The need of cells to constantly respond to endogenous and exogenous stress has necessitated the evolution of pathways to counter the deleterious effects of stress and to restore cellular homeostasis. The inability to activate a timely and adequate response can lead to disease and is a hallmark of aging. Besides protein-coding genes, cells contain a plethora of noncoding regulatory elements that allow cells to respond rapidly and efficiently to external stimuli by activating highly specific and tightly controlled mechanisms. Many of these programs converge on the regulation of translation, one of the most energy-consuming processes in cells.
Recent Advances:
The noncoding dimension of translational regulation includes short and long noncoding ribonucleic acids (ncRNAs), as well as messenger RNA features, such as the sequence and modification status of the 5′ and 3′ untranslated regions (UTRs), that do not change the amino acid sequence of the produced protein.
Critical Issues:
In this review, we discuss the regulatory role of the nonprotein-coding components of translation under stress, particularly oxidative stress. We conclude that the regulation of translation through ncRNAs, UTRs, and nucleotide modifications is emerging as a critical component of the stress response.
Future Directions:
Further areas of study using long-read sequencing technologies will be discussed. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 39, 374–389.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbdelmohsenK, PandaAC, MunkR, et al.Identification of HuR target circular RNAs uncovers suppression of PABPN1 translation by CircPABPN1. RNA Biol, 2017; 14(3):361–369; doi: 10.1080/15476286.2017.1279788
2.
AndersM, ChelyshevaI, GoebelI, et al.Dynamic m(6)A methylation facilitates mRNA triaging to stress granules. Life Sci Alliance, 2018; 1(4):e201800113; doi: 10.26508/lsa.201800113
3.
AndreevDE, O'ConnorPB, FaheyC, et al.Translation of 5’ leaders is pervasive in genes resistant to eIF2 repression. Elife, 2015; 4:e03971; doi: 10.7554/eLife.03971
4.
AngelovaPR, EsterasN, AbramovAY. Mitochondria and lipid peroxidation in the mechanism of neurodegeneration: Finding ways for prevention. Med Res Rev, 2021; 41(2):770–784; doi: 10.1002/med.21712
5.
ArangoD, SturgillD, AlhusainiN, et al.Acetylation of cytidine in mRNA promotes translation efficiency. Cell, 2018; 175(7):1872–1886 e1824; doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.10.030
6.
ArangoD, SturgillD, YangR, et al.Direct epitranscriptomic regulation of mammalian translation initiation through N4-acetylcytidine. Mol Cell, 2022; 82(15):2797–2814.e2711; doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2022.05.016
7.
ArcherT. Effects of exogenous agents on brain development: Stress, abuse and therapeutic compounds. CNS Neurosci Ther, 2011; 17(5):470–489; doi: 10.1111/j.1755-5949.2010.00171.x
8.
BaileyAD, TalkishJ, DingH, et al.Concerted modification of nucleotides at functional centers of the ribosome revealed by single-molecule RNA modification profiling. Elife, 2022; 11:e76562; doi: 10.7554/eLife.76562
9.
BakerBM, NargundAM, SunT, et al.Protective coupling of mitochondrial function and protein synthesis via the eIF2alpha kinase GCN-2. PLoS Genet, 2012; 8(6):e1002760; doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002760
10.
BarbieriI, KouzaridesT. Role of RNA modifications in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer, 2020; 20(6):303–322; doi: 10.1038/s41568-020-0253-2
BednarovaA, HannaM, DurhamI, et al.Lost in translation: Defects in transfer RNA modifications and neurological disorders. Front Mol Neurosci, 2017; 10:135; doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2017.00135
13.
BegikO, LucasMC, PryszczLP, et al.Quantitative profiling of pseudouridylation dynamics in native RNAs with nanopore sequencing. Nat Biotechnol, 2021; 39(10):1278–1291; doi: 10.1038/s41587-021-00915-6
14.
BoccalettoP, StefaniakF, RayA, et al.MODOMICS: A database of RNA modification pathways. 2021 update. Nucleic Acids Res, 2022; 50(D1):D231–D235; doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab1083
15.
BoisvertFM, van KoningsbruggenS, NavascuesJ, et al.The multifunctional nucleolus. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2007; 8(7):574–585; doi: 10.1038/nrm2184
16.
BoulonS, WestmanBJ, HuttenS, et al.The nucleolus under stress. Mol Cell, 2010; 40(2):216–227; doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.09.024
CerneckisJ, CuiQ, HeC, et al.Decoding pseudouridine: An emerging target for therapeutic development. Trends Pharmacol Sci, 2022; 43(6):522–535; doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2022.03.008
19.
ChanCT, DyavaiahM, DeMottMS, et al.A quantitative systems approach reveals dynamic control of tRNA modifications during cellular stress. PLoS Genet, 2010; 6(12):e1001247; doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001247
20.
