Recent Trends on Additive Manufacturing Biomaterial Composites in Tissue Regeneration Future Perspectives,Challenges,and Road Maps to Clinics for Biomedical Applications—A Review
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2024
Recent Trends on Additive Manufacturing Biomaterial Composites in Tissue Regeneration Future Perspectives,Challenges,and Road Maps to Clinics for Biomedical Applications—A Review
In recent years, tissue abnormalities caused by trauma, cancer, infection, and arthritis have contributed to the growth of the field of tissue regeneration and repair. Scaffold autografts and allografts are not the only options for repairing body part defects. Biomaterial composite replacements have shown several extensive usages in clinical studies. The shape, porosity, composition, surface chemistry, and mechanical qualities of implants are precisely and uniquely adjusted to greatly improve tissue regeneration. 3D printing and other forms of additive manufacturing (AM) are progressively being considered for use in the research and development of prostheses and scaffolding materials, which was facilitated by their distinct benefits in creating intricate and nonuniform scaffolds to replace damaged tissues, with a focus on primary health care. The primary goal of this article was to provide an extensive overview of the biomaterial composite types, properties, and techniques used in AM, and to enhance the rapidity of tissue regeneration to fulfill the requirements of clinical applications.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
LiC, PisignanoD, ZhaoY, et al.Advances in medical applications of additive manufacturing. Engineering, 2020; 6(11):1222–1231; doi: 10.1016/J.ENG.2020.02.018
2.
LeeMW. Fusion imaging of real-time ultrasonography with CT or MRI for hepatic intervention. Ultrasonography, 2014; 33(4):227–239; doi: 10.14366/usg.14021
3.
CurreyJD. The design of mineralised hard tissues for their mechanical functions. J Exp Biol, 1999; 202(Pt 23):3285–3294; doi: 10.1242/jeb.202.23.3285
4.
GibonE, AmanatullahDF, LoiF, et al.The biological response to orthopaedic implants for joint replacement: Part I: Metals. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 2017; 105(7):2162–2173; doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.33734
5.
LohQL, ChoongC. Three-dimensional scaffolds for tissue engineering applications: Role of porosity and pore size. Tissue Eng Part B Rev, 2013; 19(6):485–502.
6.
NicaM, CretuB, EneD, et al.Materials failure analysis of retrieved Osteosynthesis Implants. Materials (Basel), n.d; 13(5); doi: 10.3390/ma13051201
7.
RanjanN, SinghR, AhujaIPS. Investigations for mechanical properties of PLA-HAp-CS based functional prototypes. Mater Today Proc, 2019; 18:2329–2334; doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.07.016
8.
HusseinMA, MohammedAS, Al-AqeeliN. Wear characteristics of metallic biomaterials: A review. Materials (Basel), 2015; 8(5):2749–2768; doi: 10.3390/ma8052749
9.
CorcioneCE, GervasoF, ScaleraF, et al.3D printing of hydroxyapatite polymer-based composites for bone tissue engineering. J Polym Eng, 2017; 37(8):741–746; doi: 10.1515/polyeng-2016-0194
JandtKD. Evolutions, revolutions and trends in biomaterials science -A perspective. Adv Eng Mater, 2007; 9(12):1035–1050; doi: 10.1002/adem.200700284
12.
HenchLL, ThompsonI. Twenty-first century challenges for biomaterials. J R Soc Interface, 2010; 7(Suppl 4):S379–S391; 10.1098/rsif.2010.0151.focus
13.
DucheyneP. Bioactive ceramics. J Bone Jt Surg - Ser B, 1994; 76-B(6):861–862; doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.76b6.7983107
14.
MuruganR, RamakrishnaS. Development of nanocomposites for bone grafting. Compos Sci Technol, 2005; 65(15–16):2385–2406; doi: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.07.022
15.
RossoF, MarinoG, GiordanoA, et al.Smart materials as scaffolds for tissue engineering. J Cell Physiol, 2005; 203(3):465–470; doi: 10.1002/jcp.20270
16.
AhmedA, AzamA, MahmoodM, et al.Discovering the technology evolution pathways for 3D printing (3DP) using bibliometric investigation and emerging applications of 3DP during COVID-19 Discovering the technology evolution pathways for 3D printing (3DP) using bibliometric investigation. Clean Environ Syst, 2021; 3(June):100042; doi: 10.1016/j.cesys.2021.100042
17.
SantoniS, GugliandoloSG, SponchioniM, et al.3D bioprinting: Current status and trends—A guide to the literature and industrial practice. Bio-Des Manuf, 2022; 5(1):14–42; doi: 10.1007/s42242-021-00165-0
18.
RehmanM, YanenW, MushtaqRT, et al.Additive Manufacturing for Biomedical Applications: A Review on Classification, Energy Consumption, and Its Appreciable Role since COVID-19 Pandemic. Springer International Publishing; 2023; 10.1007/s40964-022-00373-9
19.
VyavahareS, MaheshV, MaheshV, et al.Additively manufactured meta-biomaterials: A state-of-the-art review. Compos Struct, 2023; 305(September 2022):116491; doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116491
20.
MirzaaliMJ, MoosabeikiV, RajaaiSM, et al.Additive manufacturing of biomaterials—Design principles and their implementation. Materials (Basel), 2022; 15(15); doi: 10.3390/ma15155457
21.
AbdudeenA, Abu QudeiriJE, KareemA, et al.Latest developments and insights of orthopedic implants in biomaterials using additive manufacturing technologies. J Manuf Mater Process, 2022; 6(6):162; doi: 10.3390/jmmp6060162
22.
KhanZN, AlbalawiHI, Valle-PérezAU, et al.From 3D printed molds to bioprinted scaffolds: A hybrid material extrusion and vat polymerization bioprinting approach for soft matter constructs. MSAM, 2022; 1(1):7; doi: 10.18063/msam.v1i1.7
RahmaniR, LopesSI, PrashanthKG. Selective laser melting and spark plasma sintering: A perspective on functional biomaterials. J Funct Biomater, 2023; 14(10); doi: 10.3390/jfb14100521
25.
ShuaiC, LiD, YaoX, et al.Additive manufacturing of promising heterostructure for biomedical applications. Int J Extrem Manuf, 2023; 5(3):032012; doi: 10.1088/2631-7990/acded2
26.
GuvendirenM, MoldeJ, SoaresRMD, et al.Designing biomaterials for 3D printing. ACS Biomater Sci Eng, 2016; 2(10):1679–1693; doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00121
27.
BudharajuH, SundaramurthiD, SethuramanS. Embedded 3D bioprinting—An emerging strategy to fabricate biomimetic & large vascularized tissue constructs. Bioact Mater, 2024; 32(October 2023):356–384; doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2023.10.012
28.
PrabhakarP, SenRK, DwivediN, et al.3D-Printed microfluidics and potential biomedical applications. Front Nanotechnol, 2021; 3(March):1–16; doi: 10.3389/fnano.2021.609355
29.
DevganS, SidhuSS. Evolution of surface modification trends in bone related biomaterials: A review. Mater Chem Phys, 2019; 233:68–78; doi: 10.1016/J.MATCHEMPHYS.2019.05.039
30.
WegenerB, SichlerA, MilzS, et al.Development of a novel biodegradable porous iron-based implant for bone replacement. Sci Rep, 2020; 10(1):9141–9110; doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-66289-y
31.
