Educating healthcare practitioners to understand, critically evaluate, and apply evidence to the clinical practice of complementary and alternative medicine has been an important initiative for the National Institutes of Health National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine.
Objective:
To determine the self-assessed research skills and interest of faculty at Pacific College of Oriental Medicine (New York campus) and their likely support of, and participatory interest in, an evidence-based medicine (EBM) training program.
Design:
The survey was administered in Survey Monkey. All questions were close-ended with 5-point Likert answers, except for one open-ended question at the end of the survey.
Setting:
One of three campuses of Pacific College of Oriental Medicine (PCOM), the largest Chinese medicine college in the United States.
Participants:
102 faculty employed at PCOM.
Results:
The response rate was 88.7%. Responses illustrated a generally high degree of interest and support for research, EBM, and institutional participation in research activities. Faculty who responded to the open-ended question (19.6% of respondents) expressed concerns about the relevance of research to Chinese medicine and the possibility of co-option by biomedicine.
Conclusions:
While faculty were overall supportive and interested in research and EBM, the results are consistent with the hypothesis that success of EBM training programs could be enhanced by soliciting and addressing faculty concerns and by being inclusive of approaches that honor the traditions of Chinese medicine and its own forms of clinical evidence.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
PearsonNJ, ChesneyMA.The CAM Education Program of the National Center for Complementary Alternative Medicine: an over view. Acad Med., 2007; 82:921–926.
2.
KreitzerMJ, SierpinaVS. NCCAM awards grants to CAM institutions to enhance research education. Explore (NY), 2008; 4:74–76.
3.
EvansR, DelagranL, MaiersM, et al.Advancing evidence informed practice through faculty development: the Northwestern Health Sciences University model. Explore (NY), 2011; 7:265–268.
4.
TaylorB, DelagranL, BaldwinL, et al.Advancing integration through evidence informed practice: Northwestern Health Sciences University's integrated educational model. Explore (NY)., 2011; 7:396–400.
5.
AndersonBJ, HerronPD, DownieSA, et al.Interprofessional Student Education: exchange program between Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Pacific College of Oriental Medicine. Explore (NY)., 2012; 8:377–381.
6.
McAlisterFA, GrahamI, KarrGW, LaupacisA. Evidence-based medicine and the practicing clinician. J Gen Intern Med., 1999; 14:236–242.
7.
WaynePM, HammerschlagR, Savetsky-GermanJ, ChapmanTF. Attitudes and interests toward research among students at two colleges of acupuncture and Oriental medicine. Explore (NY). 2010; 6:22–28.
8.
AllenES, ConnellyEN, MorrisCD, et al.A train the trainer model for integrating evidence-based medicine into a complementary and alternative medicine training program. Explore (NY)., 2011; 7:88–93.
9.
HendricsonWD, RughJD, HatchJP, et al.Validation of an instrument to assess evidence-based practice knowledge, attitudes, access, and confidence in the dental environment. J Dent Educ., 2011; 75:131–144.
HammerschlagR, LasaterK, SalantiS, FleishmanS. Research scholars program: a faculty development initiative at the Oregon College of Oriental Medicine. J Altern Complement Med., 2008; 14:437–443.
12.
WaynePM, BuringJE, DavisRB, et al.Increasing research capacity at the New England School of Acupuncture through faculty and student research training initiatives. Altern Ther Health Med., 2008; 14:52–58.
13.
LasaterK, SalantiS, FleishmanS, et al.Learning activities to enhance research literacy in a CAM college curriculum. Altern Ther Health Med., 2009; 15:46–54.
14.
KreitzerMJ, SierpinaV, FleishmanS. Teaching research literacy: a model faculty development program at Oregon College of Oriental Medicine. Explore (NY)., 2010; 6:112–114.
15.
EvansR, MaiersM, DelagranL, et al.Evidence informed practice as the catalyst for culture change in CAM. Explore (NY)., 2012; 8:68–72.
16.
