Youth with HIV (YWH) face challenges in achieving viral suppression, particularly in the Southern United States, and welcome novel interventions responsive to community needs. The Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) describes factors that influence behavior change, and the Positive Youth Development (PYD) supports youth-focused program design. We applied TPB and PYD to explore factors supporting care engagement and challenges for YWH in South Texas. We conducted 14 semi-structured interviews with YWH and 7 focus groups with 26 stakeholders informed by TPB, PYD, and themes from a youth advisory board (YAB). The research team and YAB reviewed emerging themes, and feedback-aided iterative revision of interview guides and codebook. Thematic analysis compared code families by respondent type, TPB, and PYD. All study methods were reviewed by the UT Health San Antonio and University Health Institutional Review Boards. Emerging themes associated with care engagement included: varied reactions to HIV diagnosis from acceptance to fear/grief; financial, insurance, and mental health challenges; history of trauma; high self-efficacy; desire for independence; and desire for engagement with clinic staff from their age group. Stakeholders perceived YWH lifestyle, including partying and substance use, as care barriers. In contrast, YWH viewed “partying” as an unwelcome stereotype, and barriers to care included multiple jobs and family responsibilities. Two key themes captured in PYD but not in TPB were the importance of youth voice in program design and structural barriers to care (e.g., insurance, transportation). Based on these findings, we provide critical and relevant guidance for those seeking to design more effective youth-centered HIV care engagement interventions. By considering the perspectives of YWH in program design and incorporating the PYD framework, stakeholders can better align with YWHs' desire for representation and agency. Our findings provide important and relevant guidance for those seeking to design more effective HIV care engagement interventions for YWH.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
HaguiharaT, da Oliveira SilvaM, RebouçasMC, et al.Factors associated with mortality in HIV patients failing antiretroviral therapy, in Salvador, Brazil. Braz J Infect Dis, 2019; 23(3):160–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjid.2019.06.001.
2.
RyscavagePA, AndersonEJ, SuttonSH, et al.Clinical outcomes of adolescents and young adults in adult HIV care. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr, 2011; 58(2):193–197. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0B013E31822D7564.
3.
KapogiannisBG, KoenigLJ, XuJ, et al.The HIV continuum of care for adolescents and young adults attending 13 urban US HIV care centers of the NICHD-ATN-CDC-HRSA SMILE collaborative. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr, 2020; 84(1):92–100. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000002308.
4.
Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral and clinical characteristics of persons with diagnosed HIV infection—Medical monitoring project. HIV Surveillance Special Report 29. 2020.
5.
Allan-BlitzLT, MenaLA, MayerKH. The ongoing HIV epidemic in American youth: Challenges and opportunities. Mhealth, 2021; 7:33. https://doi.org/10.21037/mhealth-20-42.
6.
FeltonJW, BanducciAN, ShadurJM, et al.The developmental trajectory of perceived stress mediates the relations between distress tolerance and internalizing symptoms among youth. Dev Psychopathol, 2017; 29(4):1391–1401. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579417000335.
7.
MustanskiB, MorganE, D'AquilaR, et al.Individual and network factors associated with racial disparities in HIV among young men who have sex with men: Results from the RADAR cohort study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr, 2019; 80(1):24–30. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000001886.
8.
Hightow-WeidmanLB, MuessigKE, BauermeisterJ, et al.Youth, technology, and HIV: Recent advances and future directions. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep, 2015; 12(4):500–515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11904-015-0280-x.
9.
KahanaSY, JenkinsRA, BruceD, et al.Structural determinants of antiretroviral therapy use, HIV care attendance, and viral suppression among adolescents and young adults living with HIV. PLoS One, 2016; 11(4):e0151106. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151106.
10.
ArnettJJ. Emerging adulthood. A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. Am Psychol, 2000; 55(5):469–480.
ToskaE, PantelicM, MeinckF, et al.Sex in the shadow of HIV: A systematic review of prevalence, risk factors, and interventions to reduce sexual risk-taking among HIV-positive adolescents and youth in sub-Saharan Africa. PLoS One, 2017; 12(6):e0178106. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178106.
13.
HarrisonS, LiX. Toward an enhanced understanding of psychological resilience for HIV youth populations. AIDS Care, 2018; 30(sup4):1–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2018.1556384.
14.
DenisonJA, PettiforA, MofensonLM, et al.Youth engagement in developing an implementation science research agenda on adolescent HIV testing and care linkages in sub-Saharan Africa. AIDS, 2017; 31(Supplement 3):S195–S201. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000001509.
SaberiP, McCuistianC, AgnewE, et al.Video-counseling intervention to address HIV care engagement, mental health, and substance use challenges: A pilot randomized clinical trial for youth and young adults living with HIV. Telemed Rep, 2021; 2(1):14–25. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmr.2020.0014.
17.
AgwuAL, YusufHE, D'AngeloL, et al.Recruitment of youth living with HIV to optimize adherence and virologic suppression: Testing the design of technology-based community health nursing to improve antiretroviral therapy (ART) clinical trials. JMIR Res Protoc, 2020; 9(12):e23480. https://doi.org/10.2196/23480.
18.
KohlerP, AgotK, NjugunaIN, et al.Data-informed stepped care to improve youth engagement in HIV care in Kenya: A protocol for a cluster randomised trial of a health service intervention. BMJ Open, 2022; 12(10):e062134. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062134.
19.
BensonPL, ScalesP, HamiltonS, et al.Positive youth development so far: Core hypotheses and their implications for policy and practice. Search Inst Insights Evidence, 2006; 3:1–13.