Ghasemi-MobarakehL, KolahreezD, RamakrishnaS, et al.Key terminology in biomaterials and biocompatibility. Curr Opin Biomed Eng, 2019; 10:45–50; doi: 10.1016/J.COBME.2019.02.004
32.
KalmanL. 3D printing of a novel dental implant abutment. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects, 2018; 12(4):299–303; doi: 10.15171/joddd.2018.047
33.
AlmogDM, TorradoE, MeitnerSW. Fabrication of imaging and surgical guides for dental implants. J Prosthet Dent, 2001; 85(5):504–508; doi: 10.1067/mpr.2001.115388
34.
FanH, FuJ, LiX, et al.Implantation of customized 3-D printed titanium prosthesis in limb salvage surgery: A case series and review of the literature. World J Surg Oncol, 2015; 13(1):308–311; doi: 10.1186/s12957-015-0723-2
35.
ByunSH, LimHK, CheonKH, et al.Biodegradable magnesium alloy (WE43) in bone-fixation plate and screw. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 2020; 108(6):2505–2512; doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.34582
36.
SharmaN, OstasD, RotarH, et al.Design and additive manufacturing of a biomimetic customized cranial implant based on Voronoi Diagram. Front Physiol, 2021; 12(April):647923; doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.647923
37.
ArabnejadS, JohnstonB, TanzerM, et al.Fully porous 3D printed titanium femoral stem to reduce stress-shielding following total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Res, 2017; 35(8):1774–1783; doi: 10.1002/jor.23445
38.
LiY, ShiY, LuY, et al.Additive manufacturing of vascular stents. Acta Biomater, 2023; 167(2023):16–37; doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2023.06.014
39.
SathishkumarS, PaulrajJ, ChakrabortiP, et al.Comprehensive review on biomaterials and their inherent behaviors for hip repair applications. ACS Appl Bio Mater, 2023; 6(11):4439–4464; doi: 10.1021/acsabm.3c00327
40.
BuciumeanuM, BagheriA, SilvaFS, et al.Tribocorrosion behavior of NiTi biomedical alloy processed by an additive manufacturing laser beam directed energy deposition technique. 2022; 10.3390/ma15020691
41.
AhangarP, CookeME, WeberMH, et al.Current biomedical applications of 3D printing and additive manufacturing. Appl Sci, 2019; 9(8):1713; doi: 10.3390/app9081713
42.
NeuhäuserováM, KoudelkaP, FaltaJ, et al.Strain-rate and printing direction dependency of compressive behaviour of 3D printed stainless steel 316L. Acta Polytech CTU Proc, 2019; 25:68–72; doi: 10.14311/APP.2019.25.0068
43.
MuleySV, VidvansAN, ChaudhariGP, et al.An assessment of ultra fine grained 316L stainless steel for implant applications. Acta Biomater, 2016; 30:408–419; doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.10.043
44.
FrazierWE. Metal additive manufacturing: A review. J Mater Eng Perform, 2014; 23(6):1917–1928; doi: 10.1007/s11665-014-0958-z
45.
PopovVV, Muller-KamskiiG, KovalevskyA, et al.Design and 3D-printing of titanium bone implants: Brief review of approach and clinical cases. Biomed Eng Lett, 2018; 8(4):337–344; doi: 10.1007/s13534-018-0080-5
46.
Issue S, Biomaterials T. Special Issue : Ti-Based Biomaterials : Synthesis. 2020; 10–14.
47.
VishwanathAS, RaneK, SchaperJ, et al.Rapid production of AZ91 Mg alloy by extrusion based additive manufacturing process. Powder Metall, 2021; 64(5):370–377; doi: 10.1080/00325899.2021.1911457
48.
BanerjeePC, Al-SaadiS, ChoudharyL, et al.Magnesium implants: Prospects and challenges. Materials (Basel), 2019; 12(1):1–21; doi: 10.3390/ma12010136
49.
WitteF. The history of biodegradable magnesium implants: A review. Acta Biomater, 2010; 6(5):1680–1692; doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.02.028
50.
KarunakaranR, OrtgiesS, TamayolA, et al.Additive manufacturing of magnesium alloys. Bioact Mater, 2020; 5(1):44–54; doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2019.12.004
51.
AmanoH, HanadaK, HinokiA, et al.Biodegradable surgical staple composed of magnesium alloy. Sci Rep, 2019; 9(1):14671–14678; doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-51123-x
52.
KamraniS, FleckC. Biodegradable magnesium alloys as temporary orthopaedic implants: A review. Biometals, 2019; 32(2):185–193; doi: 10.1007/s10534-019-00170-y
53.
FrancisA, YangY, VirtanenS, et al.Iron and iron-based alloys for temporary cardiovascular applications. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 2015; 26(3):138–116; doi: 10.1007/s10856-015-5473-8
54.
KumarR, SinghR, SinghM, et al.On ZnO nano particle reinforced PVDF composite materials for 3D printing of biomedical sensors. J Manuf Process, 2020; 60(October):268–282; doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.10.027
55.
KabirH, MunirK, WenC, et al.Recent research and progress of biodegradable zinc alloys and composites for biomedical applications: Biomechanical and biocorrosion perspectives. Bioact Mater, 2021; 6(3):836–879; doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.09.013
56.
PatelB, InamF, ReeceM, et al.A novel route for processing cobalt-chromium-molybdenum orthopaedic alloys. J R Soc Interface, 2010; 7(52):1641–1645; doi: 10.1098/rsif.2010.0036
57.
HinüberC, KleemannC, FriederichsRJ, et al.Biocompatibility and mechanical properties of diamond-like coatings on cobalt-chromium-molybdenum steel and titanium-aluminum-vanadium biomedical alloys. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2010; 95(2):388–400; doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.32851
58.
MoravejM, MantovaniD. Biodegradable metals for cardiovascular stent application: Interests and new opportunities. Int J Mol Sci, 2011; 12(7):4250–4270; doi: 10.3390/ijms12074250
59.
PeusterM, HesseC, SchlooT, et al.Long-term biocompatibility of a corrodible peripheral iron stent in the porcine descending aorta. Biomaterials, 2006; 27(28):4955–4962; doi: 10.1016/J.BIOMATERIALS.2006.05.029
60.
ChouDT, WellsD, HongD, et al.Novel processing of iron–manganese alloy-based biomaterials by inkjet 3-D printing. Acta Biomater, 2013; 9(10):8593–8603; doi: 10.1016/J.ACTBIO.2013.04.016
61.
XiropaidisAV, QahashM, LimWH, et al.Bone-implant contact at calcium phosphate-coated and porous titanium oxide (TiUniteTM)-modified oral implants. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2005; 16(5):532–539; doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01126.x
62.
FengYP, GaztelumendiN, FornellJ, et al.Mechanical properties, corrosion performance and cell viability studies on newly developed porous Fe-Mn-Si-Pd alloys. J Alloys Compd, 2017; 724:1046–1056; doi: 10.1016/J.JALLCOM.2017.07.112
63.
Sunday ObayiC, ToloueiR, MostavanA, et al.Effect of grain sizes on mechanical properties and biodegradation behavior of pure iron for cardiovascular stent application. Biomatter, 2016; 6(1):e959874; doi: 10.4161/21592527.2014.959874
64.
PradeepPV, PaulL. Review on novel biomaterials and innovative 3D printing techniques in biomedical applications. Mater Today Proc, 2022; 58:96–103; doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.01.072
65.
