Aims:Azospirillum brasilense harbors two redox-sensitive Zinc-binding anti-sigma (ZAS) factors (ChrR1 and ChrR2), which negatively regulate the activity of their cognate extra-cytoplasmic function (ECF) σ factors (RpoE1 and RpoE2) by occluding their binding to the core enzyme. Both pairs of RpoE-ChrR control responses to photooxidative stress. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the two RpoE-ChrR pairs cross-talk while responding to the stress. Results:In silico analysis showed a high sequence similarity between ChrR1 and ChrR2 proteins, but differences in redox sensitivity. Using in silico and in vitro methods of protein–protein interaction, we have shown that both ChrR1 and ChrR2 proteins physically bind to their noncognate RpoE proteins. Restoration of the phenotypes of chrR1::Tn5 and chrR2::Km mutants related to carotenoid biosynthesis and photooxidative stress tolerance by expressing chrR1 or chrR2 provided in vivo evidence for the cross-talk. In addition, up- or down-regulation of several identical proteins by expressing chrR1 or chrR2 in the chrR1::Tn5 mutant provided another in vivo evidence for the cross-talk. Innovation: Although multiple redox-sensitive ZAS anti-σ factors occur in some Gram-positive bacteria, no cross-talk is reported among them. We report here, for the first time, that the two ZAS anti-σ factors of A. brasilense also interact with their noncognate σ factors and affect gene expression. Conclusion: The two redox-sensitive ZAS anti-σ factors in A. brasilense may interact with their cognate as well as noncognate ECF σ factors to play an important role in redox homeostasis by facilitating recovery from the oxidative stress. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 20, 42–59.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alvarez-MartinezCE, LourencoRF, BaldiniRL, LaubMT, and GomesSL. The ECF sigma factor σT is involved in osmotic and oxidative stress responses in Caulobacter crescentus. Mol Microbiol, 66: 1240–1255, 2007.
2.
AnthonyJ, WarczakKL, and DonohueTJ. A transcriptional response to singlet oxygen, a toxic byproduct of photosynthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 102: 6502–6507, 2005.
3.
AnthonyJR, NewmanJD, and DonohueTJ. Interactions between the Rhodobacter sphaeroides ECF sigma factor, SigE, and its anti-sigma factor, ChrR. J Mol Biol, 341: 345–360, 2004.
4.
BaeJB, ParkJH, HahnMY, KimMS, and RoeJH. Redox-dependent changes in RsrA, an anti-sigma factor in Streptomyces coelicolor: Zinc release and disulfide bond formation. J Mol Biol, 335: 425–435, 2004.
5.
BanerjeeM, BallalA, and ApteSK. A novel glutaredoxin domain-containing peroxiredoxin ‘All1541’ protects the N2-fixing cyanobacterium Anabaena PCC 7120 from oxidative stress. Biochem J, 442: 671–680, 2012.
6.
BangIS, FryeJG, McClellandM, VelayudhanJ, and FangFC. Alternative sigma factor interactions in Salmonella: σE and σH promote antioxidant defences by enhancing σS levels. Mol Microbiol, 56: 811–823, 2005.
7.
BasseMJ, BetziS, BourgeasR, BouzidiS, ChetritB, HamonV, MorelliX, and RocheP. 2P2Idb: a structural database dedicated to orthosteric modulation of protein-protein interactions. Nucleic Acids Res, 41: D824–D827, 2013.
8.
BerghoffBA, GlaeserJ, NussAM, ZobawaM, LottspeichF, and KlugG. Anoxygenic photosynthesis and photooxidative stress: a particular challenge for Roseobacter. Environ Microbiol, 13: 775–791, 2011.
9.
BrownKL and HughesKT. The role of anti-sigma factors in gene regulation. Mol Microbiol, 16: 397–404, 1995.
10.
CampbellE, TupyJ, GruberT, WangS, SharpM, GrossC, and DarstS. Crystal structure of Escherichia coli σE with the cytoplasic domain of its anti-σ RseA. Mol Cell, 11: 1067–1078, 2003.
11.
