Discrepancies have emerged concerning the application of sulfur stable isotope ratios as a biosignature in impact crater paleolakes. The first in situ δ34S data from Mars at Gale crater display a ∼75‰ range that has been attributed to an abiotic mechanism. Yet biogeochemical studies of ancient environments on Earth generally interpret δ34S fractionations >21‰ as indicative of a biological origin, and studies of δ34S at analog impact crater lakes on Earth have followed the same approach. We performed analyses (including δ34S, total organic carbon wt%, and scanning electron microscope imaging) on multiple lithologies from the Nördlinger Ries impact crater, focusing on hydrothermally altered impact breccias and associated sedimentary lake-fill sequences to determine whether the δ34S properties define a biosignature. The differences in δ34S between the host lithologies may have resulted from thermochemical sulfate reduction, microbial sulfate reduction, hydrothermal equilibrium fractionation, or any combination thereof. Despite abundant samples and instrumental precision currently exclusive to Earth-bound analyses, assertions of biogenicity from δ34S variations >21‰ at the Miocene Ries impact crater are tenuous. This discourages the use of δ34S as a biosignature in similar environments without independent checks that include the full geologic, biogeochemical, and textural context, as well as a comprehensive acknowledgment of alternative hypotheses.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbramovO, KringDA. Impact-induced hydrothermal activity on early Mars. J Geophys Res, 2005; 110(E12):E12S09; doi: 10.1029/2005JE002453
2.
AbramovO, KringDA. Numerical modeling of impact-induced hydrothermal activity at the Chicxulub crater. Meteorit Planet Sci, 2007; 42(1):93–112; doi: 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2007.tb00220.x
3.
ArpG.Lacustrine bioherms, spring mounds, and marginal carbonates of the Ries-impact-crater (Miocene, southern Germany). Facies, 1995; 33(1):35–89; doi: 10.1007/BF02537444
4.
ArpG.Sediments of the Ries Crater Lake (Miocene, Southern Germany). SDGG, 2006; 45:213–236.
5.
ArpG, BielertF, HoffmannVE, et al.Palaeoenvironmental significance of lacustrine stromatolites of the arnstadt formation (“Steinmergelkeuper,” upper Triassic, N-Germany). Facies, 2005; 51(1–4):419–441; doi: 10.1007/s10347-005-0063-8
6.
ArpG, BlumenbergM, HansenBT, et al.Chemical and ecological evolution of the Miocene Ries impact crater lake, Germany: A reinterpretation based on the Enkingen (SUBO 18) Drill Core. Geol Soc Am Bull, 2013a;125(7–8):1125–1145; doi: 10.1130/B30731.1
7.
ArpG, KolepkaC, SimonK, et al.New evidence for persistent impact-generated hydrothermal activity in the Miocene Ries impact structure, Germany. Meteorit Planet Sci, 2013b;48(12):2491–2516; doi: 10.1111/maps.12235
8.
ArpG, HansenBT, PackA, et al.The Soda Lake—Mesosaline Halite Lake transition in the Ries impact crater basin (Drilling Löpsingen 2012, Miocene, Southern Germany). Facies, 2017; 63(1):1; doi: 10.1007/s10347-016-0483-7
9.
ArpG, DunklI, JungD, et al.A volcanic ash layer in the Nördlinger Ries impact structure (Miocene, Germany): Indication of crater fill geometry and origins of long-term crater floor sagging. J Geophys Res Planets, 2021a;126(4):e2020JE006764; doi: 10.1029/2020JE006764
10.
ArpG, GropengießerS, SchulbertC, et al.Biostratigraphy and sequence stratigraphy of the Toarcian Ludwigskanal section (Franconian Alb, Southern Germany). Zitteliana, 2021b;95:57–94; doi: 10.3897/zitteliana.95.56222
11.
ArtemievaNA, WünnemannK, KrienF, et al.Ries crater and suevite revisited –observations and modeling part II: Modeling. Meteorit Planet Sci, 2013; 48(4):590–627; doi: 10.1111/maps.12085
12.
BarakatAO, RullkötterJ. Extractable and bound fatty acids in core sediments from the Nördlinger Ries, Southern Germany. Fuel, 1995; 74(3):416–425; doi: 10.1016/0016-2361(95)93476-T
13.
BarakatAO, RullkötterJ. A comparative study of molecular paleosalinity indicators: Chromans, tocopherols and C20 isoprenoid thiophenes in Miocene Lake Sediments (Nördlinger Ries, Southern Germany). Aquat Geochem, 1997; 3(2):169–190; doi: 10.1023/A:1009645510876
14.
