Abstract
Iron accumulation has been observed in mouse models and in both sporadic and familial forms of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Iron chelation could reduce iron accumulation and the related excess of oxidative stress in the motor pathways. However, classical iron chelation would induce systemic iron depletion. We assess the safety and efficacy of conservative iron chelation (i.e., chelation with low risk of iron depletion) in a murine preclinical model and pilot clinical trial. In Sod1 G86R mice, deferiprone increased the mean life span compared with placebo. The safety was good, without anemia after 12 months of deferiprone in the 23 ALS patients enrolled in the clinical trial. The decreases in the ALS Functional Rating Scale and the body mass index were significantly smaller for the first 3 months of deferiprone treatment (30 mg/kg/day) than for the first treatment-free period. Iron levels in the cervical spinal cord, medulla oblongata, and motor cortex (according to magnetic resonance imaging), as well as cerebrospinal fluid levels of oxidative stress and neurofilament light chains were lower after deferiprone treatment. Our observation leads to the hypothesis that moderate iron chelation regimen that avoids changes in systemic iron levels may constitute a novel therapeutic modality of neuroprotection for ALS. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 29, 742–748.
Introduction
A
The present work provides the first clinical evidence about the neuroprotective potential of a therapeutically safe chelation treatment on early-stage amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients, which responded significantly to treatment in both brain iron deposits and indicators of disease progression. The novel treatment relied on oral administration of deferiprone that by chelation of labile iron it conferred on oxidation-stressed animals, improved motor functions, while essentially sparing systemic iron. The paradigmatic modality of chelation with deferiprone in ALS has prompted a multicenter study.
Dose and Sex Effect on Neuroprotection with Deferiprone in the Murine Model of ALS
A dose- and sex-dependent effect of deferiprone on survival was observed in the SOD, superoxide dismutase (SOD)1G86R mouse model (Fig. 1). The female mice in the 50 mg/kg/day deferiprone groups survived for 13 days longer than those in the vehicle group (Fig. 1A). This corresponded to a 56% extension in survival from disease onset (defined as the peak in body weight) (Fig. 1B). The dose of 100 mg/kg/day was less effective and the dose of 200 mg/kg/day was not effective (not shown). A significant effect was observed in male mice only with the highest dose (200 mg/kg/day). Deferiprone improved the animals' physical examination, as shown by greater body weight (Fig. 1B), a lower peak in neurological impairment (i.e., a lower Neuroscore, a quick phenotypic neurological scoring system) (Fig. 1C), and return of gene expression of acetylcholine receptor subunit γ (Chrng) to wild-type levels (marker of denervation of muscles) (Fig. 1D). Importantly, treated mice had less iron accumulation in the spinal cord (shown by MRI T2* sequence) compared with vehicle control mice (Fig. 1E), demonstrating an ability of deferiprone to hit the biological target. As with treatment in other neurological models (2), deferiprone did not induce anemia, and serum ferritin was only marginally below normal levels at the highest dose (Fig. 1F).

Safety Profile of Deferiprone in Early ALS Patients
Twenty-three consecutive sporadic patients were enrolled (22 limb onset and 1 bulbar onset) (Table 1). Four patients dropped out: one patient died after a fall, and 3 withdrew their consent. All were compliant to medication. The non-neurological physical examination remained unchanged. All patients displaying normal hematologic profiles, a slight elevation in urine iron levels, and a transient decrease in serum ferritin (in the normal ranges) was observed in the first 3 months of treatment.
Data are mean ± standard deviation (first line) and median value [Quartile 1-Quartile 3] (second line). A revised ALSFRS-R score was measured as the primary outcome in the patient cohorts, whereas BMI, muscle strength (measured by MMT), and SVC were also evaluated as secondary outcomes (Student's test (*) or Wilcoxon test (**), depending on the distribution assessed using histograms and the Shapiro–Wilk test).
Iron content was quantified by R2* transverse relaxation rates ( = 1/T2*) measured using a 3-Tesla MRI system (analysis of variance for repeat measures; the statistically significant contrast analyses for V0 vs. V3, V3 vs. V6, and V6 vs. V9 are indicated).
Additional secondary biological outcomes were evaluated using previously characterized assays. Units observed in control patients were within the established ranges previously reported. Ferritin in CSF and serum in ng/mL. Iron in urines in μg/24 h. 8-oxdG: DNA adduct of 8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2′-deoxyguanosine in ng/mL (Highly Sensitive 8-OHdG Check, Gentaur France SARL, Paris, France), SOD in U/mL (whole blood, as published elsewhere8); NfL: neurofilament light chain in pg/mL (Simoa/Digital ELISA platform) and pNfH: phosphorylated neurofilament heavy chain in pg/mL (BioVendor kit) (Student's t-test (*) or Wilcoxon test (**), depending on the distribution assessed using histograms and the Shapiro–Wilk test).
The bold values are statistically significant.
Is There a Disease Modifying Effect of Deferiprone in Early ALS Patients?
