Research on risk behaviors among men who have sex with men (MSM) is often based on individualistic models of health behavior, but sexual behavior is inherently social in nature and often determined by constituents of social networks. The objective of this study was to examine relationships among social networks, network norms of condom use, and safer sex. A respondent-driven sampling study recruited 350 MSM in the Shenzhen region of China between November and December 2007 and collected information on network components (relations, structures, and functions) and HIV risk behavior among egos (those interviewed) and their network alters. A total of 2385 alters were nominated by the 350 egos. Egos reported an average of 4 nonsexual relation alters and 2 sexual-partner alters. Egos perceived receiving more tangible and emotional support from nonsexual relation alters than from sexual-partner alters. Two thirds (69%) of egos consistently used condoms. Sixty-seven percent of egos reported having 1 or more alters who always encouraged egos to use condoms, 84% had 1 or more alters who consistently used condoms, and 55% had 1 or more alters who insisted on condom use. Both subjective and descriptive norms were positively associated with consistent condom use. Network components were associated with the levels of the two norms. These findings suggest that social network components may activate or strengthen condom use norms within networks, which, in turn, determine consistent condom use among MSM. HIV behavioral interventions need to target the promotion of safer sex practices through enhancing peer norms of condom use within networks.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
WassermanS, GalaskiewiczJ. Advances in Social Network Analysis: Research in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1994.
2.
LinN, CookK, BurtR. Social Capital: Theory and Research. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter, 2001.
3.
MorrisM. MorrisM. Overview of network survey designs. Network Epidemiology. New York: Oxford, 2004; 8–21.
4.
NeaigusA, FriedmanSR, CurtisRet al.The relevance of drug injectors' social and risk networks for understanding and preventing HIV infection. Soc Sci Med, 1994; 38:67–78.
5.
HallA, WellmanB. CohenS, SymesSL. Social networks and social support. Social Support and Health. Orlando: Academic Press, Inc, 1985; 23–41.
6.
HouseJS, KahnRL. CohenS. SymesSL. Measures and concepts of social support. Social Support and Health. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Inc, 1985; 83–108.
7.
KnowltonA, HuaW, LatkinC. Social support among HIV positive injection drug users: implications to integrated intervention for HIV positives. AIDS Behav, 2004; 8:357–363.
8.
ValenteT. Social network influences on adolescent substance use: An introduction. Connections, 2003; 25:11–16.
9.
HurdGS, PattisonEM, LlamasR. Models of social network intervention. Int J Fam Ther, 1981; 3:246–257.
10.
BarreraMJr. GottliebBH. Social support in the adjustment of pregnant adolescents: Assessment issues. Social Networks and Social Support. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1981; 69–96.
11.
HoganBE, LindenW, NajarianB. Social support interventions: Do they work?Clin Psychol Rev, 2002; 22:381–440.
12.
ProcidanoME, HellerK. Measures of perceived social support from friends and from family: Three validation studies. Am J Community Psychol, 1983; 11:1–24.
13.
KomproeIH, RijkenM, RosWJGet al.Available support and received support: Different effects under stressful circumstances. J Soc Pers Relat, 1997; 14:59–77.
14.
VauxA. Social Support: Theory, Research, and Intervention. New York: Praeger, 1988.
15.
PescosolidoBA. LevyJA, PescosolidoBA. The role of social networks in health, illness, disease and healing: The accepting present, the forgotten past, and the dangerous potential for a complacent future. Social Health. New York: Elsevier Science Ltd, 2002; 3–28.
16.
MillerM, NeaigusA. Networks, resources and risk among women who use drugs. Soc Sci Med, 2001; 52:967–978.
17.
CialdiniRB, RenoRR, KallgrenCA. A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. J Pers Soc Psychol, 1990; 58:1015–1026.
18.
FishbeinM, AjzenI. Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1975.
19.
AjzenI. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process, 1991; 50:179–211.
20.
BorsariB, CareyKB. Descriptive and injunctive norms in college drinking: A meta-analytic integration. J Stud Alcohol, 2003; 64:331–341.
21.
SheeranP, AbrahamC, OrbellS. Psychosocial correlates of heterosexual condom use: A meta-analysis. Psychol Bull, 1999; 125:90–132.
22.
FaberAD, WassermanS. LevyJA, PescosolidoBA. Social support and social networks: Synthesis and review. Social Networks and Health. New York: Elsevier Science Ltd, 2002; 29–72.
23.
