Vulnerabilities of Cancer Patients and Their Effects on Informed Consent for Biobanking

Warner TD , Weil CJ , Andry C , et al. Broad consent for research on biospecimens: The views of actual donors at four U.S. Medical Centers. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics, 2018; 13:115–124.

Helft PR , Champion VL , Eckles R , et al. Cancer patients' attitudes toward future research uses of stored human biological materials. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics, 2007; 2:15–22.

Biros M. Capacity, vulnerability, and informed consent for research. J Law Med Ethics, 2018; 46:72–78.

Weisman AD. Early diagnosis of vulnerability in cancer patients. Am J Med Sci, 1976; 271:187–196.

Hong SJ , Drake B , Goodman M , et al. Race, trust in doctors, privacy concerns, and consent preferences for biobanks. Health Commun, 2020; 35:1219–1228.

D'Abramo F , Schildmann J , Vollmann J . Research participants' perceptions and views on consent for biobank research: A review of empirical data and ethical analysis. BMC Med Ethics, 2015; 16:60.

Luna F. Elucidating the concept of vulnerability: Layers not labels. Int J Fem Approaches Bioethics, 2009; 2:121–139.

Forrow L , Kontrimas JC . Language barriers, informed consent, and effective caregiving. J Gen Intern Med, 2017; 32:855–857.

CFR H. 45 CFR16.116. In: 45 T, editor. Office of Federal Register.

Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Volume 1 [Revised as of April 1, 2019].

National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. The Belmont report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://wwwhhsgov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report/read-the-belmont-report/indexhtml. 1979 (last accessed April 23, 2021).

Martti. https://wwwcloudbreakus 2003 (last accessed April 23, 2021).

Schenker Y , Wang F , Selig SJ , et al. The impact of language barriers on documentation of informed consent at a hospital with on-site interpreter services. J Gen Intern Med, 2007; 22 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):294–299.

Clark S , Mangram A , Ernest D , et al. The informed consent: A study of the efficacy of informed consents and the associated role of language barriers. J Surg Educ, 2011; 68:143–147.

Ali PA , Watson R . Language barriers and their impact on provision of care to patients with limited English proficiency: Nurses' perspectives. J Clin Nurs, 2018; 27:e1152–e1160.

Heyman JC , Gutheil IA . Older latinos' attitudes toward and comfort with end-of-life planning. Health Soc Work, 2010; 35:17–26.

Perry E , Swartz J , Brown S , et al. Peer mentoring: A culturally sensitive approach to end-of-life planning for long-term dialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis, 2005; 46:111–119.

Fields LM , Calvert JD . Informed consent procedures with cognitively impaired patients: A review of ethics and best practices. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci, 2015; 69:462–471.

Crepeau AE , McKinney BI , Fox-Ryvicker M , et al. Prospective evaluation of patient comprehension of informed consent. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2011; 93.

Appelbaum P. Appendix D: Treatment refusal in medical hospitals. In: Starke L (ed.) Making Health Care Decisions: Appendices, Studies on the Foundations of Informed Consent in the Patient-Practitioner Relationship. Appendices, Studies on the Foundations of Informed Consent. Washington, DC: President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research;, 1982; Vol. 3: 418–419.

Gupta UC. Informed consent in clinical research: Revisiting few concepts and areas. Perspect Clin Res, 2013; 4:26–32.