Lower surface roughness is a good quality indicator as it is directly related to mechanical strength, permeability, and aesthetic properties of printed three-dimensional (3D) objects. This study evaluated the effect of nanoclay and laser power on the surface properties of laser-sintered (LS) objects. LS specimens created from polyamide 12 (PA12) and composites were tested for surface roughness on top and bottom surfaces. Scanning electron microscopy with surface roughness tester were used to evaluate the surface morphology like surface roughness, melt-ability, and homogeneity of dispersion of nanoclay in the LS fused polymer matrix. This study’s findings demonstrate the importance of nanoclay as a filler in LS polymer-based 3D objects. Nanoclay particles interact with polymer particles via physical and chemical cross-links. These interactions increase the packing density of particles in 3D objects, which increases their surface smoothness. Thus, this study demonstrated that the addition of nanoclay to the LS polymeric powder with optimized laser power exhibited improved surface properties with an expectation to emerge new applications.
KhalilY, HopkinsonN, KowalskiAJ, et al.Investigating the feasibility of processing activated carbon/UHMWPE polymer composite using laser powder bed fusion. Polymers (Basel), 2022; 14(16); doi: 10.3390/polym14163320
2.
VasquezGM, MajewskiCE, HaworthB, et al.A targeted material selection process for polymers in laser sintering. Addit Manuf, 2014; 1–4:127–138; doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2014.09.003
3.
BainED, GarbocziEJ, SeppalaJE, et al.AMB2018-04: Benchmark physical property measurements for powder bed fusion additive manufacturing of polyamide 12. Integr Mater Manuf Innov, 2019; 8(3):335–361; doi: 10.1007/s40192-019-00146-3
4.
TofailSAM, KoumoulosEP, BandyopadhyayA, et al.Additive manufacturing: Scientific and technological challenges, market uptake and opportunities. Mater Today, 2018; 21(1):22–37; doi: 10.1016/j.mattod.2017.07.001
5.
ChuaCK, LeongKF, AnJ. Rapid Prototyp Biomater Princ Appl, 2014; 1–15; doi: 10.1533/9780857097217.1
6.
HigaCF, GradowskiT, Elifio-EspositoS, et al.Influence of selective laser sintering process parameters on microstructure and physicochemical properties of poly(vinyl alcohol) for the production of scaffolds. Rpj, 2020; 26(6):1155–1164; doi: 10.1108/RPJ-01-2019-0021
7.
JinYA, PlottJ, ChenR, et al.Additive manufacturing of custom orthoses and prostheses - A review. Procedia CIRP, 2015; 36:199–204; doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.125
8.
DeckersJP, VermandelM, GeldhofJ, et al.Development and clinical evaluation of laser-sintered ankle foot orthoses. Plast Rubber Compos, 2018; 47(1):42–46; doi: 10.1080/14658011.2017.1413760
9.
LigonSC, LiskaR, StampflJ, et al.Polymers for 3D printing and customized additive manufacturing. Chem Rev, 2017; 117(15):10212–10290; doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00074
10.
KruthJP, LevyG, KlockeF, et al.Consolidation phenomena in laser and powder-bed based layered manufacturing. CIRP Ann - Manuf Technol, 2007; 56(2):730–759; doi: 10.1016/j.cirp.2007.10.004
11.
SivadasBO, AshcroftI, KhlobystovAN, et al.Laser sintering of polymer nanocomposites. Adv Ind Eng Polym Res, 2021; 4(4):277–300; doi: 10.1016/j.aiepr.2021.07.003
12.
YangS, ZhaoYF. Additive manufacturing-enabled design theory and methodology: A critical review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2015; 80(1–4):327–342; doi: 10.1007/s00170-015-6994-5
13.
YuanS, ShenF, ChuaCK, et al.Polymeric composites for powder-based additive manufacturing: Materials and applications. Prog Polym Sci, 2019; 91:141–168; doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2018.11.001
14.
SchmidM, AmadoA, WegenerK. Materials perspective of polymers for additive manufacturing with selective laser sintering. J Mater Res, 2014; 29(17):1824–1832; doi: 10.1557/jmr.2014.138
15.
PlummerK, VasquezM, MajewskiC, et al.Study into the recyclability of a thermoplastic polyurethane powder for use in laser sintering. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf, 2012; 226(7):1127–1135; doi: 10.1177/0954405412440066
16.
SalmoriaGV, AhrensCH, KlaussP, et al.Rapid manufacturing of polyethylene parts with controlled pore size gradients using selective laser sintering. Mat Res, 2007; 10(2):211–214; doi: 10.1590/S1516-14392007000200019
17.
BerrettaS, EvansK, GhitaO. Additive manufacture of PEEK cranial implants: Manufacturing considerations versus accuracy and mechanical performance. Mater Des, 2018; 139:141–152; doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.10.078
18.
ShiYÃ, ChenJ, WangY, et al.Study of the selective laser sintering of polycarbonate and postprocess for parts reinforcement. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part L J Mater Des Appl, 2007; 221(1):37–42; doi: 10.1243/14644207JMDA65
19.
