MitterVR, Kohl SchwartzAS, RueeggCS. Re: “The association of assisted reproductive technology and breastfeeding rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis” by Youseflu et al. Breastfeed Med, 2023; 18(3):248–249; doi: 10.1089/bfm.2022.0275
2.
YousefluS, SoltaniF, MalekiA. The association of assisted reproductive technology and breastfeeding rates: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Breastfeed Med, 2022; 17(10):841–852.
3.
WengS-S, ChienL-Y, HuangY-T, et al.Why does mode of conception affect early breastfeeding outcomes? A retrospective cohort study. PLoS One, 2022; 17(3):e0265776.
4.
ShaT, YanY, GaoX, et al.Association of assisted reproductive techniques with infant feeding practices: A community-based study in China. Breastfeed Med, 2019; 14(9):654–661.
5.
SalehM, Zadeh ModarresS, EsmaeiliS, et al.Effects of assisted reproduction techniques on breastfeeding outcomes. J Matern Fetal Neonat Med, 2022; 35(13):2464–2468.
6.
PileriP, di BartoloI, MazzoccoMI, et al.Breastfeeding: Biological and social variables in different modes of conception. Life, 2021; 11(2):110.
7.
O’QuinnC, MetcalfeA, McDonaldSW, et al.Exclusive breastfeeding and assisted reproductive technologies: A calgary cohort. Reproductive Sys Sexual Disord, 2012; S5(002):1–4; doi: 10.4172/2161-038X.S5-002
8.
MichelsKA, MumfordSL, SundaramR, et al.Differences in infant feeding practices by mode of conception in a United States cohort. Fertil Steril, 2016; 105(4):1014.e1–1022.e1.
9.
LeeS-H, LeeM-Y, ChiangT-L, et al.Child growth from birth to 18 months old born after assisted reproductive technology—results of a national birth cohort study. Int J Nurs Stud, 2010; 47(9):1159–1166.
10.
da SilvaSG, da SilveiraMF, BertoldiAD, et al.Maternal and child-health outcomes in pregnancies following Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART): A prospective cohort study. BMC Pregn Childbirth, 2020; 20(1):1–8.
11.
FisherJ, HammarbergK, WynterK, et al.Assisted conception, maternal age and breastfeeding: An Australian cohort study. Acta Paediatr, 2013; 102(10):970–976.
12.
Diaz SáezJ, Granero MolinaJ, López RodríguezMDM, et al.Influential factors of breastfeeding after assisted reproduction: A Spanish Cohort. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2022; 19(5):2673.
13.
CromiA, SeratiM, CandeloroI, et al.Assisted reproductive technology and breastfeeding outcomes: A case-control study. Fertil Steril, 2015; 103(1):89–94.
14.
BarreraCM, KawwassJF, BouletSL, et al.Fertility treatment use and breastfeeding outcomes. Am J Obstetr Gynecol, 2019; 220(3):261.e1–261.e7.
15.
McDonaldSD, PullenayegumE, ChapmanB, et al.Prevalence and predictors of exclusive breastfeeding at hospital discharge. Obstetr Gynecol, 2012; 119(6):1171–1179.
16.
PurtschertLA, MitterVR, ZdanowiczJA, et al.Breastfeeding following in vitro fertilisation in Switzerland—Does mode of conception affect breastfeeding behaviour?. Acta Paediatr, 2021; 110(4):1171–1180.
17.
Zegers-HochschildF, MasoliD, SchwarzeJ-E, et al.Reproductive performance in oocyte donors and their recipients: Comparative analysis from implantation to birth and lactation. Fertil Steril, 2010; 93(7):2210–2215.
18.
KermaniR, NedaeifardL, TehraniM, et al.Pattern of breastfeeding in infants conceived by assisted reproductive techniques at royan institute from birth to 6 months in Tehran-Iran. J Family Reprod Health, 2012; 6(3):105–109.
19.
WiffenJ, FetherstonC. Relationships between assisted reproductive technologies and initiation of lactation: Preliminary observations. Breastfeed Rev, 2016; 24(1):21–27.
20.
ThevenetL, HasslerP, RiquetS, et al.New-born feeding decisions after intrauterine insemination. La Revue Sage-Femme, 2015; 14(5):169–178.
21.
DeeksJJ, HigginsJP, AltmanDG, et al.Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses. In: Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. (Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, et al, eds.); John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, England; 2019; pp. 241–284.