BarakatAO, PeakmanTM, RullkötterJ. Isolation and structural characterization of 10-oxo-octadecanoic acid in some lacustrine sediments from the Nördlinger Ries (Southern Germany). Org Geochem, 1994; 21(8–9):841–847; doi: 10.1016/0146-6380(94)90043-4
15.
BarakatAO, BaumgartS, BrocksP, et al.Alkylated phenol series in lacustrine black shales from the Nördlinger Ries, Southern Germany. J Mass Spectrom, 2012; 47(8):987–994; doi: 10.1002/jms.3049
16.
BarakatAO, Scholz-BöttcherBM, RullkötterJ. Lipids in a sulfur-rich lacustrine sediment from the Nördlinger Ries (Southern Germany) with a focus on free and bound sterols. Geochem J, 2013; 47(4):397–407; doi: 10.2343/geochemj.2.0258
17.
BarkanY, ParisG, WebbSM, et al.Sulfur isotope fractionation between aqueous and carbonate-associated sulfate in abiotic calcite and aragonite. Geochim Cosmochim Acta, 2020; 280:317–339; doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2020.03.022
18.
BarlowNG.A review of martian impact crater ejecta structures and their implications for target properties. In: Large Meteorite Impacts III. (KenkmannT, HörzF, DeutschA. eds.) Geological Society of America: Boulder, Colorado; 2005; pp 433–442.
19.
BauneC, BöttcherME. Experimental investigation of sulphur isotope partitioning during outgassing of hydrogen sulphide from diluted aqueous solutions and seawater. Isotopes Environ Health Stud, 2010; 46(4):444–453; doi: 10.1080/10256016.2010.536230
20.
BergerJA, SchmidtME, GellertR, et al.Zinc and germanium in the sedimentary rocks of Gale Crater on Mars indicate hydrothermal enrichment followed by diagenetic fractionation. J Geophys Res Planets, 2017; 122(8):1747–1772; doi: 10.1002/2017JE005290
21.
BernerZA, PucheltH, NöltnerT, et al.Pyrite geochemistry in the Toarcian Posidonia Shale of South-West Germany: Evidence for contrasting trace-element patterns of diagenetic and syngenetic pyrites. Sedimentology, 2013; 60(2):548–573; doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3091.2012.01350.x
22.
BöttcherME, SchnetgerB.Direct measurement of the content and isotopic composition of sulfur in black shales by means of Combustion-Isotope-ratio-monitoring Mass Spectrometry (C-IrmMS). In: Handbook of Stable Isotope Analytical Techniques, Part I. (de GrootP. ed.) Elsevier: Netherlands; 2004; pp 597–603.
23.
BöttcherME, BrumsackH-J, de LangeGJ. Sulfate reduction and related stable isotope (34S, 18O) variations in interstitial waters from the Eastern Mediterranean. In: Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Scientific Results. (RobertsonAHF, EmeisKC, RichterC, et al. eds.) College Station, TX; 1998; pp 365–373.
24.
BöttcherME, SievertSM, KueverJ. Fractionation of sulfur isotopes during dissimilatory reduction of sulfate by a thermophilic Gram-negative bacterium at 60°C. Arch Microbiol, 1999; 172(2):125–128; doi: 10.1007/s002030050749
25.
BrandWA, CoplenTB. Stable isotope deltas: Tiny, yet robust signatures in nature. Isot Environ Health Stud, 2012; 48(3):393–409; doi: 10.1080/10256016.2012.666977
26.
BrunnerB, BernasconiSM, KleikemperJ, et al.A model for oxygen and sulfur isotope fractionation in sulfate during bacterial sulfate reduction processes. Geochim Cosmochim Acta, 2005; 69(20):4773–4785; doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2005.04.017
27.
ButlerIB, BöttcherME, RickardD, et al.Sulfur isotope partitioning during experimental formation of pyrite via the polysulfide and hydrogen sulphide pathways: Implications for the interpretation of sedimentary and hydrothermal pyrite isotope records. Earth Planet Sci Lett, 2004; 228(3–4):495–509; doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2004.10.005
28.
CaiC, LiH, LiK, et al.Thermochemical sulfate reduction in sedimentary basins and beyond: A review. Chem Geol, 2022; 607:121018; doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2022.121018
29.
CanfieldDE.Biogeochemistry of sulfur isotopes. Rev Mineral Geochem, 2001; 43:607; doi: 10.2138/gsrmg.43.1.607
30.
