Water present on early Mars is often assumed to have been habitable. In this study, experiments were performed to investigate the habitability of well-defined putative martian fluids and to identify the accompanying potential formation of biosignatures. Simulated martian environments were developed by combining martian fluid and regolith simulants based on the chemistry of the Rocknest sand shadow at Gale Crater. The simulated chemical environment was inoculated with terrestrial anoxic sediment from the Pyefleet mudflats (United Kingdom). These enrichments were cultured for 28 days and subsequently subcultured seven times to ensure that the microbial community was solely grown on the defined, simulated chemistry. The impact of the simulated chemistries on the microbial community was assessed by cell counts and sequencing of 16S rRNA gene profiles. Associated changes to the fluid and precipitate chemistries were established by using ICP-OES, IC, FTIR, and NIR. The fluids were confirmed as habitable, with the enriched microbial community showing a reduction in abundance and diversity over multiple subcultures relating to the selection of specific metabolic groups. The final community comprised sulfate-reducing, acetogenic, and other anaerobic and fermentative bacteria. Geochemical characterization and modeling of the simulant and fluid chemistries identified clear differences between the biotic and abiotic experiments. These differences included the elimination of sulfur owing to the presence of sulfate-reducing bacteria and more general changes in pH associated with actively respiring cells that impacted the mineral assemblages formed. This study confirmed that a system simulating the fluid chemistry of Gale Crater could support a microbial community and that variation in chemistries under biotic and abiotic conditions can be used to inform future life-detection missions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbbasAS, EdwardsC.Effects of metals on Streptomyces coelicolor growth and actinorhodin production. Appl Environ Microbiol, 1990; 56(3):675–680; doi: 10.1128/aem.56.3.675-680.1990.
2.
AbinandanS, PereraIA, SubashchandraboseSR, et al. Acid-adapted microalgae exhibit phenotypic changes for their survival in acid mine drainage samples. FEMS Microbiol Ecol, 2020; 96(11):1–12; doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiaa113.
3.
AdamsRI, BatemanAC, BikHM, et al. Microbiota of the indoor environment: A meta-analysis. Microbiome, 2015; 3:49; doi: 10.1186/s40168-015-0108-3.
4.
AntwisRE, GriffithsSM, HarrisonXA, et al. Fifty important research questions in microbial ecology. FEMS Microbiol Ecol, 2017; 93(5); doi: 10.1093/femsec/fix044.
5.
BauermeisterA, RettbergP, FlemmingHC. Growth of the acidophilic iron-sulfur bacterium Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans under Mars-like geochemical conditions. Planet Space Sci, 2014; 98:205–215; doi: 10.1016/j.pss.2013.09.009.
6.
BennettPC, RogersJR, ChoiWJ, et al. Silicates, silicate weathering, and microbial ecology. Geomicrobiol J, 2001; 18(1):3–19; doi: 10.1080/01490450151079734.
7.
BibringJP, LangevinY, GendrinA, et al. Mars surface diversity as revealed by the OMEGA/Mars express observations. Science, 2005; 307(5715):1576–1581; doi: 10.1126/science.1108806.
8.
BilliD, VerseuxC, FagliaroneC, et al. A desert cyanobacterium under simulated Mars-like conditions in low Earth Orbit: Implications for the habitability of Mars. Astrobiology, 2019; 19(2):158–169; doi: 10.1089/ast.2017.1807.
9.
BlakeDF, MorrisRV, KocurekG, et al. Curiosity at Gale Crater, Mars: Characterization and analysis of the Rocknest sand shadow. Science, 2013; 341(6153):1239505; doi: 10.1126/science.1239505.
10.
BrimblecombeP.The global sulfur cycle. In Treatise on Geochemistry. (HollandHD and TurekianKK. eds.) Elsevier: Amsterdam, 2003; pp 645–682.
11.
BristowTF, BishDL, VanimanDT, et al. The origin and implications of clay minerals from Yellowknife Bay, Gale Crater, Mars. Am Mineral, 2015; 100(4):824–836; doi: 10.2138/am-2015-5077CCBYNCND.
12.