ChanPP, LoweTM. GtRNAdb 2.0: An expanded database of transfer RNA genes identified in complete and draft genomes. Nucleic Acids Res, 2016; 44(D1):D184–D189; doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1309
21.
ChangH, YangJ, WangQ, et al.Role of N6-methyladenosine modification in pathogenesis of ischemic stroke. Expert Rev Mol Diagn, 2022; 22(3):295–303; doi: 10.1080/14737159.2022.2049246
22.
ChekulaevaM, RajewskyN. Roles of long noncoding RNAs and circular RNAs in translation. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol, 2019; 11(6):a032680; doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a032680
23.
ChenB, LiY, LiuY, et al.circLRP6 regulates high glucose-induced proliferation, oxidative stress, ECM accumulation, and inflammation in mesangial cells. J Cell Physiol, 2019; 234(11):21249–21259; doi: 10.1002/jcp.28730
24.
ChenC-K, ChengR, DemeterJ, et al.Structured elements drive extensive circular RNA translation. Mol Cell, 2021; 81(20):4300–4318.e4313; doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2021.07.042
ChouYT, LoKY. Thallium(I) treatment induces nucleolar stress to stop protein synthesis and cell growth. Sci Rep, 2019; 9(1):6905; doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43413-1
27.
ChujoT, TomizawaK. Human transfer RNA modopathies: Diseases caused by aberrations in transfer RNA modifications. FEBS J, 2021; 288(24):7096–7122; doi: 10.1111/febs.15736
28.
CobleyJN, FiorelloML, BaileyDM. 13 reasons why the brain is susceptible to oxidative stress. Redox Biol, 2018; 15:490–503; doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2018.01.008
29.
CondicM, RalserDJ, KlumperN, et al.Comprehensive analysis of N6-methyladenosine (m6A) writers, erasers, and readers in cervical cancer. Int J Mol Sci, 2022; 23(13):7165; doi: 10.3390/ijms23137165
Cortés-LópezM, GrunerMR, CooperDA, et al.Global accumulation of circRNAs during aging in Caenorhabditis elegans. BMC Genomics, 2018; 19(1):8; doi: 10.1186/s12864-017-4386-y
32.
CuiQ, YinK, ZhangX, et al.Targeting PUS7 suppresses tRNA pseudouridylation and glioblastoma tumorigenesis. Nat Cancer, 2021; 2(9):932–949; doi: 10.1038/s43018-021-00238-0
33.
DaiQ, ZhangLS, SunHL, et al.Quantitative sequencing using BID-seq uncovers abundant pseudouridines in mammalian mRNA at base resolution. Nat Biotechnol, 2023; 41(3):344–354; doi: 10.1038/s41587-022-01505-w
34.
DavisFF, AllenFW. Ribonucleic acids from yeast which contain a fifth nucleotide. J Biol Chem, 1957; 227(2):907–915.
35.
DesrosiersR, FridericiK, RottmanF. Identification of methylated nucleosides in messenger RNA from Novikoff hepatoma cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1974; 71(10):3971–3975; doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.10.3971
36.
DestefanisE, AvsarG, GrozaP, et al.A mark of disease: How mRNA modifications shape genetic and acquired pathologies. RNA, 2021; 27(4):367–389; doi: 10.1261/rna.077271.120
37.
DeverTE, GreenR. The elongation, termination, and recycling phases of translation in eukaryotes. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol, 2012; 4(7):a013706; doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a013706
38.
DingQ, MarkesberyWR, CecariniV, et al.Decreased RNA, and increased RNA oxidation, in ribosomes from early Alzheimer's disease. Neurochem Res, 2006; 31(5):705–710; doi: 10.1007/s11064-006-9071-5
39.
DingQ, ZhuH, ZhangB, et al.Increased 5S rRNA oxidation in Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis, 2012; 29(1):201–209; doi: 10.3233/JAD-2012-111058
40.
DizdarogluM, JarugaP. Mechanisms of free radical-induced damage to DNA. Free Radic Res, 2012; 46(4):382–419; doi: 10.3109/10715762.2011.653969
41.
DonnellyN, GormanAM, GuptaS, et al.The eIF2alpha kinases: Their structures and functions. Cell Mol Life Sci, 2013; 70(19):3493–3511; doi: 10.1007/s00018-012-1252-6
42.
EndresL, DedonPC, BegleyTJ. Codon-biased translation can be regulated by wobble-base tRNA modification systems during cellular stress responses. RNA Biol, 2015; 12(6):603–614; doi: 10.1080/15476286.2015.1031947
43.
Esteve-PuigR, Bueno-CostaA, EstellerM. Writers, readers and erasers of RNA modifications in cancer. Cancer Lett, 2020; 474:127–137; doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2020.01.021
44.
FanX, YangY, ChenC, et al.Pervasive translation of circular RNAs driven by short IRES-like elements. Nat Commun, 2022; 13(1):3751; doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31327-y
45.
