Abstract
The negative effects of testosterone deficiency (TD) on human health and quality of life are well demonstrated, including signs, symptoms, metabolic syndrome, obesity, and increased mortality. Recently, substantial evidence emerged, demonstrating the benefits of testosterone therapy in men with classical and “age-related” hypogonadism. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) opposes testosterone therapy in men with age-related hypogonadism but not in men with classical hypogonadism. The FDA acknowledges that TD merits treatment, but the FDA made an artificial distinction between diagnoses where T treatment is warranted and others where the underlying diagnosis is unknown, and treatment is unwarranted. The FDA labeled the unknown category as “age-related.” Since the FDA is unable to demonstrate that one group differs in benefits or risks from the other, there are no bases for this distinction. This action by the FDA is not based on scientific or clinical evidence. There is no evidence that the response to testosterone therapy of “age-related” hypogonadism occurs via different physiological or biochemical mechanisms than those historically recognized conditions. Also, there is no evidence that “age-related” hypogonadism responds less well to testosterone therapy than “classical” hypogonadism. More importantly, there is no scientific or clinical evidence to suggest that the risks of testosterone therapy in men with “age-related” hypogonadism are worse or different for men with “classical” hypogonadism. For these reasons, we disagree with the FDA position on testosterone therapy in age-related hypogonadism.
Introduction
Hypogonadism (henceforth referred to as “testosterone deficiency”) is a clinical syndrome characterized by low serum testosterone (T) and a host of clinical signs/symptoms. 1 T deficiency (TD) occurs as a result of testicular (primary) or pituitary/hypothalamic dysfunction (secondary) and is known historically as “classical” TD, or as a result of unknown underlying pathologies.
Although aging alone does not necessarily cause a significant decline in T levels,2–9 the predominant form of TD, in aging men, is mixed with primary and secondary hypogonadism components, attributed to varying pathophysiology and comorbidities. Luteinizing hormone (LH) levels can vary in older men based on decreased numbers and function of Leydig cells, decreased sensitivity of the hypothalamus–pituitary gonadal axis to feedback inhibition, and/or decreased LH pulse amplitude despite normal pulse frequency. Decreased LH pulse amplitude may potentially be related to reductions in neuronal cell secretion of gonadotrophic-releasing hormone.10,11
“Age-related” hypogonadism (TD) is defined as “a clinical and biochemical syndrome associated with advancing age, characterized by specific symptoms, and a deficiency in serum testosterone (T)”.
12
This syndrome, which often occurs in middle-age and older men, is often referred to as adult-onset hypogonadism.
13
This syndrome does not meet the criteria for either classical primary (testicular failure) or secondary (pituitary or hypothalamic failure) hypogonadism. However, it exhibits elements of both presentations.
13
It is noteworthy that the signs and symptoms of TD and the response to treatment are similar, irrespective of the underlying causes
Signs and Symptoms of Testosterone Deficiency Irrespective of the Underlying Etiology
Reference: Defeudis et al. 137
TTh, T therapy.
“Age-related hypogonadism” was introduced by Nguyen and his colleagues in their perspective published in New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) 14 stating the position of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on this important clinical issue. In this perspective, the authors strongly expressed concerns on “Testosterone and Age-Related Hypogonadism.” Henceforth, in this article, the use of “age-related hypogonadism” is to maintain consistent reference to the FDA original argument against the use of T in older men.
The FDA issued a statement in March 2015 opposing the use of T therapy (TTh) in the treatment of hypogonadism attributed to aging, without a defined cause. The FDA position on “age-related” TD is that this condition does not merit treatment. 14 We disagree with the FDA position on this very point. Given next is a summary of the rationale as to why this condition should be treated as any other clinical condition.
On October 1, 2015, an international expert consensus panel convened to discuss the negative impact of TD on human health and quality of life and evaluated the merits of TTh in men with TD. The panel unanimously approved nine resolutions suggesting that: (1) symptoms and signs of TD occur as a result of low T and may benefit from T treatment regardless of whether there is an identified underlying etiology; (2) there is no scientific basis for any age-specific recommendations against the use of T therapy in men.