LiY, WangY, NiuJ, et al.Microstructure and mechanical properties of M2 high speed steel produced by electron beam melting. Mater Sci Eng A, 2023; 862(September 2022):144327; doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2022.144327
66.
ChowdhuryS, YadaiahN, PrakashC, et al.Laser powder bed fusion: A state-of-the-art review of the technology, materials, properties & defects, and numerical modelling. J Mater Res Technol, 2022; 20:2109–2172; doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.07.121
67.
RishmawiI, SalarianM, VlaseaM. Tailoring green and sintered density of pure iron parts using binder jetting additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf, 2018; 24:508–520; doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2018.10.015
68.
KumariG, PhamTQ, SuenH, et al.Improving the soft magnetic properties of binder jet printed iron-silicon alloy through boron addition. Mater Chem Phys, 2023; 296:127181; doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2022.127181
69.
WilmsMB, PirchN, GökceB. Manufacturing oxide-dispersion-strengthened steels using the advanced directed energy deposition process of high-speed laser cladding. Prog Addit Manuf, 2023; 8(2):159–167; doi: 10.1007/s40964-022-00319-1
NikzadM, MasoodSH, SbarskiI, et al.Thermo-mechanical properties of a metal-filled polymer composite for fused deposition modelling applications. 5th. Australas Congr Appl Mech, 2007; 1(December):319–324.
73.
Sa’udeN, IbrahimM, IbrahimMHI. Mechanical properties of highly filled iron-ABS composites in injection molding for FDM wire filament. Mater Sci Forum, 2014; 773–774(March 2015):448–453; doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.773-774.448
74.
CarluccioD, BerminghamM, KentD, et al.Comparative study of pure iron manufactured by selective laser melting, laser metal deposition, and casting processes. Adv Eng Mater, 2019; 21(7); doi: 10.1002/adem.201900049
75.
AvrilP, Le NailLR, BrennanM, et al.Mesenchymal stem cells increase proliferation but do not change quiescent state of osteosarcoma cells: Potential implications according to the tumor resection status. J Bone Oncol, 2016; 5(1):5–14; doi: 10.1016/j.jbo.2015.11.002
76.
SowaMG, WangJ, SchultzCP, et al.Infrared spectroscopic investigation of in vivo and ex vivo human nails. Vib Spectrosc, 1995; 10(1):49–56; doi: 10.1016/0924-2031(95)00027-R
77.
JakusAE. An introduction to 3D printing—past, present, and future promise. 3D Print Orthop Surg, 2019:1–15; doi: 10.1016/B978-0-323-58118-9.00001-4
78.
SchinhammerM, HänziAC, LöfflerJF, et al.Design strategy for biodegradable Fe-based alloys for medical applications. Acta Biomater, 2010; 6(5):1705–1713; doi: 10.1016/J.ACTBIO.2009.07.039
79.
YuW, ZhaoH, DingZ, et al.In vitro and in vivo evaluation of MgF2 coated AZ31 magnesium alloy porous scaffolds for bone regeneration. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces, 2017; 149:330–340; doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.10.037
80.
GorejováR, OriňakováR, KrálováZO, et al.In vitro corrosion behavior of biodegradable iron foams with polymeric coating. Materials (Basel), 2020; 13(1):184; doi: 10.3390/ma13010184
81.
GorejováR, HaverováL, OriňakováR, et al.Recent advancements in Fe-based biodegradable materials for bone repair. J Mater Sci, 2019; 54(3):1913–1947; doi: 10.1007/s10853-018-3011-z
82.
KiselevskiyMV, AnisimovaNY, KapustinAV, et al.Additive Manufacturing Approaches to Design Pore Structures for Development of Bioactive Scaffolds for Orthopedic Applications: A Critical Review. 2023; doi: 10.20944/preprints202308.1983.v1
83.
HongD, ChouDT, VelikokhatnyiOI, et al.Binder-jetting 3D printing and alloy development of new biodegradable Fe-Mn-Ca/Mg alloys. Acta Biomater, 2016; 45:375–386; doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.08.032
84.
BandyopadhyayA, MitraI, GoodmanSB, et al.Improving biocompatibility for next generation of metallic implants. Prog Mater Sci, 2023; 133(September 2022):101053; doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2022.101053
85.
MurrLE, MartinezE, PanX, et al.Microstructures and properties of solid and reticulated mesh components of pure iron fabricated by electron beam melting. J Mater Res Technol, 2013; 2(4):376–385; doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2013.10.002
86.
RishmawiI, SalarianM, VlaseaM. Binder jetting additive manufacturing of water-atomized iron. Solid Free Fabr 2018 Proc 29th Annu Int Solid Free Fabr Symp - An Addit Manuf Conf SFF 2018, 2020;(325):160–170.
KoptyugA, BäckströmM, Botero VegaCA, et al.Developing new materials for electron beam melting: Experiences and challenges. Mater Sci Forum, 2018; 941(December):2190–2195; doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.941.2190
89.
SalamaM, VazMF, ColaçoR, et al.Biodegradable iron and porous iron: Mechanical properties, degradation behaviour, manufacturing routes and biomedical applications. J Funct Biomater, 2022; 13(2); doi: 10.3390/jfb13020072
90.
Al-TamimiAA, FernandesPRA, PeachC, et al.Metallic bone fixation implants: A novel design approach for reducing the stress shielding phenomenon. Virtual Phys Prototyp, 2017; 12(2):141–151; doi: 10.1080/17452759.2017.1307769
91.
CunatP. and Other Chromium-Containing Alloys. 2004; 1–24.
92.
DaroliaR. Development of strong, oxidation and corrosion resistant nickel-based superalloys: Critical review of challenges, progress and prospects. Int Mater Rev, 2019; 64(6):355–380; doi: 10.1080/09506608.2018.1516713
93.
KaoCT, DingSJ, ChenYC, et al.The anticorrosion ability of titanium nitride (TiN) plating on an orthodontic metal bracket and its biocompatibility. J Biomed Mater Res, 2002; 63(6):786–792; doi: 10.1002/jbm.10484
94.
BordjiK, JouzeauJY, MainardD, et al.Evaluation of the effect of three surface treatments on the biocompatibility of 316L stainless steel using human differentiated cells. Biomaterials, 1996; 17(5):491–500; doi: 10.1016/0142-9612(96)82723-2
95.
SinghA, SinghP, PablaBS, et al.Parametric analysis to explore the viability of cold spray additive manufacturing to print SS316L parts for biomedical application. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng, 2022; 44(8):1–22; doi: 10.1007/s40430-022-03666-w
96.
LodhiMJK, DeenKM, Greenlee-WackerMC, et al.Additively manufactured 316L stainless steel with improved corrosion resistance and biological response for biomedical applications. Addit Manuf, 2019; 27(February):8–19; doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2019.02.005
97.
Talib MohammedM. Mechanical properties of SLM-titanium materials for biomedical applications: A review. Mater Today Proc, 2018; 5(9):17906–17913; doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2018.06.119
98.
NazirA, GokcekayaO, Md Masum BillahK, et al.Multi-material additive manufacturing: A systematic review of design, properties, applications, challenges, and 3D printing of materials and cellular metamaterials. Mater Des, 2023; 226:111661; doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2023.111661
99.
TamayoJA, RiascosM, VargasCA, et al.Additive manufacturing of Ti6Al4V alloy via electron beam melting for the development of implants for the biomedical industry. Heliyon, 2021; 7(5):e06892; doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06892
100.