FarrukhMR, NissarUA, AfnanQ, et al.Oxidative stress mediated Ca(2+) release manifests endoplasmic reticulum stress leading to unfolded protein response in UV-B irradiated human skin cells. J Dermatol Sci, 2014; 75(1):24–35; doi: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2014.03.005
46.
FengD, WangZ, ZhaoY, et al.circ-PRKCB acts as a ceRNA to regulate p66Shc-mediated oxidative stress in intestinal ischemia/reperfusion. Theranostics, 2020; 10(23):10680–10696; doi: 10.7150/thno.44250
47.
FengZ, LiK, QinK, et al.The LINC00623/NAT10 signaling axis promotes pancreatic cancer progression by remodeling ac4C modification of mRNA. J Hematol Oncol, 2022; 15(1):112; doi: 10.1186/s13045-022-01338-9
48.
FernandezIS, NgCL, KelleyAC, et al.Unusual base pairing during the decoding of a stop codon by the ribosome. Nature, 2013; 500(7460):107–110; doi: 10.1038/nature12302
49.
FryNJ, LawBA, IlkayevaOR, et al.N(6)-methyladenosine is required for the hypoxic stabilization of specific mRNAs. RNA, 2017; 23(9):1444–1455; doi: 10.1261/rna.061044.117
50.
FryeM, HaradaBT, BehmM, et al.RNA modifications modulate gene expression during development. Science, 2018; 361(6409):1346–1349; doi: 10.1126/science.aau1646
51.
GeorgeS, RafiM, AldarmakiM, et al.tRNA derived small RNAs-small players with big roles. Front Genet, 2022; 13:997780; doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.997780
52.
GerovacM, TampeR. Control of mRNA translation by versatile ATP-driven machines. Trends Biochem Sci, 2019; 44(2):167–180; doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2018.11.003
53.
GingoldH, TehlerD, ChristoffersenNR, et al.A dual program for translation regulation in cellular proliferation and differentiation. Cell, 2014; 158(6):1281–1292; doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.08.011
54.
GingrasAC, RaughtB, GygiSP, et al.Hierarchical phosphorylation of the translation inhibitor 4E-BP1. Genes Dev, 2001; 15(21):2852–2864; doi: 10.1101/gad.912401
GorriniC, HarrisIS, MakTW. Modulation of oxidative stress as an anticancer strategy. Nat Rev Drug Discov, 2013; 12(12):931–947; doi: 10.1038/nrd4002
57.
GrunerH, Cortés-LópezM, CooperDA, et al.CircRNA accumulation in the aging mouse brain. Sci Rep, 2016; 6(1):38907; doi: 10.1038/srep38907
58.
GuLQ, WanunuM, WangMX, et al.Detection of miRNAs with a nanopore single-molecule counter. Expert Rev Mol Diagn, 2012; 12(6):573–584; doi: 10.1586/erm.12.58
59.
GuzziN, CieslaM, NgocPCT, et al.Pseudouridylation of tRNA-derived fragments steers translational control in stem cells. Cell, 2018; 173(5):1204–1216 e1226; doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.03.008
60.
HananM, SimchovitzA, YayonN, et al.A Parkinson's disease CircRNAs resource reveals a link between circSLC8A1 and oxidative stress. EMBO Mol Med, 2020; 12(9):e11942; doi: 10.15252/emmm.201911942
61.
HansenTB, JensenTI, ClausenBH, et al.Natural RNA circles function as efficient microRNA sponges. Nature, 2013; 495(7441):384–388; doi: 10.1038/nature11993
62.
HansonG, CollerJ. Codon optimality, bias and usage in translation and mRNA decay. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2018; 19(1):20–30; doi: 10.1038/nrm.2017.91
63.
HardingHP, ZhangY, ZengH, et al.An integrated stress response regulates amino acid metabolism and resistance to oxidative stress. Mol Cell, 2003; 11(3):619–633; doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(03)00105-9
64.
HendraC, PratanwanichPN, WanYK, et al.Detection of m6A from direct RNA sequencing using a multiple instance learning framework. Nat Methods, 2022; 19(12):1590–1598; doi: 10.1038/s41592-022-01666-1
65.
HenrasAK, Plisson-ChastangC, O'DonohueMF, et al.An overview of pre-ribosomal RNA processing in eukaryotes. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA, 2015; 6(2):225–242; doi: 10.1002/wrna.1269
66.
HernandezG, OsnayaVG, Perez-MartinezX. Conservation and variability of the AUG initiation codon context in eukaryotes. Trends Biochem Sci, 2019; 44(12):1009–1021; doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2019.07.001
67.
HolmstromKM, FinkelT. Cellular mechanisms and physiological consequences of redox-dependent signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2014; 15(6):411–421; doi: 10.1038/nrm3801
68.
HolzMK, BallifBA, GygiSP, et al.mTOR and S6K1 mediate assembly of the translation preinitiation complex through dynamic protein interchange and ordered phosphorylation events. Cell, 2005; 123(4):569–580; doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.10.024
69.
