Potential biosignatures that offer the promise of extraterrestrial life (past or present) are to be expected in the coming years and decades, whether from within our own solar system, from an exoplanet atmosphere, or otherwise. With each such potential biosignature, the degree of our uncertainty will be the first question asked. Have we really identified extraterrestrial life? How sure are we? This paper considers the problem of unconceived alternative explanations. We stress that articulating our uncertainty requires an assessment of the extent to which we have explored the relevant possibility space. It is argued that, for most conceivable potential biosignatures, we currently have not explored the relevant possibility space very thoroughly at all. Not only does this severely limit the circumstances in which we could reasonably be confident in our detection of extraterrestrial life, it also poses a significant challenge to any attempt to quantify our degree of uncertainty. The discussion leads us to the following recommendation: when it comes specifically to an extraterrestrial life-detection claim, the astrobiology community should follow the uncertainty assessment approach adopted by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllwoodAC, RosingMT, FlanneryDT, et al.Reassessing evidence of life in 3,700-million-year-old rocks of Greenland. Nature, 2018; 563(7730):241–244; doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0610-4.
2.
AlmárI, RaceMS. Discovery of extra-terrestrial life: Assessment by scales of its importance and associated risks. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci, 2011; 369(1936):679–692; doi: 10.1098/rsta.2010.0227.
3.
BrasierMD, GreenOR, JephcoatAP, et al.Questioning the evidence for Earth's oldest fossils. Nature, 2002; 416:76–81.
4.
BudescuDV, PorH-H, BroomellSB. Effective communication of uncertainty in the IPCC reports. Climatic Change,, 2012; 113(2):181–200; doi: 10.1007/s10584-011-0330-3.
5.
BudescuDV, PorH.-H, BroomellSB, et al.The interpretation of IPCC probabilistic statements around the world. Nature Climate Change,, 2014; 4(6):508–512; doi: 10.1038/nclimate2194.
6.
CadySL, FarmerJD, GrotzingerJP, et al.Morphological biosignatures and the search for life on Mars. Astrobiology, 2003; 3(2):351–368; doi: 10.1089/153110703769016442.
7.
CapeceMC, ClarkE, SalehJK, et al.Polyextremophiles and the constraints for terrestrial habitability. In Polyextremophiles: Life Under Multiple Forms of Stress. (SeckbachJ, OrenA, Stan-LotterH. eds.) Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2013; pp 3–59.
8.
CatlingDC, Krissansen-TottonJ, KiangNY, et al.Exoplanet biosignatures: A framework for their assessment. Astrobiology, 2018; 18(6):709–738; doi: 10.1089/ast.2017.1737.
DawidR, HartmannS, SprengerJ. The no alternatives argument. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 2015; 66(1):213–234.
11.
DenningK, DickS. Preparing for the discovery of life beyond Earth. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, 2019; 51(7):183.
12.
Des MaraisDJ, AllamandolaLJ, BennerSA, et al.The NASA Astrobiology Roadmap. Astrobiology, 2003; 3(2):219–235; doi: 10.1089/153110703769016299.
13.
DickSJ.Lessons learned from the twentieth-century extraterrestrial life debate. In Space, Time, and Aliens: Collected Works on Cosmos and Culture. (DickSJ. ed.) Springer International Publishing: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2020; pp 695–721.
14.
García-RuizJM, HydeST, CarnerupAM, et al.Self-assembled silica-carbonate structures and detection of ancient microfossils. Science, 2003; 302:1194–1197.
15.
GoldenDC, MingDW, SchwandtCS, et al.A simple inorganic process for formation of carbonates, magnetite, and sulfides in martian meteorite ALH84001. Am Mineral, 2001; 86(3):370–375; doi: 10.2138/am-2001-2-321.
16.
GreenJ, HoehlerT, NeveuM, et al.Call for a framework for reporting evidence for life beyond Earth. Nature, 2021; 598(7882):575–579; doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03804-9.
17.
HarrisonJP, GheeraertN, TsigelnitskiyD, et al.The limits for life under multiple extremes. Trends Microbiol, 2013; 21(4):204–212; doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2013.01.006.
18.
Hoegh-GuldbergO, JacobD, BindiM, et al.Impacts of 1.5°C Global Warming on Natural and Human Systems. 2018. Available from https://helda.helsinki.fi/handle/10138/311749 [Last accessed 07/05/2023].
19.
KauseA, Bruine de BruinW, PerssonJ, et al.Confidence levels and likelihood terms in IPCC reports: A survey of experts from different scientific disciplines. Climatic Change, 2022; 173(1):2; doi: 10.1007/s10584-022-03382-3.
20.
Krissansen-TottonJ, OlsonS, CatlingDC. Disequilibrium biosignatures over Earth history and implications for detecting exoplanet life. Sci Adv, 2018; 4(1):eaao5747; doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aao5747.
21.
MachKJ, MastrandreaMD, FreemanPT, et al.Unleashing expert judgment in assessment. Global Environmental Change, 2017; 44:1–14; doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.02.005.
22.
MartelJ, YoungD, PengH-H, et al.Biomimetic properties of minerals and the search for life in the martian meteorite ALH84001. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci, 2012; 40(1):167–193; doi: 10.1146/annurev-earth-042711-105401.
23.
MastrandreaMD, MachKJ. Treatment of uncertainties in IPCC Assessment Reports: Past approaches and considerations for the Fifth Assessment Report. Climatic Change, 2011; 108(4):659; doi: 10.1007/s10584-011-0177-7.
24.
MastrandreaMD, FieldCB, StockerTF, et al.Guidance Note for Lead Authors of the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report on Consistent Treatment of Uncertainties (p. 7). Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Geneva, Switzerland, 2010; p 7.
25.