YanC, ShiY, HaoL. Investigation into the differences in the selective laser sintering between amorphous and semi-crystalline polymers. Int Polym Process, 2011; 26(4):416–423; doi: 10.3139/217.2452
20.
Al-MaharmaAY, PatilSP, MarkertB. Effects of porosity on the mechanical properties of additively manufactured components: A critical review. Mater Res Express, 2020; 7(12):122001; doi: 10.1088/2053-1591/abcc5d
21.
FlodbergG, PetterssonH, YangL. Pore analysis and mechanical performance of selective laser sintered objects. Addit Manuf, 2018; 24(October):307–315; doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2018.10.001
22.
AlmansooriA, AbramsKJ, Ghali Al-RubayeAD, et al.Novel plasma treatment for preparation of laser sintered nanocomposite parts. Addit Manuf, 2019; 25:297–306; doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2018.11.016
23.
BourellDL, WattTJ, LeighDK, et al.Performance limitations in polymer laser sintering. Phys Procedia, 2014; 56(C):147–156; doi: 10.1016/j.phpro.2014.08.157
24.
NarK, MajewskiC, LewisR. A comprehensive characterisation of laser sintered polyamide-12 surfaces. Polym Test, 2022; 106:107450.
25.
PetzoldS, KlettJ, SchauerA, et al.Surface roughness of polyamide 12 parts manufactured using selective laser sintering. Polym Test, 2019; 80(September):106094; doi: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.106094
26.
KotlinskiJ. Mechanical properties of commercial rapid prototyping materials. Rapid Prototyp J, 2014; 20(6):499–510; doi: 10.1108/RPJ-06-2012-0052
27.
SinghS, SachdevaA, SharmaVS. Optimization of selective laser sintering process parameters to achieve the maximum density and hardness in polyamide parts. Prog Addit Manuf, 2017; 2(1–2):19–30; doi: 10.1007/s40964-017-0020-4
28.
GoodridgeRD, TuckCJ, HagueRJM. Laser sintering of polyamides and other polymers. Prog Mater Sci, 2012; 57(2):229–267.
29.
DewulfW, PavanM, CraeghsT, et al.CIRP annals - manufacturing technology using X-ray computed tomography to improve the porosity level of polyamide-12 laser sintered parts. CIRP Ann - Manuf Technol, 2016; 65(1):205–208; doi: 10.1016/j.cirp.2016.04.056
30.
CaulfieldB, McHughPE, LohfeldS. Dependence of mechanical properties of polyamide components on build parameters in the SLS process. J Mater Process Technol, 2007; 182(1–3):477–488; doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.09.007
31.
ChacónJM, CamineroMA, García-PlazaE, et al.Additive manufacturing of PLA structures using fused deposition modelling: Effect of process parameters on mechanical properties and their optimal selection. Mater Des, 2017; 124:143–157; doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.03.065
32.
AlmansooriA, MajewskiC, RodenburgC. Nanoclay/polymer composite powders for use in laser sintering applications: Effects of nanoclay plasma treatment. Jom (1989), 2017; 69(11):2278–2285; doi: 10.1007/s11837-017-2408-5
33.
GadelmawlaES, KouraMM, MaksoudTMA, et al.Roughness parameters. J Mater Process Technol, 2002; 123(1):133–145.
34.
DobesJ, LealJES, ProfetaJ, et al.Effect of mechanical vibration on Ra, Rq, Rz, and Rt roughness parameters. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2017; 92(1–4):393–406.
35.
HeB, DingS, ShiZ. A comparison between profile and areal surface roughness parameters. Metrol Meas Syst, 2021; 28(3):413–438.
36.
KumarS, BatishA, SinghR, et al.A hybrid Taguchi-artificial neural network approach to predict surface roughness during electric discharge machining of titanium alloys. J Mech Sci Technol, 2014; 28(7):2831–2844.
37.
SachdevaA, SinghS, SharmaVS. Investigating surface roughness of parts produced by SLS process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2013; 64(9–12):1505–1516.
38.
VaithilingamJ, GoodridgeRD, HagueRJM, et al.The effect of laser remelting on the surface chemistry of Ti6al4V components fabricated by selective laser melting. J Mater Process Technol, 2016; 232:1–8; doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.01.022
39.
EidtW, TatmanE-P, McCartherJ, et al.Surface roughness characterization in laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing. In: 2019 International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium University of Texas at Austin; 2019.
40.
CzelusniakT, AmorimFL. Influence of energy density on polyamide 12 processed by SLS: From physical and mechanical properties to microstructural and crystallization evolution. Rpj, 2021; 27(6):1189–1205.
41.
BeardMA, GhitaOR, EvansKE. Using Raman spectroscopy to monitor surface finish and roughness of components manufactured by selective laser sintering. J Raman Spectroscopy, 2011; 42(4):744–748.
42.
de Oliveira SettiG, Fernandes de OliveiraM, Alves MaiaI, et al.Correlation between mechanical and surface properties of SLS parts. Rapid Prototyp J, 2014; 20(4):285–290.
43.
CzelusniakT, AmorimFL. Influence of energy density on selective laser sintering of carbon fiber-reinforced PA12. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2020; 111(7–8):2361–2376.