CanfieldDE, RaiswellR, WestrichJT, et al.The use of chromium reduction in the analysis of reduced inorganic sulfur in sediments and shales. Chem Geol, 1986; 54(1–2):149–155; doi: 10.1016/0009-2541(86)90078-1
31.
CanfieldDE, HabichtKS, ThamdrupB. The Archean sulfur cycle and the early history of atmospheric oxygen. Science, 2000; 288(5466):658–661; doi: 10.1126/science.288.5466.658
32.
CanfieldDE, FarquharJ, ZerkleAL. High isotope fractionations during sulfate reduction in a low-sulfate euxinic ocean analog. Geology, 2010; 38(5):415–418; doi: 10.1130/G30723.1
33.
CaudillC, OsinskiGR, GreenbergerRN, et al.Origin of the degassing pipes at the Ries impact structure and implications for impact-induced alteration on Mars and other planetary bodies. Meteorit Planet Sci, 2021; 56(2):404–422; doi: 10.1111/maps.13600
34.
ClarkBC, BairdAK, WeldonRJ, et al.Chemical composition of martian fines. J Geophys Res, 1982; 87(B12):10059; doi: 10.1029/JB087iB12p10059
35.
CockellCS, OsinskiG, SapersH, et al.Microbial life in impact craters. Curr Issues Mol Biol, 2020; 38:75–102; doi: 10.21775/cimb.038.075
36.
CollinsA.Geochemistry of Oilfield Waters. Elsevier: Amsterdam; 1975.
37.
CroweSA, ParisG, KatsevS, et al.Sulfate was a trace constituent of Archean seawater. Science, 2014; 346(6210):735–739; doi: 10.1126/science.1258966
38.
DavidsonMM, BisherME, PrattLM, et al.Sulfur isotope enrichment during maintenance metabolism in the thermophilic sulfate-reducing bacterium Desulfotomaculum putei. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2009; 75(17):5621–5630; doi: 10.1128/AEM.02948-08
39.
DeamerD, DamerB, KompanichenkoV. Hydrothermal chemistry and the origin of cellular life. Astrobiology, 2019; 19(12):1523–1537; doi: 10.1089/ast.2018.1979
40.
Di VincenzoG.High precision multi-collector 40Ar/39Ar dating of moldavites (Central European tektites) reconciles geochrological and paleomagnetic data. Chem Geol, 2022; 608:121026; doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2022.121026
41.
DingT, ValkiersS, KipphardtH, et al.Calibrated sulfur isotope abundance ratios of three IAEA sulfur isotope reference materials and V-CDT with a reassessment of the atomic weight of sulfur. Geochim Cosmochim Acta, 2001; 65(15):2433–2437; doi: 10.1016/S0016-7037(01)00611-1
42.
EigenbrodeJL, SummonsRE, SteeleA, et al.Organic matter preserved in 3-billion-year-old mudstones at Gale Crater, Mars. Science, 2018; 360(6393):1096–1101; doi: 10.1126/science.aas9185
43.
EldridgeDL, GuoW, FarquharJ. Theoretical estimates of equilibrium sulfur isotope effects in aqueous sulfur systems: Highlighting the role of isomers in the sulfite and sulfoxylate systems. Geochim Cosmochim Acta, 2016; 195:171–200; doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2016.09.021
44.
ElsgaardL, IsaksenMF, JørgensenBB, et al.Microbial sulfate reduction in deep-sea sediments at the Guaymas Basin hydrothermal vent area: Influence of temperature and substrates. Geochim Cosmochim Acta, 1994; 58(16):3335–3343; doi: 10.1016/0016-7037(94)90089-2
45.
FarmerJD.Hydrothermal systems: Doorways to early biosphere evolution. GSA Today, 2000; 10(7):1–9.
46.
FichtnerV, StraussH, ImmenhauserA, et al.Diagenesis of carbonate associated sulfate. Chem Geol, 2017; 463:61–75; doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2017.05.008
47.
FörstnerVU.Geochemical investigations on the sediments of Lake Ries (research borehole Nördlingen 1973). Geol Bavarica, 1977; 75:13–19.
48.
FranzHB, McAdamAC, MingDW, et al.Large sulfur isotope fractionations in martian sediments at Gale Crater. Nat Geosci, 2017; 10(9):658–662; doi: 10.1038/ngeo3002
49.
FranzHB, KingPL, GaillardF. Sulfur onMars from the atmosphere to the core. In: Volatiles in the Martian Crust. (Filberto J, Schwenzer P. eds.) Elsevier: Amsterdam; 2019.
50.
FryB, GestH, HayesJM. Sulfur isotope effects associated with protonation of HS- and volatilization of H2S. Chem Geol, 1986; 58(3):253–258; doi: 10.1016/0168-9622(86)90014-X
51.
