Abstract
Background:
Primary restrictive bariatric procedures, including laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding, vertical banded gastroplasty, and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, have shown safety and efficiency as bariatric methods. However, these procedures pose the risk of failure in terms of inadequate weight loss or weight regain. Following failed restrictive surgeries, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is the most often used revision technique. One-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) has gained popularity during the past 10 years. This study aimed to compare OAGB to RYGB as revisional procedures in terms of perioperative events and weight loss throughout a 1-year follow-up period.
Patients and Methods:
This is a prospective nonrandomized study that included patients who had failed restrictive surgeries and were scheduled for revisional surgery (OAGB or RYGB). Data concerning the patients’ demographics, comorbidities, and surgery events were recorded and analyzed. Propensity score matching was performed.
Results:
A significantly lower mean operative time was shown in the OAGB (105.5 ± 4.3 min vs. 130.7 ± 4.25, t = 27.64, p < 0.001). The OAGB group showed a lower number of patients with leaks (0% vs. 4.5%). The rates of early postoperative complications were comparable in the two groups (6.8% and 9.1%, respectively, p = 0.667) at the 1-year follow-up; remission of esophagitis occurred in one patient of the OAGB group (2.27%) compared with seven patients (15.9%) in the RYGB group (p = 0.014). No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups in the body mass index or the excess weight loss.
Conclusion:
This study supports the efficacy and safety of OAGB for revision of failed restrictive procedures. There remains concern regarding post-OAGB gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and RYGB should be preferred in cases of preoperative GERD.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