CampbellEA and DarstSA. Regulation of bacterial transcription by anti-σ factors. In: Structural Biology of Bacterial Pathogenesis, edited by WaksmanG, CaparonM, and HultgrenS. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology Press, 2005, pp. 1–15.
12.
CampbellEA, GreenwellR, AnthonyJR, WangS, LimL, DasK, SofiaHJ, DonohueTJ, and DarstSA. A conserved structural module regulates transcriptional responses to diverse stress signals in bacteria. Mol Cell, 27: 793–805, 2007.
13.
CampbellEA, WestbladeLF, and DarstSA. Regulation of bacterial RNA polymerase sigma factor activity: a structural perspective. Curr Opin Microbiol, 11: 121–127, 2008.
14.
CreightonTE. Disulphide bonds between cysteine residues. In: Protein Structure edited by CreightonTE. Oxford, United Kingdom: IRL Press, 1989, p. 156.
15.
FirovedAM, BoucherJC, and DereticV. Global genomic analysis of AlgU (σE)-dependent promoters (sigmulon) in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and implications for inflammatory processes in cystic fibrosis. J Bacteriol, 184: 1057–1064, 2002.
16.
GalperinMY. Bacterial signal transduction network in a genomic perspective. Environ Microbiol, 6: 552–567, 2004.
17.
GeorgiouG. How to flip the (redox) switch. Cell, 111: 607–610, 2002.
18.
GostickDO, GreenJ, IrvineAS, GassonMJ, and GuestJR. A novel regulatory switch mediated by the FNR-like protein of Lactobacillus casei. Microbiology, 144: 705–717, 1998.
19.
GraumannJ, LilieH, TangX, TuckerKA, HoffmannJH, VijayalakshmiJ, SaperM, BardwellJC, and JakobU. Activation of the redox-regulated molecular chaperone Hsp33-a two step mechanism. Structure, 9: 377–387, 2001.
20.
GruberTM and GrossCA. Multiple sigma subunits and the partitioning of bacterial transcription space. Annu Rev Microbiol, 57: 441–466, 2003.
21.
GuptaN, KumarS, MishraMN, and TripathiAK. A constitutively expressed pair of rpoE2-chrR2 in Azospirillum brasilense Sp7 is required for survival under antibiotic and oxidative stress. Microbiology, 159: 205–218, 2013.
22.
HelmannJD and ChamberlinMJ. Structure and function of bacterial σ factors. Annu Rev Biochem, 57: 839–872, 1988.
HelmannJD. The extracytoplasmic function (ECF) sigma factors. Adv Microb Physiol, 46: 47–110, 2002.
25.
JacobU, EserM, and BardwellJC. Redox switch of Hsp33 has a novel zinc-binding motif. J Biol Chem, 275: 38302–38310, 2000.
26.
JakobU, MuseW, EserM, and BardwellJCA. Chaperone activity with a redox switch. Cell, 96: 341–352, 1999.
27.
KangJ, PagetM, SeokY, HahnM, BaeJ, HahnJS, KleanthousC, ButtnerMJ, and RoeJH. RsrA, an anti-sigma factor regulated by redox change. EMBO J, 18: 4292–4298, 1999.
28.
KittichotiratW, GuerquinM, BumgarnerR E, and SamudralaR. Protinfo PPC: A web server for atomic level prediction of protein complexes. Nucleic Acids Res, 37: W519–W525, 2009.
29.
KumarK, TharadM, GanapathyS, RamG, NarayanA, KhanJA, PratapR, GhoshA, SamuchiwalSK, KumarS, BhallaK, GuptaD, NatarajanK, SinghY, and RanganathanA. Phenylalanine-rich peptides potently bind ESAT6, a virulence determinant of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, and concurrently affect the pathogen's growth. PLoS One, 4: e7615, 2009.
30.
KumarS, RaiAK, MishraMN, ShuklaM, SinghPK, and TripathiAK. RpoH2 sigma factor controls the photooxidative stress response in non-photosynthetic rhizobacterium Azospirillum brasilense Sp7. Microbiology, 158: 2891–2902, 2012.
31.
KundrotasPJ, ZhuZ, and VakserIA. GWIDD: Genome-wide protein docking database. Nucleic Acids Res, 38: D513–D517, 2010.