HsiehAC, LiuY, EdlindMP, et al.The translational landscape of mTOR signalling steers cancer initiation and metastasis. Nature, 2012; 485(7396):55–61; doi: 10.1038/nature10912
70.
HsuMT, Coca-PradosM. Electron microscopic evidence for the circular form of RNA in the cytoplasm of eukaryotic cells. Nature, 1979; 280(5720):339–340; doi: 10.1038/280339a0
71.
HuberSM, BegleyU, SarkarA, et al.Arsenite toxicity is regulated by queuine availability and oxidation-induced reprogramming of the human tRNA epitranscriptome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2022; 119(38):e2123529119; doi: 10.1073/pnas.2123529119
72.
Ill-RagaG, TajesM, Busquets-GarciaA, et al.Physiological control of nitric oxide in neuronal BACE1 translation by heme-regulated eIF2alpha kinase HRI induces synaptogenesis. Antioxid Redox Signal, 2015; 22(15):1295–1307; doi: 10.1089/ars.2014.6080
73.
IshimuraR, NagyG, DotuI, et al.RNA function. Ribosome stalling induced by mutation of a CNS-specific tRNA causes neurodegeneration. Science, 2014; 345(6195):455–459; doi: 10.1126/science.1249749
JackK, BellodiC, LandryDM, et al.rRNA pseudouridylation defects affect ribosomal ligand binding and translational fidelity from yeast to human cells. Mol Cell, 2011; 44(4):660–666; doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.09.017
76.
JacksonRJ, HellenCU, PestovaTV. The mechanism of eukaryotic translation initiation and principles of its regulation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2010; 11(2):113–127; doi: 10.1038/nrm2838
77.
JenjaroenpunP, WongsurawatT, WadleyTD, et al.Decoding the epitranscriptional landscape from native RNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res, 2021; 49(2):e7; doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa620
78.
KhatterH, MyasnikovAG, NatchiarSK, et al.Structure of the human 80S ribosome. Nature, 2015; 520(7549):640–645; doi: 10.1038/nature14427
79.
KhoshnevisS, Dreggors-WalkerRE, MarchandV, et al.Ribosomal RNA 2'-O-methylations regulate translation by impacting ribosome dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2022; 119(12):e2117334119; doi: 10.1073/pnas.2117334119
80.
KimHK, FuchsG, WangS, et al.A transfer-RNA-derived small RNA regulates ribosome biogenesis. Nature, 2017; 552(7683):57–62; doi: 10.1038/nature25005
81.
KimHK, XuJ, ChuK, et al.A tRNA-derived small RNA regulates ribosomal protein S28 protein levels after translation initiation in humans and mice. Cell Rep, 2019; 29(12):3816–3824 e3814; doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.11.062
82.
KonchaRR, RamachandranG, SepuriNBV, et al.CCCP-induced mitochondrial dysfunction—Characterization and analysis of integrated stress response to cellular signaling and homeostasis. FEBS J, 2021; 288(19):5737–5754; doi: 10.1111/febs.15868
83.
KrishnamoorthyJ, TenkerianC, GuptaJ, et al.Downregulation of PERK activity and eIF2alpha serine 51 phosphorylation by mTOR complex 1 elicits pro-oxidant and pro-death effects in tuberous sclerosis-deficient cells. Cell Death Dis, 2018; 9(3):254; doi: 10.1038/s41419-018-0326-2
84.
KristensenLS, AndersenMS, StagstedLVW, et al.The biogenesis, biology and characterization of circular RNAs. Nat Rev Genet, 2019; 20(11):675–691; doi: 10.1038/s41576-019-0158-7
85.
KubyshkinV, Acevedo-RochaCG, BudisaN. On universal coding events in protein biogenesis. Biosystems, 2018; 164:16–25; doi: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2017.10.004
86.
KumarS, MohapatraT. Deciphering epitranscriptome: Modification of mRNA bases provides a new perspective for post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression. Front Cell Dev Biol, 2021; 9:628415; doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.628415
87.
LarosaV, RemacleC. Insights into the respiratory chain and oxidative stress. Biosci Rep, 2018; 38(5); doi: 10.1042/BSR20171492
88.
LegerA, AmaralPP, PandolfiniL, et al.RNA modifications detection by comparative Nanopore direct RNA sequencing. Nat Commun, 2021; 12(1):7198; doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27393-3
89.
LeibovitchM, TopisirovicI. Dysregulation of mRNA translation and energy metabolism in cancer. Adv Biol Regul, 2018; 67:30–39; doi: 10.1016/j.jbior.2017.11.001
90.
LeppekK, DasR, BarnaM. Functional 5’ UTR mRNA structures in eukaryotic translation regulation and how to find them. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2018; 19(3):158–174; doi: 10.1038/nrm.2017.103
91.
LiG, ScullC, OzcanL, et al.NADPH oxidase links endoplasmic reticulum stress, oxidative stress, and PKR activation to induce apoptosis. J Cell Biol, 2010; 191(6):1113–1125; doi: 10.1083/jcb.201006121
92.
