Abstract
The HIV Research for Prevention (HIVR4P) conference is dedicated to advancing HIV prevention research, responding to a growing consensus that effective and durable prevention will require a combination of approaches as well as unprecedented collaboration among scientists, practitioners, and community workers from different fields and geographic areas. The conference theme in 2018, “From Research to Impact,” acknowledged an increasing focus on translation of promising research findings into practical, accessible, and affordable HIV prevention options for those who need them worldwide. HIVR4P 2018 was held in Madrid, Spain, on 21–25 October, with >1,400 participants from 52 countries around the globe, representing all aspects of HIV prevention research and implementation. The program included 137 oral and 610 poster presentations. This article presents a brief summary of highlights from the conference. More detailed information, complete abstracts as well as webcasts and daily Rapporteur summaries may be found on the conference website.
Introduction
Opening plenary talks, delivered by
HIV Prevention Clinical Trials that are Described in this Conference Summary
DMPA, depot medroxyprogesterone acetate; DPV, dapivirine; DTG, dolutegravir; EFV, efavirenz; FTC, emtricitabine; IVR, intravaginal ring; LNG, levonorgestrel; MSM, men who have sex with men; PrEP, pre-exposure prophylaxis; TAF, tenofovir alafenamide; TasP, treatment as prevention; TDF, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate; TGW, transgender women.
More Signposts on the Road to HIV Vaccines
The journey of discovery toward an effective HIV vaccine may be longer than many imagined, but the consensus from this conference was that there are now more signposts than ever to guide the way. HIVR4P included a wealth of presentations exploring our growing knowledge of immune responses, updates from studies currently underway, views of strategies to improve the results of RV144, and an examination of the growing pipeline of vaccine approaches. These include broadly neutralizing antibodies (bNAbs) and CD8+ T-cell pathways to a vaccine, and DNA, RNA, and mosaic strategies. As concluded by
Current vaccine studies fall into three broad categories: (i) those following the RV144 trial and aimed at induction of durable antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC)-promoting antibodies; (ii) those aimed at eliciting bNAbs, either by mimicking Env vulnerability sites or by driving immune responses from germline B-cells; and (iii) those aiming to elicit robust T-cell responses, including those directed toward potentially protective but subdominant epitopes.
RV144 follow-up
As described by
Novel immunogen design
In a comprehensive overview,
In a related approach,
Mosaic immunogen approaches and T-cell-based vaccines
In HVTN 106, a phase 1 study reported by
Antibody-Mediated Prevention
Recombinant forms of bNAbs are known to be safe when administered by infusion to uninfected individuals, also known as passive immunization.
Importantly, AMP strategies can also be used to prevent mother-to-child transmission.
New data presented at HIVR4P described different improved AMP strategies currently under development, including those relying on vector-based delivery, such as adeno-associated virus-based strategies presented by
Advances in Basic Science
HIV transmission and dissemination
New findings presented at HIVR4P focused on aspects of mucosal HIV transmission and early dissemination.
Reporting on Lake Victoria fishing communities with a high prevalence of both HIV and Schistosoma mansoni,
A role for the microbiome in HIV susceptibility?
Finally, several speakers discussed the role of microbial diversity in HIV susceptibility.
Mucosal microbiomes influence susceptibility to disease and response to treatment. There is strong evidence that vaginal dysbiosis increases risk of HIV acquisition. However, the relationship between hormonal contraception and HIV susceptibility is less clear. Studies of multiple contraception methods have found that hormonal contraception optimizes vaginal bacteria over time (as measured by decreased Nugent score).
Contraception, pregnancy and HIV risk
Hormonal contraception products such as injectable depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) and norethisterone enanthate (NET-EN) may modulate HIV acquisition risk; however, the biological mechanisms at play remain incompletely understood.
Focusing on “safe conception” strategies for couples living with HIV,
PrEP Comes of Age
PrEP impact, PrEP access, and the possibility that PrEP works differently for different people were running themes throughout HIVR4P 2018. Conference sessions and presentations looked at the current and potential future impact of PrEP, scale-up options, and opportunities and challenges of building social, political, and financial support to make PrEP available for those who could benefit most. Abstracts focused on PrEP acceptability, mathematical modeling of PrEP targeting, costs and benefits, and a host of presentations on emerging PrEP drugs and delivery options that could greatly increase the future impact of PrEP were also discussed.
Who is using PrEP?