32.
LiW, BottrillAR, BibbMJ, ButtnerMJ, PagetMS, and KleanthousC. The role of zinc in the disulfide stress-regulated anti-sigma factor RsrA from Streptomyces coelicolor. J Mol Biol, 333: 461–472, 2003.
33.
LofererH, WunderlichM, HenneckeH, and GlockshuberR. A bacterial thioredoxin-like protein that is exposed to the periplasm has redox properties comparable with those of cytoplasmic thioredoxins. J Biol Chem, 270: 26178–26183, 1995.
34.
López-GomollónS, HernándezJA, PellicerS, AngaricaVE, PeleatoML, and FillatMF. Cross-talk between iron and nitrogen regulatory networks in Anabaena (Nostoc) sp. PCC 7120: identification of overlapping genes in FurA and NtcA regulons. J Mol Biol, 374: 267–281, 2007.
35.
ManganelliR, ProveddiR, RodrigueS, BeaucherJ, GaudreauL, and SmithI. Sigma factors and global gene regulation in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Bacteriol, 186: 895–902, 2004.
36.
Martınez-SalazarJM, SalazarE, EncarnacionS, Ramirez-RomeroMA, and RiveraJ. Role of the extracytoplasmic function sigma factor RpoE4 in oxidative and osmotic stress responses in Rhizobium etli. J Bacteriol, 191: 4122–4132, 2009.
37.
MishraMN, KumarS, GuptaN, KaurS, GuptaA, and TripathiAK. An extra-cytoplasmic function sigma factor cotranscribed with its cognate anti-sigma factor confers tolerance to NaCl, ethanol and methylene blue in Azospirillum brasilense Sp7. Microbiology, 157: 988–999, 2011.
38.
NewmanJD, AnthonyJR, and DonohueTJ. The importance of zinc-binding to the function of Rhodobacter sphaeroides ChrR as an anti-sigma factor. J Mol Biol, 313: 485–499, 2001.
39.
NinfaAJ and MagasanikB. Covalent modification of the glnG product, NRI, by the glnL product, NRII, regulates the transcription of the glnALG operon in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 83: 5909–5913, 1986.
40.
NinfaAJ, NinfaEG, LupasAN, StockA, MagasanikB, and StockJ. Crosstalk between bacterial chemotaxis signal transduction proteins and regulators of transcription of the Ntr regulon: evidence that nitrogen assimilation and chemotaxis are controlled by a common phosphotransfer mechanism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 85: 5492–5496, 1988.
41.
NurI, YuvalLS, OkonY, and HenisY. Carolenoid composition and function in nitrogen fixing bacteria of the genus Azospirillum. J Gen Microbiol, 122: 27–32, 1981.
42.
NussAM, GlaeserJ, BerghoffBA and KlugG. Overlapping alternative sigma factor regulons in response to singlet oxygen in Rhodobacter sphaeroides. J Bacteriol, 192: 2613–2623, 2010.
43.
Ortiz de Orué LucanaD, WedderhoffI, and GrovesMR. ROS-mediated signalling in bacteria: zinc-containing Cys-X-X-Cys redox centres and iron-based oxidative stress. J Signal Transduct, 2012: 605905, 2012.
44.
PagetM, MolleV, CohenG, AharonowitzY, and ButtnerM. Defining the disulphide stress response in Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2): identification of the σR regulon. Mol Microbiol, 42: 1007–1020, 2001.
45.
PagetMSB and ButtnerMJ. Thiol-based regulatoryswitches. Annu Rev Genet, 37: 91–121, 2003.
46.
PettersenEF, GoddardTD, HuangCC, CouchGS, GreenblattDM, MengEC, and FerrinTE. UCSF Chimera-a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J Comput Chem, 25: 1605–1612, 2004.
47.
QiuJ and HelmannJD. The −10 region is a key promoter specificity determinant for the Bacillus subtilis ECF sigma factor σX and σW. J Bacteriol, 183: 1921–1927, 2001.
48.
RowleyG, SpectorM, KormanecJ, and RobertsM. Pushing the envelope: extracytoplasmic stress responses in bacterial pathogens. Nat Rev Microbiol, 4: 383–394, 2006.
