Full oral feeding (FOF) is a critical milestone in preterm infants, often delayed because of immature feeding coordination. The Fucile oral motor stimulation protocol aims to address these challenges and enhance feeding progression. To evaluate the effectiveness of the Fucile oral motor stimulation protocol in reducing the transition time to FOF, shortening hospital stays, and improving feeding-related outcomes in preterm infants.
Methods:
A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO: CRD42022369514). Databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CENTRAL, and CINAHL (1990–2024), were searched. Randomized controlled trials comparing the Fucile protocol with control interventions in preterm infants (<37 weeks of gestation) were included. Outcomes included transition time to FOF, hospital stay length, weight at discharge, and milk transfer rate. Risk of bias (RoB 2) and evidence certainty (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) were evaluated.
Results:
Nineteen trials (1,031 infants) showed that the Fucile protocol significantly reduced transition time to FOF (mean difference [MD]: −5.77 days; 95% confidence interval [CI]: −6.64 to −4.90) and hospital stay duration (MD: −6.47 days; 95% CI: −8.41 to −4.53) with moderate-certainty evidence.
Conclusion:
The Fucile protocol accelerates feeding milestones and reduces hospital stays for preterm infants, providing moderate-certainty evidence to support its clinical use. However, methodological limitations, including small sample sizes and risk of bias, underline the need for larger, high-quality trials to confirm these findings and refine clinical guidelines. These results suggest the potential of integrating oral motor stimulation into neonatal intensive care unit practices to enhance feeding outcomes and optimize care for preterm infants.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
GreenCR. Effects of Infant-Driven Feeding in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) for Premature Infants with Additional Morbidities. Rush University; 2023.
2.
LauC. Oral feeding in the preterm infant. NeoReviews, 2006; 7(1):e19–e27; doi: 10.1542/neo.7-1-e19
3.
BertoncelliN, CuomoG, CattaniS, et al.Oral feeding competences of healthy preterm infants: A review. Int J Pediatr, 2012; 2012(1):896257; doi: 10.1155/2012/896257
4.
HuangC-C, LiaoT-T, HuangM-C. Oral feeding readiness assessment tools for preterm infants. Hu Li Za Zhi, 2024; 71(5):89–95; doi: 10.6224/JN.202410_71(5).11
5.
KamityR, KapavarapuPK, ChandelA. Feeding problems and long-term outcomes in preterm infants—a systematic approach to evaluation and management. Children, 2021; 8(12):1158; doi: 10.3390/children8121158
6.
VizzariG, MorniroliD, D’AuriaA, et al.Feeding difficulties in late preterm infants and their impact on maternal mental health and the mother–infant relationship: A literature review. Nutrients, 2023; 15(9):2180; doi: 10.3390/nu15092180
7.
FucileS, GiselE, LauC. Oral stimulation accelerates the transition from tube to oral feeding in preterm infants. J Pediatr, 2002; 141(2):230–236; doi: 10.1067/mpd.2002.125731
8.
ThakkarPA, RohitH, Ranjan DasR, et al.Effect of oral stimulation on feeding performance and weight gain in preterm neonates: A randomised controlled trial. Paediatr Int Child Health, 2018; 38(3):181–186; doi: 10.1080/20469047.2018.1435172
9.
YounesianS, YadegariF, SoleimaniF. Impact of oral sensory motor stimulation on feeding performance, length of hospital stay, and weight gain of preterm infants in NICU. Iran Red Crescent Med J, 2015; 17(7):e13515; doi: 10.5812/ircmj.17(5)2015.13515
10.
ArvedsonJ, ClarkH, LazarusC, et al.Evidence-based systematic review: Effects of oral motor interventions on feeding and swallowing in preterm infants. Am J Speech Lang Pathol, 2010; 19(4):321–340; doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2010/09-0067
11.
LessenBS. Effect of the premature infant oral motor intervention on feeding progression and length of stay in preterm infants. Adv Neonatal Care, 2011; 11(2):129–139; doi: 10.1097/ANC.0b013e3182115a2a
12.