ZhongY, RännarLE, LiuL, et al.Additive manufacturing of 316L stainless steel by electron beam melting for nuclear fusion applications. J Nucl Mater, 2017; 486:234–245; doi: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2016.12.042
101.
KaneSN, MishraA, DuttaAK. Preface: International Conference on Recent Trends in Physics (ICRTP 2016). J Phys Conf Ser, 2016; 755(1):3–9; doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/755/1/011001
102.
AhmadM, JavaidM, HaleemA. Enhancing biocompatible metal alloy fabrication for bio implants through laser-based additive manufacturing (LBAM). Biomed Anal, 2024; 1(1):73–85; doi: 10.1016/j.bioana.2024.02.001
103.
MirzababaeiS, PasebaniS. A review on binder jet additive manufacturing of 316L stainless steel. J Manuf Mater Process, 2019; 3(3):82–12; doi: 10.3390/jmmp3030082
104.
MeenashisundaramGK, XuZ, NaiMLS, et al.Binder jetting additive manufacturing of high porosity 316L stainless steel metal foams. Materials (Basel), 2020; 13(17):1–23; doi: 10.3390/MA13173744
105.
AdeyemiA, AkinlabiET, MahamoodRM. Powder bed based laser additive manufacturing process of stainless : A review. Mater Today Proc, 2018; 5(9):18510–18517; doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2018.06.193
106.
PereiraTF, SilvaMAC, OliveiraMF, et al.Effect of process parameters on the properties of selective laser sintered Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: This paper analyzes how laser scan spacing and powder layer thickness affect the morphology and mechanical properties. Virtual Phys Prototyp, 2012; 7(4):275–285; doi: 10.1080/17452759.2012.738551
Garcia-CabezonC, HernándezCG, Castro-SastreMA, et al.Heat treatments of 17-4 PH SS processed by SLM to improve its strength and biocompatibility in biomedical applications. J Mater Res Technol, 2023; 26:3524–3543; doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.08.104
109.
XuS, MaH, SongX, et al.Finite element simulation of stainless steel porous scaffolds for selective laser melting (SLM) and its experimental investigation. Coatings, 2023; 13(1):134; doi: 10.3390/coatings13010134
110.
SinghS, RamakrishnaS, SinghR. Material issues in additive manufacturing: A review. J Manuf Process, 2017; 25(January):185–200; doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2016.11.006
111.
SolaA, TrinchiA, HillAJ. Self-assembly meets additive manufacturing: Bridging the gap between nanoscale arrangement of matter and macroscale fabrication. Smart Mater Manuf, 2023; 1(December 2022):100013; doi: 10.1016/j.smmf.2022.100013
112.
KumarY, AuthorC, HallG, et al.The Effects of Hot Isostatic Pressing on Parts Fabricated by Binder Jetting Additive Manufacturing. Authors : Williams, Christopher B. a * Design, Research, and Education for Additive Manufacturing Systems Lab Virginia Tech Department of Mechan. Elsevier, 2018, pp. 0–31.
113.
BandyopadhyayA, GhoshS, BoccacciniAR, et al.3D printing of biomedical materials and devices. J Mater Res, 2021; 36(19):3713–3724; doi: 10.1557/s43578-021-00407-y
114.
ZhangXY, FangG, ZhouJ. Additively manufactured scaffolds for bone tissue engineering and the prediction of their mechanical behavior: A review. Materials (Basel), 2017; 10(1); doi: 10.3390/ma10010050
115.
WenY, LiuQ, WangJ, et al.Improving in vitro and in vivo corrosion resistance and biocompatibility of Mg–1Zn–1Sn alloys by microalloying with Sr. Bioact Mater, 2021; 6(12):4654–4669; doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.04.043
116.
SharmaSK, SaxenaKK, DixitAK, et al.Role of additive manufacturing and various reinforcements in MMCs related to biomedical applications. Adv Mater Process Technol, 2024; 10(2):231–248; doi: 10.1080/2374068X.2022.2122005
117.
ZhouH, LiangB, JiangH, et al.Magnesium-based biomaterials as emerging agents for bone repair and regeneration: From mechanism to application. J Magnes Alloy, 2021; 9(3):779–804; doi: 10.1016/j.jma.2021.03.004
118.
AhmadiM, TabarySAAB, RahmatabadiD, et al.Review of selective laser melting of magnesium alloys: Advantages, microstructure and mechanical characterizations, defects, challenges, and applications. J Mater Res Technol, 2022; 19:1537–1562; doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.05.102
119.
ZengZ, SalehiM, KoppA, et al.Recent progress and perspectives in additive manufacturing of magnesium alloys. J Magnes Alloy, 2022; 10(6):1511–1541; doi: 10.1016/j.jma.2022.03.001
120.
BadkoobehF, MostaanH, RafieiM, et al.Additive manufacturing of biodegradable magnesium-based materials: Design strategies, properties, and biomedical applications. J Magnes Alloy, 2023; 11(3):801–839; doi: 10.1016/j.jma.2022.12.001
121.
García-SobrinoR, MuñozM, Rodríguez-JaraE, et al.Bioabsorbable composites based on polymeric matrix (PLA and PCL) reinforced with magnesium (Mg) for use in bone regeneration therapy: Physicochemical properties and biological evaluation. Polymers (Basel), 2023; 15(24); doi: 10.3390/polym15244667
122.
BalanP, ThiagarajanV, GanesanSP, et al.Characterization of powder metallurgy processed magnesium alloys for biomedical implants. Emergent Mater, 2023; 6(2):573–581; doi: 10.1007/s42247-023-00476-1
123.
FellabaumCA, MeyerRJ. Dispersion and stability studies for development of ceramic paste for direct ink writing by. 2024;(May).
124.
WolffM, MesterknechtT, BalsA, et al.FFF of Mg-alloys for biomedical application. Miner Met Mater Ser, 2019; 43–49; doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-05789-3_8
125.
LinX, Saijilafu, WuX. Biodegradable Mg-based alloys: Biological implications and restorative opportunities. Int Mater Rev, 2022; 1–39; doi: 10.1080/09506608.2022.2079367
126.
JahrH, LiY, ZhouJ, et al.Additively manufactured absorbable porous metal implants – processing, alloying and corrosion behavior. Front Mater, 2021; 8(April):15–20; doi: 10.3389/fmats.2021.628633
127.
SezerN, EvisZ, KoçM. Additive manufacturing of biodegradable magnesium implants and scaffolds: Review of the recent advances and research trends. J Magnes Alloy, 2021; 9(2):392–415; doi: 10.1016/j.jma.2020.09.014
128.
EzhilmaranV, Suya Prem AnandP, KannanS, et al.Review of bioresorbable AZ91, AZ31 and Mg–Zn–Ca implants and their manufacturing methods. Mater Sci Technol, 2023; 39(8):901–925; doi: 10.1080/02670836.2022.2153207
129.
SalariF, BosettiP, SglavoVM. Binder jetting 3D printing of magnesium oxychloride cement-based materials: Parametric analysis of manufacturing factors. J Manuf Mater Process, 2022; 6(4):86; doi: 10.3390/jmmp6040086
130.
NandhakumarR, VenkatesanK. A Process Parameters Review on Selective Laser Melting-Based Additive Manufacturing of Single and Multi-Material: Microstructure, Physical Properties, Tribological, and Surface Roughness. Elsevier Ltd; 2023; doi: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.105538
131.
