Abstract
Life appears to have emerged relatively quickly on the Earth, a fact sometimes used to justify a high rate of spontaneous abiogenesis (λ) among Earth-like worlds. Conditioned upon a single datum—the time of earliest evidence for life (t
obs)—previous Bayesian formalisms for the posterior distribution of λ have demonstrated how inferences are highly sensitive to the priors. Rather than attempt to infer the true λ posterior, we here compute the relative change to λ when new experimental/observational evidence is introduced. By simulating posterior distributions and resulting entropic information gains, we compare three experimental pressures on λ: (1) evidence for an earlier start to life, t
obs, (2) constraints on spontaneous abiogenesis from the laboratory, and (3) an exoplanet survey for biosignatures. First, we find that experiments 1 and 2 can only yield lower limits on λ, unlike 3. Second, evidence for an earlier start to life can yield negligible information on λ if
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
