Abstract
Introduction:
Shigella bacteria cause shigellosis, a gastrointestinal infection most often acquired from contaminated food or water.
Methods:
In this review, the general characteristics of Shigella bacteria are described, cases of laboratory-acquired infections (LAIs) are discussed, and evidence gaps in current biosafety practices are identified.
Results:
LAIs are undoubtedly under-reported. Owing to the low infectious dose, rigorous biosafety level 2 practices are required to prevent LAIs resulting from sample manipulation or contact with infected surfaces.
Conclusions:
It is recommended that, before laboratory work with Shigella, an evidence-based risk assessment be conducted. Particular emphasis should be placed on personal protective equipment, handwashing, and containment practices for procedures that generate aerosols or droplets.
Introduction
The World Organization for Animal Health, World Health Organization (WHO), and Chatham House are collaborating to improve the sustainable implementation of laboratory biological risk management, particularly in low-resource settings. The Biosafety Research Roadmap project aims to support the application of laboratory biological risk management and improve laboratory sustainability by providing an evidence base for biosafety measures (including engineering controls) and evidence-based biosafety options for low-resource settings. This will inform strategic decisions on global health security and investments in laboratory systems.
This study involves assessing the current evidence base required for implementing laboratory biological risk management, aiming to provide better access to evidence, identifying research and capability gaps that need to be addressed, and providing recommendations on how an evidence-based approach can support biosafety and biosecurity in low-resource settings.
This review describes the general characteristics of Shigella spp., and the current biosafety evidence and available information regarding laboratory-acquired infections (LAIs) and laboratory releases are detailed.
Materials and Methods
A 15 member technical working group (TWG) was formed to develop a Biosafety Research Roadmap (BRM) with the goal of supporting the application of laboratory biological risk management and improving laboratory sustainability by providing an evidence base for biosafety measures.
The TWG conducted a gap analysis for a selected list of priority pathogens on procedures related to diagnostic testing and associated research for those pathogens, including but not limited to sample processing, testing, animal models, tissue processing, necropsy, culture, storage, waste disposal and decontamination. To achieve this, the TWG screened databases, websites, publications, reviews, articles, and reference libraries for relevant data. The main research domains used to perform the literature searches were the ABSA database, Belgian Biosafety Server, CDC reports, WHO reports, PubMed, and internet searches for terms related to biosafety matters, including, for example, inactivation, decontamination, laboratory-acquired infections, laboratory releases and modes of transmission. The summary of evidence and potential gaps in biosafety was divided into five main sections: route of inoculation/modes of transmission, infectious dose, laboratory-acquired infections, containment releases, and disinfection and decontamination strategies.
General Characteristics
Shigella spp. are common human enteric bacterial pathogens belonging to the family Enterobacteriaceae. They are gram-negative nonsporulating rod-shaped facultatively anaerobic bacteria. Shigella spp. are classified as Risk Group 2 pathogens 1 and are transmitted by the fecal–oral route. Communities lacking public health infrastructure to provide safe drinking water are at the most significant risk for large outbreaks; however, outbreaks related to improperly prepared foods are a global problem. The bacteria demonstrate acid-resistant characteristics, and survival is continued through the digestive system. 2
Disease Treatment and Prophylaxis
Shigella infection in young children, the elderly, or the immunocompromised may lead to life-threatening diarrheal disease. The Shigella flexneri species causes bacterial dysentery. Treatment of severe Shigella spp. related infections include rehydration therapy, and antibiotic therapy using ciprofloxacin and azithromycin,3,4 although antimicrobial resistance is a significant issue. 5 In contrast, a Shigella spp. infection in healthy well-nourished individuals is usually self-limiting, and antibiotic treatment is not required. However, after symptoms subside, Shigella spp. may be shed in the feces for a month. 6
Diagnostics
Laboratory procedures commonly used for diagnosing shigellosis are stool sample examination, stool culture, blood culture, polymerase chain reaction, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. 5 Serological testing of isolated bacteria with antibodies is used to identify the Shigella spp.