FüchtbauerH, von der BrelieG, DehmR, et al.Tertiary lake sediments of the Ries, research borehole Nördlingen 1973—A summary. Geol Bavarica, 1977; 75:13–19
52.
GillBC, LyonsTW, FrankTD. Behavior of carbonate-associated sulfate during meteoric diagenesis and implications for the sulfur isotope paleoproxy. Geochim Cosmochim Acta, 2008; 72(19):4699–4711; doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2008.07.001
53.
GoldfarbRJ, NewberryRJ, PickthornWJ, et al.Oxygen, hydrogen, and sulfur isotope studies in the Juneau Gold Belt, southeastern Alaska; constraints on the origin of hydrothermal fluids. Econ Geol, 1991; 86(1):66–80; doi: 10.2113/gsecongeo.86.1.66
54.
GoudgeTA, MustardJF, HeadJW, et al. Assessing the mineralogy of the watershed and fan deposits of the Jezero Crater paleolake system, Mars., J Geophys Res Planets, 2015;120(4): 775–808; doi: 10.1002/2014JE00, 4782
GrotzingerJP, GuptaS, MalinMC, et al.Deposition, exhumation, and paleoclimate of an ancient lake deposit, Gale Crater, Mars. Science, 2015; 350(6257):aac7575; doi: 10.1126/science.aac7575
57.
HabichtKS, GadeM, ThamdrupB, et al.Calibration of sulfate levels in the Archean ocean. Science, 2002; 298(5602):2372–2374; doi: 10.1126/science.1078265
58.
HabichtKS, SallingL, ThamdrupB, et al.Effect of low sulfate concentrations on lactate oxidation and isotope fractionation during sulfate reduction by Archaeoglobus fulgidus strain Z. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2005; 71(7):3770–3777; doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.7.3770-3777.2005
59.
Hamilton-BrehmSD, GibsonRA, GreenSJ, et al.Thermodesulfobacterium geofontis sp. nov., a hyperthermophilic, sulfate-reducing bacterium isolated from Obsidian Pool, Yellowstone National Park. Extremophiles, 2013; 17(2):251–263; doi: 10.1007/s00792-013-0512-1
60.
HarrisonAG, ThodeHG. Mechanism of the bacterial reduction of sulphate from isotope fractionation studies. Trans Faraday Soc, 1958; 54:84; doi: 10.1039/tf9585400084
61.
HartmannM, NielsenH. δ34S values in recent sea sediments and their significance using several sediment profiles from the western Baltic Sea. Isot Environ Health Stud, 2012; 48(1):7–32; doi: 10.1080/10256016.2012.660528
62.
HaysLE, GrahamHV, Des MaraisDJ, et al.Biosignature preservation and detection in Mars analog environments. Astrobiology, 2017; 17(4):363–400; doi: 10.1089/ast.2016.1627
63.
HendrixAR, HurfordTA, BargeLM, et al.The NASA Roadmap to ocean worlds. Astrobiology, 2019; 19(1):1–27; doi: 10.1089/ast.2018.1955
64.
HoefsJ.Stable Isotope Geochemistry, 9th ed. Springer International Publishing: New York City; 2021.
65.
HofmannP, LeythaeuserD, SchwarkL. Organic matter from the Bunte Breccia of the Ries Crater, southern Germany: Investigating possible thermal effects of the impact. Planet Space Sci, 2001; 49(8):845–851; doi: 10.1016/S0032-0633(01)00034-4
66.
HörzF, OstertagR, RaineyDA. Bunte Breccia of the Ries: Continuous deposits of large impact craters. Rev Geophys, 1983; 21(8):1667; doi: 10.1029/RG021i008p01667
67.
IvanovBA.Heating of the lithosphere during meteorite cratering. Sol Syst Res, 2004; 38(4):266–279; doi: 10.1023/B:SOLS.0000037462.56729.ba
68.
JankowskiB.The post-impact sediments in the research well Nördlingen 1973. Geol Bavarica, 1977; 75:21–36.
KacarB, GarciaAK, AnbarAD. Evolutionary history of bioessential elements can guide the search for life in the universe. ChemBioChem, 2021; 22(1):114–119; doi: 10.1002/cbic.202000500
71.
KaplanIR, RittenbergSC. Microbiological fractionation of sulphur isotopes. J Gen Microbiol, 1964; 34(2):195–212; doi: 10.1099/00221287-34-2-195
72.
