EngelenE-M, Röttger-RösslerB. Current disciplinary and interdisciplinary debates on empathy. Emotion Rev. 2012; 4(1):3–8.
2.
Van KrevelenDA, KuipersC. The psychopathology of autistic psychopathy. Acta Paedopsychiatr. 1962; 29:22–31.
3.
Baron‐CohenS.Autism: The empathizing–systemizing (E‐S) theory. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009; 1156(1):68–80.
4.
SmithA.The empathy imbalance hypothesis of autism: A theoretical approach to cognitive and emotional empathy in autistic development. Psychol Rec. 2009; 59(3):489–510.
5.
BlairRJR.Responding to the emotions of others: Dissociating forms of empathy through the study of typical and psychiatric populations. Conscious Cogn. 2005; 14(4):698–718.
BloomP.Against Empathy: The Case for Rational Compassion. New York, NY: Random House; 2017.
8.
MiltonDE.On the ontological status of autism: The ‘double empathy problem’. Disabil Soc. 2012; 27(6):883–887.
9.
MiltonDE.Autistic expertise: A critical reflection on the production of knowledge in autism studies. Autism. 2014; 18(7):794–802.
10.
CollinsH, EvansR. Rethinking Expertise. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2009.
11.
BurkeK.A Rhetoric of Motives. New York, NY: Prentice-Hall; 1955.
12.
HobsonRP.Autism and the philosophy of mind. In: FulfordKWM, DaviesM, GippsRGT, et al., eds. The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Psychiatry. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013; 820–834.
13.
SheppardE, PillaiD, WongG, et al.How easy is it to read the minds of people with autism spectrum disorder?. J Autism Dev Disord. 2016; 46:1247–1254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-015-2662-8.
14.
SassonNJ, FasoDJ, NugentJ, et al.Neurotypical peers are less willing to interact with those with autism based on thin slice judgments. Sci Rep. 2017; 7:40700.
15.
SassonNJ, MorrisonKE. First impressions of adults with autism improve with diagnostic disclosure and increased autism knowledge of peers. Autism. 2018 (in press).
16.
MiltonD, SimsT. How is a sense of well-being and belonging constructed in the accounts of autistic adults?. Disabil Soc. 2016; 31(4):520–534.
17.
MiltonD.A Mismatch of Salience. Hove: Pavilion; 2017.
18.
HeasmanB, GillespieA. Perspective-taking is two-sided: Misunderstandings between people with Asperger's syndrome and their family members. Autism. 2018; 22(6):740–750.
19.
DuffyJ, DornerR. The pathos of “mindblindness”: Autism, science, and sadness in “theory of mind” narratives. J Literary Cult Disabil Stud. 2011; 5(2):201–216.
20.
JackJ.Autism and Gender: From Refrigerator Mothers to Computer Geeks. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press; 2014.
21.
McGuireAE, MichalkoR. Minds between us: Autism, mindblindness, and the uncertainty of communication. Educ Philos Theory. 2011; 43(2):162–177.
22.
ZunshineL.Why We Read Fiction: Theory of Mind and the Novel. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University Press; 2006.
23.
ManningE, MassumiB.A perspective of the Universe. Inflexions 6, “Arakawa and Gins” 2013:448–455. www.inflexions.org
24.
ManningE, MassumiB. Thought in the Act: Passages in the Ecology of Experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 2014.
25.
GatesJA, KangE, LernerMD. Efficacy of group social skills interventions for youth with autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2017; 52:164–181.
FasoDJ, SassonNJ, PinkhamAE. Evaluating posed and evoked facial expressions of emotion from adults with autism spectrum disorder. J Autism Dev Disord. 2015; 45:75–89.
28.
HubbardDJ, FasoDJ, AssmannPF, SassonNJ. Production and perception of emotional prosody by adults with autism spectrum disorder. Autism Res. 2017; 10:1991–2001.
29.
Baron-CohenS, WheelwrightS, SkinnerR, et al.The autism-spectrum quotient (AQ): Evidence from Asperger syndrome/high-functioning autism, males and females, scientists and mathematicians. J Autism Dev Disord. 2001; 31(1):5–17.
30.
GernsbacherMA, StevensonJL, DernS. Specificity, contexts, and reference groups matter when assessing autistic traits. PLoS One. 2017; 12(2):e0171931.