Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Atazanavir/Ritonavir Treatment in a Real-Life Cohort of Treatment-Experienced Patients with HIV Type 1 Infection

Abstract

Atazanavir-based regimens have established efficacy and safety in both antiretroviral (ARV)-naive and -experienced patients. However, data evaluating effectiveness beyond 2 years is sparse. Therefore, we assessed the long-term outcomes of ritonavir-boosted atazanavir (ATV/r)-containing regimens in ARV-experienced patients in a clinical setting in a noncomparative, retrospective, observational study collecting data from three European HIV databases on ARV-experienced adults with HIV-1 infection starting an ATV/r-based regimen. Data were extracted every 6 months (maximum follow-up 5 years). Primary outcome was the proportion of patients remaining on ATV/r by baseline HIV-1 RNA (<500 or ≥500 copies/ml). Secondary outcomes included time to virologic failure, reasons for discontinuation, and long-term safety profile. The duration of treatment and time to virologic failure were analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method. Data were analyzed for 1,294 ARV-experienced patients (male 74%; mean ART exposure 5.7 years). After 3 years, 56% (95% CI: 52%, 60%) of patients with baseline HIV-1 RNA <500 copies/ml and 53% (95% CI: 49%, 58%) of those with HIV-1 RNA ≥500 copies/ml remained on ATV/r. After 3 years, 75% (95% CI: 69%, 80%) of patients with baseline HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/ml remained suppressed and 51% (95% CI: 47%, 55%) of those with baseline HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/ml achieved and maintained virologic suppression. Although adverse events (AEs) were the main known reason for discontinuation, no unexpected AEs were observed. In a real-life setting ATV/r-based regimens demonstrated sustained virologic suppression in ARV-experienced patients. After long-term therapy the majority of patients remained on treatment and no unexpected AEs were observed.