KenkmannT, SchönianF. Ries and Chicxulub: Impact craters on Earth provide insights for Martian ejecta blankets. Meteorit Planet Sci, 2006; 41(10):1587–1603; doi: 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2006.tb00437.x
73.
KingPL, McLennanSM. Sulfur on Mars. Elements, 2010; 6(2):107; doi: 10.2113/gselements.6.2.107
74.
KirsimäeK, OsinskiGR. Impact-induced hydrothermal activity. In: Impact Cratering. (OsinskiGR, PierazzoE. eds.) Wiley-Blackwell: West Sussex, UK; 2012; pp. 76–89.
75.
KringDA.Impact events and their effect on the origin, evolution, and distribution of life. GSA Today, 2000; 10(8):1–7.
76.
KringDA, WhitehouseMJ, SchmiederM. Microbial sulfur isotope fractionation in the Chicxulub hydrothermal system. Astrobiology, 2021; 21(1):103–114; doi: 10.1089/ast.2020.2286
77.
KutuzovI, RosenbergYO, BishopA, et al.The origin of organic sulphur compounds and their impact on the paleoenvironmental record. In: Hydrocarbons, Oils and Lipids: Diversity, Origin, Chemistry and Fate, Handbook of Hydrocarbon and Lipid Microbiology. (WilkesH, ed.) Springer: Cham, Switzerland; 2020; pp 355–408.
78.
LéveilléR.A half-century of terrestrial analog studies: From craters on the moon to searching for life on Mars. Planet Space Sci, 2010; 58(4):631–638; doi: 10.1016/j.pss.2009.04.001
79.
LiaghatiT, CoxMR, PredaM. Distribution of Fe in waters and bottom sediments of a small estuarine catchment, Pumicestone region, southeast Queensland, Australia. Sci Tot Env, 2005; 336(1–3):243–254; doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.05.028
80.
LorandJ, LabidiJ, Rollion-BardC, et al.The sulfur budget and sulfur isotopic composition of martian regolith breccia NWA 7533. Meteorit Planet Sci, 2020; 55(9):2097–2116; doi: 10.1111/maps.13564
81.
LyonsTW, GillBC. Ancient sulfur cycling and oxygenation of the early biosphere. Elements, 2016; 6(2):93–99; doi: 10.2113/gselements.6.2.93
82.
MaQ, EllisGS, AmraniA, et al.Theoretical study on the reactivity of sulfate species with hydrocarbons. Geochim Cosmochim Acta, 2008; 72(18):4565–4576; doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2008.05.061
MachelHG.Bacterial and thermochemical sulfate reduction in diagenetic settings—Old and new insights. Sediment Geol, 2001; 140(1–2):143–175; doi: 10.1016/S0037-0738(00)00176-7
85.
MachelHG, KrouseHR, SassenR. Products and distinguishing criteria of bacterial and thermochemical sulfate reduction. Appl Geochem, 1995; 10(4):373–389; doi: 10.1016/0883-2927(95)00008-8
86.
MangoldN, GuptaS, GasnaultO, et al.Perseverance rover reveals an ancient delta-lake system and flood deposits at Jezero Crater, Mars. Science, 2021; 374(6568):eab14051; doi: 10.1126/science.abl4051
87.
MariniL, MorettiR, AccorneroM. Sulfur isotopes in magmatic-hydrothermal systems, melts, and magmas. Rev Mineral Geochem, 2011; 73(1):423–492; doi: 10.2138/rmg.2011.73.14
88.
McLennanSM, AndersonRB, BellJF, et al. Elemental geochemistry of sedimentary rocks at Yellowknife Bay, Gale Crater, Mars., Science, 2014;343(6169): 1244734; doi: 10.1126/science.124, 4734
89.
MeshoulamA, EllisGS, Said AhmadW, et al.Study of thermochemical sulfate reduction mechanism using compound specific sulfur isotope analysis. Geochim Cosmochim Acta, 2016; 188:73–92; doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2016.05.026
90.
MitchellK, HeyerA, CanfieldDE, et al.Temperature effect on the sulfur isotope fractionation during sulfate reduction by two strains of the hyperthermophilic Archaeoglobus fulgidus. Environ Microbiol, 2009; 11(12):2998–3006; doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.02002.x
91.
MontanoD, GasparriniM, GerdesA, et al.In-situ U-Pb dating of Ries Crater lacustrine carbonates (Miocene, South-West Germany): Implications for continental carbonate chronostratigraphy. Earth Planet Sci Lett, 2021; 568:117011; doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2021.117011
92.