DavisHR. Change and innovation. In: FeldmanS, ed. Administration and Mental Health. Springfield, IL: Thomas, 1973.
17.
DavisHR. Management of innovation and change in mental health services. Hosp Commun Psychiatry., 1978; 29:649–658.
18.
DavisHR, SalasinSE. The utilization of evaluation. In: StruenigI, GuttentagM, eds. Handbook of Evaluation Research. Vol. 1. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1975.
19.
RogersEM. Diffusion of Innovations. 4th ed. New York: The Free Press, NY: 1995.
20.
WilsonK, MillsE. Closing comment: Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine: is it a viable concept?. J Altern Complement Med., 2002; 8:875–876.
21.
BarrettB, MarchandL, SchederJ, et al.Themes of holism, empowerment, access, and legitimacy define complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine in relation to conventional biomedicine. J Altern Complement Med., 2003; 9:937–947.
22.
KreitzerMJ, SierpinaV, MaiersM, et al.Ways of knowing: integrating research into CAM education and holism into conventional health professional education. Explore (NY)., 2008; 4:278–281.
23.
KaptchukTJ. Acupuncture: theory, efficacy, and practice. Ann Intern Med., 2002; 136:374–383.
24.
MillsEJ, HollyerT, GuyattG, et al.Teaching evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine: 1. A learning structure for clinical decision changes. J Altern Complement Med., 2002; 8:207–214.
25.
KaptchukTJ, EisenbergDM. The persuasive appeal of alternative medicine. Ann Intern Med., 1998; 129:1061–1065.
26.
KaptchukT. The Web That Has No Weaver: Understanding Chinese Medicine. Chicago: Congdon & Weed, 2000.
27.
KaptchukTJ, ChenK, SongJ. Recent clinical trials of acupuncture in the West: responses from the practitioners. Chin J Integr Med., 2010; 16:197–203.
28.
NahinRL, StrausSE. Research into complementary and alternative medicine: problems and potential. BMJ., 2001; 322:161–164.
29.
LangevinHM, HammerschlagR, LaoL, et al.Controversies in acupuncture research: selection of controls and outcome measures in acupuncture clinical trials. J Altern Complement Med., 2006; 12:943–953.
30.
WaljiR, BoonH. Redefining the randomized controlled trial in the context of acupuncture research. Complement Ther Clin Pract., 2006; 12:91–96.
31.
JobstKA. Becoming and growing—what does integration mean?. J Altern Complement Med., 2009; 15:v–vi.
32.
MacPhersonH, AltmanDG, HammerschlagR, et al.Revised STandards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture (STRICTA): Extending the CONSORT statement. J Evid Based Med., 2010; 3:140–155.
33.
HammerschlagR, MilleyR, ColbertA, et al.Randomized controlled trials of acupuncture (1997–2007): an assessment of reporting quality with a CONSORT- and STRICTA-based instrument. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med., 2011; 2011. pii: 183910.
34.
SmithCA, ZaslawskiCJ, ZhengZ, et al.Development of an instrument to assess the quality of acupuncture: results from a Delphi process. J Altern Complement Med., 2011; 17:441–452.
35.
AndersonB, RosenthalL. Acupuncture and in vitro fertilization: critique of the evidence and application to clinical practice. Complement Ther Clin Pract., 2013; 19:1–5.
36.
MaiersM, McKenzieE, EvansR, McKenzieM. Patient outcomes at a traditional Chinese medicine teaching clinic: a prospective data collection project. J Altern Complement Med, 2008; 14:1083–1088.
37.
MarxBL, RubinLH, MilleyR, et al.A prospective patient-centered data collection program at an acupuncture and oriental medicine teaching clinic. J Altern Complement Med., 2013; 19:410–415.
38.
KhanKS, AwonugaAO, DwarakanathLS, TaylorR. Assessments in evidence-based medicine workshops: loose connection between perception of knowledge and its objective assessment. Med Teach., 2001; 23:92–94.