The decrease in the ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R) score was significantly smaller for the first 3 months of deferiprone treatment than for the 3-month treatment-free period (p = 0.013) (Table 1). Likewise, the decrease in the body mass index (BMI) was significantly different, with a decrease during the first 3 months and a small increase during the treatment period (no percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding) (p = 0.047). Then, the BMI remained unchanged for 9 months. The reduction in manual muscle testing (MMT) scores was lower in patients on deferiprone than in matched patients from the Mitotarget study, although this difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.09) (Table 2).
The revised ALSFRS-R, BMI, muscle strength (measured by MMT), and SVC were evaluated.
Model for ALSFRS:
The bold value is statistically significant.
p-Value for the overall interaction between group and time, adjusted for the outcome level before DFP treatment (baseline).
Iron Accumulation and Oxidative Stress Reduction Under Deferiprone in Early ALS Patients
A significant decrease in iron concentration (shown by a decrease in R2*) was observed in the cervical spinal cord, the medulla oblongata, and the motor cortex but not in areas outside the motor system (i.e., the cerebellum and the occipital cortex) following treatment with deferiprone. Iron levels, oxidative stress markers, and neurofilament light chains were lower after deferiprone treatment in the CSF (Table 1).
Conservative Iron Chelation
The present study is a first to demonstrate the safety of conservative iron chelation in ALS. In both a murine model of familial ALS and sporadic ALS patients, low-dose deferiprone was associated with a decrease in pathologic iron accumulation in the central motor pathways but did not alter iron metabolism in other regions of the brain or in the periphery. This new therapeutic strategy appears to maintain the patient's overall aerobic metabolism and limit excess oxidative stress—as has been observed in Parkinson's disease (2).
Deferiprone significantly increased survival, as previously reported with other iron chelators (3, 5). This was observed despite treatment initiation at the symptomatic stage in the phenotypically aggressive SOD1G86R model. An interaction between dose and sex was observed; disease severity, iron accumulation, and the required dose were higher in males than in females.
Deferiprone had a good safety profile in patients, with adverse events mostly relating to persistent ALS symptoms. We did not detect any of the adverse events occasionally observed in patients, with systemic iron overload, treated with 100 mg/kg/day deferiprone.
Encouragingly, for a safety trial with a small number of patients, deferiprone treatment was associated with slower disability progression and weight loss. However, the occurrence of a nocebo effect and then a placebo effect cannot be ruled out, and so, a large, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial is underway.
Materials and Methods
SOD186R transgenic mice
All animal experiments were carried out in accordance with the “Principles of Laboratory Animal Care,” the current French and European Union legislative and regulatory framework (APAFIS#4269-2015112317225759), and the European ALS group's preclinical trial guidelines of 2010. A dose/response study was performed in FVB-Tg(Sod1*G86R)M1Jwg/J mice (JAX Laboratories) with 50, 100, or 200 mg/kg p.o. deferiprone or vehicle twice a day (10 in each group). Study treatment was initiated at 75 days, that is, an age at which these mice are devoid of motor symptoms but already present with weight loss. The investigators were blinded to the study treatment. MRI of the cervical spinal cord was done using a 7-T MR system (BioSpec Bruker, Ettlingen, Germany), using a multiecho T2*-weighted sequence (number of echoes: 12; first echo time: 4 ms; echo spacing: 7 ms; repetition time: 1500 ms; slice thickness: 1 mm; field of view: 200 × 250 mm; matrix: 256 × 256; number of signal averages: 2).
Clinical trial
A single-center, single-arm, 12-month pilot clinical trial was performed to evaluate the effect of deferiprone on patients with ALS. The patients were followed for a 3-month treatment-free period and then treated for 12 months with the liquid formulation of deferiprone at a dose level of 30 mg/kg/day (morning and evening dose). The patients were recruited between December 2013 and January 2015, and all provided written informed consent. All patients had been taking riluzole. Treatment compliance (>80%) was assessed by questioning the participants and inspection of the dispensed packs of medication. The primary outcome criterion was disease progression, measured using the revised ALSFRS-R. The 3-month treatment-free period was compared with the first 3 months of treatment. The secondary outcomes included MMT, BMI, slow vital capacity, and CSF levels of markers for oxidative stress and neurofilaments. Physical examination was assessed every 3 months together with adverse event reports and reviewed anonymously by an independent safety monitoring board. Weekly blood counts were used to monitor the risk of neutropenia. For exploratory purposes, 19 patients treated with deferiprone for 9 months were compared with 19 matched individuals from among the 512 patients in the Mitotarget trial (negative results with olesoxime; NCT:00868166) (7).
