The anogenital distance (AGD) is an anthropometric marker determined by exposures to androgens in utero and throughout the first few months of life. Early exposures to endocrine-disrupting chemicals such as phthalates have been significantly associated with shortened AGD in boys. Limited studies have explored phthalate concentrations in breast milk and infant formula.
Objective:
To explore the associations between breastfeeding duration and AGD measures in infants.
Materials and Methods:
MALAMA (Medio Ambiente y Lactancia Materna) is a follow-up study of 430 mother–child pairs, from birth to 2 years, from two population-based cohorts in Murcia, Spain. Data were collected through medical visits and telephone surveys from birth to 2 years of age. World Health Organization breastfeeding definitions were used. AGD measurements were assessed in a subsample of 71 boys and 49 girls at the 2-year visit. Descriptive analyses, Pearson correlations, and linear regressions were calculated between AGD and breastfeeding duration.
Results:
Duration of all types of breastfeeding, especially full breastfeeding (FB), is correlated with AGD measures in boys (p < 0.05). AGDAS (anoscrotal distance) and AGDAP (anopenile distance) were positively associated with FB (β = 0.004, 95%CI: 0.001–0.007 and β = 0.003, 95%CI: 0.000–0.007, respectively).
Conclusions:
A positive correlation between AGD in male infants and the duration of breastfeeding is reported. Inversely, early introduction of infant formula could lead to the reduction of AGD in boys.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The Surgeon General's Call to Action to Support Breastfeeding. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Surgeon General, 2011.
2.
ShillingT. Video review: The benefits of breastfeeding. J Hum Lact, 2000; 16:367.
SolomonGM, WeissPM. Chemical contaminants in breast milk: Time trends and regional variability. Environ Health Perspect, 2002; 110:A339–A347.
5.
Díaz-GómezNM, AresS, Hernández-AguilarMT, et al.Chemical pollution and breast milk: Taking positions. An Pediatr (Barc), 2013; 79:391.
6.
Ribas-FitóN, CardoE, SalaM, et al.Breastfeeding, exposure to organochlorine compounds and neurodevelopment in infants. Pediatrics, 2003; 111(5Pt1):e580–585.
7.
SathyanarayanaS, BeardL, ZhouC, et al.Measurement and correlates of ano-genital distance in healthy, newborn infants. Int J Androl, 2010; 33:317–323.
8.
ThankamonyA, OngKK, DungerDB, et al.Anogenital distance from birth to 2 years: A population study. Environ Health Perspect, 2009; 117:1786–1790.
9.
MendiolaJ, StahlhutRW, JorgensenN, et al.Shorter anogenital distance predicts poorer semen quality in young men in Rochester, New York. Environ Health Perspect, 2011; 119:958–963.
10.
JarfeltK, DalgaardM, HassU, et al.Antiandrogenic effects in male rats perinatally exposed to a mixture of di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate and di(2-ethylhexyl) adipate. Reprod Toxicol, 2005; 19:505–515.
11.
SwanSH, SathyanarayanaS, BarrettES, et al.First trimester phthalate exposure and anogenital distance in newborns. Hum Reprod, 2015; 30:963–972.
12.
Ortega GarcíaJA, Pastor TorresE, Martínez LorenteI, et al.Malama project in the Region of Murcia (Spain): Environment and breastfeeding. An Pediatr (Barc), 2008; 68:447–453.
13.
Ortega-GarcíaJA, Cárceles-ÁlvarezA, Cotton-CaballeroA, et al.Environmental factors related with breastfeeding duration: A one year follow-up study. Acta Pediatr Esp, 2015; 73:97–104.
14.
LeeJH, JiYH, LeeSK, et al.Change in penile length in children: Preliminary study. Korean J Urol, 2012; 53:870–874.
15.
World Health Organization (WHO/UNICEF). Indicators for Assessing Health Facility Practices that Affect Breastfeeding. Geneve: WHO, 1993.
16.
