To explore the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) for infertility in a multicultural healthcare setting and to compare Western and non-Western infertility patients' reasons for using CAM and the meanings they attribute to CAM use.
Design:
Qualitative semi-structured interviews using thematic analysis.
Settings/location:
Two infertility clinics in Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Participants:
An ethnoculturally varied sample of 32 heterosexual infertile couples.
Results:
CAM used included lifestyle changes (e.g., changing diet, exercise), alternative medicine (e.g., acupuncture, herbal medicines), and religious methods (e.g., prayers, religious talismans). Patients expressed three attitudes toward CAM: desperate hope, casual optimism, and amused skepticism. Participants' CAM use was consistent with cultural traditions of health and fertility: Westerners relied primarily on biomedicine and used CAM mainly for relaxation, whereas non-Westerners' CAM use was often influenced by culture-specific knowledge of health, illness and fertility.
Conclusions:
Understanding patients' CAM use may help clinicians provide culturally sensitive, patient-centered care.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
GreilAL. Infertility and psychological distress: a critical review of the literature. Soc Sci Med, 1997; 45:1679–1704.
2.
GreilAL, Slauson-BlevinsK, McQuillanJ. The experience of infertility: a review of recent literature. Sociol Health Ill, 2010; 32:140–162.
3.
InhornMC, Birenbaum-CarmeliD. Assisted reproductive technologies and culture change. Annu Rev Anthropol, 2008; 37:177–196.
4.
KooLC. The use of food to treat and prevent disease in Chinese culture. Soc Sci Med, 1984; 18:757–766.
5.
Meera GuntupalliA, ChenchelgudemP. Perceptions, causes and consequences of infertility among the Chenchu tribe of India. J Reprod Infant Psychol, 2004; 22:249–259.
6.
EdirneT, AricaSG, GucukS, et al. Use of complementary and alternative medicines by a sample of Turkish women for infertility enhancement: a descriptive study. BMC Complement Altern Med, 2010; 10:1–7.
7.
VanderlindenLK. German genes and Turkish traits: ethnicity, infertility, and reproductive politics in Germany. Soc Sci Med, 2009; 69:266–273.
8.
Van RooijFB, Van BalenF, HermannsJMA. Emotional distress and infertility: Turkish migrant couples compared to Dutch couples and couples in Western Turkey. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol, 2007; 28:87–95.
9.
SchmidJ, KirchengastS, Vytiska-BinstorferE, et al. Psychosocial and sociocultural aspects of infertility—a comparison between Austrian women and immigrant women. Anthropol Anz, 2004; 62:301–309.
10.
YebeiVN. Unmet needs, beliefs and treatment-seeking for infertility among migrant Ghanian women in the Netherlands. Reprod Health Matters, 2000; 8:134–141.
11.
OlthiusG, van HeterenG. Multicultural health care in practice. Health Care Anal, 2003; 11:199–206.
12.
KleinmanA. Patients and Healers in the Context of Culture. Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1980.
13.
SommerhalderK, AbrahamA, ZuffereyMC, et al. Internet information and medical consultations: Experiences from patients' and physicians' perspectives. Patient Educ Couns, 2009; 77:266–271.
14.
PerryTE, Hirshfeld-CytronJM. Role of complementary and alternative medicine to achieve fertility in uninsured patients. Obstet Gynecol Surv, 2013; 68:305–311.
15.
RaynerJ-A, McLachlanHL, ForsterDA, et al. Australian women's use of complementary and alternative medicines to enhance fertility: exploring the experiences of women and practitioners. BMC Complement Altern Med, 2009; 9:52.
16.
SmithJF, EisenbergML, MillsteinSG, et al. The use of complementary and alternative fertility treatment in couples seeking fertility care: data from a prospective cohort in the United States. Fertil Steril, 2010; 93:2169–2174.
17.
RaynerJ-A, WillisK, BurgessR. Women's use of complementary and alternative medicine for fertility enhancement: a review of the literature. J Altern Complement Med, 2011; 17:685–690.
18.
CoulsonC, JenkinsJ. Complementary and alternative medicine utilisation in NHS and private clinic settings: a United Kingdom survey of 400 infertility patients. J Exp Clin Assist Reprod, 2005; 2.
19.