DuttaS, RoyM. Recent developments in engineered magnesium scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. ACS Biomater Sci Eng, 2023; 9(6):3010–3031; doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c01510
132.
SerboJV, GerechtS. Vascular tissue engineering: Biodegradable scaffold platforms to promote angiogenesis. Stem Cell Res Ther, 2013; 4(1):8.
133.
GogoiD, KumarM, SinghJ. A comprehensive review on hydrogel-based bio-ink development for tissue engineering scaffolds using 3D printing. Ann 3D Print Med, 2024; 15(June):100159; doi: 10.1016/j.stlm.2024.100159
134.
MostaedE, Sikora-JasinskaM, MostaedA, et al.Novel Zn-based alloys for biodegradable stent applications: Design, development and in vitro degradation. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 2016; 60:581–602; doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.03.018
135.
LiP, ZhangW, SpintzykS, et al.Impact of sterilization treatments on biodegradability and cytocompatibility of zinc-based implant materials. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 2021; 130(April):112430; doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2021.112430
136.
El-DalyAA, HammadAE, Al-GanainyGS, et al.Influence of Zn addition on the microstructure, melt properties and creep behavior of low Ag-content Sn-Ag-Cu lead-free solders. Mater Sci Eng A, 2014; 608:130–138; doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2014.04.070
137.
FukadaT, HojyoS, FuruichiT. Zinc signal: A new player in osteobiology. J Bone Miner Metab, 2013; 31(2):129–135; doi: 10.1007/s00774-012-0409-6
138.
VenezuelaJ, DarguschMS. The influence of alloying and fabrication techniques on the mechanical properties, biodegradability and biocompatibility of zinc: A comprehensive review. Acta Biomater, 2019; 87(xxxx):1–40; doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.01.035
139.
DoloiS, RajputAS, KapilS, et al.Hybrid additive manufacturing of knee joint implant: possibilities and challenges BT. In: Advances in Additive Manufacturing and Metal Joining. (Ramesh BabuN, KumarS, ThylaPR eds) Springer Nature Singapore: Singapore, 2023, pp. 161–176.
140.
ZhouY, WangJ, YangY, et al.Laser additive manufacturing of zinc targeting for biomedical application. Int J Bioprint, 2022; 8(1):501; doi: 10.18063/ijb.v8i1.501
141.
ChakrabortyM, DeviA. Landscape of scaffolds from advanced synthesis to tissue engineering. Mater Today Chem, 2024; 40(June):102258; doi: 10.1016/j.mtchem.2024.102258
142.
SnellingDA, WilliamsCB, SuchicitalCTA, et al.Binder jetting advanced ceramics for metal-ceramic composite structures. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2017; 92(1–4):531–545; doi: 10.1007/s00170-017-0139-y
143.
EsmaeiliS, Akbari AghdamH, MotififardM, et al.A porous polymeric–hydroxyapatite scaffold used for femur fractures treatment: Fabrication, analysis, and simulation. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol, 2020; 30(1):123–131; doi: 10.1007/s00590-019-02530-3
144.
ThianES, KonishiT, KawanobeY, et al.Zinc-substituted hydroxyapatite: A biomaterial with enhanced bioactivity and antibacterial properties. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 2013; 24(2):437–445; doi: 10.1007/s10856-012-4817-x
145.
ChenY, WenP, VoshageM, et al.Laser additive manufacturing of Zn metal parts for biodegradable implants: Effect of gas flow on evaporation and formation quality. J Laser Appl, 2019; 31(2); doi: 10.2351/1.5096118
146.
LiuA, QinY, DaiJ, et al.Fabrication and performance of zinc-based biodegradable metals: From conventional processes to laser powder bed fusion. Bioact Mater, 2024; 41(November 2023):312–335; doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2024.07.022
147.
ShishirR, NasiruddinU, ManojkumarP, et al.Zinc as a potential bio-degradable temporary implant material. Mater Today Proc, 2023;(October); doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2023.09.009
148.
YangF, ZengJ, LongH, et al.Micrometer copper-zinc alloy particles-reinforced wood plastic composites with high gloss and antibacterial properties for 3d printing. Polymers (Basel), 2020; 12(3); doi: 10.3390/polym12030621
149.
ChongWJ, ShenS, LiY, et al.Additive manufacturing of antibacterial PLA-ZnO nanocomposites: Benefits, limitations and open challenges. J Mater Sci Technol, 2022; 111:120–151; doi: 10.1016/j.jmst.2021.09.039
150.
Sam FroesFH. Titanium for Medical and Dental Applications-An Introduction. Elsevier Inc.; 2018; doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-812456-7.00001-9
151.
ŁęckaKM, GąsiorekJ, Mazur-NowackaA, et al.Adhesion and corrosion resistance of laser-oxidized titanium in potential biomedical application. Surf Coatings Technol, 2019; 366(March):179–189; doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.03.032
152.
SonkambleV, PhafatN. A current review on electron beam assisted additive manufacturing technology: Recent trends and advances in materials design. Discov Mech Eng, 2023; 2(1); doi: 10.1007/s44245-022-00008-x
153.
LuJ, ZhuoL. Additive manufacturing of titanium alloys via selective laser melting: Fabrication, microstructure, post-processing, performance and prospect. Int J Refract Met Hard Mater, 2023; 111(January):106110; doi: 10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2023.106110
154.
SenopatiG, Rahman RashidRA, KartikaI, et al.Recent development of low-cost β-Ti alloys for biomedical applications: A review. Metals (Basel), 2023; 13(2):194; doi: 10.3390/met13020194
155.
ZhangLC, AttarH, CalinM, et al.Review on manufacture by selective laser melting and properties of titanium based materials for biomedical applications. Mater Technol, 2016; 31(2):66–76; doi: 10.1179/1753555715Y.0000000076
156.
JózwikJ, OstrowskiD, MilczarczykR, et al.Analysis of relation between the 3D printer laser beam power and the surface morphology properties in Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy parts. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng, 2018; 40(4); doi: 10.1007/s40430-018-1144-2
157.
RenganathanG, TanneruN, MaduraiSL. Orthopedical and Biomedical Applications of Titanium and Zirconium Metals. Elsevier Ltd; 2018; doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-102205-4.00010-6
158.
GuoL, ZuoP, ZhangZ, et al.A review of Cu–Ni–Sn alloys: Processing, microstructure, properties, and developing trends. Materials (Basel), 2023; 16(1); doi: 10.3390/ma16010444
159.
ChowdhuryS, ArunachalamN. Surface functionalization of additively manufactured titanium alloy for orthopaedic implant applications. J Manuf Process, 2023; 102(July):387–405; doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2023.07.015
160.
BandekhodaMR, MosallanejadMH, AtapourM, et al.Investigation on the potential of laser and electron beam additively manufactured Ti–6Al–4V components for orthopedic applications. Met Mater Int, 2024; 30(1):114–126; doi: 10.1007/s12540-023-01496-6
161.
ZengL, KanWH, ZhangK, et al.Hybrid laser powder bed fusion and hot isostatic pressing of Ti-6Al-4V parts without degassing for process efficiency. J Manuf Process, 2023; 92(January):63–74; doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2023.02.050
162.
BehnoodA, Modiri GharehveranM. Morphology, rheology, and physical properties of polymer-modified asphalt binders. Eur Polym J, 2019; 112:766–791; doi: 10.1016/J.EURPOLYMJ.2018.10.049
163.
