Sexual minority men (SMM) who experience intimate partner violence (IPV) may also be at increased risk for HIV; however, little is known about the relationship between these experiences and the utilization of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention. This systematic review aimed to synthesize available literature to examine the complex interplay between IPV experiences and engagement in the PrEP care continuum among SMM. A comprehensive search following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines in Embase, PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Medline, and CINAHL identified only 13 relevant articles, most of which were conducted in the United States (n = 9) and only two in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Nearly all studies (n = 12, 92.3%) were quantitative in design and used cross-sectional data. The findings of this review identified critical gaps in measuring IPV and PrEP outcomes and revealed mixed findings regarding the complex interplay between IPV and PrEP care engagement in the context of syndemics experienced by SMM. The results highlight the critical need for future research to understand the impact of IPV on PrEP uptake and adherence and its underlying mechanisms. This includes investigating the effects of different types of IPV (e.g., emotional, physical, sexual) on PrEP utilization and how these experiences influence PrEP preferences, such as daily PrEP versus on-demand PrEP or long-acting injectable PrEP. The implications of this review call for comprehensive public health policies and integrated health care practices that provide tailored interventions for IPV screening in PrEP care settings to deliver IPV services and promote engagement in the PrEP care continuum among SMM, as well as further investigation in LMICs.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
MayerKH, NelsonL, Hightow-WeidmanL, et al.The persistent and evolving HIV epidemic in American men who have sex with men. Lancet, 2021; 397(10279):1116–1126; doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00321-4
2.
StannahJ, SoniN, LamJKS, et al.Trends in HIV testing, the treatment cascade, and HIV incidence among men who have sex with men in Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet HIV, 2023; 10(8):e528–e542; doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(23)00111-X
3.
SullivanPS, JohnsonAS, PembletonES, et al.Epidemiology of HIV in the USA: Epidemic burden, inequities, contexts, and responses. Lancet, 2021; 397(10279):1095–1106.
4.
GrantRM, LamaJR, AndersonPL, et al.Preexposure chemoprophylaxis for HIV prevention in men who have sex with men. N Engl J Med, 2010; 363(27):2587–2599; doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1011205
5.
BaetenJM, DonnellD, NdaseP, et al.Antiretroviral prophylaxis for HIV Prevention in heterosexual men and women. N Engl J Med, 2012; 367(5):399–410; doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1108524
6.
HeffronR, MugoN, WereE, et al.PrEP is efficacious for HIV-1 prevention among women using DMPA for contraception. AIDS, 2014; 28(18):2771–2776; doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000000493
7.
PrEPWatch. The Global PrEP Tracker. Published 2024 Available from: https://data.prepwatch.org/ [Last accessed: April18, 2024].
8.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. US Public Health Service: Preexposure prophylaxis for the prevention of HIV infection in the United States—2021 Update: a clinical practice guideline. Published online 2021:108.
9.
LandovitzRJ, DonnellD, ClementME, et al.Cabotegravir for HIV prevention in cisgender men and transgender women. N Engl J Med, 2021; 385(7):595–608; doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2101016
10.
EdezaA, Karina SantamariaE, ValentePK, et al.Experienced barriers to adherence to pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention among MSM: A systematic review and meta-ethnography of qualitative studies. AIDS Care, 2021; 33(6):697–705; doi: 10.1080/09540121.2020.1778628
11.
GolubSA, GamarelKE, RendinaHJ, et al.From efficacy to effectiveness: Facilitators and barriers to PrEP acceptability and motivations for adherence among MSM and transgender women in New York City. AIDS Patient Care STDS, 2013; 27(4):248–254; doi: 10.1089/apc.2012.0419
12.
ZablotskaI, GrulichAE, PhanuphakN, et al.PrEP implementation in the Asia‐Pacific region: Opportunities, implementation and barriers. J Int AIDS Soc, 2016; 19(7(Suppl 6):21119.
13.
MatacottaJJ, Rosales-PerezFJ, CarrilloCM. HIV preexposure prophylaxis and treatment as prevention—beliefs and access barriers in men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women: A systematic review. J Patient Cent Res Rev, 2020; 7(3):265–274.
14.