Optimizing PrEP delivery
In a captivating presentation,
New ARVs and combination products for prevention
In an oral abstract session focused on the development of new ARVs,
Treatment as Prevention
Undetectable equals untransmittable
Breastfeeding is an exception
The Future of Prevention Research
If a single sentiment permeated this third biennial HIVR4P meeting, it may have been the sense of excitement at the richness of the prevention pipeline, and the variety of new prevention approaches and products in development. Presentations on new prevention drugs and delivery systems—including inserts, implantables, gels, biodegradable polymers, refillable reservoirs, osmotic pumps, and more—drew crowds in Madrid. So did discussions about the opportunities and obstacles created by the increasing number of prevention options available and in development. Among these are the challenges of evolving trial design, the need to understand user preference and evaluate health system capacity, managing product introduction and, of course, maintaining financial and political support for biomedical HIV prevention.
Trial design in the PrEP era
A major challenge for clinical trial design in the PrEP era is that alternative PrEP agents are being compared with oral TDF/FTC as the current standard of care.
HIV prevention in women of childbearing age
Choice in Prevention Options
“Show Me The Ring”
The themes of user choice and the need for more and better user-controlled prevention options, including options that can protect women without their partner's knowledge, resonated throughout the conference. Interest was high in the status of the DPV ring, as well as in new rings and other female-controlled products in development. Updates on vaginal and rectal microbicides also filled conference rooms in Madrid, with delegates anxious to learn the latest on these long-sought-after forms of prevention.
Presented by
Adolescents in South Africa account for 40% of new infections, yet little is known about preferred prevention modalities in this group. Findings from UChoose, a study of prevention choices in adolescent women ages 15–19, were presented by
“Give Me Prevention That Lasts”
Continuing with the theme of choice in prevention, those seeking news on systemic prevention approaches encountered an expanding universe of data on long-acting PrEP at HIVR4P, including the first tail-phase data on long-acting injectable cabotegravir in women.
Reported by
Finally,
Concluding Messages
In the two years since the HIVR4P 2016 conference, consistent progress has been made toward improving and expanding HIV prevention strategies. As prevention science advances, however, the challenges of maintaining the political will and funding to support a global movement to end the AIDS epidemic come into even sharper focus.
New strategies of vaccine design are following several well-defined routes to reach 50%–60% efficacy, suggested as the lowest acceptable threshold for a vaccine candidate to be used in combination with other prevention strategies. In parallel, bNAbs are emerging as important new tools in the repertoire of feasible prevention strategies. For both these approaches, data from ongoing studies will be eagerly awaited at the next HIVR4P meeting.
Condom use, VMMC, prevention of mother-to-child transmission, TasP, and PrEP have also made significant strides as nonvaccine-based strategies for HIV prevention. Multipurpose products, providing protection against HIV and pregnancy, will provide exciting new options for women.
It was clear from discussions in the meeting rooms, poster sessions, and hallways that hope persists that the future of biomedical HIV prevention will include a wide array of prevention modalities. Behavioral research has demonstrated that preferences for specific modalities vary greatly, and the availability of multiple options may help us to develop a wider range of implementation strategies to reach more men and women worldwide. Ensuring that scientific advances progress from the laboratory to clinical trials to the community remains a challenge that HIVR4P participants are poised to address.
The next HIVR4P conference will be held in Cape Town, South Africa, in October 2020.
Footnotes
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge the conference participants who agreed to release the contents of their presentations. They apologize to all those whose important work could not be cited in this review due to space limitations. Conference Co-Chairs for HIVR4P 2018 were José Alcamí of the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spain; Susan Buchbinder of the San Francisco Department of Public Health, United States; Mike Chirenje of the University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Zimbabwe; and Georgia Tomaras of Duke University, United States. Conference partners for HIVR4P 2018 included the French National Agency for Research on AIDS and Viral Hepatitis (ANRS); Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation; Gilead Sciences * ; Glaxo-SmithKline (GSK); Government of Spain (Gobierno de España, Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades); Instituto de Salud Carlos III; the International AIDS Vaccine Initiative (IAVI); International Partnership for Microbicides (IPM); Janssen; Merck Sharp and Dohme AG (MSD); South African Medical Research Council; United States National Institutes of Health (NIH) and United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) † ; and ViiV Healthcare. The views expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of partners.
Author Disclosure Statement
No competing financial interests exist.
*
Supported by Gilead who provided funding. Gilead has had no input into the content of the materials used at this meeting/conference. No other pharmaceutical company has had input into the content of the materials used at this conference.
†
HIVR4P 2018 was made possible in part by 1 R13 AI136762-01 from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). The views expressed in written conference materials or publications and by speakers and moderators do not necessarily reflect the official policies of the Department of Health and Human Services; nor does mention of trade names, commercial practices, or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