JørgensenAMM, OlsenHB, BalschmidtP, et al.Solution structure of the superactive monomeric Des-[Phe(B25)] Human insulin mutant: Elucidation of the structural basis for the monomerization of Des-[Phe(B25)] Insulin and the dimerization of Native Insulin. J Mol Biol, 1996; 257(3):684–699; doi: 10.1006/JMBI.1996.0194
164.
Sanchez-GarciaMD, GimenezE, LagaronJM. Morphology and barrier properties of solvent cast composites of thermoplastic biopolymers and purified cellulose fibers. Carbohydr Polym, 2008; 71(2):235–244; doi: 10.1016/J.CARBPOL.2007.05.041
165.
ChaudharyV, AhmadF. A review on plant fiber reinforced thermoset polymers for structural and frictional composites. Polym Test, 2020; 91:106792; doi: 10.1016/J.POLYMERTESTING.2020.106792
166.
ZareM, GhomiER, VenkatramanPD, et al.Silicone-based biomaterials for biomedical applications: Antimicrobial strategies and 3D printing technologies. J App Polym Sci, 2021; 138(38); doi: 10.1002/app.50969
167.
Bassas-GaliaM, FollonierS, PusnikM, et al.Natural polymers: A source of inspiration. Bioresorbable Polym Biomed Appl From Fundam to Transl Med, 2017; 31–64; doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-100262-9.00002-1
168.
AnithaA, SowmyaS, KumarPTS, et al.Chitin and chitosan in selected biomedical applications. Prog Polym Sci, 2014; 39(9):1644–1667; doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2014.02.008
169.
WestSL, SalvageJP, LobbEJ, et al.The biocompatibility of crosslinkable copolymer coatings containing sulfobetaines and phosphobetaines. Biomaterials, 2004; 25(7–8):1195–1204; doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.08.010
170.
BilodeauC, GoltsisO, RogersIM, et al.Limitations of recellularized biological scaffolds for human transplantation. J Tissue Eng Regen Med, 2020; 14(3):521–538; doi: 10.1002/term.3004
KieltyCM, GrantME. The collagen family: Structure, assembly, and organization in the extracellular matrix. Connect Tissue Its Heritable Disord, 2003; 159–221; doi: 10.1002/0471221929.ch2
173.
SabirMI, XuX, LiL. A review on biodegradable polymeric materials for bone tissue engineering applications. J Mater Sci, 2009; 44(21):5713–5724; doi: 10.1007/s10853-009-3770-7
174.
FriessW. Collagen - Biomaterial for drug delivery. Eur J Pharm Biopharm, 1998; 45(2):113–136; doi: 10.1016/S0939-6411(98)00017-4
175.
FengS, RepkaMA. Future prospects including novel polymeric excipients for 3D printing of pharmaceutical and biomedical applications BT. In: 3D Printing : Emerging Technologies and Functionality of Polymeric Excipients in Drug Product Development. (RepkaMA, LangleyN. eds) Springer International Publishing: Cham, 2024, pp. 273–286; 10.1007/978-3-031-46015-9_11
176.
LiH, DaiJ, WangZ, et al.Digital light processing (DLP)-based (bio)printing strategies for tissue modeling and regeneration. Aggregate, 2023; 4(2):1–20; doi: 10.1002/agt2.270
177.
YangH, FangH, WangC, et al.3D printing of customized functional devices for smart biomedical systems. SmartMat, 2024; 5(5); doi: 10.1002/smm2.1244
178.
DonderwinkelI, Van HestJCM, CameronNR. Bio-inks for 3D bioprinting: Recent advances and future prospects. Polym Chem, 2017; 8(31):4451–4471; doi: 10.1039/c7py00826k
179.
BhattacharyyaA, JanarthananG, NohI. Nano-biomaterials for designing functional bioinks towards complex tissue and organ regeneration in 3D bioprinting. Addit Manuf, 2021; 37:101639; doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2020.101639
180.
Buj-CorralI, Herranz-DiezC, Tejo-OteroA, et al.Biomedical applications of the fused filament fabrication (FFF) technology BT. In: Interaction of Nanomaterials With Living Cells. (SheikhFA, MajeedS, BeighMA eds) Springer Nature Singapore: Singapore, 2023, pp. 839–858; 10.1007/978-981-99-2119-5_28
181.
AnandhapadmanA, VenkateswaranA, JayaramanH, et al.Advances in 3D printing of composite scaffolds for the repairment of bone tissue associated defects. Biotechnol Prog, 2022; 38(3):e3234; doi: 10.1002/btpr.3234
182.
ZhuJ, WangX, LinL, et al.3D bioprinting for vascular grafts and microvasculature. Int J Bioprinting, 2023; 9(6):0012–0272; doi: 10.36922/IJB.0012
183.
AhmadyA, HayatiN, SamahA. A review : Gelatine as a bioadhesive material for medical and pharmaceutical applications. Int J Pharm, 2021; 608(August):121037; doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.121037
184.
PourshahrestaniS, ZeimaranE, KadriNA, et al.Polymeric hydrogel systems as emerging biomaterial platforms to enable hemostasis and wound healing. Adv Healthc Mater, 2020; 9(20):e2000905; doi: 10.1002/adhm.202000905
185.
GregoryDA, FrickerATR, MitrevP, et al.Additive manufacturing of polyhydroxyalkanoate-based blends using fused deposition modelling for the development of biomedical devices. J Funct Biomater, 2023; 14(1); doi: 10.3390/jfb14010040
186.
MassonieM, PineseC, SimonM, et al.Biodegradable tyramine functional Gelatin/6 Arms-PLA inks compatible with 3D two photon-polymerization printing and meniscus tissue regeneration. Biomacromolecules, 2024; 25(8):5098–5109; doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.4c00495
187.
ShopperlyLK, SpinnenJ, KrügerJP, et al.Blends of gelatin and hyaluronic acid stratified by stereolithographic bioprinting approximate cartilaginous matrix gradients. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 2022; 110(10):2310–2322; doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.35079
188.
BinRA, ShowvaNN, HoqueME. Gelatin-based scaffolds: An intuitive support structure for regenerative therapy. Curr Opin Biomed Eng, 2023; 26:100452; doi: 10.1016/j.cobme.2023.100452
189.
Blanco-LópezM, Marcos-GarcíaA, González-GarcinuñoÁ, et al.Exploring the effect of experimental conditions on the synthesis and stability of alginate–gelatin coacervates. Polym Adv Technol, 2024; 35(8):1–14; doi: 10.1002/pat.6554
190.
RajabiN, RezaeiA, KharazihaM, et al.Recent advances on bioprinted gelatin methacrylate-based hydrogels for tissue repair. Tissue Eng Part A, 2021; 27(11–12):679–702; doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2020.0350
191.
KaliampakouC, LagopatiN, CharitidisCA. Direct ink writing of alginate–gelatin hydrogel: An optimization of ink property design and printing process efficacy. Appl Sci, 2023; 13(14):8261; doi: 10.3390/app13148261
192.
WangZ, TianZ, JinX, et al.Visible light photoinitiation of cell adhesive gelatin methacryloyl hydrogels for stereo- lithography 3D bioprinting. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2018; 10(32):26859–26869.
193.
MurphyCA, LimKS, WoodfieldTBF. Next evolution in organ-scale biofabrication : Bioresin design for rapid high-resolution vat polymerization. Adv Mater, 2022; 34(20):2107759; doi: 10.1002/adma.202107759
194.