LiL, NiZ, SiX, et al.Emerging clues of regulatory roles of circular RNAs through modulating oxidative stress: Focus on neurological and vascular diseases. Oxid Med Cell Longev, 2021; 2021:6659908; doi: 10.1155/2021/6659908
93.
LiS, HuGF. Angiogenin-mediated rRNA transcription in cancer and neurodegeneration. Int J Biochem Mol Biol, 2010; 1(1):26–35.
94.
LiX-X, XiaoL, ChungHK, et al.Interaction between HuR and circPABPN1 modulates autophagy in the intestinal epithelium by altering ATG16L1 translation. Mol Cell Biol, 2020; 40(6); doi: 10.1128/MCB.00492-19
95.
LiX, PengJ, YiC. Transcriptome-wide mapping of N (1)-methyladenosine methylome. Methods Mol Biol, 2017; 1562:245–255; doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-6807-7_16
96.
LiX, XiongX, WangK, et al.Transcriptome-wide mapping reveals reversible and dynamic N(1)-methyladenosine methylome. Nat Chem Biol, 2016; 12(5):311–316; doi: 10.1038/nchembio.2040
97.
LiX, ZhuP, MaS, et al.Chemical pulldown reveals dynamic pseudouridylation of the mammalian transcriptome. Nat Chem Biol, 2015; 11(8):592–597; doi: 10.1038/nchembio.1836
98.
LiZ, MallaS, ShinB, et al.Battle against RNA oxidation: Molecular mechanisms for reducing oxidized RNA to protect cells. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA, 2014; 5(3):335–346; doi: 10.1002/wrna.1214
99.
LinY-C, LeeY-C, ChangK-L, et al.Analysis of common targets for circular RNAs. BMC Bioinformatics, 2019; 20(1):372; doi: 10.1186/s12859-019-2966-3
100.
LombardiS, TestaMF, PinottiM, et al.Translation termination codons in protein synthesis and disease. Adv Protein Chem Struct Biol, 2022; 132:1–48; doi: 10.1016/bs.apcsb.2022.06.001
101.
LongF, LinZ, LiL, et al.Comprehensive landscape and future perspectives of circular RNAs in colorectal cancer. Mol Cancer, 2021; 20(1):26; doi: 10.1186/s12943-021-01318-6
102.
LyonsSM, KharelP, AkiyamaY, et al.eIF4G has intrinsic G-quadruplex binding activity that is required for tiRNA function. Nucleic Acids Res, 2020; 48(11):6223–6233; doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa336
103.
MalinD, LeeY, ChepikovaO, et al.Methionine restriction exposes a targetable redox vulnerability of triple-negative breast cancer cells by inducing thioredoxin reductase. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2021; 190(3):373–387; doi: 10.1007/s10549-021-06398-y
104.
MathlinJ, Le PeraL, ColomboT. A census and categorization method of epitranscriptomic marks. Int J Mol Sci, 2020; 21(13):4684; doi: 10.3390/ijms21134684
105.
McEwenE, KedershaN, SongB, et al.Heme-regulated inhibitor kinase-mediated phosphorylation of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 inhibits translation, induces stress granule formation, and mediates survival upon arsenite exposure. J Biol Chem, 2005; 280(17):16925–16933; doi: 10.1074/jbc.M412882200
106.
McGillivrayP, AultR, PawasheM, et al.A comprehensive catalog of predicted functional upstream open reading frames in humans. Nucleic Acids Res, 2018; 46(7):3326–3338; doi: 10.1093/nar/gky188
107.
McMahonM, ContrerasA, HolmM, et al.A single H/ACA small nucleolar RNA mediates tumor suppression downstream of oncogenic RAS. Elife, 2019; 8:e48847; doi: 10.7554/eLife.48847
MiloR, JorgensenP, MoranU, et al.BioNumbers—The database of key numbers in molecular and cell biology. Nucleic Acids Res, 2010; 38(Database Issue):D750–D753; doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp889
110.
MoradianH, RochT, AnthoferL, et al.Chemical modification of uridine modulates mRNA-mediated proinflammatory and antiviral response in primary human macrophages. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids, 2022; 27:854–869; doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2022.01.004
111.
NatchiarSK, MyasnikovAG, HazemannI, et al.Visualizing the role of 2'-OH rRNA methylations in the human ribosome structure. Biomolecules, 2018; 8(4):125; doi: 10.3390/biom8040125
NunomuraA, MoreiraPI, CastellaniRJ, et al.Oxidative damage to RNA in aging and neurodegenerative disorders. Neurotox Res, 2012; 22(3):231–248; doi: 10.1007/s12640-012-9331-x
PanseVG, JohnsonAW. Maturation of eukaryotic ribosomes: Acquisition of functionality. Trends Biochem Sci, 2010; 35(5):260–266; doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2010.01.001
116.
