The purpose of this article is to reopen from a practical perspective the question of the extent in altitude of Earth's biosphere. We make a number of different suggestions for how searches for biological material could be conducted in the mesosphere and lower thermosphere, colloquially referred to as the “ignore-osphere” because it has been generally ignored in the meteorological community compared to other regions. Relatively recent technological advances such as CubeSats in very low Earth orbit or more standard approaches such as the rocket-borne MAGIC meteoric smoke particle sampler are shown as potentially viable for sampling biological material in the ignore-osphere. The issue of contamination is discussed, and a potential solution to the problem is proposed by means of a new detector design that filters for particles based on their size and relative velocity to the detector.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonRC, JanduraL, OkonAB, et al. Collecting samples in Gale Crater, Mars; An overview of the Mars Science Laboratory Sample Acquisition, Sample Processing and Handling System. Space Sci Rev, 2012; 170(1):57–75; doi: 10.1007/s11214-012-9898-9.
2.
BebberDP, HolmesT, GurrSJ. The global spread of crop pests and pathogens. Glob Ecol Biogeogr, 2014; 23(12):1398–1407; doi: 10.1111/geb.12214.
3.
BereraA.Space dust collisions as a planetary escape mechanism. Astrobiology, 2017; 17(12):1274–1282; doi: 10.1089/ast.2017.1662.
4.
BereraA and BrenerDJ.On the force of vertical winds in the upper atmosphere: Consequences for small biological particles. Proc Math Phys Eng Sci, 2022; 478(2257):20210626; doi: 10.1098/rspa.2021.0626.
5.
BirdGA.Aerodynamic effects on atmospheric composition measurements from rocket vehicles in the thermosphere. Planet Space Sci, 1988; 36(9):921–926; doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-0633(88)90099-2.
6.
BrownJK and HovmøllerMS.Aerial dispersal of pathogens on the global and continental scales and its impact on plant disease. Science, 2002; 297(5581):537–541; doi: 10.1126/science.1072678.
7.
BryanNC, ChristnerBC, GuzikTG, et al. Abundance and survival of microbial aerosols in the troposphere and stratosphere. ISME J 2019; 13(11):2789–2799; doi: 10.1038/s41396-019-0474-0.
8.
CarandenteV.New concepts of deployable de-orbit and re-entry systems for CubeSat miniaturized satellites. Recent Patents on Engineering, 2014; 8:2–12; doi: 10.2174/1872212108666140204004335.
9.
ClarkBC, KolbVM, SteeleA, et al. Origin of life on Mars: Suitability and opportunities. Life, 2021; 11(6); doi: 10.3390/life11060539.
10.
ClarkeA, MorrisGJ, FonsecaF, et al. A low temperature limit for life on Earth. PloS One 2013; 8(6):e66207; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066207.
11.
CockellCS, GronstalAL, VoytekMA, et al. Microbial abundance in the deep subsurface of the Chesapeake Bay Impact Crater: Relationship to lithology and impact processes. In The ICDP-USGS Deep Drilling Project in the Chesapeake Bay Impact Structure: Results from the Eyreville Core Holes. Geological Society of America: Boulder, CO, 2009; doi: 10.1130/2009.2458(40).
12.
DassarmaP, AntunesA, SimõesMF, et al. Earth's stratosphere and microbial life. In Astrobiology: Current, Evolving, and Emerging Perspectives. (Antunes A. ed.) Caister Academic Press: Poole, England, 2020; doi: 10.21775/9781912530304.08.
13.
DentonEH.Rocket-borne cryogenic air samplers. Science Progress, 1970; 58(232):539–561.
14.
EisenhoferR, MinichJJ, MarotzC, et al. Contamination in low microbial biomass microbiome studies: Issues and recommendations. Trends Microbiol, 2018; 27(2):105–117; doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2018.11.003.
15.
EscuderoC, OggerinM, AmilsR.The deep continental subsurface: The dark biosphere. Int Microbiol, 2018; 21(1):3–14; doi: 10.1007/s10123-018-0009-y.
16.
GrebennikovaTV, SyroeshkinAV, ShubralovaEV, et al. The DNA of bacteria of the World Ocean and the Earth in cosmic dust at the International Space Station. The Scientific World Journal, 2018; 1–7; doi: 10.1155/2018/7360147.
17.
GriffinD.Terrestrial microorganisms at 20,000 meters in Earth's atmosphere. Aerobiologia, 2004; 20:135–140; doi: 10.1023/B:AERO.0000032948.84077.12.
18.
GronstalAL, VoytekMA, KirshteinJD, et al. Contamination assessment in microbiological sampling of the Eyreville Core, Chesapeake Bay Impact Structure. In The ICDP-USGS Deep Drilling Project in the Chesapeake Bay Impact Structure: Results from the Eyreville Core Holes. Geological Society of America: Boulder, CO, 2009; doi: 10.1130/2009.2458(41).
19.
GumbelJ.Aerodynamic influences on atmospheric in situ measurements from sounding rockets. J Geophys Res Space Physics, 2001;106(A6):10553–10563; doi: 10.1029/2000JA900166.
20.
HedinJ, Gumbel J and RappM.On the efficiency of rocket-borne particle detection in the mesosphere. Atmos Chem Phys, 2007a;7(14):3701–3711; doi: 10.5194/acp-7-3701-2007.
21.
HedinJ, GumbelJ, WaldemarssonT, et al. The aerodynamics of the MAGIC meteoric smoke sampler. Adv Space Res, 2007b;40(6):818–824; doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2007.06.046.
22.
HedinJ, GiovaneF, WaldemarssonT, et al. The MAGIC meteoric smoke particle sampler. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 2014; 118:127–144; doi: 10.1016/j.jastp.2014.03.003.