20.
LernerJV, AlmerigiJ, Institute for Applied Research in YouthDevelopment. Towards a new vision and vocabulary about adolescence: Theoretical, empirical, and applied bases of a “positive youth development” perspective. In: Child psychology: A handbook of contemporary issues. (Balter L, Tamis-LeMonda CS. eds.). Psychology Press/Taylor and Francis: New York, NY; 2006; pp. 445–469.
21.
LernerRM, Abo-ZenaM, BebirogluN, et al.Adolescent health: Understanding and preventing risk behaviors. Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, CA; 2009; pp. 115–128.
22.
HarperGW, BruceD, HosekSG, et al.Resilience processes demonstrated by young gay and bisexual men living with HIV: Implications for intervention. AIDS Patient Care STDS, 2014; 28(12):666–676. https://doi.org/10.1089/apc.2013.0330.
23.
LaurenceC, WispelweyE, FlickingerTE, et al.Development of PositiveLinks: A mobile phone app to promote linkage and retention in care for people with HIV. JMIR Form Res, 2019; 3(1):e11578. https://doi.org/10.2196/11578.
24.
DillinghamR, IngersollK, FlickingerTE, et al.PositiveLinks: A mobile health intervention for retention in HIV care and clinical outcomes with 12-month follow-up. AIDS Patient Care STDS, 2018; 32(6):241–250. https://doi.org/10.1089/apc.2017.0303.
25.
CananCE, WaselewskiME, WaldmanALD, et al.Long term impact of PositiveLinks: Clinic-deployed mobile technology to improve engagement with HIV care. PLoS One, 2020; 15(1):e0226870. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226870.
26.
ChidesterAB, JohnsonCJ, LinH, et al.Nothing about us without us: Involving youth living with HIV in a virtual advisory board. J Adolesc Health, 2023; 73(6):1158–1161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2023.06.028.
RamirezAG, ThompsonIM, VelaL, eds. The South Texas health status review: A health disparities roadmap. Springer International Publishing: Cham; 2013. Available from: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-00233-0 [Last accessed: March6, 2024].
GodinG, KokG. The theory of planned behavior: A review of its applications to health-related behaviors. Am J Health Promot, 1996; 11(2):87–98. https://doi.org/10.4278/0890-1171-11.2.87.
33.
GriebSM, KerriganD, TepperV, et al.The clinic environment as a form of social support for adolescents and young adults living with HIV. AIDS Patient Care STDS, 2018; 32(5):208–213. https://doi.org/10.1089/apc.2018.0012.
NeuendorfKA.Content analysis and thematic analysis. In: Advanced research methods for applied psychology. (Brough P, ed.) Routledge: Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY; 2018. pp. 211–223. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315517971-21.
36.
ShiJ, KimHK. Integrating risk perception attitude framework and the theory of planned behavior to predict mental health promotion behaviors among young adults. Health Commun, 2020; 35(5):597–606. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2019.1573298.
37.
YangX, WangZ, WangX, et al.Behavioral intention to initiate antiretroviral therapy (ART) among Chinese HIV-infected men who have sex with men having high CD4 count in the era of “treatment for all.”. Am J Mens Health, 2019; 13(1):155798831982861. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557988319828615.
38.
BanasK, LyimoRA, HospersHJ, et al.Predicting adherence to combination antiretroviral therapy for HIV in Tanzania: A test of an extended theory of planned behaviour model. Psychol Health, 2017; 32(10):1249–1265. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2017.1283037.
39.
VissmanAT, HergenratherKC, RojasG, et al.Applying the theory of planned behavior to explore HAART adherence among HIV-positive immigrant Latinos: Elicitation interview results. Patient Educ Couns, 2011; 85(3):454–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2010.12.004.
40.
CampDM, MooreSJ, Wood-PalmerD, et al.Preferences of young black gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men regarding integration of HIV and mental health care services. AIDS Patient Care STDs, 2022; 36(9):356–363. https://doi.org/10.1089/apc.2022.0065.
41.
KalichmanSC, EatonLA, KalichmanMO. Substance use-related international nonadherence to antiretrovial therapy among young adults living with HIV. AIDS Patient Care STDs, 2022; 36(1):26–33. https://doi.org/10.1089/apc.2021.0137.
42.
ChanW, McCraeRR, De FruytF, et al.Stereotypes of age differences in personality traits: Universal and accurate?. J Pers Soc Psychol, 2012; 103(6):1050–1066. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029712.
WeissD, ZhangX. Multiple sources of aging attitudes: Perceptions of age groups and generations from adolescence to old age across China, Germany, and the United States. J Cross Cult Psychol, 2020; 51(6):407–423. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022120925904.
45.
BernaysS, PapariniS, SeeleyJ, et al.“Not taking it will just be like a sin”: Young people living with hiv and the stigmatization of less-than-perfect adherence to antiretroviral therapy. Med Anthropol, 2017; 36(5):485–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/01459740.2017.1306856.
MuellerMK, Lewin-BizanS, UrbanJB. Youth activity involvement and positive youth development. In: Advances in Child Development and Behavior. Academic Press Inc.: San Diego, CA; 2011; pp. 231–249. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-386492-5.00009-9.
48.
MarianoJM, GoingJ. Youth purpose and positive youth development. In: Advances in Child Development and Behavior. Elsevier: New York, NY; 2011; pp. 39–68; doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-386-492-5.00003-8.
49.
KingPE, CarrD, BoitorC. Religion, spirituality, positive youth development, and thriving. Adv Child Dev Behav, 2011; 41:161–195.