BoironM, NobregaLD, RouxS, et al.Effects of oral stimulation and oral support on non‐nutritive sucking and feeding performance in preterm infants. Dev Med Child Neurol, 2007; 49(6):439–444.
13.
HwangY-S, LinC-H, CosterWJ, et al.Effectiveness of cheek and jaw support to improve feeding performance of preterm infants. Am J Occup Ther, 2010; 64(6):886–894.
14.
GaeblerCP, HanzlikJR. The effects of a prefeeding stimulation program on preterm infants. Am J Occup Ther, 1996; 50(3):184–192.
15.
OstadiM, ArmanianA-M, NamnabatiM, et al.The effects of swallowing exercise and non-nutritive sucking exercise on oral feeding readiness in preterm infants: A randomized controlled trial. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 2021; 142:110602.
16.
ÇamurZ, ÇetinkayaB. The effect of sensorimotor interventions on feeding readiness and oral feeding success in preterm infants: A randomized controlled trial. Early Child Dev. Care, 2023; 193(5):661–678.
17.
ChenD, YangZ, ChenC, et al.Effect of oral motor intervention on oral feeding in preterm infants: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Speech Lang Pathol, 2021; 30(5):2318–2328; doi: 10.1044/2021_AJSLP-20-00322
18.
FurlanAD, PennickV, BombardierC, et al.; Editorial Board, Cochrane Back Review Group. 2009 updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Back Review Group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2009; 34(18):1929–1941; doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b1c99f
19.
PageMJ, McKenzieJE, BossuytPM, et al.Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: Development of the PRISMA 2020 statement. J Clin Epidemiol, 2021; 134:103–112; doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.02.003
20.
AsadollahpourF, BaghbanK, SakhaiF, et al.Effectiveness of oral-motor stimulation on oral feeding in premature infants: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled randomized trials. Iran J Child Neurol, 2024; 18(3):43–55; doi: 10.22037/ijcn.v18i3.42755
21.
HigginsJPT, AltmanDG, GotzschePC, et al.; Cochrane Bias Methods Group. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011; 343(oct18 2):d5928; doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5928
22.
HigginsJP, AltmanDG. Assessing risk of bias in included studies. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions: Cochrane book series, 2008:187–241; doi: 10.1002/9780470712184.ch8
23.
McGuinnessLA, HigginsJP. Risk‐of‐bias VISualization (robvis): An R package and Shiny web app for visualizing risk‐of‐bias assessments. Res Synth Methods, 2021; 12(1):55–61; doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1411
24.
WanX, WangW, LiuJ, et al.Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Med Res Methodol, 2014; 14(1):1–13; doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-135
25.
FurukawaTA, LeuchtS. How to obtain NNT from Cohen’s d: Comparison of two methods. PLoS One, 2011; 6(4):e19070; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019070
26.
HigginsJP, ThompsonSG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis. Stat Med, 2002; 21(11):1539–1558; doi: 10.1002/sim.1186
27.
GuyattG, OxmanA, VistG, et al.; GRADE Working Group. GRADE Working Group 2008 GRADE: An emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ, 2008; 336(7650):924–926; doi: 10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD
28.
KhalessiN, NaziS, ShariatM, et al.The effects of pre-feeding oral stimulations and non-nutritive sucking on physical growth and independent oral feeding of preterm infants. IJN, 2015; 6(4):25–29; doi: 10.22038/ijn.2015.6145
29.
HardingC, FrankL, Van SomerenV, et al.How does non-nutritive sucking support infant feeding? Infant Behav Dev, 2014; 37(4):457–464; doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2014.05.002
30.
LiX-L, LiuY, LiuM, et al.Early premature infant oral motor intervention improved oral feeding and prognosis by promoting neurodevelopment. Am J Perinatol, 2020; 37(6):626–632; doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1685448
31.