OglesbyL, KünzliN, MonnC, et al.Validity of annoyance scores for estimation of long term air pollution exposure in epidemiologic studies: The Swiss Study on Air Pollution and Lung Diseases in Adults (SAPALDIA). Am J Epidemiol, 2000; 152:75–83.
BornehagCG, CarlstedtF, JönssonBA, et al.Prenatal phthalate exposures and anogenital distance in Swedish boys. Environ Health Perspect, 2015; 123:101–107.
19.
SwanSH. Environmental phthalate exposure in relation to reproductive outcomes and other health endpoints in humans. Environ Res, 2008; 108:177–184.
20.
PapadopoulouE, VafeiadiM, AgramuntS, et al.Anogenital distances in newborns and children from Spain and Greece: Predictors, tracking and reliability. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol, 2013; 27:89–99.
21.
HotchkissAK, Parks-SalduttiLG, OstbyJS, et al.A mixture of the “anti-androgens” linuron and butyl benzyl phthalate alters sexual differentiation of the male rat in a cumulative fashion. Biol Reprod, 2004; 71:1852–1861.
22.
MitchellRT, MungallW, McKinnellC, et al.Anogenital distance plasticity in adulthood: Implications for its use as a biomarker of fetal androgen action. Endocrinology, 2015; 156:24–31.
23.
AnderssonAM, ToppariJ, HaavistoAM, et al.Longitudinal reproductive hormone profiles in infants: Peak of inhibin B levels in infant boys exceeds levels in adult men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 1998; 83:675–681.
24.
Kuiri-HännienT, SankilampiU, DunkelL. Activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary gonadal axis in infancy: Minipuberty. Horm Res Paediatr, 2014; 82:73–80.
25.
MainKM, MortensenGK, KalevaMM, et al.Human breast milk contamination with phthalates and alterations of endogenous reproductive hormones in infants three months of age. Environ Health Perspect, 2006; 114:270–276.
26.
RoganWJ, GladenBC, McKinneyJD, et al.Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and dichlorodiphenyl dichloroethene (DDE) in human milk: Effects on growth, morbidity, and duration of lactation. Am J Public Health, 1987; 77:1.294–1.297.
27.
IszattN, StigumH, VernerMA, et al.Prenatal and postnatal exposure to persistent organic pollutants and infant growth: A pooled analysis of seven european birth cohorts. Environ Health Perspect, 2015; 123:730–736.
28.
MortensenGK, MainKM, AnderssonAM, et al.Determination of phthalate monoesters in human milk, consumer milk, and infant formula by tandem mass spectrometry (LC- MS- MS). Anal Bioanal Chem, 2005; 382:1084–1092.
29.
CirilloT, LatiniG, CastaldiMA, et al.Exposure to di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate, di-n-butyl phthalate and bisphenol A through infant formulas. J Agric Food Chem, 2015; 63:3303–3310.
30.
FrommeH, GruberL, SeckinE, et al.Phthalates and their metabolites in breast milk. Results from the Bavarian Monitoring of Breast Milk (BAMBI). Environ Int, 2011; 37:715–722.
31.
BehrM, OehlmannJ, WagnerM. Estrogens in the daily diet: In vitro analysis indicates that estrogenic activity is omnipresent in foodstuff and infant formula. Food Chem Toxicol, 2011; 49:2681–2688.
32.
LangerS, BeköG, WeschlerCJ, et al.Phthalate metabolites in urine samples from Danish children and correlations with phthalates in dust samples from their homes and daycare centers. Int J Hyg Environ Health, 2014; 217:78–87.
33.
JanjuaN, FrederiksenH, SkakkebækN, et al.Urinary excretion of phthalates and paraben after repeated whole-body topical application in humans. Int J Androl, 2008; 31:118–130.
34.
SathyanarayanaS, KarrCJ, LozanoP, et al.Baby care products: Possible sources of infant phthalate exposure. Pediatrics, 2008; 121:e260–e268.
35.
EisenbergML, HsiehMH, WaltersRC, et al.The relationship between anogenital distance, fatherhood, and fertility in adult men. PLoS One, 2011; 6:e18973.