Evidence for Benefits of T Treatment in Older Men with TD
TTh in men with TD has been clinically utilized since the 1940s with marked success15–17 and became FDA approved in the United States in the 1950s. TTh for TD has long been considered the standard of care. The main argument advanced by the FDA is that, although TTh is indicated for men with “classical” TD, there are insufficient data to support the use of TTh in men with “age-related” TD. 14 Nevertheless, nearly all published data involve subjects with “age-related” TD.18–36
There are almost no large studies on TTh in men with “classical” TD, because such cases are rare. It is unwarranted that the FDA recommendations remain standing despite the recent findings of the T-trials 26 and several meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials,34–36, which clearly demonstrated that TD has a negative impact on health and well-being and TTh of “age-related” TD improves body composition, glycemic control, and sexual function. Lower T levels are shown to be associated with increased mortality, 37 fracture risk, 38 and cardiovascular disease (CVD).39,40 The recent T trials have demonstrated that many of these changes attributed to T deficiency are reversible with TTh in older men.
The data from the largest National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded, double blind, placebo-controlled T-trials in the United States, in 790 men with a mean age of 72 years, demonstrated that TTh significantly improved symptoms and abnormalities in men >65 years old without “classical” TD.19–26 TTh improved all aspects of sexual function,19,20 improved walking distance by a small amount, 25 slightly improved mood and depression symptoms, 19 improved hemoglobin and corrected mild and moderate anemia of both known and unknown causes, 24 markedly increased volumetric bone mineral density and estimated bone strength, 23 and led to no notable increase in cardiovascular or prostate cancer risk and with fewer hospitalizations. 26
There is good evidence of benefit in men with metabolic diseases (diabetes, obesity), improving parameters of lean body mass, reduced body fat, waist circumference, and insulin resistance.14–23–36 The data from the T-trials and other clinical studies (Table 2) are in stark contrast to those reported in the aforementioned clinical studies41–44 which were significantly flawed and also could not serve as safety trials. 45
Studies on Benefits of T Therapy in Older Men
AMS, aging male symptom scale; BMD, bone mineral density; CHF, congestive heart failure; CVD, cardiovascular disease; FFM, fat-free mass; HRQoL, health related quality of life; PDQ, Psychosexual Daily Questionnaire; PSA, prostate specific antigen; RCT, randomized clinical trial; TD, testosterone deficiency; 6MWD, 6-minute walk distance.
It is critical to highlight that the benefits of TTh in men with TD are similar, regardless of age or underlying condition.18–36 Thus, we conclude that, irrespective of age, the negative effects of TD on human health and quality of life are well demonstrated, including signs, symptoms, metabolic syndrome, obesity, and increased mortality.45–62 The benefits of TTh in men with TD were documented, regardless of age, in clinical trials, registry studies, observational studies, and systematic reviews and meta-analyses (Table 2), and were attributed to restoration of normal T levels.18–36
Further, recent advances in endocrinology have uncovered several other etiologies that contribute to TD. These include obesity, diabetes, and opioid use. Interestingly, these etiologies are not encompassed in the indications listed by the FDA for T treatment, demonstrating that clinical science evolves, and the pathophysiological mechanisms of these newly identified idiopathic underpinnings of TD may be recognized and understood in the not-too-distant future.
Does It Really Matter What Causes Low T?
The FDA argues that “age-related” TD does not merit treatment. 14 This argument was borne by the notion that “age-related” TD is a natural consequence of aging and should be left alone. It is illogical to conclude that because a condition is more common with age it does not merit treatment. Clinicians treat numerous “age-related” conditions, including hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, arthritis, cataracts, atherosclerosis, and most cancers.
The FDA believes that if the underlying etiology of low T is classical hypogonadism (primary or secondary) then it merits treatment. However, the FDA believes that if low T is attributed to age-related hypogonadism, then it does not merit treatment, despite lack of any scientific evidence to support such contentions.19–26
In addition, the FDA voiced a safety concern regarding TTh and risk of CVD based on the following: (1) one clinical trial halted by the data safety monitoring board and again not designed as a safety trial, 41 in which the authors concluded that the reported evidence may be due to “chance alone”; (2) two observational studies suggesting potential CVD risk associated with TTh. Both studies were fraught with methodological and statistical analyses that were not validated at the time42,43; (3) one meta-analysis, which included studies that do not meet the criteria for inclusion. 44 These four studies have been rebutted in detail by many published studies and experts in the field.1,15,27–31,40,45,59,63–66
Despite all the available evidence to the contrary, and the results of the recent T trials,19–26 the FDA concluded that, although the limitations and potential confounders or biases in these studies41–44 preclude a clear conclusion regarding the role of TTh in adverse cardiovascular outcomes, a possible association cannot be overlooked. 14 The FDA recommended TTh only for “classical” TD but not for “age-related” TD. 14 The FDA's position insists that men afflicted with “age-related” TD should not be treated with T but should be offered behavioral and nutritional life approaches to attain healthier lifestyle. It is important to acknowledge that the FDA position about lifestyle treatment does not exclude the use of TTh in older men with TD. More often, such a combined approach may be synergistic and useful.