CannonKM, BrittDT, SmithTM, et al. Mars global simulant MGS-1: A Rocknest-based open standard for basaltic martian regolith simulants. Icarus, 2019; 317:470–478; doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2018.08.019.
13.
CarrozzoFG, Di AchilleG, SaleseF, et al. Geology and mineralogy of the Auki Crater, Tyrrhena Terra, Mars: A possible post impact-induced hydrothermal system. Icarus, 2017; 281:228–239; doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2016.09.001.
14.
CarterJ, LoizeauD, MangoldN, et al. Widespread surface weathering on early Mars: A case for a warmer and wetter climate. Icarus, 2015; 248:373–382; doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2014.11.011.
15.
ChatzigiannidouI, PropsR, BoonN.Drinking water bacterial communities exhibit specific and selective necrotrophic growth. npj Clean Water, 2018; 1:22; doi: 10.1038/s41545-018-0023-9.
ClarkBC, BairdAK, RoseHJ, et al. Inorganic analyses of martian surface samples at the Viking landing sites. Science, 1976; 194(4271):1283–1288; doi: 10.1126/science.194.4271.1283.
18.
CockellCS, BushT, BryceC, et al. Habitability: A review. Astrobiology, 2016; 16(1):89–117; doi: 10.1089/ast.2015.1295.
19.
ColemanML, HedricktDB, LovleyDR, et al. Reduction of Fe(III) in sediments by sulphate-reducing bacteria. Nature, 1993; 361:436–438; doi: 10.1038/361436a0.
20.
ComteJ, FauteuxL, Del GiorgioPA. Links between metabolic plasticity and functional redundancy in freshwater bacterioplankton communities. Front Microbiol, 2013; 4:112; doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00112.
21.
ConradPG.Scratching the surface of martian habitability. Science, 2014; 346(6215):1288–1289; doi: 10.1126/science.1259943.
22.
CousinsCR, CrawfordIA, CarrivickJL, et al. Glaciovolcanic hydrothermal environments in Iceland and implications for their detection on Mars. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 2013; 256:61–77; doi: 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2013.02.009.
23.
Cruz-LópezR, MaskeH.The vitamin B1 and B12 required by the marine dinoflagellate Lingulodinium polyedrum can be provided by its associated bacterial community in culture. Front Microbiol, 2016; 7:560; doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00560.
24.
Curtis-HarperE, PearsonV, SummersS, et al. The microbial community of a terrestrial Anoxic inter-tidal zone: A model for laboratory-based studies of potentially habitable ancient lacustrine systems on Mars. Microorganisms, 2018; 6(3):61; doi: 10.3390/microorganisms6030061.
25.
DeSantisTZ, HugenholtzP, LarsenN, et al. Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2006; 72(7):5069–5072; doi: 10.1128/AEM.03006-05.
26.
DowdSE, CallawayTR, WolcottRD, et al. Evaluation of the bacterial diversity in the feces of cattle using 16S rDNA bacterial tag-encoded FLX amplicon pyrosequencing (bTEFAP). BMC Microbiol., 2008a;8:125; doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-8-125.
27.
DowdSE, SunY, WolcottRD, et al. Bacterial tag-encoded FLX amplicon pyrosequencing (bTEFAP) for microbiome studies: Bacterial diversity in the ileum of newly weaned Salmonella-infected pigs. Foodborne Pathog Dis, 2008b;5(4):459–472; doi: 10.1089/fpd.2008.0107.
28.
EhlmannBL, EdwardsCS. Mineralogy of the martian surface. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci, 2014; 42:291–315; doi: 10.1146/annurev-earth-060313-055024.
29.
FairénAG, DavilaAF, Gago-DuportL, et al. Stability against freezing of aqueous solutions on early Mars. Nature, 2009; 459:401–404; doi: 10.1038/nature07978.
30.
FilibertoJ, SchwenzerSP (eds.). Volatiles in the Martian Crust. Elsevier: Amsterdam; 2019.
31.
FlemmingCA, TrevorsJT. Copper toxicity and chemistry in the environment: A review. Water Air Soil Pollut, 1989; 44:143–158; doi: 10.1007/BF00228784.