49.
Saïd-SalimB, MostowyS, KristofAS, and BehrMA. Mutations in Mycobacterium tuberculosis Rv0444c, the gene encoding anti-SigK, explain high level expression of MPB70 and MPB83 in Mycobacterium bovis. Mol Microbiol, 62: 1251–1263, 2006.
50.
SalvadoB, VilaprinyoE, KarathiaH, SorribasA, and AlvesR. Two component systems: physiological effect of a third component. PLoS One, 7: e31095, 2012.
51.
SchurrMJ, YuH, Martinez-SalazarJM, BoucherJC, and DereticV. Control of AlgU, a member of the sigma E-like family of stress sigma factors, by the negative regulators MucA and MucB and Pseudomonas aeruginosa conversion to mucoidy in cystic fibrosis. J Bacteriol, 178: 4997–5004, 1996.
52.
SimonR, PrieferU, and PuehlerA. A broad host range mobilization system for in vivo genetic engineering: transposon mutagenesis in Gram negative bacteria. Biotechnology, 1: 784–791, 1983.
53.
StaronA, SofiaHJ, DietrichS, UlrichLE, LiesegangH, and MascherT. The third pillar of bacterial signal transduction: classification of the extracytoplasmic function (ECF) sigma factor protein family. Mol Microbiol, 74: 557–581, 2009.
54.
ThakurKG, JaiswalRK, ShuklaJK, PraveenaT, and GopalB. Over-expression and purification strategies for recombinant multi-protein oligomers: a case study of Mycobacterium tuberculosis σ/anti-σ factor protein complexes. Protein Expr Purif, 74: 223–230, 2010.
55.
ThirunavukkarasuN, MishraMN, SpaepenS, VanderleydenJ, GrossCA, and TripathiAK. An extra-cytoplasmic function sigma factor and anti-sigma factor control carotenoid biosynthesis in Azospirillum brasilense. Microbiology, 154: 2096–2105, 2008.
56.
UlrichLE, KooninEV, and ZhulinIB. One-component systems dominate signal transduction in prokaryotes. Trends Microbiol, 13: 52–56, 2005.
57.
VanstockemM, MichielsK, VanderleydenJ, and Van GoolAP. Transposon mutagenesis of Azospirillum brasilense and Azospirillum lipoferum: physical analysis of Tn5 and Tn5-mob insertion mutants. Appl Environ Microbiol, 53: 410–415, 1987.
58.
VerhammeDT, ArentsJC, PostmaPW, CrielaardW, and HellingwerfKJ. Investigation of in vivo cross-talk between key two-component systems of Escherichia coli. Microbiology, 148: 69–78, 2002.
59.
WenlungS and LeeCH. Predict interactions between protein residues for developing antibody therapeutics. Adv Mater Res, 383: 4003–4006, 2012.
60.
WinterC, HenschelA, TuukkanenA, and SchroederM. Protein interactions in 3D: From interface evolution to drug discovery. J Struct Biol, 179: 347–358, 2012.
61.
WuichetK and ZhulinIB. Origins and diversification of a complex signal transduction system in prokaryotes. Sci Signal, 3: 219–225, 2010.
62.
YoshimuraM, AsaiK, SadaieY, and YoshikawaH. Interaction of Bacillus subtilis extracytoplasmic function (ECF) sigma factors with the N-terminal regions of their potential anti-sigma factors. Microbiology, 150: 591–599, 2004.
63.
ZdanowskiK, DoughtyP, JakimowiczP, O'HaraL, ButtnerMJ, PagetMS, and KleanthousC. Assignment of the zinc ligands in RsrA, a redox-sensing ZAS protein from Streptomyces coelicolor. Biochemistry, 45: 8294–8300, 2006.
64.
ZhengM, AslundF, and StorzG. Activation of the OxyR transcription factor by reversible disulfide bond formation. Science, 279: 1718–1721, 1998.
65.
ZiegelhofferEC and DonohueTJ. Bacterial responses to photo-oxidative stress. Nat Rev Microbiol, 7: 856–863, 2009.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