LatkinCA, FormanV, KnowltonAet al.Norms, social networks, and HIV-related risk behaviors among urban disadvantaged drug users. Soc Sci Med, 2003; 56:465–476.
24.
PetersonJL, RothenbergR, KraftJMet al.Perceived condom norms and HIV risks among social and sexual networks of young African American men who have sex with men. Health Educ Res, 2009; 24:119–127.
25.
FriedmanSR, AralS. Social networks, risk-potential networks, health, and disease. J Urban Health, 2001; 78:411–418.
26.
FisherJ, FisherW. PetersonJ, DiClementeR. Theoretical approaches to individual-level change in HIV risk behavior. Handbook of HIV Prevention. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 2001; 1–54.
LuX. An interface between individualistic and collectivistic orientations in Chinese cultural values and social relations. Harv J Commun, 1998; 9:91–107.
29.
LiuH, YangH, LiXet al.Men who have sex with men and human immunodeficiency virus/sexually transmitted disease control in China. Sex Transm Dis, 2006; 33:68–76.
30.
LuF, WangN, WuZet al.Estimating the number of people at risk for and living with HIV in China in 2005: Methods and results. Sex Transm Infect, 2006; 82:iii87–iii91.
31.
LiuP, ChanCS. LairdJ, GreenR-J. Lesbian, gay, and bisexual Asian Americans and their families. Lesbians and Gays in Couples and Families: A Handbook for Therapists. San Francisco CA: Jossey-Bass, 1996; 137–152.
32.
ZhouYR. Homosexuality, seropositivity, and family obligations: Perspectives of HIV-infected men who have sex with men in China. Cult Health Sex, 2006; 8:487–500.
33.
HeN, WongFY, HuangZJet al.HIV risks among two types of male migrants in Shanghai, China: Money boys vs. general male migrants. AIDS, 2007; 21:S73–79.
34.
HeQ, WangY, LinPet al.Potential bridges for HIV infection to men who have sex with men in Guangzhou, China. AIDS Behav, 2006; 10:S17–23.
35.
MaX, ZhangQ, HeXet al.Trends in prevalence of HIV, syphilis, hepatitis C, hepatitis B, and sexual risk behavior among men who have sex with men. Results of 3 consecutive respondent-driven sampling surveys in Beijing, 2004 through 2006. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr, 2007; 45:581–587.
36.
LauJT, KimJH, LauMet al.HIV related behaviours and attitudes among Chinese men who have sex with men in Hong Kong: A population based study. Sex Transm Infect, 2004; 80:459–465.
37.
KoYC, ChangSJ. Sexual patterns and human immunodeficiency virus infection among homosexuals in Taiwan. Sex Transm Dis, 1992; 19:335–338.
38.
JeffriesWLIV. Sociodemographic, sexual, and HIV and other sexually transmitted disease risk profiles of non homosexual-identified men who have sex with men. Am J Public Health, 2009; 99:1042–1045.
39.
SchwarczS, SpindlerH, ScheerSet al.Assessing representativeness of sampling methods for reaching men who have sex with men: A direct comparison of results obtained from convenience and probability samples. AIDS Behav, 2007; 11:596–602.
40.
LiuH, LiuH, CaiYet al.Money boys, level of HIV risks, and the associations between norms and safer sex: A respondent-driven sampling study in Shenzhen, China. AIDS Behav, 2009; 13:652–662.
41.
YangZ, HuangS, ChaiWet al.Survey on syphilis and HIV infection and sexual behavior among men having sex with male. Chinese J Public Health, 2003; 19:1292–1293.
42.
TaoX, ChaiW, ChaiYet al.Survey on high risk behavior among MSM in Shenzhen. Modern Preventive Medicine, 2004; 31:247–248.
43.
ChaiW, FengT, DanJet al.HIV/STD infection and risk behaviors among MSM. Mod Prev Med, 2005; 32:323–326.
44.
FengT, CaiW, TanJet al.Using capture-recapture method to estimate size of MSM in Shenzhen. Paper presented at: China HIV/STD Surveillance Annual Report. Haerbin, China, 2005.
45.
HeckathornDD. Respondent-driven sampling: A new approach to the study of hidden populations. Soc Probl, 1997; 44:174–199.
46.
NorbeckJS, LindseyAM, CarrieriVL. Further development of the Norbeck Social Support Questionnaire: Normative data and validity testing. Nurs Res, 1983; 32:4–9.
47.