MuttikN, KirsimäeK, VennemannTW. Stable isotope composition of smectite in suevites at the Ries Crater, Germany: Implications for hydrous alteration of impactites. Earth Planet Sci Lett, 2010; 299(1–2):190–195; doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2010.08.034
93.
MuttikN, KirsimäeK, NewsomHE, et al.Boron isotope composition of secondary smectite in suevites at the Ries Crater, Germany: Boron fractionation in weathering and hydrothermal processes. Earth Planet Sci Lett, 2011; 310(3–4):244–251; doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2011.08.028
94.
NewsomHE, GraupG, SewardsT, et al.Fluidization and hydrothermal alteration of the suevite deposit at the Ries Crater, West Germany, and implications for Mars. J Geophys Res, 1986; 91(B13):E239; doi: 10.1029/JB091iB13p0E239
95.
NewsomHE, GraupG, IseriDA, et al.The formation of the Ries Crater, West Germany; Evidence of atmospheric interactions during a larger cratering event. In: Global Catastrophes in Earth History; An Interdisciplinary Conference on Impacts, Volcanism, and Mass Mortality. (SharptonVL, WardPD. eds.). Geological Society of America: Boulder, Colorado; 1990; pp 195–206.
96.
NielsenH.Sulfur-isotope ratios in strata-bound mineralizations in central Europe. Geol Jb D, 1985; 70:225–262.
97.
NielsenH, PilotJ, GrinenkoLN, et al.Lithospheric sources of sulphur. In: Stable Isotopes: Natural and Anthropogenic Sulphur in the Environment. (KrouseHR, GrinenkoVA. eds.) John Wiley and Sons: Chichester, UK; SCOPE-43; 1991; pp. 65–132.
98.
NozakiT, NagaseT, UshikuboT, et al.Microbial sulfate reduction plays an important role at the initial stage of subseafloor sulfide mineralization. Geology, 2020; 49(2):222–227; doi: 10.1130/G47943.1
OhmotoH, GoldhaberMB. Sulfur and Carbon Isotopes. Geochemistry of Hydrothermal Ore Deposits, 3rd ed. (BarnesHL. ed.) John Wiley and Sons: New York; 1997.
101.
OrrWL.Changes in sulfur content and isotopic ratios of sulfur during petroleum maturation—Study of big horn basin paleozoic oils. AAPG Bull, 1974; 58(11):2295–2318; doi: 10.1306/83D91B9B-16C7-11D7-8645000102C1865D.
102.
OsinskiGR.Hydrothermal activity associated with the Ries impact event, Germany. Geofluids, 2005; 5(3):202–220; doi: 10.1111/j.1468-8123.2005.00119.x
103.
OsinskiGR, GrieveRAF, SprayJG. The nature of the groundmass of surficial suevite from the Ries impact structure, Germany, and constraints on its origin. Meteorit Planet Sci, 2004; 39(10):1655–1683; doi: 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2004.tb00065.x
104.
OsinskiGR, TornabeneLL, BanerjeeNR, et al.Impact-generated hydrothermal systems on Earth and Mars. Icarus, 2013; 224(2):347–363; doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2012.08.030
105.
OsinskiGR, GrieveRAF, ChanouA, et al.The “Suevite” conundrum, Part 1: The Ries suevite and sudbury onaping formation compared. Meteorit Planet Sci, 2016; 51(12):2316–2333; doi: 10.1111/maps.12728
106.
OsinskiGR, CockellCS, PontefractA, et al.The role of meteorite impacts in the origin of life. Astrobiology, 2020; 20(9):1121–1149; doi: 10.1089/ast.2019.2203
107.
PacheM, ReitnerJ, ArpG. Geochemical evidence for the formation of a large Miocene “Travertine” mound at a sublacustrine spring in a Soda Lake (Wallerstein Castle Rock, Nördlinger Ries, Germany). Facies, 2001; 45(1):211–230; doi: 10.1007/BF02668114
108.
ParnellJ, BoyceA, ThackreyS, et al.Sulfur isotope signatures for rapid colonization of an impact crater by thermophilic microbes. Geology, 2010; 38(3):271–274; doi: 10.1130/G30615.1
109.
PassierHF, MiddelburgJJ, de LangeGJ, et al.Modes of sapropel formation in the eastern Mediterranean: Some constraints based on pyrite properties. Mar Geol, 1999; 153(1–4):199–219; doi: 10.1016/S0025-3227(98)00081-4
110.
PohlJ, StöfflerD, GallH, et al.The Ries impact crater. In: Impact and Explosion Cratering. (RoddyD, PepinR, MerrillR. eds.) Pergamon: New York; 1977; pp 343–404.
111.