PappLV, LuJ, StriebelF, et al.The redox state of SECIS binding protein 2 controls its localization and selenocysteine incorporation function. Mol Cell Biol, 2006; 26(13):4895–4910; doi: 10.1128/MCB.02284-05
PestovaTV, KolupaevaVG. The roles of individual eukaryotic translation initiation factors in ribosomal scanning and initiation codon selection. Genes Dev, 2002; 16(22):2906–2922; doi: 10.1101/gad.1020902
119.
PhizickyEM, HopperAK. tRNA biology charges to the front. Genes Dev, 2010; 24(17):1832–1860; doi: 10.1101/gad.1956510
120.
PisarevAV, SkabkinMA, PisarevaVP, et al.The role of ABCE1 in eukaryotic posttermination ribosomal recycling. Mol Cell, 2010; 37(2):196–210; doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.12.034
121.
PratanwanichPN, YaoF, ChenY, et al.Identification of differential RNA modifications from nanopore direct RNA sequencing with xPore. Nat Biotechnol, 2021; 39(11):1394–1402; doi: 10.1038/s41587-021-00949-w
122.
PratsA-C, DavidF, DialloLH, et al.Circular RNA, the key for translation. Int J Mol Sci, 2020; 21(22):8591; doi: 10.3390/ijms21228591
123.
QinS, ZhangQ, XuY, et al.m(6)A-modified circRNAs: Detections, mechanisms, and prospects in cancers. Mol Med, 2022; 28(1):79; doi: 10.1186/s10020-022-00505-5
124.
RajeshK, KrishnamoorthyJ, KazimierczakU, et al.Phosphorylation of the translation initiation factor eIF2alpha at serine 51 determines the cell fate decisions of Akt in response to oxidative stress. Cell Death Dis, 2015; 6:e1591; doi: 10.1038/cddis.2014.554
SafraM, Sas-ChenA, NirR, et al.The m1A landscape on cytosolic and mitochondrial mRNA at single-base resolution. Nature, 2017; 551(7679):251–255; doi: 10.1038/nature24456
129.
SapioRT, BurnsCJ, PestovDG. Effects of hydrogen peroxide stress on the nucleolar redox environment and pre-rRNA maturation. Front Mol Biosci, 2021; 8:678488; doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.678488
130.
SaxtonRA, SabatiniDM. mTOR signaling in growth, metabolism, and disease. Cell, 2017; 168(6):960–976; doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.02.004
131.
SchieberM, ChandelNS. ROS function in redox signaling and oxidative stress. Curr Biol, 2014; 24(10):R453–R462; doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.03.034
132.
SchimmelP. The emerging complexity of the tRNA world: Mammalian tRNAs beyond protein synthesis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2018; 19(1):45–58; doi: 10.1038/nrm.2017.77
133.
SchwartzS, BernsteinDA, MumbachMR, et al.Transcriptome-wide mapping reveals widespread dynamic-regulated pseudouridylation of ncRNA and mRNA. Cell, 2014; 159(1):148–162; doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.08.028
134.
SenguptaS, PetersonTR, SabatiniDM. Regulation of the mTOR complex 1 pathway by nutrients, growth factors, and stress. Mol Cell, 2010; 40(2):310–322; doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.09.026
135.
ShcherbikN, PestovDG. The impact of oxidative stress on ribosomes: From injury to regulation. Cells, 2019; 8(11):1379; doi: 10.3390/cells8111379
136.
ShedlovskiyD, ZinskieJA, GardnerE, et al.Endonucleolytic cleavage in the expansion segment 7 of 25S rRNA is an early marker of low-level oxidative stress in yeast. J Biol Chem, 2017; 292(45):18469–18485; doi: 10.1074/jbc.M117.800003
137.
ShenQ, ChuFF, NewburgerPE. Sequences in the 3'-untranslated region of the human cellular glutathione peroxidase gene are necessary and sufficient for selenocysteine incorporation at the UGA codon. J Biol Chem, 1993; 268(15):11463–11469
138.
ShiH, WeiJ, HeC. Where, when, and how: Context-dependent functions of RNA methylation writers, readers, and erasers. Mol Cell, 2019; 74(4):640–650; doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.04.025
139.
SloanKE, WardaAS, SharmaS, et al.Tuning the ribosome: The influence of rRNA modification on eukaryotic ribosome biogenesis and function. RNA Biol, 2017; 14(9):1138–1152; doi: 10.1080/15476286.2016.1259781
140.
SpriggsKA, StoneleyM, BushellM, et al.Re-programming of translation following cell stress allows IRES-mediated translation to predominate. Biol Cell, 2008; 100(1):27–38; doi: 10.1042/BC20070098
141.
SunJ, ChengB, SuY, et al.The potential role of m6A RNA methylation in the aging process and aging-associated diseases. Front Genet, 2022; 13:869950; doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.869950
142.