FishbeinM. TerryDJ, GalloisC. McCamishM. Introduction. The Theory of Reasoned Action. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press, 1993; xv–xxv.
48.
HuiCH, TriandisHC. Individualism-collectivism: A study of cross-cultural researchers. J Cross Cult Psychol, 1986; 17:225–248.
49.
TriandisHC, BontempoR, VillarealMJet al.Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self group relationships. J Pers Soc Psychol, 1988; 54:323–338.
50.
Murray-JohnsonL, WitteK, LiuW-Yet al.Addressing cultural orientation in fear appeals: Promoting AIDS-protective behaviors among Mexican immigrant and African American adolescents and American and Taiwanese college students. J Health Commun, 2001; 6:335–358.
51.
TriandisHC. Self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychol Rev, 1989; 96:269–289.
52.
AmirkhanianYA, KellyJA, KabakchievaEet al.A randomized social network HIV prevention trial with young men who have sex with men in Russia and Bulgaria. AIDS, 2005; 19:1897–1905.
53.
AmirkhanianYA, KellyJA, KirsanovaAVet al.HIV risk behaviour patterns, predictors, and sexually transmitted disease prevalence in the social networks of young men who have sex with men in St Petersburg, Russia. Int J STD AIDS, 2006; 17:50–56.
54.
KellyJA, AmirkhanianYA, KabakchievaEet al.Prevention of HIV and sexually transmitted diseases in high risk social networks of young Roma (Gypsy) men in Bulgaria: Randomised controlled trial. BMJ, 2006; 333:1098.
55.
DarbesL, CrepazN, LylesCet al.The efficacy of behavioral interventions in reducing HIV risk behaviors and incident sexually transmitted diseases in heterosexual African Americans. AIDS, 2008; 22:1177–1194.
56.
RogersEM. Diffusion of Innovations. 5th. New York: Free Press, 2003.
57.
LiuH, FengT, RhodesAGet al.Assessment of the Chinese version of HIV- and homosexuality-related stigma scales. Sex Transm Infect, 2009; 85:65–69.
58.
MorrisonDM, CaseyEA, BeadnellBAet al.Effects of friendship closeness in an adolescent group HIV prevention intervention. Prev Sci, 2007; 8:274–284.
59.
Prevention CDC. HIV/AIDS surveillance report Vol. 19. Atlanta. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2009.
60.
BaralS, SifakisF, CleghornF, BeyrerC. Elevated risk for HIV infection among men who have sex with men in low- and middle-income countries 2000–2006: A systematic review. PLoS Med, 2007; 4:e339.
61.
GaoL, ZhangL, JinQ. Meta-analysis Prevalence of HIV infection and syphilis among MSM in China. Sex Transm Infect(in press).
62.
LiuH, GruskyO, LiX, MaE. Drug users: A potentially important bridge population in the transmission of sexually transmitted diseases, including AIDS, in China. Sex Transm Dis, 2006; 33:111–117.
63.
WongFY, HuangZJ, HeNet al.HIV risks among gay- and non-gay-identified migrant money boys in Shanghai, China. AIDS Care, 2008; 20:170–180.
64.
YangH, LiX, StantonBet al.Heterosexual transmission of HIV in China: A systematic review of behavioral studies in the past two decades. Sex Transm Dis, 2005; 32:270–280.
65.
LiA, VarangratA, WimonsateWet al.Sexual behavior and risk factors for HIV infection among homosexual and bisexual men in Thailand. AIDS Behav, 2009; 13:318–327.
66.
AralSO, HughesJP, StonerBet al.Sexual mixing patterns in the spread of gonococcal and chlamydial infections. Am J Public Health, 1999; 89:825–833.
67.
PolliniRA, BrouwerKC, LozadaRMet al.Syringe possession arrests are associated with receptive syringe sharing in two Mexico-US border cities. Addiction, 2008; 103:101–108.
68.
StrathdeeSA, LozadaR, PolliniRAet al.Individual, social, and environmental influences associated with HIV infection among injection drug users in Tijuana, Mexico. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr, 2008; 47:369–376.
69.
JohnstonLG, MalekinejadM, KendallCet al.Implementation challenges to using respondent-driven sampling methodology for HIV biological and behavioral surveillance: Field experiences in international settings. AIDS Behav, 2008 Jul12,4 Suppl:S131–141.
70.
KellyJA. Popular opinion leaders and HIV prevention peer education: Resolving discrepant findings, and implications for the development of effective community programmes. AIDS Care, 2004; 16:139–150.