32.
Fox-PowellMG, HallsworthJE, CousinsCR, et al. Ionic strength is a barrier to the habitability of Mars. Astrobiology, 2016; 16(6):427–442; doi: 10.1089/ast.2015.1432.
33.
FrankKL, RogersDR, OlinsHC, et al. Characterizing the distribution and rates of microbial sulfate reduction at Middle Valley hydrothermal vents. ISME J, 2013; 7:1391–1401; doi: 10.1038/ismej.2013.17.
34.
GellertR, RiederR, BrücknerJ, et al. Alpha Particle X-Ray Spectrometer (APXS): Results from Gusev crater and calibration report. J Geophys Res Planets, 2006; 111(2); doi: 10.1029/2005JE002555.
35.
GörresCM, ConradR, PetersenSO. Effect of soil properties and hydrology on archaeal community composition in three temperate grasslands on peat. FEMS Microbiol Ecol, 2013; 85(2):227–240; doi: 10.1111/1574-6941.12115.
36.
GreenJ, HoehlerT, NeveuM, et al. Call for a framework for reporting evidence for life beyond Earth. Nature, 2021; 598:575–579; doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03804-9.
37.
GriffithsRI, WhiteleyAS, DonnellAGO, et al. Rapid method for coextraction of DNA and RNA from natural environments for analysis of ribosomal DNA- and rRNA-based microbial community composition. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2000; 66(12):5488–5491; doi: 10.1128/aem.66.12.5488-5491.2000.
38.
GrotzingerJP, SumnerDY, KahLC, et al. A habitable fluvio-lacustrine environment at Yellowknife Bay, Gale Crater, Mars. Science, 2014; 343(6169):1242777; doi: 10.1126/science.1242777.
39.
HiebertFK, BennettPC. Microbial control of silicate weathering in organic-rich ground water. Science, 1992; 258(5080):278–281; doi: 10.1126/science.258.5080.278.
40.
JakoskyBM, ShockEL. The biological potential of Mars, the early Earth, and Europa. J Geophys Res Planets, 1998; 103(E8):19359–19364; doi: 10.1029/98JE01892.
41.
KralTA, BekkumCR, McKayCP. Growth of methanogens on a mars soil simulant. Orig Life Evol Biosph, 2004; 34(6):615–626; doi: 10.1023/B:ORIG.0000043129.68196.5f.
42.
KunduK, WeberN, GrieblerC, et al. Phenotypic heterogeneity as key factor for growth and survival under oligotrophic conditions. Environ Microbiol, 2020; 22(8):3339–3356; doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.15106.
43.
Lehtovirta-MorleyLE.Ammonia oxidation: Ecology, physiology, biochemistry and why they must all come together. FEMS Microbiol Lett, 2018; 365(9):1–9; doi: 10.1093/femsle/fny058.
44.
LiYL, ValiH, YangJ, et al. Reduction of iron oxides enhanced by a sulfate-reducing bacterium and biogenic H2S. Geomicrobiol J, 2006; 23(2):103–117; doi: 10.1080/01490450500533965.
45.
LondryKL, Des MaraisDJ. Stable carbon isotope fractionation by sulfate-reducing bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003; 69(5):2942–2949; doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.5.2942-2949.2003.
46.
LovleyDR, RodenEE, PhillipsEJP, et al. Enzymatic iron and uranium reduction by sulfate-reducing bacteria. Mar Geol, 1993; 113(1–2):41–53; doi: 10.1016/0025-3227(93)90148-O.
47.
MaceyMC, Fox-PowellM, RamkissoonNK, et al. The identification of sulfide oxidation as a potential metabolism driving primary production on late Noachian Mars. Sci. Rep., 2020; 10(1):10941; doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-67815-8.
48.
Martín-TorresFJ, ZorzanoMP, Valentín-SerranoP, et al. Transient liquid water and water activity at Gale Crater on Mars. Nat Geosci, 2015; 8:357–361; doi: 10.1038/ngeo2412.
49.
