The Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) was used to describe the personality profiles of homeopaths in Norway. It was hypothesized that the homeopaths would score higher than the norm sample on Openness, Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness.
Design:
The NEO-PI-R describes personality scores on five traits; Neuroticism, Extraversion, Openness, Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness. A cross-sectional survey of 128 (39%) members of the Norwegian association for homeopaths was compared with the Norwegian population norm sample.
Results:
Compared to the norm population score with a mean of 50, the homeopaths scored significantly higher on the personality traits Openness (54.7) and Agreeableness (58.0). Significant, but small differences were also observed with a higher score on Conscientiousness (52.3) and a lower score on Extraversion (48.3). There were no significant differences on Neuroticism (49.7).
Conclusions:
People who work as homeopaths can be described as open to new and different ideas, and as caring, understanding, and altruistic persons. Therefore, there is reason to believe that these dispositions are central in choosing homeopathy as an occupation. Further research should investigate whether personality traits are associated with important occupational areas such as job satisfaction, occupational stability, or income.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
TettRP, BurnettDD. A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance. J Appl Psychol, 2003; 88:500–517.
2.
HollandJL. Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments. Florida: Lutz: Psychological Assessment Resources, 1997.
3.
BarrickMR, MountMK, GuptaR. Meta-analysis of the relationship between the five-factor model of personality and Holland's occupational types. Personnel Psychol, 2003; 56:45–74.
4.
IshitaniTT. Exploring the effects of congruence and Holland's personality codes on job satisfaction: An application of hierarchical linear modeling techniques. J Vocational Behav, 2010; 76:16–24.
5.
BarnesPM, BloomB, NahinRL. Complementary and alternative medicine use among adults and children: United States, 2007. Natl Health Stat Report, 2008; 12:1–23.
6.
SteinsbekkA, NilsenTV, RiseMB. Characteristics of visitors to homeopaths in a total adult population study in Norway (HUNT 2)Homeopathy, 2008; 97:178–184.
MatthewsG, DearyIJ. Personality Traits. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
9.
CostaPTJr, SomerfieldMR, MccraeRR. Personality, coping: A reconceptualization. ZeidnerM, EndlerNS. Handbook of Coping. New York: Wiley, 1996.
10.
SalgadoJF. The Five Factor Model of personality and job performance in the European Community. J Appl Psychol, 1997; 82:30–43.
11.
FurnhamA, ChengH. Personality as predictor of mental health and happiness in the East and West. Personality Indiv Diff, 1999; 27:395–403.
12.
SilverthorneC. Leadership effectiveness and personality: A cross cultural evaluation. Personality Indiv Diff, 2001; 30:303–309.
13.
McManusIC, KeelingA, PaiceE. Stress, burnout and doctors' attitudes to work are determined by personality and learning style: A twelve year longitudinal study of UK medical graduates. BMC Med, 2004; 2:29.
JerramKL, ColemanPG. The big five personality traits and reporting of health problems and health behaviour in old age. Br J Health Psychol, 1999; 4:181–192.
16.
NysæterT, LangvikE, BerthelsenM, NordvikH. Interpersonal problems and personality traits: The relation between IIP-64C and NEO-FFI. Nordic Psychol, 2009; 61:82–93.
17.
CostaPT, TerraccianoA, MccraeRR. Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: Robust and surprising findings. J Personality Soc Psychol, 2001; 81:322–331.
18.
CostaPT, MccraeRR. Personality in adulthood: A 6-year longitudinal-study of self-reports and spouse ratings on the Neo Personality-Inventory. J Personality Soc Psychol, 1988; 54:853–863.
19.
RobertsBW, DelVecchioWF. The rank-order consistency of personality traits from childhood to old age: A quantitative review of longitudinal studies. Psychol Bull, 2000; 126:3–25.
20.
CostaPT, MccraeRR, HollandJL. Personality and vocational interests in an adult sample. J Appl Psychol, 1984; 69:390–400.
21.
NordvikH. Work activity and career goals in Holland and Schein theories of vocational personalities and career anchors. J Vocational Behav, 1991; 38:165–178.
22.
ZhaoH, SeibertSE. The big five personality dimensions and entrepreneurial status: A meta-analytical review. J Appl Psychol, 2006; 91:259–271.
23.
GriffinB, HeskethB. Why openness to experience is not a good predictor of job performance. Int J Select Assess, 2004; 12:243–251.
24.
MarkertRJ, RodenhauserP, El-BaghdadiMMet al.Personality as a prognostic factor for specialty choice: A prospective study of 4 medical school classes. Medscape J Med, 2008; 10:49.
25.
EngMK, MacneilyAE, AldenL. The urological personality: Is it unique?Can J Urol, 2004; 11:2401–2406.
26.
ScandellDJ, WlazelekBG, ScandellRS. Personality of the therapist and theoretical orientation. Irish J Psychol, 1997; 18:413–418.
27.
SmithBW, DalenJ, WigginsKTet al.Who is willing to use complementary and alternative medicine? Explore (NY), 2008; 4:359–367.
28.
HondaK, JacobsonJS. Use of complementary and alternative medicine among United States adults: The influences of personality, coping strategies, and social support. Prev Med, 2005; 40:46–53.
29.
SiroisFM, Purc-StephensonRJ. Personality and consultations with complementary and alternative medicine practitioners: A five-factor model investigation of the degree of use and motives. J Altern Complement Med, 2008; 14:1151–1158.
30.
GottfredsonGD, JonesEM, HollandJL. Personality and vocational interests: The relation of Hollands 6 interest dimensions to 5 robust dimensions of personality. J Counsel Psychol, 1993; 40:518–524.
31.
MccraeRR, CostaPTJr. Personality trait structure as a human universal. Am Psychol, 1997; 52:509–516.
32.
LievensF, CoetsierP, DeFF, DeMJ. Medical students' personality characteristics and academic performance: A five-factor model perspective. Med Educ, 2002; 36:1050–1056.
33.
ProttasDJ, ThompsonCA. Stress, satisfaction, and the work-family interface: A comparison of self-employed business owners, independents, and organizational employees. J Occup Health Psychol, 2006; 11:366–378.
34.
SteinsbekkA. A survey of Norwegian homeopaths income in 2003 [in Norwegian]Dynamis, 2005; 19:10–15.
35.
MartinsenO, NordvikH, ØstbøLE. Norwegian Translation of the NEO PI-R [in Norwegian]Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk, 2003.
36.
NordvikH. Personality traits: Their nature and number [in Norwegian]J Norwegian Psychol Assoc, 2005; 42:994–997.
CohenJ. A power primer. Psychol Bull, 1992; 112:155–159.
39.
FaulF, ErdfelderE, LangAG, BuchnerA. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods, 2007; 39:175–191.
40.
SeibertSE, KraimerML. The five-factor model of personality and career success. J Vocational Behav, 2001; 58:1–21.
41.
SteinsbekkA, FønnebøV. Characteristics of Norwegian homeopaths: Economic, number of patients and time [in Norwegian]Dynamis, 1999; 4:12–18.