Biosafety Evidence
Modes of Transmission
Shigellosis is transmitted through the fecal–oral route. Infections are most common in developing country locations where sanitation and hygiene are substandard. 7 Public health measures are urgently needed to provide uncontaminated water for food preparation and handwashing. Shigella is highly transmissible between persons during outbreaks and commonly circulates or clusters in high-risk settings such as day-care centers 8 and men who have sex with men. 9 Transmission occurs through contaminated food, water, and fomites with infectious fecal matter. 10
Infectious Dose
The high frequency of initial and secondary transmission is due to the very low infectious dose of Shigella spp. between 10 and 200 organisms 10 to 10 and 100 organisms. 11
Laboratory-Acquired Infections
Shigellosis is one of the most common LAIs. The frequency is likely underestimated due to (1) the self-limiting nature of the infection and (2) the difficulty in pinpointing the source of infection. Although many shigellosis cases in laboratory workers were reported before 1990, fewer cases with incident descriptions and causes can be found in the literature. The most detailed descriptions come from reports of laboratory infections acquired in British clinical laboratories throughout the 1980s.12–17 A review of these LAIs shows that most of these occurred while performing routine work, primarily during the manipulation of cultures and secondarily during the manipulation of infected human (serum and stool) specimens.
Inexperience and carelessness were cited as the number one cause of such accidents. It is important to note that manipulations with Shigella spp. and other enteric pathogens were performed on the open bench without gloves. Owing to the low infectious dose, trace contamination of the hands may lead to oral inoculation. Since the 1994 study of Walker and Campbell, 18 reported cases of shigellosis LAIs have declined.
Updated evidence-based biosafety guidance for handling Shigella and other enteric pathogens now includes full personal protective equipment (PPE) (i.e., laboratory coat, gloves, and eye protection) and a primary barrier (biosafety cabinet or bench shield) to prevent accidental contamination. 19 Handwashing with boiled or disinfected water after glove removal is essential. These factors have likely resulted in decreased shigellosis LAIs over the past decades.
Decontamination and Inactivation
Chemical
It is reported that Shigella spp. are susceptible to 1% sodium hypochlorite, 70% ethanol, 2% glutaraldehyde, iodine, phenolics, and formaldehyde; however, only a generic reference19,20 has been provided, and there is no clear evidence for the effectiveness of these disinfectants although empirical evidence would suggest that these disinfectants are effective. The WHO provides additional recommendations, with practical advice on preparing appropriate concentrations based on the amount of organic material. 21
Thermal and autoclaving
Organisms can be heat killed by steaming using an autoclave for 1 h at 100°C under normal atmospheric pressure. 22 The autoclave sterilization cycle is very effective, but the time required for steam penetration in a particular load should be validated.
Other methods
Sonophotocatalytic disinfection has been reported effective 23 and 16.5 ppm ozone. 24
A complete list of the evidence is provided in Table 1.
Detailed Pathogen Biosafety Evidence for Shigella spp.
HTH, high test hypochlorite; LAIs, laboratory-acquired infections.
Knowledge Gaps
Decontamination and Inactivation
There appears to be a knowledge gap in the literature on the actual effectiveness, especially regarding concentrations and optimal contact times, of common disinfectants such as sodium hypochlorite, ethanol, glutaraldehyde, iodine, phenolics, and formaldehyde.
Laboratory-Acquired Infection
The actual number of Shigella spp. LAIs are likely to be under-reported by staff since (1) shigellosis is generally self-limiting and not life threatening, (2) the origin of these infections is not often clear cut, and (3) it may cause embarrassment or fear of sanction. Although this is not strictly a gap, it limits the opportunities to determine the mechanisms and options to prevent LAIs.
Conclusions
According to current guidance, it is recommended that a risk assessment be performed before beginning work with Shigella spp. 20 Particular emphasis should be placed on PPE, handwashing, manipulation of faucet handles, and decontaminating work surfaces to decrease the risk of LAIs. 25 For activities that may produce aerosols or infectious droplets, such as vortexing and pipetting of liquids containing Shigella spp., it is recommended that a biological safety cabinet be used.
Centrifugation operations should be performed using rotors with tight-fitting lids or safety cups in the case of bucket rotors. 25 Since fewer reports of LAIs have been published formally or anecdotally (as per subject matter experts) most likely because biosafety guidance has relied more strongly on addressing specific risks and evidence collected in prior years, the recommendations described appear appropriate for handling organic materials containing Shigella spp.
Footnotes
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Ben Wakefield, The Royal Institute of International Affairs, Chatham House, United Kingdom, for providing administrative support to this project, and David Elliott, United Kingdom International Biosecurity Programme, Defence Science and Technology Laboratory, Porton Down, United Kingdom.
Authors' Disclosure Statement
No competing financial interests exist.
Funding Information
This study was supported by the Weapons Threat Reduction Program of Global Affairs Canada. This research was funded in whole, or in part, by the Wellcome Trust [220211]. For the purpose of Open Access, the author has applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission.