PohlJ, PoschlodK, ReimoldWU, et al.Ries Crater, Germany: The Enkingen magnetic anomaly and associated drill core SUBO 18. In: Large Meteorite Impacts and Planetary Evolution IV. (GibsonRL, ReimoldWU. eds.) The Geological Society of America: Boulder, Colorado; 2010; pp 141–163.
112.
RampeEB, BlakeDF, BristowTF, et al.Mineralogy and geochemistry of sedimentary rocks and eolian sediments in Gale Crater, Mars: A review after six earth years of exploration with curiosity. Geochemistry, 2020; 80(2):125605; doi: 10.1016/j.chemer.2020.125605
113.
ReeseBK, AndersonMA, AmrheinC. Hydrogen sulfide production and volatilization in a polymictic eutrophic saline lake, Salton Sea, California. Sci Total Environ, 2008; 406(1–2):205–218; doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.07.021
114.
ReimoldWU, HansenBK, JacobJ, et al.Petrography of the impact breccias of the Enkingen (SUBO 18) drill core, southern Ries Crater, Germany: New estimate of impact melt volume. Geol Soc Am Bull, 2012; 124(1–2):104–132; doi: 10.1130/B30470.1
115.
ReimoldWU, McDonaldI, SchmittR-T, et al. Geochemical studies of the SUBO 18 (Enkingen) drill core and other impact breccias from the Ries Crater, Germany., Meteorit Planet Sci, 2013;48(9): 1531–1571; doi: 10.1111/maps.1, 2175
116.
RickardD.Geochemistry of framboids. In: Framboids. (RickardD. ed.) Oxford University Press: New York; 2021; pp. 169–190.
117.
RullkötterJ, LittkeR, SchaeferRG. Characterization of organic matter in sulfur-rich lacustrine sediments of Miocene Age (Nördlinger Ries, southern Germany). In: Geochemistry of Sulfur in Fossil Fuels. (OrrWL, WhiteCM. eds.) American Chemical Society: Washington, D.C.; 1990; pp 149–169.
118.
SakaiH.Fractionation of sulphur isotopes in nature. Geochim Cosmochim Acta, 1957; 12(1–2):150–169; doi: 10.1016/0016-7037(57)90025-X
119.
SakaiH.Isotopic properties of sulfur compounds in hydrothermal processes. Geochem J, 1968; 2(1):29–49; doi: 10.2343/geochemj.2.29
120.
SandfordSA, NuevoM, BeraPP, et al.Prebiotic astrochemistry and the formation of molecules of astrobiological interest in interstellar clouds and protostellar disks. Chem Rev, 2020; 120(11):4616–4659; doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00560
121.
SapersHM, OsinskiGR, FlemmingRL, et al.Evidence for a spatially extensive hydrothermal system at the Ries impact structure, Germany. Meteorit Planet Sci, 2017; 52(2):351–371; doi: 10.1111/maps.12796
122.
SchaeferB, GriceK, CoolenMJL, et al.Microbial life in the nascent Chicxulub Crater. Geology, 2020; 48(4):328–332; doi: 10.1130/G46799.1
123.
SchaeferB, SchwarkL, BöttcherME, et al.Paleoenvironmental evolution during the early Eocene climate optimum in the Chicxulub impact crater. Earth Planet Sci Lett, 2022; 589:117589; doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2022.1175
124.
SchwenzerSP, KringDA. Impact-generated hydrothermal systems capable of forming phyllosilicates on Noachian Mars. Geology, 2009; 37(12):1091–1094; doi: 10.1130/G30340A.1
125.
SealRR.Sulfur isotope geochemistry of sulfide minerals. Rev Mineral Geochem, 2006; 61(1):633–677; doi: 10.2138/rmg.2006.61.12
126.
SharpZ.Principles of Stable Isotope Geochemistry, 2nd ed. Prentice Hall: Upper Sadle River, NJ; 2017.
127.
SimMS, BosakT, OnoS. Large sulfur isotope fractionation does not require disproportionation. Science, 2011; 333(6038):74–77; doi: 10.1126/science.1205103
128.
SimMS, SessionsAL, OrphanVJ, et al.Precise determination of equilibrium sulfur isotope effects during volatilization and deprotonation of dissolved H2S. Geochim Cosmochim Acta, 2019; 248:242–251; doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2019.01.016
129.
SquyresSW, GrotzingerJP, ArvidsonRE, et al. In situ evidence for an ancient aqueous environment at Meridiani Planum, Mars., Science, 2004;306(5702): 1709–1714; doi: 10.1126/science.110, 4559
130.