SuraganiRN, ZachariahRS, VelazquezJG, et al.Heme-regulated eIF2alpha kinase activated Atf4 signaling pathway in oxidative stress and erythropoiesis. Blood, 2012; 119(22):5276–5284; doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-10-388132
143.
SuzukiT. The expanding world of tRNA modifications and their disease relevance. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2021; 22(6):375–392; doi: 10.1038/s41580-021-00342-0
144.
SzaflarskiW, Lesniczak-StaszakM, SowinskiM, et al.Early rRNA processing is a stress-dependent regulatory event whose inhibition maintains nucleolar integrity. Nucleic Acids Res, 2022; 50(2):1033–1051; doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab1231
145.
SzwedM, SonstevoldT, OverbyeA, et al.Small variations in nanoparticle structure dictate differential cellular stress responses and mode of cell death. Nanotoxicology, 2019; 13(6):761–782; doi: 10.1080/17435390.2019.1576238
146.
TangH, LiJ, LiuX, et al.Down-regulation of HSP60 suppresses the proliferation of glioblastoma cells via the ROS/AMPK/mTOR pathway. Sci Rep, 2016; 6:28388; doi: 10.1038/srep28388
147.
ThompsonDM, LuC, GreenPJ, et al.tRNA cleavage is a conserved response to oxidative stress in eukaryotes. RNA, 2008; 14(10):2095–2103; doi: 10.1261/rna.1232808
148.
ThoreenCC, ChantranupongL, KeysHR, et al.A unifying model for mTORC1-mediated regulation of mRNA translation. Nature, 2012; 485(7396):109–113; doi: 10.1038/nature11083
149.
TorresAG, BatlleE, Ribas de PouplanaL. Role of tRNA modifications in human diseases. Trends Mol Med, 2014; 20(6):306–314; doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2014.01.008
150.
TsaiK, Jaguva VasudevanAA, Martinez CamposC, et al.Acetylation of cytidine residues boosts HIV-1 gene expression by increasing viral RNA stability. Cell Host Microbe, 2020; 28(2):306–312 e306; doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2020.05.011
151.
TsujiT, SunY, KishimotoK, et al.Angiogenin is translocated to the nucleus of HeLa cells and is involved in ribosomal RNA transcription and cell proliferation. Cancer Res, 2005; 65(4):1352–1360; doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-2058
152.
VerduciL, TarcitanoE, StranoS, et al.CircRNAs: role in human diseases and potential use as biomarkers. Cell Death Dis, 2021; 12(5):468; doi: 10.1038/s41419-021-03743-3
153.
VerfaillieT, van VlietA, GargAD, et al.Pro-apoptotic signaling induced by photo-oxidative ER stress is amplified by Noxa, not Bim. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2013; 438(3):500–506; doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.07.107
154.
VindryC, OhlmannT, ChavatteL. Translation regulation of mammalian selenoproteins. Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj, 2018; 1862(11):2480–2492; doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2018.05.010
155.
VoJN, CieslikM, ZhangY, et al.The landscape of circular RNA in cancer. Cell, 2019; 176(4):869–881.e813; doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.12.021
156.
WangG, ZhangM, ZhangY, et al.NAT10-mediated mRNA N4-acetylcytidine modification promotes bladder cancer progression. Clin Transl Med, 2022a;12(5):e738; doi: 10.1002/ctm2.738
157.
WangY, WengQ, GeJ, et al.tRNA-derived small RNAs: Mechanisms and potential roles in cancers. Genes Dis, 2022b;9(6):1431–1442; doi: 10.1016/j.gendis.2021.12.009
158.
WangY, ZhaoY, BollasA, et al.Nanopore sequencing technology, bioinformatics and applications. Nat Biotechnol, 2021; 39(11):1348–1365; doi: 10.1038/s41587-021-01108-x
159.
WarnerJR. The economics of ribosome biosynthesis in yeast. Trends Biochem Sci, 1999; 24(11):437–440; doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(99)01460-7
160.
WilkinsonE, CuiYH, HeYY. Context-dependent roles of RNA modifications in stress responses and diseases. Int J Mol Sci, 2021; 22(4):1949; doi: 10.3390/ijms22041949
161.
WilkinsonE, CuiYH, HeYY. Roles of RNA modifications in diverse cellular functions. Front Cell Dev Biol, 2022; 10:828683; doi: 10.3389/fcell.2022.828683
162.
WilliJ, KupferP, EvequozD, et al.Oxidative stress damages rRNA inside the ribosome and differentially affects the catalytic center. Nucleic Acids Res, 2018; 46(4):1945–1957; doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx1308
163.
WisniewskiJR, HeinMY, CoxJ, et al.A “proteomic ruler” for protein copy number and concentration estimation without spike-in standards. Mol Cell Proteomics, 2014; 13(12):3497–3506; doi: 10.1074/mcp.M113.037309
164.