EzenniaO, GeterA, SmithDK. The PrEP care continuum and black men who have sex with men: A scoping review of published data on awareness, uptake, adherence, and retention in PrEP Care. AIDS Behav, 2019; 23(10):2654–2673; doi: 10.1007/s10461-019-02641-2
15.
PlotzkerR, SeekaewP, JantarapakdeJ, et al.Importance of risk perception: Predictors of PrEP acceptance among Thai MSM and TG women at a community-based health service. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr, 2017; 76(5):473–481.
16.
BlashillAJ, BradyJP, RooneyBM, et al.Syndemics and the PrEP cascade: Results from a sample of young Latino men who have sex with men. Arch Sex Behav, 2020; 49(1):125–135; doi: 10.1007/s10508-019-01470-7
17.
MitchellJW, LeeJY, WoodyattC, et al.HIV-negative male couples’ attitudes about pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and using PrEP with a sexual agreement. AIDS Care, 2016; 28(8):994–999; doi: 10.1080/09540121.2016.1168911
18.
DeckerM, LittletonHL, EdwardsKM. An updated review of the literature on LGBTQ+ intimate partner violence. Curr Sex Health Rep, 2018; 10(4):265–272.
19.
DomingosVAC, de LiraAN. Risk and protective factors associated with intimate partner violence with gay men: A scoping review. Trauma Violence Abuse, 2023; 25(3):2264–2281; doi: 10.1177/15248380231209738Published online November 23, 15248380231209738
20.
PeitzmeierSM, MalikM, KattariSK, et al.Intimate partner violence in transgender populations: Systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence and correlates. Am J Public Health, 2020; 110(9):e1–e14; doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305774
21.
CallanA, CorballyM, McElvaneyR. A scoping review of intimate partner violence as it relates to the experiences of gay and bisexual men. Trauma Violence Abuse, 2021; 22(2):233–248; doi: 10.1177/1524838020970898
22.
YuY, CaiH, ChenX, et al.Intimate partner violence and its associations among HIV-infected MSM with new drug abuse in Jinan, China. BMC Public Health, 2023; 23(1):2517; doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17451-4
23.
LiuM, CaiX, HaoG, et al.Prevalence of intimate partner violence among men who have sex with men: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Sex Med, 2021; 9(6):100433; doi: 10.1016/j.esxm.2021.100433
24.
SwiatloAD, KahnNF, HalpernCT. Intimate partner violence perpetration and victimization among young adult sexual minorities. Perspect Sex Reprod Health, 2020; 52(2):97–105; doi: 10.1363/psrh.12138
25.
StephensonR, DarbesLA, RossoMT, et al.Perceptions of contexts of intimate partner violence among young, partnered gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men in the United States. J Interpers Violence, 2022; 37(15-16):NP12881–NP12900; doi: 10.1177/08862605211001472
26.
HongC, StephensonR, SantosGM, et al.Intimate partner violence victimization during the COVID-19 pandemic among a global online sample of sexual minority men. J Fam Violence, 2023; 38(8):1–10; doi: 10.1007/s10896-022-00461-y
27.
DavisDA, RockA, Santa LuceR, et al.Intimate partner violence victimization and mental health among men who have sex with men living with HIV in Guatemala. J Interpers Violence, 2020; 37(3-4):NP1637–NP1657; doi: 10.1177/0886260520928960 Published online June 17, 0886260520928960
28.
NydeggerLA, BlancoL, MartiCN, et al.Evaluation of sexual minority identity as a moderator of the association between intimate partner violence and suicidal ideation and attempts among a national sample of youth. PLoS One, 2020; 15(8):e0236880.
29.
HeintzAJ, MelendezRM. Intimate partner violence and HIV/STD risk among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender individuals. J Interpers Violence, 2006; 21(2):193–208.
30.
ParsonsJT, MillarBM, MoodyRL, et al.Syndemic conditions and HIV transmission risk behavior among HIV-negative gay and bisexual men in a US national sample. Health Psychol, 2017; 36(7):695–703.
31.
BullerAM, DevriesKM, HowardLM, et al.Associations between intimate partner violence and health among men who have sex with men: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med, 2014; 11(3):e1001609; doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001609
32.
EdwardsKM, SylaskaKM, NealAM. Intimate partner violence among sexual minority populations: A critical review of the literature and agenda for future research. Psychology of Violence, 2015; 5(2):112–121.