ZiniA, FischerMA, NamRK, et al. Use of alternative and hormonal therapies in male infertility. Urology, 2004; 63:141–143.
20.
FarquharJ. Objects, processes, and female infertility in Chinese medicine. Med Anthropol Q, 1991; 5:370–399.
21.
TulandiT, KingL, ZelkowitzP. Public funding of and access to in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med, 2013; 368:1948–1949.
22.
SandelowskiM. Whatever happened to qualitative description?. Res Nurs Health, 2000; 23:334–340.
23.
MorseJM, RichardsL. Readme First for a User's Guide to Qualitative Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2002.
24.
ReadSC, CarrierM-E, BoucherM-E, et al. Psychosocial services for couples in infertility treatment: what do couples really want?. Patient Educ Couns, 2014; 94:390–395.
25.
GreilAL, LeitkoTA, PorterKL. Infertility: his and hers. Gender Soc, 1988; 2:172–199.
26.
GreilAL, McQuillanJ, Slauson-BlevinsK. The social construction of inferility. Sociol Compass, 2011; 5:736–746.
27.
SchmidtL. Social and psychological consequences of infertility and assisted reproduction–what are the research priorities?. Hum Fertil, 2009; 12:14–20.
28.
GloverL, McLellanA, WeaverSM. What does having a fertility problem mean to couples?. J Reprod Infant Psychol, 2009; 27:401–418.
29.
United Nations Statistics Division. Composition of macro geographical (continental) regions, geographical sub-regions, and selected economic and other groupings. October31, 2013. Online document at: http://unstats.un.org/unsd/methods/m49/m49regin.htm Accessed May15, 2013.
30.
BraunV, ClarkeV. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol, 2006; 3:77–101.
31.
National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine. Complementary, alternative, or integrative health: what's in a name?July2014. Online document at: http://nccam.nih.gov/health/whatiscam Accessed December11, 2013.
32.
The Mayo Clinic. Complementary and alternative medicine. October20, 2011. Online document at: http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/alternative-medicine/PN00001 Accessed December11, 2013.
33.
DoodemanIMM, RenckensCNM. The use of complementary and alternative medicine in Dutch fertility patients. Hum Reprod, 2010; 25:I20–I1.
34.
StankiewiczM, SmithC, AlvinoH, et al. The use of complementary medicine and therapies by patients attending a reproductive medicine unit in South Australia: a prospective survey. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol, 2007; 47:145–149.
35.
LauJTF, WangQ, ChengY, et al. Infertility-related perceptions and responses and their associations with quality of life among rural Chinese infertile couples. J Sex Marital Ther, 2008; 34:248–267.
36.
DyerSJ. The value of children in African countries—insights from studies on infertility. J Psychosom Obst Gyn, 2007; 28:69–77.
37.
SewpaulV. Culture religion and infertility: a South African perspective. Br J Soc Work, 1999; 29:741–754.
38.
FidoA. Coping with infertility among Kuwaiti women: cultural perspectives. Int J Soc Psychiatry, 2004; 50:294–300.
39.
AbbeyA, AndrewsFM, HalmanJ. Gender's role in responses to infertility. Psychol Women Q, 1991; 15:295–316.
XiJ. English fluency of the US immigrants: assimilation effects, cohort variations, and periodical changes. Soc Sci Res, 2013; 42:1109–1121.
42.
CsizerK, KormosJ. Modelling the role of inter-cultural contact in the motivation of learning english as a foreign language. Applied Linguistics, 2008; 30:166–185.
43.
LeeJH, GoldsteinMS, Richard BrownE, et al. How does acculturation affect the use of complementary and alternative medicine providers among Mexican- and Asian-Americans?. J Immigrant Minority Health, 2008; 12:302–309.
44.
van EmpelIWH, NelenWLDM, TepeET, et al. Weaknesses, strengths and needs in fertility care according to patients. Hum Reprod, 2009; 25:142–149.
45.
van EmpelIWH, DancetEAF, KoolmanXHE, et al. Physicians underestimate the importance of patient-centredness to patients: a discrete choice experiment in fertility care. Hum Reprod, 2011; 26:584–593.
46.
AartsJWM, FaberMJ, van EmpelIWH, et al. Professionals' perceptions of their patients' experiences with fertility care. Hum Reprod, 2011; 26:1119–1127.