WuF, ZhangL, LaiC, et al.Dynamic alteration profile and new role of RNA m6A methylation in replicative and H(2)O(2)-induced premature senescence of human embryonic lung fibroblasts. Int J Mol Sci, 2022; 23(16):9271; doi: 10.3390/ijms23169271
165.
WuQ, WangY, CaoM, et al.Homology-independent discovery of replicating pathogenic circular RNAs by deep sequencing and a new computational algorithm. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2012; 109(10):3938–3943; doi: 10.1073/pnas.1117815109
166.
XuanJJ, SunWJ, LinPH, et al.RMBase v2.0: Deciphering the map of RNA modifications from epitranscriptome sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res, 2018; 46(D1):D327–D334; doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx934
167.
XueS, BarnaM. Specialized ribosomes: A new frontier in gene regulation and organismal biology. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2012; 13(6):355–369; doi: 10.1038/nrm3359
168.
YamasakiS, IvanovP, HuGF, et al.Angiogenin cleaves tRNA and promotes stress-induced translational repression. J Cell Biol, 2009; 185(1):35–42; doi: 10.1083/jcb.200811106
169.
YangB, ChenQ. Cross-talk between oxidative stress and m(6)A RNA methylation in cancer. Oxid Med Cell Longev, 2021; 2021:6545728; doi: 10.1155/2021/6545728
170.
YangC, YuanW, YangX, et al.Circular RNA circ-ITCH inhibits bladder cancer progression by sponging miR-17/miR-224 and regulating p21, PTEN expression. Mol Cancer, 2018; 17(1):19; doi: 10.1186/s12943-018-0771-7
171.
YangY, FanX, MaoM, et al.Extensive translation of circular RNAs driven by N6-methyladenosine. Cell Res, 2017; 27(5):626–641; doi: 10.1038/cr.2017.31
172.
YangY, WangZ. IRES-mediated cap-independent translation, a path leading to hidden proteome. J Mol Cell Biol, 2019; 11(10):911–919; doi: 10.1093/jmcb/mjz091
173.
YoonA, PengG, BrandenburgerY, et al.Impaired control of IRES-mediated translation in X-linked dyskeratosis congenita. Science, 2006; 312(5775):902–906; doi: 10.1126/science.1123835
174.
YoungSK, WekRC. Upstream open reading frames differentially regulate gene-specific translation in the integrated stress response. J Biol Chem, 2016; 291(33):16927–16935; doi: 10.1074/jbc.R116.733899
175.
ZahiaTH, YonaL, Anne-LaureB, et al.Selective up-regulation of human selenoproteins in response to oxidative stress. Free Radic Biol Med, 2014; 75(Suppl 1):S25; doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2014.10.745
176.
ZengY, WangL, ZhouY, et al.NMDA receptor antagonists engender neuroprotection against gp120-induced cognitive dysfunction in rats through modulation of PKR activation, oxidative stress, ER stress and IRE1alpha signal pathway. Eur J Neurosci, 2022; 56(2):3806–3824; doi: 10.1111/ejn.15688
177.
ZhangJ, YanS, ChangL, et al.Direct microRNA sequencing using nanopore-induced phase-shift sequencing. iScience, 2020; 23(3):100916; doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.100916
178.
ZhangR, ZhangY, GuoF, et al.RNA N6-methyladenosine modifications and its roles in Alzheimer's disease. Front Cell Neurosci, 2022a;16:820378; doi: 10.3389/fncel.2022.820378
179.
ZhangW, SuiY. CircBPTF knockdown ameliorates high glucose-induced inflammatory injuries and oxidative stress by targeting the miR-384/LIN28B axis in human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Mol Cell Biochem, 2020; 471(1–2):101–111; doi: 10.1007/s11010-020-03770-2
180.
ZhangX, WangS, WangH, et al.Circular RNA circNRIP1 acts as a microRNA-149-5p sponge to promote gastric cancer progression via the AKT1/mTOR pathway. Mol Cancer, 2019; 18(1):20; doi: 10.1186/s12943-018-0935-5
181.
ZhangY, JingY, WangY, et al.NAT10 promotes gastric cancer metastasis via N4-acetylated COL5A1. Signal Transduct Target Ther, 2021; 6(1):173; doi: 10.1038/s41392-021-00489-4
ZhaoT, LiX, SunD, et al.Oxidative stress: One potential factor for arsenite-induced increase of N(6)-methyladenosine in human keratinocytes. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol, 2019; 69:95–103; doi: 10.1016/j.etap.2019.04.005
184.
ZhengQ, BaoC, GuoW, et al.Circular RNA profiling reveals an abundant circHIPK3 that regulates cell growth by sponging multiple miRNAs. Nat Commun, 2016; 7(1):11215; doi: 10.1038/ncomms11215
185.
ZhuHL, ShiXT, XuXF, et al.Melatonin protects against environmental stress-induced fetal growth restriction via suppressing ROS-mediated GCN2/ATF4/BNIP3-dependent mitophagy in placental trophoblasts. Redox Biol, 2021; 40:101854; doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2021.101854