MarzoGA, DavilaAF, TornabeneLL, et al. Evidence for Hesperian impact-induced hydrothermalism on Mars. Icarus, 2010; 208(2):667–683; doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2010.03.013.
50.
MckewBA, DumbrellAJ, TaylorJD, et al. Differences between aerobic and anaerobic degradation of microphytobenthic biofilm-derived organic matter within intertidal sediments. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 2013; 84(3):495–509; doi: 10.1111/1574-6941.12077.
51.
MetsaluT, ViloJ.ClustVis: A web tool for visualizing clustering of multivariate data using principal component analysis and heatmap. Nucleic Acids Res, 2015; 43(W1):W566–W570; doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv468.
O'Connell-CooperCD, SprayJG, ThompsonLM, et al. APXS-derived chemistry of the Bagnold dune sands: Comparisons with Gale Crater soils and the global martian average. J Geophys Res Planets, 2017; 122(2):2623–2643; doi: 10.1002/2017JE005268.
54.
Olsson-FrancisK, PearsonVK, SteerED, et al. Determination of geochemical bio-signatures in Mars-like basaltic environments. Front. Microbiol., 2017; 8:1668; doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01668.
PluggeCM, ZhangW, ScholtenJCM, et al. Metabolic flexibility of sulfate-reducing bacteria. Front Microbiol, 2011; 2:81; doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00081.
57.
PrestonLJ, JohnsonD, CockellCS, GradyMM. Fourier transform infrared Spectral detection of life in polar subsurface environments and its application to mars exploration. Appl Spectrosc, 2015; 69(9):1059–1065; doi: 10.1366/14-07843.
58.
PriceA, PearsonVK, SchwenzerSP, et al. Nitrate-dependent iron oxidation: A potential Mars metabolism. Front Microbiol, 2018; 9:513; doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00513.
59.
RamirezRM, CraddockRA. The geological and climatological case for a warmer and wetter early Mars. Nat. Geosci. 2018; 11:230–237; doi: 10.1038/s41561-018-0093-9.
60.
RamkissoonNK, SchwenzerSP, PearsonVK, et al. Simulating the martian chemical environment. In 49th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston, 2018; abstract 1934.
61.
RamkissoonNK, PearsonVK, SchwenzerSP, et al. New simulants for martian regolith: Controlling iron variability. Planet Space Sci, 2019a;179:104722; doi: 10.1016/j.pss.2019.104722.
62.
RamkissoonNK, SchwenzerSP, PearsonVK, et al. Modelling secondary mineral formation within a martian impact-generated hydrothermal system. In 50th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston, 2019b; abstract 1380.
63.
RamkissoonNK, TurnerSMR, MaceyMC, et al. Exploring the environments of martian impact-generated hydrothermal systems and their potential to support life. Meteorit Planet Sci, 2021; 56(7):1350–1368; doi: 10.1111/maps.13697.
64.
RampeEB, MingDW, BlakeDF, et al. Mineralogy of an ancient lacustrine mudstone succession from the Murray Formation, Gale Crater, Mars. Earth Planet Sci Lett, 2017; 471:172–185; doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2017.04.021.
65.
ReedMH, SpycherNF, PalandriJ.Users guide for CHIM-XPT: A program for computing reaction processes in aqueous-mineral-gas systems and MINTAB Guide. University of Oregon: Eugene, Oregon; 2010.
66.
Sánchez-AndreaI, GuedesIA, HornungB, et al. The reductive glycine pathway allows autotrophic growth of Desulfovibrio desulfuricans. Nat Commun, 2020; 11:5090; doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18906-7.
67.
SassH, OvermannJ, RüttersH, et al.Desulfosporomusa polytropa gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel sulfate-reducing bacterium from sediments of an oligotrophic lake. Arch Microbiol, 2004; 182(2–3):204–211; doi: 10.1007/s00203-004-0703-3.
68.
SchirmackJ, AlawiM, WagnerD.Influence of martian regolith analogs on the activity and growth of methanogenic archaea, with special regard to long-term desiccation. Front Microbiol, 2015; 6:210; doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00210.
69.
