Multi-Material Ink Direct Writing System with Material Switching Optimization

Abstract

Multi-material direct ink writing (M-DIW) is an advanced additive manufacturing technology capable of fabricating complex soft polymeric structures. However, material switching during M-DIW presents challenges such as switching lag and coextrusion, which significantly affect printing accuracy and fidelity. To address these issues, this study develops an M-DIW system integrating a pneumatic extrusion control system and a multichannel printhead, enabling material switching during printing. To enhance printing performance, a flow rate–pressure model is established to analyze ink extrusion dynamics, and a static ink pre-extrusion control strategy is proposed to minimize switching lag while mitigating coextrusion effects. Experimental validation demonstrates that the proposed method effectively improves material switching precision, ensuring high-resolution multi-material printing. Multiple printing case studies, including checkerboard patterns and functional soft structures, confirm that the system can achieve rapid material switching during printing while ensuring sharp material boundaries. This research provides an optimized method for M-DIW printing, broadening the scope of complex soft structures that can be designed and manufactured.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Skylar-Scott

, Mueller

, Visser

, et al. Voxelated soft matter via multimaterial multinozzle 3D printing. Nature 2019;575(7782):330–335; doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1736-8

2. Hassan

, Selvaganapathy

. Microfluidic printheads for highly switchable multimaterial 3D printing of soft materials. Adv Mater Technol 2022;7(9):2101709; doi: 10.1002/admt.202101709

3. Schaffner

, Faber

, Pianegonda

, et al. 3D printing of robotic soft actuators with programmable bioinspired architectures. Nat Commun 2018;9(1):878; doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03216-w

4. Hassan

, Selvaganapathy

. A microfluidic printhead with integrated hybrid mixing by sequential injection for multimaterial 3D printing. Addit Manuf 2022;50:102559; doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2021.102559

5. Uzel

SGM

, Weeks

, Eriksson

, et al. Multimaterial multinozzle adaptive 3D printing of soft materials. Adv Mater Technol 2022;7(8):2101710; doi: 10.1002/admt.202101710

6. Hardman

, Hughes

, Thuruthel

, et al. 3D printable sensorized soft gelatin hydrogel for multi-material soft structures. IEEE Robot Autom Lett 2021;6(3):5269–5275; doi: 10.1109/LRA.2021.3072600

7. Nassar

, Ntagios

, Navaraj

, et al. Multi-Material 3D Printed Bendable Smart Sensing Structures. In: 2018 IEEE Sensors. IEEE; 2018; pp. 1–4; doi: 10.1109/ICSENS.2018.8589625

8. Hardin

, Ober

, Valentine

, et al. Microfluidic printheads for multimaterial 3D printing of viscoelastic inks. Adv Mater 2015;27(21):3279–3284; doi: 10.1002/adma.201500222

9. Ober

, Foresti

, Lewis

. Active mixing of complex fluids at the microscale. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2015;112(40):12293–12298; doi: 10.1073/pnas.1509224112

10.

10. Walker

, Daalkhaijav

, Thrush

, et al. Zero-support 3D printing of thermoset silicone via simultaneous control of both reaction kinetics and transient rheology. 3D Print Addit Manuf 2019;6(3):139–147; doi: 10.1089/3dp.2018.0117

11.

11. Shao

, Han

, Quan

, et al. Study on ink flow of silicone rubber for direct ink writing. J Appl Polymer Sci 2021;138(33):50819; doi: 10.1002/app.50819

12.

12. Saadi

, Maguire

, Pottackal

, et al. Direct ink writing: A 3D printing technology for diverse materials. Adv Mater 2022;34(28):e2108855; doi: 10.1002/adma.202108855

13.

13. Tagliaferri

, Panagiotopoulos

, Mattevi

. Direct ink writing of energy materials. Mater Adv 2021;2(2):540–563; doi: 10.1039/D0MA00753F

14.

14. Maguire

, Pottackal

, Saadi

MASR

, et al. Additive manufacturing of polymer-based structures by extrusion technologies. Oxford Open Mater Sci 2021;1(1):itaa004; doi: 10.1093/oxfmat/itaa004

15.

15. M’Barki

, Bocquet

, Stevenson

. Linking rheology and printability for dense and strong ceramics by direct ink writing. Sci Rep 2017;7(1):6017; doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-06115-0

16.

16. Malda

, Visser

, Melchels

, et al. 25th anniversary article: Engineering hydrogels for biofabrication. Adv Mater 2013;25(36):5011–5028; doi: 10.1002/adma.201302042

17.

17. Messelmi

. On the blocking limit of steady-state flow of Herschel–Bulkley fluid. Math Mech Complex Syst 2019;7(1):63–73; doi: 10.2140/memocs.2019.7.63

18.

18. Zhu

, Kim

, De Kee

. Non-Newtonian fluids with a yield stress. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 2005;129(3):177–181; doi: 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2005.06.001

19.

19. Gupta

. Laminar entrance region flow of Herschel–Bulkley fluids in a circular pipe. J Polym Eng 2002;22(3):219–232; doi: 10.1515/POLYENG.2002.22.3.219

20.

20. Corker

, Ng

, Poole

, et al. 3D printing with 2D colloids: Designing rheology protocols to predict ‘printability’ of soft-materials. Soft Matter 2019;15(6):1444–1456; doi: 10.1039/C8SM01936C

21.

21. Sarker

, Chen

. Modeling the flow behavior and flow rate of medium viscosity alginate for scaffold fabrication with a three-dimensional bioplotter. J Manuf Sci Eng 2017;139(8); doi: 10.1115/1.4036226

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

59.27 MB

0.00 MB