HuberCM, LyerS, ErmertH, et al.Wall-less flow phantoms with 3D printed soluble filament for ultrasonic experiments. Curr Dir Biomed Eng, 2023; 9(1):97–100; doi: 10.1515/cdbme-2023-1025
195.
Grivet-BrancotA, BoffitoM, CiardelliG. Use of polyesters in fused deposition modeling for biomedical applications. Macromol Biosci, 2022; 22(10):e2200039–e29; doi: 10.1002/mabi.202200039
196.
BrossierT, VolpiG, Vasquez-VillegasJ, et al.Photoprintable gelatin- graft-poly(trimethylene carbonate) by stereolithography for tissue engineering applications. Biomacromolecules, 2021; 22(9):3873–3883.
197.
SajjadR, ChauhdaryST, AnwarMT, et al.A review of 4D printing—Technologies, shape shifting, smart polymer based materials, and biomedical applications. Adv Ind Eng Polym Res, 2024; 7(1):20–36; doi: 10.1016/j.aiepr.2023.08.002
198.
BarsottiMC, FeliceF, BalbariniA, et al.Fibrin as a Scaffold for Cardiac Tissue. 2011;(Lv); 10.1002/bab.49
199.
WangX, WangY, TengY, et al.3D bioprinting: Opportunities for wound dressing development. Biomed Mater, 2023; 18(5); doi: 10.1088/1748-605X/ace228
200.
UchidaDT, BruschiML. 3D Printing as a technological strategy for the personalized treatment of wound healing. AAPS PharmSciTech, 2023; 24(1):41; doi: 10.1208/s12249-023-02503-0
201.
EnukashvilyNI, DombrovskayaJA, KotovaAV, et al.Fibrin glue implants seeded with dental pulp and periodontal ligament stem cells for the repair of periodontal bone defects: A preclinical study. Bioengineering, 2021; 8(6):75–15; doi: 10.3390/bioengineering8060075
202.
de MeloBAG, JodatYA, CruzEM, et al.Strategies to use fibrinogen as bioink for 3D bioprinting fibrin-based soft and hard tissues. Acta Biomater, 2020; 117(xxxx):60–76; doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.09.024
203.
PanwarA, TanLP. Current Status of Bioinks for Micro-Extrusion-Based. 2016; doi: 10.3390/molecules21060685
204.
MunazA, VadiveluRK, StJ, et al.Journal of science : Advanced materials and devices three-dimensional printing of biological matters. J Sci Adv Mater Devices, 2016; 1(1):1–17; doi: 10.1016/j.jsamd.2016.04.001
205.
ZhangY, ChoppM, ZhangZG, et al.Systemic administration of cell-free exosomes generated by human bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells cultured under 2D and 3D conditions improves functional recovery in rats after traumatic brain injury. Neurochem Int, 2017; 111:69–81; doi: 10.1016/j.neuint.2016.08.003
206.
JiangT, Munguia-LopezJG, Flores-TorresS, et al.Extrusion bioprinting of soft materials : An emerging technique for biological model fabrication. Appl Physics Rev, 2019; 6(1); doi: 10.1063/1.5059393
207.
MobarakMH, IslamMA, HossainN, et al.Recent advances of additive manufacturing in implant fabrication – A review. Appl Surf Sci Adv, 2023; 18(August):100462; doi: 10.1016/j.apsadv.2023.100462
208.
ElomaaL, YangYP. Additive manufacturing of vascular grafts and vascularized tissue constructs. Tissue Eng Part B Rev, 2017; 23(5):436–450; doi: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2016.0348
209.
LeeYB, PolioS, LeeW, et al.Bio-printing of collagen and VEGF-releasing fibrin gel scaffolds for neural stem cell culture. Exp Neurol, 2010; 223(2):645–652; doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2010.02.014
210.
In P, Advanced D, Delivery D, et al.The recent approaches in nano-technology with applications of 3-D the recent approaches in nano-technology with applications of 3-D printing (3DP) in diverse advanced drug delivery SYSTEM (DDS). 2023;(September); doi: 10.48047/ecb/2023.12.si10.00510
211.
KunduB, RajkhowaR, KunduSC, et al.Recent innovations in silk biomaterials silk fi broin biomaterials for tissue regenerations ☆. Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 2013; 65(4):457–470; doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2012.09.043
212.
AkintayoOS, OlajideJL, BetikuOT, et al.Poly(Lactic acid)-silkworm silk fibre/fibroin bio-composites: A review of their processing, properties, and nascent applications. Express Polym Lett, 2020; 14(10):924–951; doi: 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2020.76
213.
S, R GAP, BajajG, et al.A review on the recent applications of synthetic biopolymers in 3D printing for biomedical applications. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 2023; 34(12):62; doi: 10.1007/s10856-023-06765-9
214.
DeBariMK, KeyserMN, BaiMA, et al.3D printing with silk: Considerations and applications. Connect Tissue Res, 2020; 61(2):163–173; doi: 10.1080/03008207.2018.1553959
215.
GhoshA, OrasughJT, RaySS, et al.Integration of 3D printing-coelectrospinning: Concept shifting in biomedical applications. ACS Omega, 2023; 8(31):28002–28025; doi: 10.1021/acsomega.3c03920
216.
DonatoRK, MijaA. Keratin associations with synthetic, biosynthetic and natural polymers : An extensive review. Polymers (Basel), 2019; 12(1):1–64.
217.
KimSH, YeonYK, LeeJM, et al.Precisely printable and biocompatible silk fibroin bioink for digital light processing 3D printing. Nat Commun, 2018; 9(1):2350–2314; doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03759-y
218.
ShinS, KwakH, HyunJ. Melanin nanoparticle-incorporated silk fibroin hydrogels for the enhancement of printing resolution in 3D-Projection stereolithography of poly(ethylene glycol)-tetraacrylate bio-ink. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2018; 10(28):23573–23582; doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b05963
219.
FrancisJN, BanerjeeI, ChughA, et al.Additive manufacturing of polyetheretherketone and its composites: A review. Polym Compos, 2022; 43(9):5802–5819; doi: 10.1002/pc.26961
220.
WuY, LuY, ZhaoM, et al.A critical review of additive manufacturing techniques and associated biomaterials used in bone tissue engineering. Polymers (Basel), 2022; 14(10):1–24; doi: 10.3390/polym14102117
221.
VarmaMV, KandasubramanianB, IbrahimSM. 3D printed scaffolds for biomedical applications. Mater Chem Phys, 2020; 255:123642; doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.123642
222.
DoderoA, AlbertiS, GaggeroG, et al.An up-to-date review on alginate nanoparticles and nanofibers for biomedical and pharmaceutical applications. Adv Materials Inter, 2021; 8(22); doi: 10.1002/admi.202100809
223.
AbasalizadehF, MoghaddamSV, AlizadehE, et al.Alginate-based hydrogels as drug delivery vehicles in cancer treatment and their applications in wound dressing and 3D bioprinting. J Biol Eng, 2020; 14:8–22.
HurtadoA, AljabaliAAA, MishraV, et al.Alginate : Enhancement strategies for advanced applications. Int J Mol Sci, 2022; 23(9).
226.
ZenniferA, ManivannanS, SethuramanS, et al.Biomaterials advances 3D bioprinting and photocrosslinking : Emerging strategies & future perspectives. Biomater Adv, 2022; 134(September 2021):112576; doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2021.112576
227.