SchuergerAC, NicholsonWL. Twenty species of hypobarophilic bacteria recovered from diverse soils exhibit growth under simulated martian conditions at 0.7 kPa. Astrobiology, 2016; 16(12):964–976; doi: 10.1089/ast.2016.1587.
70.
SchwenzerSP, BridgesJC, WiensRC, et al. Fluids during diagenesis and sulfate vein formation in sediments at Gale Crater, Mars. Meteorit Planet Sci, 2016; 51(11):2175–2202; doi: 10.1111/maps.12668.
71.
SchwiegerF, TebbeCC. A new approach to utilize PCR-single-strand-conformation polymorphism for 16S rRNA gene-based microbial community analysis. Appl Environ Microbiol, 1998; 64(12):4870–4876; doi: 10.1128/AEM.64.12.4870-4876.1998.
72.
SerranoP, AlawiM, De VeraJP, et al. Response of methanogenic archaea from Siberian permafrost and non-permafrost environments to simulated Mars-like desiccation and the presence of perchlorate. Astrobiology, 2019; 19(2):197–208; doi: 10.1089/ast.2018.1877.
73.
SethEC, TagaME. Nutrient cross-feeding in the microbial world. Front. Microbiol. 2014; 5:350; doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00350.
74.
SheoranAS, SheoranV, ChoudharyRP. Bioremediation of acid-rock drainage by sulphate-reducing prokaryotes: A review. Miner Eng, 2010; 23(14):1073–1100; doi: 10.1016/j.mineng.2010.07.001.
75.
StachJEM, BatheS, ClappJP, et al. PCR-SSCP comparison of 16S rDNA sequence diversity in soil DNA obtained using different isolation and purification methods. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 2006; 36(2–3):139–151; doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2001.tb00834.x.
76.
StevensAH, SteerE, McDonaldA, et al. Y-Mars: An astrobiological analogue of martian mudstone. Earth Space Sci, 2018; 5(4):163–174; doi: 10.1002/2017EA000318.
77.
StevensAH, ChildersD, Fox-PowellM, et al. Growth, viability, and death of planktonic and biofilm Sphingomonas desiccabilis in simulated martian brines. Astrobiology, 2019a;19(1):87–98; doi: 10.1089/ast.2018.1840.
78.
StevensAH, McDonaldA, de KoningC, et al. Detectability of biosignatures in a low-biomass simulation of martian sediments. Sci. Rep., 2019b;9:9706; doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-46239-z.
79.
SutterB, EigenbrodeJL, SteeleA, et al. The sample analysis at Mars (SAM) detections of CO2 and CO insedimentary material from Gale Crater, Mars: Implications for the presence of organic carbon and microbial habitability on Mars. In Proceedings of the AGU Fall Meeting. American Geophysical Union: Washington, DC; 2016.
80.
TianF, KastingJF, SolomonSC. Thermal escape of carbon from the early martian atmosphere. Geophys Res Lett, 2009; 36(2); doi: 10.1029/2008GL036513.
81.
TimmersPHA, VavourakisCD, KleerebezemR, et al. Metabolism and occurrence of methanogenic and sulfate-reducing syntrophic acetate oxidizing communities in haloalkaline environments. Front. Microbiol., 2018; 9:3039; doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.03039.
82.
TurnerSMR, BridgesJC, GrebbyS, et al. Hydrothermal activity recorded in post Noachian-aged impact craters on Mars. J Geophys Res Planets, 2016; 121(4):608–625; doi: 10.1002/2015JE004989.
83.
VanimanDT, BishDL, MingDW, et al. Mineralogy of a mudstone at Yellowknife Bay, Gale Crater, Mars. Science, 2014; 343(6169):1243480; doi: 10.1126/science.1243480.
84.
WankeH, BrucknerJ, DreibusG, et al. Chemical composition of rocks and soils at the Pathfinder site. Space Sci Rev, 2001; 96:317–330; doi: 10.1023/A:1011961725645.
85.
WrightRJ, GibsonMI, Christie-OlezaJA. Understanding microbial community dynamics to improve optimal microbiome selection. Microbiome, 2019; 7,(1):85; doi: 10.1186/s40168-019-0702-x.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
