporation of mammalian cells by nanosecond electric field oscillations and its inhibition by the electric field reversal. Sci Rep, 2015; 5:13818.
2.
BertinoG, SersaG, De TerlizziF, et al.European Research on Electrochemotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer (EURECA) project: Results of the treatment of skin cancer. Eur J Cancer, 2016; 63:41–52.
3.
Pérez-AndrésJM, CharouxCMG, CullenPJ, et al.Chemical modifications of lipids and proteins by nonthermal food processing technologies. J Agric Food Chem, 2018; 66:5041–5054.
4.
RemsL, MiklavčičD. Tutorial: Electroporation of cells in complex materials and tissue. J Appl Phys, 2016; 119:201101.
5.
MiklavcicD, RolsM-P, Haberl MeglicS, et al.Gene electrotransfer: A mechanistic perspective. Curr Gene Ther, 2016; 16:98–129.
6.
HeL, XiaoD, FengJ, et al.Induction of apoptosis of liver cancer cells by nanosecond pulsed electric fields (nsPEFs). Med Oncol, 2017; 34:1–11.
7.
HannaH, DenziA, LibertiM, et al.Electropermeabilization of inner and outer cell membranes with microsecond pulsed electric fields: Quantitative study with calcium ions. Sci Rep, 2017; 7:1–14.
8.
HavelkaD, CifraM, KučeraO. Multi-mode electro-mechanical vibrations of a microtubule: In silico demonstration of electric pulse moving along a microtubule. Appl Phys Lett, 2014; 104:243702.
9.
KučeraO, HavelkaD. Mechano-electrical vibrations of microtubules—Link to subcellular morphology. Biosystems, 2012; 109:346–355.
10.
D. Havelka MC. Calculation of the electromagnetic field around a microtubule. Acta Polytech, 2009; 49:58–63.
11.
CifraM, HavelkaD, KučeraO, et al. Electric field generated by higher vibration modes of microtubule. In: Proceedings of 15th Conference Microwave Techniques, COMITE 2010. Czech Republic: IEE, 2010: 205–208.
12.
HekstraDR, WhiteKI, SocolichMA, et al.Electric-field-stimulated protein mechanics. Nature, 2016; 540:400–405.
13.
HavelkaD, CifraM, KučeraO, et al.High-frequency electric field and radiation characteristics of cellular microtubule network. J Theor Biol, 2011; 286:31–40.
14.
CarrL, BardetSM, BurkeRC, et al.Calcium-independent disruption of microtubule dynamics by nanosecond pulsed electric fields in U87 human glioblastoma cells. Sci Rep, 2017; 7:41267.
15.
ZhaoY, ZhanQ. Electric fields generated by synchronized oscillations of microtubules, centrosomes and chromosomes regulate the dynamics of mitosis and meiosis. Theor Biol Med Model, 2012; 9:26.
16.
EnglishNJ, WaldronCJ. Perspectives on external electric fields in molecular simulation: Progress, prospects and challenges. Phys Chem Chem Phys, 2015; 17:12407–12440.
17.
MarracinoP, HavelkaD, PrůšaJ, et al.Tubulin response to intense nanosecond-scale electric field in molecular dynamics simulation. Sci Rep, 2019; 9:10477.
18.
PokornýJ, PokornýJ, KobilkováJ. Postulates on electromagnetic activity in biological systems and cancer. Integr Biol (Camb), 2013; 5:1439–1446.
19.
PilletF, Formosa-DagueC, BaazizH, et al.Cell wall as a target for bacteria inactivation by pulsed electric fields. Sci Rep, 2016; 6:19778.
20.
AdachiR, HatayamaS, OhnishiN, et al.Cell death induced by nanosecond pulsed electric fields and its dependence on pulse duration. Electron Commun Japan, 2018; 101:38–48.
21.
PakhomovaON, XiaoS, SaulisG, et al.Oxidative effects of nanosecond pulsed electric field exposure in cells and cell-free media. Arch Biochem Biophys, 2012; 527:55–64.
22.
DrewD, LerchM, KunjiE, et al.Optimization of membrane protein overexpression and purification using GFP fusions. Nat Methods, 2006; 3:303–313.
23.
NakataniT, YasuiN, IsseiT, et al.Specific modification at the C-terminal lysine residue of the green fluorescent protein variant, GFPuv, expressed in Escherichia coli. Sci Rep, 2019; 9:1–13.
24.
DrewD, NewsteadS, SonodaY, et al.GFP-based optimization scheme for the overexpression and purification of eukaryotic membrane proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat Protoc, 2008; 3:784–798.
25.
YamamotoH, SaitohY, YasugawaS, et al.Dephosphorylation of r factor by protein phosphatase 2A in synaptosomal cytosol fractions, and inhibition by aluminum. J Neurochem, 1990; 55:683–690.
26.
VyasSB, DuffyLK. Stabilization of secondary structure of Alzheimer β-protein by aluminum(III) ions and D-Asp substitutions. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 1995; 206:718–723.
27.
SheaTB, BalikianP, Beermann MLou. Aluminum inhibits neurofilament protein degradation by multiple cytoskeleton-associated proteases. FEBS Lett, 1992; 307:195–198.
28.
ScottCW, FielesA, SygowskiLA, et al.Aggregation of tau protein by aluminum. Brain Res, 1993; 628:77–84.
29.
NayakP. Aluminum: Impacts and disease. Environ Res, 2002; 89:101–115.
30.
KawaharaM, MuramotoK, KobayashiK, et al.Aluminum promotes the aggregation of Alzheimer's amyloid β-protein in vitro. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 1994; 198:531–535.
31.
ArispeN, RojasE, PollardHB. Alzheimer disease amyloid beta protein forms calcium channels in bilayer membranes: Blockade by tromethamine and aluminum. Proc Natl Acad Sci, 1993; 90:567–571.
32.
ZhaoW, TangY, LuL, et al.Review: Pulsed electric fields processing of protein-based foods. Food Bioprocess Technol, 2014; 7:114–125.
33.
BekardI, DunstanDE. Electric field induced changes in protein conformation. Soft Matter, 2014; 10:431–437.
34.
TimmonsJJ, PretoJ, TuszynskiJA, et al.Tubulin's response to external electric fields by molecular dynamics simulations. PLoS One, 2018; 13:e0202141.