StetterKO.Archaeoglobus fulgidus gen. nov., sp. nov.: A new taxon of extremely thermophilic Archaebacteria. Syst Appl Microbiol, 1988; 10(2):172–173; doi: 10.1016/S0723-2020(88)80032-8
131.
StetterKO, LauererG, ThommM, et al.Isolation of extremely thermophilic sulfate reducers: Evidence for a novel branch of Archaebacteria. Science, 1987; 236(4803):822–824; doi: 10.1126/science.236.4803.822
132.
StöfflerD.Research Drilling Nördlingen 1973: Polymict breccias, crater basement, and cratering model of the Ries impact structure. Geol Bavarica, 1977; 75:443–458.
133.
StöfflerD, ArtemievaNA, WünnemannK, et al.Ries Crater and suevite revisited –observations and modeling part I: Observations. Meteorit Planet Sci, 2013; 48(4):515–589; doi: 10.1111/maps.12086
134.
StüekenEE, TinoCJ, ArpG, et al.Nitrogen isotope ratios trace high-pH conditions in a terrestrial Mars analog site. Sci Adv, 2020; 6(9):eaay3440; doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aay3440
135.
SturmS, WulfG, JungD, et al.The Ries impact, a double-layer rampart crater on Earth. Geology, 2013; 41(5):531–534; doi: 10.1130/G33934.1
136.
SurkovA, BöttcherME, KueverJ. Sulphur isotope fractionation during the reduction of elemental sulphur and thiosulphate by Dethiosulfovibrio spp. Isot Environ Health Stud, 2012; 48(1):65–75; doi: 10.1080/10256016.2011.626525
VanimanDT, BishDL, MingDW, et al.Mineralogy of a mudstone at Yellowknife Bay, Gale Crater, Mars. Science, 2014; 343(6169):1243480; doi: 10.1126/science.1243480
139.
ViolaD, McEwenAS, DundasCM, et al.Subsurface volatile content of martian double-layer ejecta (DLE) craters. Icarus, 2017; 284:325–343; doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2016.11.031
140.
von EngelhardtW.Distribution, petrography and shock metamorphism of the ejecta of the Ries Crater in Germany—A review. Tectonophysics, 1990; 171(1–4):259–273; doi: 10.1016/0040-1951(90)90104-G
141.
von EngelhardtW.Suevite breccia of the Ries impact crater, Germany: Petrography, chemistry and shock metamorphism of crystalline rock clasts. Meteorit Planet Sci, 1997; 32(4):545–554; doi: 10.1111/j.1945-5100.1997.tb01299.x
142.
von GehlenK, NielsenH. Sulfur isotopes and the formation of stratabound lead-bearing Triassic sandstones in northeastem Bavaria. Geol Jb D, 1985; 70:212–223.
143.
WatanabeY, FarquharJ, OhmotoH. Anomalous fractionations of sulfur isotopes during thermochemical sulfate reduction. Science, 2009; 324(5925):370–373; doi: 10.1126/science.1169289
144.
WeberA, JørgensenBB. Bacterial sulfate reduction in hydrothermal sediments of the Guaymas Basin, Gulf of California, Mexico. Deep Sea Res I Oceanogr Res Pap, 2002; 49(5):827–841; doi: 10.1016/S0967-0637(01)00079-6
145.
WestrichJT, BernerRA. The role of sedimentary organic matter in bacterial sulfate reduction: The G model tested. Limnol Oceanogr, 1984; 29(2):236–249; doi: 10.4319/lo.1984.29.2.0236
146.
WinklerH.The groundwater in the N—rdlinger Ries, taking into account the hydrological and hydrochemical relationships to the reservoir rock. Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität: München; 1972.
147.
WolfM.Coal petrographic investigations of the lake sediments of the research well Nördlingen 1973 and Comparison with other research results from the team. Geol Bavarica, 1977; 75:127–138.
148.
WordsworthR, KnollAH, HurowitzJ, et al.A coupled model of episodic warming, oxidation and geochemical transitions on early Mars. Nat Geosci, 2021; 14(3):127–132; doi: 10.1038/s41561-021-00701-8
YangS, SchulzH-M, HorsfieldB, et al.Geological alteration of organic macromolecules by irradiation: Implication for organic matter occurrence on Mars. Geology, 2020; 48(7):713–717; doi: 10.1130/G47171.1
151.
ZhangT, AmraniA, EllisGS, et al.Experimental investigation on thermochemical sulfate reduction by H2S initiation. Geochim Cosmochim Acta, 2008; 72(14):3518–3530; doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2008.04.036
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