MastrandreaMD, MachKJ, PlattnerG-K, et al.The IPCC AR5 guidance note on consistent treatment of uncertainties: A common approach across the working groups. Climatic Change, 2011; 108(4):675–691; doi: 10.1007/s10584-011-0178-6.
26.
McKayDS, GibsonEK, Thomas-KeprtaKL, et al.Search for past life on Mars: Possible relic biogenic activity in martian meteorite ALH84001. Science, 1996; 273(5277):924–930; doi: 10.1126/science.273.5277.924.
27.
McMahonS, CosmidisJ. False biosignatures on Mars: Anticipating ambiguity. Journal of the Geological Society, 2022; 179(2):jgs2021-050; doi: 10.1144/jgs2021-050.
28.
MeadowsVS, ReinhardCT, ArneyGN, et al.Exoplanet biosignatures: Understanding oxygen as a biosignature in the context of its environment. Astrobiology, 2018; 18(6):630–662; doi: 10.1089/ast.2017.1727.
29.
MeadowsV, GrahamH, AbrahamssonV, et al.Community Report from the Biosignatures Standards of Evidence Workshop. arXiv e-prints, 2022; arXiv:2210.14293
30.
MolinaT, AbadalE. The evolution of communicating the uncertainty of climate change to policymakers: A study of IPCC synthesis reports. Sustainability, 2021; 13(5):5; doi: 10.3390/su13052466.
31.
MossRH, SchneiderSH. Recommendations to lead authors for more consistent assessment and reporting. In Guidance Papers on the Cross Cutting Issues of the Third Assessment Report of the IPCC. (PachauriR, TaniguchiT, TanakaK. eds.) World Meteorological Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2000; p 33–51.
32.
NASEM. Origins, Worlds, and Life: A Decadal Strategy for Planetary Science and Astrobiology 2023–2032. The National Academies Press: Washington, DC, 2022a.
33.
NASEM. Independent Review of the Community Report from the Biosignature Standards of Evidence Workshop: Report Series—Committee on Astrobiology and Planetary Sciences. The National Academies Press: Washington, DC, 2022b.
34.
NutmanAP, BennettVC, FriendCRL, et al.Rapid emergence of life shown by discovery of 3,700-million-year-old microbial structures. Nature, 2016; 537(7621):7621; doi: 10.1038/nature19355.
35.
NutmanAP, BennettVC, FriendCRL, et al.Cross-examining Earth's oldest stromatolites: Seeing through the effects of heterogeneous deformation, metamorphism and metasomatism affecting Isua (Greenland) ∼3700 Ma sedimentary rocks. Precambrian Res, 2019; 331:105347; doi: 10.1016/j.precamres.2019.105347.
36.
ParkerWS. Evidence and knowledge from computer simulation. Erkenntnis, 2020; 87:1521–1538.
37.
ReaDG, O'LearyBT, SintonWM. Mars: The origin of the 3.58- and 3.69-micron minima in the infrared spectra. Science, 1965; 147(3663):1286–1288; doi: 10.1126/science.147.3663.1286.
38.
RehgW, StaleyK. “Agreement” in the IPCC confidence measure. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 2017; 57:126–134; doi: 10.1016/j.shpsb.2016.10.008.
39.
RouillardJ, García-RuizJ-M, GongJ, et al.A morphogram for silica-witherite biomorphs and its application to microfossil identification in the early Earth rock record. Geobiology, 2018; 16(3):279–296; doi: 10.1111/gbi.12278.
40.
SchopfJW, PackerBM. Early Archean (3.3-billion to 3.5-billion-year-old) microfossils from Warrawoona Group, Australia. Science, 1987; 237:70–73.
41.
SchwietermanEW, KiangNY, ParenteauMN, et al.Exoplanet biosignatures: A review of remotely detectable signs of life. Astrobiology, 2018; 18(6):663–708; doi: 10.1089/ast.2017.1729.
42.
ShirkJS, HaseltineWA, PimentelGC. Sinton bands: Evidence for deuterated water on Mars. Science, 1965; 147(3653):48–49; doi: 10.1126/science.147.3653.48.
43.
SimonciniE, VirgoN, KleidonA. Quantifying drivers of chemical disequilibrium: Theory and application to methane in the Earth's atmosphere. Earth System Dynamics, 2013; 4(2):317–331; doi: 10.5194/esd-4-317-2013.
44.
SintonWM. Spectroscopic evidence for vegetation on Mars. Astrophys J, 1957; 126:231; doi: 10.1086/146393.
45.
SintonWM. Further evidence of vegetation on Mars: The presence of large organic molecules is indicated by recent infrared-spectroscopic tests. Science, 1959; 130(3384):1234–1237; doi: 10.1126/science.130.3384.1234.
46.
StanfordPK. Exceeding Our Grasp: Science, History, and the Problem of Unconceived Alternatives. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK; 2006.
47.
StanfordPK. Damn the consequences: Projective evidence and the heterogeneity of scientific confirmation. Philosophy of Science, 2011; 78(5):887–899; doi: 10.1086/662283.
48.
SteeleA, BenningLG, WirthR, et al.Organic synthesis associated with serpentinization and carbonation on early Mars. Science, 2022; 375(6577):172–177; doi: 10.1126/science.abg7905.
49.
ThompsonMA, Krissansen-TottonJ, WoganN, et al.The case and context for atmospheric methane as an exoplanet biosignature. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2022; 119(14):e2117933119; doi: 10.1073/pnas.2117933119.
50.
VickersP. Identifying Future-Proof Science. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK; 2022.
51.
WaceyD, SaundersM, KongC, et al.3.46 Ga Apex chert ‘microfossils’ reinterpreted as mineral artefacts produced during phyllosilicate exfoliation. Gondwana Research, 2016; 36:296–313.