LyuT-C, ZhangY-X, HuX-J, et al.The effect of an early oral stimulation program on oral feeding of preterm infants. Int. J. Nurs, 2014; 1(1):42–47; doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2014.02.010
32.
da Rosa PereiraK, LevyDS, ProcianoyRS, et al.Impact of a pre-feeding oral stimulation program on first feed attempt in preterm infants: Double-blind controlled clinical trial. PLoS One, 2020; 15(9):e0237915; doi: 10.1542/neo.7-1-e19
33.
MézianeS, Brévaut-MalatyV, GarbiA, et al.Cardio-respiratory events and food autonomy responses to early uni-modal orofacial stimulation in very premature babies: A randomized, controlled study. Children (Basel), 2021; 8(12):1188; doi: 10.3390/children8121188
34.
FucileS, GiselEG, McFarlandDH, et al.Oral and non‐oral sensorimotor interventions enhance oral feeding performance in preterm infants. Dev Med Child Neurol, 2011; 53(9):829–835; doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2011.04023.x
35.
FucileS, MilutinovM, TimmonsK, et al.Oral sensorimotor intervention enhances breastfeeding establishment in preterm infants. Breastfeed Med, 2018; 13(7):473–478; doi: 10.1089/bfm.2018.0014
36.
RochaAD, MoreiraMEL, PimentaHP, et al.A randomized study of the efficacy of sensory-motor-oral stimulation and non-nutritive sucking in very low birthweight infant. Early Hum Dev, 2007; 83(6):385–388; doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2006.08.003
37.
PimentaHP, MoreiraME, RochaAD, et al.Effects of non-nutritive sucking and oral stimulation on breastfeeding rates for preterm, low birth weight infants: A randomized clinical trial. J Pediatr (Rio J), 2008; 84(5):423–427; doi: 10.2223/JPED.1839
38.
LiL, LiuL, ChenF, et al.Clinical effects of oral motor intervention combined with non-nutritive sucking on oral feeding in preterm infants with dysphagia. J Pediatr (Rio J), 2022; 98(6):635–640; doi: 10.1016/j.jped.2022.02.005
39.
AsadollahpourF, YadegariF, SoleimaniF, et al.The effects of non-nutritive sucking and pre-feeding oral stimulation on time to achieve independent oral feeding for preterm infants. Iran J Pediatr, 2015; 25(3):e809–e5; doi: 10.5812/ijp.25(3)2015.809
40.
Aguilar-RodríguezM, León-CastroJC, Álvarez-CerezoM, et al.The effectiveness of an oral sensorimotor stimulation protocol for the early achievement of exclusive oral feeding in premature infants. A randomized, controlled trial. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr, 2020; 40(4):371–383; doi: 10.1080/01942638.2019.1698688
41.
Aras DoganS, CelebiogluA, Aytekin OzdemirA, et al.; Yozgat Bozok University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Yozgat, Turkey. Oral Motor Stimulation, Feeding and Sucking Success in Preterm Infants. J Nursology, 2023; 26(1):27–33; doi: 10.5152/JANHS.2023.2296162
42.
BauerM, PradeL, Keske-SoaresM, et al.The oral motor capacity and feeding performance of preterm newborns at the time of transition to oral feeding. Braz J Med Biol Res, 2008; 41(10):904–907; doi: 10.1590/S0100-879X2008001000012
43.
LauC, SmithE. Interventions to improve the oral feeding performance of preterm infants. Acta Paediatr, 2012; 101(7):e269–e274; doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2012.02662.x
44.
ZhangY, LyuT, HuX, et al.Effect of nonnutritive sucking and oral stimulation on feeding performance in preterm infants: A randomized controlled trial. Pediatr Crit Care Med, 2014; 15(7):608–614; doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000182
45.
TsaiY-L, HsiehP-C, ChenT-Y, et al.Effects of complete oral motor intervention and nonnutritive sucking alone on the feeding performance of premature infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Children (Basel), 2023; 11(1):4–15; doi: 10.3390/children11010004
46.
Rodriguez GonzalezP, Perez-CabezasV, Chamorro-MorianaG, et al.Effectiveness of oral sensory-motor stimulation in premature infants in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) systematic review. Children (Basel), 2021; 8(9):758–779; doi: 10.3390/children8090758
