US Preventive Services Task Force. The Guide to Clinical Preventive Services: Recommendations of the US Preventive Services Task Force. Rockville, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2006.
GopalakrishnaG, LangendamMW, ScholtenRJ, et al.Guidelines for guideline developers: A systematic review of grading systems for medical tests. Implement Sci, 2013; 8:78.
4.
MaymoneMBC, GanSD, BigbyM. Evaluating the strength of clinical recommendations in the medical literature: GRADE, SORT, and AGREE. J Invest Dermatol, 2014; 134:1–5.
5.
GarcíaCAC, AlvaradoKPP, GaxiolaGP. Grading recommendations in clinical practice guidelines: Randomised experimental evaluation of four different systems. Arch Dis Child, 2011; 96:723–728.
6.
EbellMH, SiwekJ, WeissBD, et al.Strength of recommendation taxonomy (SORT): A patient-centered approach to grading evidence in the medical literature. J Am Board Fam Pract, 2004; 17:59–67.
GuyattG, OxmanAD, AklEA, et al.GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction—GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol, 2011; 64:383–394.
9.
BalshemH, HelfandM, SchünemannHJ, et al.GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol, 2011; 64:401–406.
10.
IrvingM, EramudugollaR, CherbuinN, et al.A critical review of grading systems: Implications for public health policy. Eval Health Prof, 2017; 40:244–262.
11.
GugiuPC, GugiuMR. A critical appraisal of standard guidelines for grading levels of evidence. Eval Health Prof, 2010; 33:233–255.
12.
AGREE Enterprise. Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) Instrument. AGREE Enterprise. Published 2000. Available at https://www.agreetrust.org/ (accessed June30, 2020).