33.
O’MalleyTL, HawkME, EganJE, et al.Intimate partner violence and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP): A rapid review of current evidence for women’s HIV prevention. AIDS Behav, 2020; 24(5):1342–1357; doi: 10.1007/s10461-019-02743-x
34.
RobertsST, HabererJ, CelumC, et al.Intimate partner violence and adherence to HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in African women in HIV serodiscordant relationships: A prospective cohort study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr, 2016; 73(3):313–322.
35.
O’MalleyTL, EganJE, HawkME, et al.Intimate partner violence, HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) acceptability, and attitudes about use: Perspectives of women seeking care at a family planning clinic. AIDS Behav, 2021; 25(2):427–437.
36.
JinG, ShiH, DuJ, et al.Pre-exposure prophylaxis care continuum for HIV risk populations: An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. AIDS Patient Care STDS, 2023; 37(12):583–615; doi: 10.1089/apc.2023.0158
37.
MeyerIH. Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychol Bull, 2003; 129(5):674–697; doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.674
38.
MeyerIH, FrostDM. Minority stress and the health of sexual minorities. In: Handbook of Psychology and Sexual Orientation. Oxford University Press; 2013:252–266.
39.
StephensonR, DarbesLA, ChavandukaT, et al.HIV testing, knowledge and willingness to use PrEP among partnered men who have sex with men in South Africa and Namibia. AIDS Behav, 2021; 25(7):1993–2004; doi: 10.1007/s10461-020-03129-0
40.
BraksmajerA, WaltersSM, CreanHF, et al.Pre-exposure prophylaxis use among men who have sex with men experiencing partner violence. AIDS Behav, 2020; 24(8):2299–2306; doi: 10.1007/s10461-020-02789-2
41.
StephensonR, RogersE, ManserghG, et al.Intimate partner violence and preferences for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) modes of delivery among a sample of gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men. AIDS Behav, 2022; 26(7):2425–2434; doi: 10.1007/s10461-022-03587-8
42.
PageMJ, McKenzieJE, BossuytPM, et al.The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 2021; 372:n71; doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71
43.
HongC. Characterizing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on HIV PrEP care: A review and synthesis of the literature. AIDS Behav, 2023; 27(7):2089–2102; doi: 10.1007/s10461-022-03941-w
44.
PeterssonJ, StrandSJM. Family-only perpetrators of intimate partner violence: A systematic review. Trauma Violence Abuse, 2020; 21(2):367–381; doi: 10.1177/1524838018770410
45.
BootsG, CrozierB, PopovicG, et al.Self-reported intimate partner violence among men who have sex with men at an urban Australian sexual health clinic. Sex Health, 2024; 21(1):NULL; doi: 10.1071/SH23160
46.
ChenYT, DuncanDT, Del VecchioN, et al.COVID-19–related stressors, sex behaviors, and HIV status neutral care among black men who have sex with men and transgender women in Chicago, USA. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr, 2021; 88(3):261–271.
47.
FriedmanMR, SangJM, BukowskiLA, et al.Prevalence and correlates of PrEP awareness and use among black men who have sex with men and women (MSMW) in the United States. AIDS Behav, 2019; 23(10):2694–2705; doi: 10.1007/s10461-019-02446-3
48.
GuoP, HouF, CaoW, et al.Intimate partner violence and willingness to use pre-exposure prophylaxis among men who have sex with men in Chengdu, China. J Interpers Violence, 2023; 38(7-8):5824–5848; doi: 10.1177/08862605221127197
49.
JohnSA, StarksTJ, RendinaHJ, et al.Should I convince my partner to go on pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP)? The role of personal and relationship factors on PrEP-related social control among gay and bisexual men. AIDS Behav, 2018; 22(4):1239–1252; doi: 10.1007/s10461-017-1835-1
50.
KahleEM, SharmaA, SullivanS, et al.The Influence of relationship dynamics and sexual agreements on perceived partner support and benefit of PrEP use among same-sex male couples in the U.S. AIDS Behav, 2020; 24(7):2169–2177; doi: 10.1007/s10461-020-02782-9
51.
