Abstract
Objective:
Myopia prevalence mostly affects young people, particularly in Asia. Of the several recommendations addressing the myopia epidemic, auricular acupoint stimulation (AAS) has been proposed and investigated. However, reported outcomes have been inconsistent, prompting a meta-analysis to obtain more precise estimates.
Materials and Methods:
Twelve articles were included in a meta-analysis, wherein each article was evaluated for risk of bias. Summary effects were calculated using odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Outlier and sensitivity treatments as well as publication bias assessment were applied.
Results:
Risk of bias among the articles was low in random sequence but generally unclear judgments for the other bias criteria. AAS outcomes were significant (Pa [P-value for association] <0.00001–0.003) when random and fixed effects favored the treated groups (ORs: 2.87–3.42; 95% CIs: 1.44–5.75).
Conclusions:
This meta-analysis showed evidence of AAS being effective for controlling myopia. Substantial magnitude (up to 3.4-fold), robustness, and lack of bias strengthened this effect.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
