Abstract
Background:
Metabolic surgery is a new term used to emphasize the metabolic benefits of a variety of bariatric surgery procedures, particularly with relationship to the treatment of type 2 diabetes and its complications. Means by which the likely impact of metabolic surgery on diabetes could be assessed in individual patients would be of clinical value.
Methods:
Two main scoring systems (ABCD and DiaRem) have been proposed to predict remission of diabetes after metabolic surgery. We present a description of these systems, discuss the sources of differences in their predictive power, and suggest means by which to improve predictive power.
Results:
ABCD is more predictive in patients with intermediate and poorer scores. Neither score is validated as a means of predicting, which patients will benefit most from the repercussions of improved glycemic control in terms of complications.
Conclusion:
A composite scoring system derived from ABCD and DiaRem may improve prediction of postoperative remission rates. Such a system should be considered principally as an aid to decision-making. Excessive focus on prediction of long-term remission of type 2 diabetes mellitus should be avoided in favor of identifying which patients may stand to benefit most, even if full clinical remission is not achieved.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