SangJM, MooreDM, WangL, et al.Examining the secondary impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on syndemic production and PrEP use among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (GBM) in Vancouver, Canada. BMC Public Health, 2023; 23(1):2124; doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17049-w
52.
StorholmED, ReynoldsHE, MuthuramalingamS, et al.Intimate partner violence and the sexual health of sexual minority men. LGBT Health, 2023; 10(S1):S39–S48; doi: 10.1089/lgbt.2023.0134
53.
WirtzAL, BurnsPA, PoteatT, et al.Abuse in the Continua: HIV prevention and care outcomes and syndemic conditions associated with intimate partner violence among black gay and bisexual men in the Southern United States. AIDS Behav, 2022; 26(11):3761–3774; doi: 10.1007/s10461-022-03705-6
54.
StephensonR, FinneranC. The IPV-GBM scale: A new scale to measure intimate partner violence among gay and bisexual men. PLoS One, 2013; 8(6):e62592; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062592
55.
FinneranC, StephensonR. Intimate partner violence among men who have sex with men: A systematic review. Trauma Violence Abuse, 2013; 14(2):168–185; doi: 10.1177/1524838012470034
56.
SaltzmanLE, FanslowJL, McMahonPM, ShelleyGA. Intimate partner violence surveillance: Uniform definitions and recommended data elements. Version 1.0. Published online 1999.
57.
DarbesLA, ChakravartyD, NeilandsTB, et al.Sexual risk for HIV among gay male couples: A longitudinal study of the impact of relationship dynamics. Arch Sex Behav, 2014; 43(1):47–60.
58.
HoffCC, CampbellCK, ChakravartyD, et al.Relationship-based predictors of sexual risk for HIV among MSM couples: A systematic review of the literature. AIDS Behav, 2016; 20(12):2873–2892.
59.
SullivanPS, SalazarL, BuchbinderS, et al.Estimating the proportion of HIV transmissions from main sex partners among men who have sex with men in five US cities. AIDS, 2009; 23(9):1153–1162; doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32832baa34
60.
SingerM. Introduction to Syndemics: A Critical Systems Approach to Public and Community Health. John Wiley & Sons; 2009.
61.
StallR, FriedmanM, and CataniaJA. Interacting Epidemics and Gay Men’s Health: A Theory of Syndemic Production among Urban Gay Men. In: WolitskiRJ, StallR, and ValdiserriRO, Eds. Unequal Opportunity: Health Disparities Affecting Gay and Bisexual Men in the United States, Oxford University Press, New York, 2008; 251–274.
62.
JieW, CiyongL, XueqingD, et al.A syndemic of psychosocial problems places the MSM (men who have sex with men) population at greater risk of HIV infection. PLoS One, 2012; 7(3):e32312.
63.
BielloKB, OldenburgCE, SafrenSA, et al.Multiple syndemic psychosocial factors are associated with reduced engagement in HIV care among a multinational, online sample of HIV-infected MSM in Latin America. AIDS Care, 2016; 28 Suppl 1(sup1):84–91; doi: 10.1080/09540121.2016.1146205
64.
ChakrapaniV, NewmanPA, ShunmugamM, et al.Syndemics of depression, alcohol use, and victimisation, and their association with HIV-related sexual risk among men who have sex with men and transgender women in India. Glob Public Health, 2017; 12(2):250–265.
65.
SantosGM, DoT, BeckJ, et al.Syndemic conditions associated with increased HIV risk in a global sample of men who have sex with men. Sex Transm Infect, 2014; 90(3):250–253.
66.
HongC, HorvathKJ, StephensonR, et al.PrEP use and persistence among young sexual minority men 17–24 years old during the COVID-19 pandemic. AIDS Behav, 2022; 26(3):631–638; doi: 10.1007/s10461-021-03423-5
67.
De SantisJP, Gonzalez-GuardaR, Provencio-VasquezE, et al.The tangled branches (Las Ramas Enredadas) sexual risk, substance abuse, and intimate partner violence among Hispanic men who have sex with men. J Transcult Nurs, 2014; 25(1):23–32.
68.
AndradeEA, BetancourtG, MoralesG, et al.A Community-based Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Telehealth Program focused on Latinx sexual minority men. AIDS Patient Care STDS, 2023; 37(11):517–524; doi: 10.1089/apc.2023.0185
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