Iron content was quantified by R2* transverse relaxation rates ( = 1/T2*) measured using a 3-Tesla MRI system (Achieva, Philips Medical Systems, Best, The Netherlands), using a 2D fast-field echo multiecho sequence (number of echoes: 15; first echo time: 3.6 ms; echo spacing: 3.3 ms; repetition time: 1803 ms). Two stacks were subsequently acquired in the axial plane; 17 slices for each (slice thickness: 2 mm; isotropic, no gap, field of view: 230 × 190 mm; matrix: 116 × 95; number of signal averages: 2) to cover a volume between the floor of the fourth ventricle and the corpus callosum convexity. Images were processed using a T2* tool on an IDL virtual machine (V2,
Statistical analysis
Differences in main outcomes between the treatment-free period (months 0–3) and the first three months of deferiprone treatment (months 3–6) were assessed with a paired T test (for normally distributed variables) or Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
Taking into account the differences in baseline characteristics between the patients on deferiprone and the Mitotarget population, we performed 1:1 matching on three prespecified factors: age (±5 years), disease duration (±2 months), and sex. Changes in the main outcomes between month 3 and 15 (9 months of treatment) in the paired groups were compared using linear mixed models with random coefficients. Group, time, the group × time interaction, and the baseline value were considered as fixed effects, with the participant and block matching considered as random effects. All statistical tests were two sided (p < 0.05), and all data were analyzed using SAS software (version 9.4, SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC).
Study approval
All clinical investigations were performed in accordance with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. All patients provided written informed consent to participation. A local institutional review board approved the aims and procedures of the main study (national reference number: 2013-001228-21;
Footnotes
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the Lille University Medical Center, the ARSLA charity (Association pour la Recherche sur la Sclérose Latérale Amyotrophique et autres maladies du motoneurones), and ApoPharma, Inc. for support. They also thank Michael Spino, Fernando Tricta, John Connelly, and C.F. for valuable advice on deferiprone and the Fédération de la Recherche Clinique du CHU de Lille (Lille, France, with Professor Dominique Deplanque, Pauline Guyon, Edouard Millois, Francine Niset, Marie Pleuvret, P.G., and Bertrand Accard) for support. The authors also thank Andreas Jeromin for the kits of neurofilament assaying, Delphine Taillieu and Yann Lepage from the EOPS1 rodent behavioral exploration facility (Federation of Neurosciences, University of Lille, Lille, France), Dr. P.M., Jean Francois Wiart, and Valerie Cuvier for technical support. They thank Dr. David Fraser (Biotech Communication, Damery, France) for editing the article.
Authors' Contributions
A: study concept and design; B: acquisition of data; C: analysis and interpretation; D: critical revision of the article for important intellectual content; E: study supervision. Caroline Moreau: A, B, C, D; Véronique Danel: A, B, C, D; G.G., K.T., M.P., C.L., F.G., A.J., M.D., C.L., R.L., C.V.-D., G.K., T.P., P.J., F.A.: B, C, D; M.K. and A.D.: C, D, and independent and blind statistical analyses; P.F.P., H.B., P.C., L.D., Guillaume Garçon, L.D., J.D., R.B.: A, C, D; M.O., P.Ö.: B, C, D; D.D.: A, C, D, E; the indicated authors take responsibility for data collection and analysis and the principal investigator (DD), who had full access to all the study data, takes full responsibility for submitting the final work for publication.
Author Disclosure Statement
C.M. has received grants from the France Parkinson charity. She has received various honoraria from pharmaceutical companies for consultancy and lectures on Parkinson's disease at symposia, including Aguettant, AbbVie, Medtronic, and Novartis. V.D., J.C.D., G.G., K.T., M.P., C.L., F.G., A.J., M.D., C.L., R.L., C.V.-D., G.K., F.A., A.D., M.K., H.B., T.P., P.J.-T., L.D., G.G., P.O., R.B., and J.D. have nothing to declare. P.C. served on the advisory board and received honoraria from Roche for consultancy and grants from the ARSLA charity. P.F.P. has received grants from the ARSLA charity, the Association Française contre les Myopathies-Téléthon (AFM-Téléthon), the Institut pour la Recherche sur la Moelle épinière et l'Encéphale (IRME), the T.L. Foundation, and the Target ALS Foundation. L.D. served on the Scientific Advisory Board for Novartis and Aguettant, and has received honoraria from pharmaceutical companies for consultancy and lectures. M.O. received grants from the European Union (FAIRPARK-II), German Ministry of Science and Technology (KNDD-FTLDc), T.L. Foundation, ALS Foundation, Foundation of the state Baden-Wuerttemberg, and the German Science Foundation. He has served as advisor for Axon, Biogen, and given lectures for Lilly, Fujirebio, and Teva. D.D. has received PHRC grants from the French Ministry of Health and research funding from the ARSLA charity, the France Parkinson charity, and the Credit Agricole Foundation. He has led two investigator-driven pilot studies involving deferiprone (FAIRPARK-I and SAFE-FAIR ALS-I), provided free of charge by ApoPharma. He has served on advisory boards, served as a consultant, and given lectures for pharmaceutical companies such as Orkyn, Aguettant, AbbVie, Medtronic, Novartis, Teva, UCB, Lundbeck, and ApoPharma.