It is worth emphasizing that the FDA does acknowledge that TD is an indication for TTh, however limiting such treatments only to men who are diagnosed with “classical” TD. This action by the FDA is not based on scientific or clinical evidence and in my view is irrational. We should point out that the listed conditions of “classical” TD are largely of a historical nature, representing only those conditions of TD recognized by clinicians since the 1940s and 1950s (e.g., testicular failure due to varying pathologies, such as XXY karyotype (Klinefelter syndrome), toxicities (chemotherapy-induced), infectious destruction (mumps orchitis), or radiation-induced damage or physical trauma and injury or pituitary/hypothalamic dysfunction attributed to endocrine disruption or comorbidities).
Advances in science and clinical research have identified new risk factors for TD. These include obesity, diabetes, and metabolic syndrome and opioid use, among others.40,67–80 Therefore, it is irrational to dismiss these newly described conditions and advocate against TTh under the guise of “age-related” TD. Moreover, in the clinical setting, “age-related” or “idiopathic” TD is among the most common etiology noted. There is no evidence that the response to TTh of idiopathic (or “age-related”) TD occurs via different physiological or biochemical mechanisms than those historically recognized conditions (i.e.,
We are not aware of any evidence provided by the FDA or to the FDA regarding TTh on CV safety in men with “classical” TD. Thus, to assume that TTh produces adverse effects in men with “age-related” TD but not in men with “classical” TD is simply an illusion. We conclude that the FDA recommendations regarding TTh in men with “age-related” TD are not evidence-based and unwarranted. It is unfortunate that this particular distinction of TD, based on an historical recognition, was promoted almost entirely by the FDA, without scientific or clinical evidence. 5 We are aware that the FDA, as a regulatory agency, has enormous responsibilities toward the safety of the U.S. public.
Indeed, this differs from the responsibilities of practicing physicians, which are to provide the utmost care for their patients and to relieve pain and suffering and improve quality of life. The FDA is not in the business of dictating the practice of medicine. The practice of medicine is often based on clinical guidelines that are evidence based. It should be emphasized that the T guidelines do not require that patients have classical hypogonadism to be treated. The T guidelines only require low serum T values and signs and symptoms of hypogonadism. The FDA is charged with regulating the pharmaceutical industry, but the FDA is not charged with regulating or providing guidance for the practice of medicine. We, therefore, conclude that TD is a pathophysiological condition that merits T treatment, irrespective of the underlying causes or the historical terms used to describe it.
Conclusions
The negative effects of TD on human health and quality of life are well demonstrated, including signs, symptoms, metabolic syndrome, obesity, and increased mortality. Substantial evidence exists demonstrating benefits of TTh in men with “age-related” TD (Table 2).18–36,81–136 More importantly, the T trials demonstrated that TTh confers significant and clinically meaningful health benefits in older men with low T and this treatment is safe and effective, irrespective of etiology.18–36 In addition, the T trials provided compelling evidence that T therapy confers significant benefits in the growing population of men with obesity and/or type 2 diabetes.
We are aware that the FDA, as a regulatory agency, has enormous responsibilities toward the safety of the U.S. public. Indeed, this differs from the responsibilities of practicing physicians, which are to provide the utmost care for their patients and to relieve pain and suffering and improve quality of life. The FDA is charged with regulating the pharmaceutical industry, but the FDA is not charged with regulating the practice of medicine. We conclude that TD is a pathophysiological condition that merits T treatment, irrespective of the underlying causes, or the historical terms to define it.
Footnotes
Author Contribution
A.M.T. has conceptualized, drafted, written, and revised the article.
Disclaimer
This article is solely undertaken by the author to contribute to the scientific and clinical community and no resources were sought or obtained from any entity of any kind.
Author Disclosure Statement
No competing financial interests exist.
Funding Information
No funding was received for this article.
