FerreiraR, PereiraR, BianchiIS, da SilvaMM. Decision factors for remote work adoption: advantages, disadvantages, driving forces and challenges. J Open Innov Technol Mark Compl, 2021; 7:70.
2.
VigliarE, CepurnaiteR, Alcaraz-MateosE, et al.Global impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cytopathology practice: Results from an international survey of laboratories in 23 countries. Cancer Cytopathol, 2020; 128:885–894.
3.
HendersonMK, KozlakidisZ, FachirohJ, et al.The responses of biobanks to COVID-19. Biopreserv Biobank, 2020; 18:483–491.
4.
RuganiB, CaroD. Impact of COVID-19 outbreak measures of lockdown on the Italian carbon footprint. Sci Total Environ, 2020; 737:139806.
5.
FilimonauV, ArcherD, BellamyL, SmithN, WintripR. The carbon footprint of a UK University during the COVID-19 lockdown. Sci Total Environ, 2021; 756:143964.
6.
CarrollN, ConboyK. Normalising the “new normal”: Changing tech-driven work practices under pandemic time pressure. Int J Inf Manage, 2020; 55:102186.
7.
GohH-H, BournePE. Ten simple rules for researchers while in isolation from a pandemic. PLoS Comput Biol, 2020; 16:e1007946.
8.
ChapmanDG, ThamrinC. Scientists in pyjamas: Characterising the working arrangements and productivity of Australian medical researchers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Med J Aust, 2020; 213:516–520.
9.
García-MarínD. Mapping the factors that determine engagement in podcasting: Design from the users and podcasters' experience. Commun Soc, 2020; 33:49–63.
10.
AhmedS, ShehataM, HassanienM. Emerging faculty needs for enhancing student engagement on a virtual platform. Med Ed Publish, 2020; 9. DOI: 10.15694/mep.2020.000075.1
11.
2nd International BiobankingConference, Qatar (IBCQ). Available at: https://www.ibcq2021.com/about Accessed June28, 2021.
12.
Humanize the Online Event Experience. Available at: https://remo.co/ Accessed June30, 2021.