23.
HeintzenbergJ, HermannM, TheissD.Out of Africa: High aerosol concentrations in the upper troposphere over Africa. Atmos Chem Phys, 2003; 3(4):1191–1198; doi: 10.5194/acp-3-1191-2003.
24.
HorányiM, GumbelJ, WittG, et al. Simulation of rocket-borne particle measurements in the mesosphere. Geophys Res Lett, 1999; 26(11):1537–1540; doi: 10.1029/1999GL900298.
ImshenetskyAA, LysenkoSV, KazakovGA. Upper boundary of the biosphere. Appl Environ Microbiol, 1978; 35(1):1–5; doi: 10.1128/aem.35.1.1-5.1978.
27.
Juanes-VallejoCM, GramaVV, KatramadosI, et al. Cranfield Astrobiological Stratospheric Sampling Experiment (Cass.E): Overview of flight hardware configuration, implemented planetary protection and contamination control procedures and preliminary post-flight results. In 20th Symposium on European Rocket and Balloon Programmes and Related Research. (Ouwehand L. ed.) ESA Special Publication: Noordwijk, the Netherlands, 2011; pp 467–472.
28.
KawaguchiY, ShibuyaM, KinoshitaI, et al. DNA damage and survival time course of Deinococcal cell pellets during 3 years of exposure to outer space. Front Microbiol, 2020; 11:2050; doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.02050.
29.
KriskoA, RadmanM. Biology of extreme radiation resistance: The way of Deinococcus radiodurans. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2013; 5(7):a012765; doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a012765.
MartellEA.High altitude air sampling with a rocketborne cryocondenser. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 1970; 9(1):170–177.
32.
MillanRM, von SteigerR, ArielM, et al. small satellites for space science: A COSPAR Scientific Roadmap. Adv Space Res, 2019; 64(8):1466–1517; doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2019.07.035.
33.
Moissl-EichingerC, CockellC, RettbergP.Venturing into new realms? Microorganisms in space. FEMS Microbiol Rev, 2016; 40(5):722–737; doi: 10.1093/femsre/fuw015.
34.
PearceDA, BridgePD, HughesKA, et al. Microorganisms in the atmosphere over Antarctica. FEMS Microbiol Ecol, 2009; 69(2):143–157; doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2009.00706.x.
35.
RichardL, BizzocoW, KelleyS. Volcanic steam vents: Life at low pH and high temperature. In Extremophiles as Astrobiological Models. (Seckbach J, Stan-Lotter H. eds.) Wiley-Scrivener: Hoboken, NJ, 2020; pp 1–20; doi: 10.1002/9781119593096.ch1.
36.
RosenJM.The vertical distribution of dust to 30 kilometers. J Geophys Res, 1964; 69(21):4673–4676; doi: 10.1029/JZ069i021p04673.
Šantl-TemkivT, AmatoP, CasamayorEO, et al. Microbial ecology of the atmosphere. FEMS Microbiol Rev, 2022; 46(4):fuac009; doi: 10.1093/femsre/fuac009.
39.
SmithD.Microbes in the upper atmosphere and unique opportunities for astrobiology research. Astrobiology, 2013; 13(10):981–990; doi: 10.1089/ast.2013.1074.
40.
SternA.Next-Generation Suborbital Researchers Conference: February 18-20, 2010. Boulder, CO; 2010.
41.
StrelnikovB. Private Communication, Leibniz-Institute of Atmospheric Physics, 2022.
42.
SudoS, MiyasakaY, NemotoK, et al. Detection of small particles in fluid flow using a self-mixing laser. Opt Express, 2007; 15(13):8135–8145; doi: 10.1364/OE.15.008135.
43.
SuessE.Die Entstehung Der Alpen. Braumüller; 1875.
44.
UrsemB.Climate shifts and the role of nano structured particles in the atmosphere. Atmospheric and Climate Sciences, 2016; 06:51–76; doi: 10.4236/acs.2016.61005.
45.
VernadskyVI.The biosphere: An envelope of the Earth. In The Biosphere. Springer: New York, 1998; pp 91–102; doi: 10.1007/978-1-4612-1750-3_8.
46.
Virgili-LlopJ, RobertsP, HaoZ, et al. Very low Earth orbit mission concepts for Earth observation: Benefits and challenges. In Proceedings of the Reinventing Space Conference. Royal Society: London, 2014.
47.
VitzthumF, GeigerG, BisswangerH, et al. A quantitative fluorescence-based microplate assay for the determination of double-stranded DNA using SYBR Green I and a standard ultraviolet transilluminator gel imaging system. Anal Biochem, 1999; 276(1):59–64; doi: 10.1006/abio.1999.4298.
48.
VossH, DaileyJ, CrowleyJ, et al. TSAT Globalstar ELaNa-5 Extremely Low-Earth Orbit (ELEO) Satellite. In 28th Annual AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites. Utah State University: Logan, UT, 2014; SSC14-WK-6.
49.
WainwrightM, WickramasingheNC, NarlikarJV, et al. Microorganisms cultured from stratospheric air samples obtained at 41 km. FEMS Microbiol Lett, 2003; 218(1):161–165; doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2003.tb11513.x.
50.
XuL, ShiG, ZhangL, et al. Number concentration, size distribution and fine particle fraction of tropospheric and stratospheric aerosols. China Particuology, 2003; 1(5):201–205; doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-2515(07)60142-0.
51.
YinY, ChenQ, JinL, et al. The effects of deep convection on the concentration and size distribution of aerosol particles within the upper troposphere: A case study. J Geophys Res Atmospheres, 2012;117(D22); doi: 10.1029/2012JD017827.