BukitBF, SyamaniFA, RochimaE, et al.Review of alginate-based composites for 3D printing material. Polym from Renew Resour, 2024; 15(2):256–277; doi: 10.1177/20412479241227137
228.
HuX, ZhangZ, WuH, et al.Progress in the application of 3D-printed sodium alginate-based hydrogel scaffolds in bone tissue repair. Biomater Adv, 2023; 152:213501; doi: 10.1016/j.bioadv.2023.213501
229.
GuoY, QiaoD, ZhaoS, et al.Biofunctional chitosan–biopolymer composites for biomedical applications. Mater Sci Eng R Reports, 2024; 159(February):100775; doi: 10.1016/j.mser.2024.100775
230.
JanaS, JanaS. Functional Biomaterials: Drug Delivery and Biomedical Applications. 2022; doi: 10.1007/978-981-16-7152-4
231.
AgarwalK, SrinivasanV, LatherV, et al.Insights of 3D bioprinting and focusing the paradigm shift towards 4D printing for biomedical applications. J Mater Res, 2023; 38(1):112–141; doi: 10.1557/s43578-022-00524-2
232.
TaghizadehM, TaghizadehA, YazdiMK, et al.Chitosan-based inks for 3D printing and bioprinting. Green Chem, 2022; 24(1):62–101; doi: 10.1039/D1GC01799C
233.
BogaertJ. Poly (lactic acids): A potential solution to plastic waste dilemma. 2018;3900(March 2000); 10.1002/1521-3900(200003)153
234.
SamanRA, IqbalM. Nanotechnology-based drug delivery systems: Past, present and future. Nanotechnol Appl Energy, Drug Food, 2019; 175–185; doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-99602-8_7
235.
ShahAA, HasanF, HameedA, et al.Biological degradation of plastics: A comprehensive review. Biotechnol Adv, 2008; 26(3):246–265; doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2007.12.005
236.
HadziioannouG, SteinRS. Neutron scattering studies of dimensions and of interactions between components in polystyrene/poly(vinyl methyl ether) and poly(vinylidene fluoride)/poly(methyl methacrylate) amorphous blends†. Macromolecules, 1984; 17(4):567–573; doi: 10.1021/ma00134a010
237.
OmarE, CaryV, GallK. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials Structure-property relationships in 3D-printed poly (L -lactide- co - ε -caprolactone) degradable polymer. 2021;121(April).
238.
SeyedsalehiA, DaneshmandiL, BarajaaM, et al.Fabrication and characterization of mechanically competent 3D printed polycaprolactone-reduced graphene oxide scaffolds. Sci Rep, 2020; 10(1):22210–22214; doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-78977-w
239.
DuanR, WangY, ZhangY, et al.Blending with Poly(l -lactic acid) improves the printability of poly(l -lactide- co-caprolactone) and enhances the potential application in cartilage tissue engineering. ACS Omega, 2021; 6(28):18300–18313; doi: 10.1021/acsomega.1c02190
240.
ZanchinG, LeoneG. Polyolefin thermoplastic elastomers from polymerization catalysis: Advantages, pitfalls and future challenges. Prog Polym Sci, 2021; 113:101342; doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2020.101342
241.
WangK, PanW, LiuZ, et al.3D printing of viscoelastic suspensions via digital light synthesis for tough nanoparticle–elastomer composites. Adv Mater, 2020; 32(25):e2001646–e2001648; doi: 10.1002/adma.202001646
242.
MaginRL. Fractional calculus models of complex dynamics in biological tissues. Comput Math with Appl, 2010; 59(5):1586–1593; doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2009.08.039
243.
Lanceros-MéndezS, ManoJF, CostaAM, et al.FTIR and DSC studies of mechanically deformed β-PVDF films. J Macromol Sci - Phys, 2001; 40(3–4):517–527; doi: 10.1081/MB-100106174
244.
AsyrafMRM, SyamsirA, IshakMR, et al.Mechanical properties of hybrid lignocellulosic fiber-reinforced biopolymer green composites: A review. Fibers Polym, 2023; 24(2):337–353; doi: 10.1007/s12221-023-00034-w
245.
VarshosazJ, MoazenE. Novel lectin-modified poly(ethylene-co-vinyl acetate) mucoadhesive nanoparticles of carvedilol: Preparation and in vitro optimization using a two-level factorial design. Pharm Dev Technol, 2014; 19(5):605–617; doi: 10.3109/10837450.2013.819011
246.
BäckemoJ, LiuY, LendleinA. Bio-inspired and computer-supported design of modulated shape changes in polymer materials. MRS Commun, 2021; 11(4):462–469; doi: 10.1557/s43579-021-00056-6
247.
WangK, DengQ. The thermal and mechanical properties of poly(ethylene-co-vinyl acetate) random copolymers (PEVA) and its covalently crosslinked analogues (cPEVA). Polymers (Basel), 2019; 11(6); doi: 10.3390/polym11061055
248.
KnoopF, SchoepnerV. Mechanical and thermal properties of FDM parts manufactured. Solid Free Fabr Symp, 2015; 935–948.
249.
ArunM, SathishkumarN, Nithesh KumarK, et al.Development of patient specific bio-polymer incisor teeth by 3D printing process: A case study. Mater Today Proc, 2021; 39(xxxx):1303–1308; doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.367
250.
BaiJ, YuanS, ShenF, et al.Toughening of polyamide 11 with carbon nanotubes for additive manufacturing. Virtual Phys Prototyp, 2017; 12(3):235–240; doi: 10.1080/17452759.2017.1315146
251.
BalakrishnanH, HassanA, WahitMU, et al.Novel toughened polylactic acid nanocomposite: Mechanical, thermal and morphological properties. Mater Des, 2010; 31(7):3289–3298; doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.02.008
252.
VeliogluZB, PulatD, DemirbakanB, et al.3D-printed poly(lactic acid) scaffolds for trabecular bone repair and regeneration: Scaffold and native bone characterization. Connect Tissue Res, 2019; 60(3):274–282; doi: 10.1080/03008207.2018.1499732
253.
IlyasRA, SapuanSM, HarussaniMM, et al.Polylactic acid (Pla) biocomposite: Processing, additive manufacturing and advanced applications. Polymers (Basel), 2021; 13(8); doi: 10.3390/polym13081326
254.
ShubhraQTH, AlamAKMM, QuaiyyumMA. Mechanical properties of polypropylene composites: A review. J Thermoplast Compos Mater, 2013; 26(3):362–391; doi: 10.1177/0892705711428659
255.
BertolinoM, BattegazzoreD, ArrigoR, et al.Designing 3D printable polypropylene: Material and process optimisation through rheology. Addit Manuf, 2021; 40(October 2020):101944; doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2021.101944
256.
PaajanenH, LaineH. Operative treatment of massive ventral hernia using polypropylene mesh: A challenge for surgeon and anesthesiologist. Hernia, 2005; 9(1):62–67; doi: 10.1007/s10029-004-0283-9
257.
RahimTNAT, AbdullahAM, Md AkilH. Recent developments in fused deposition modeling-based 3D printing of polymers and their composites. Polym Rev, 2019; 59(4):589–624; doi: 10.1080/15583724.2019.1597883
258.
RehmanA, HoushyarS, WangX. Nanodiamond in composite: Biomedical application. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2020; 108(4):906–922; doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.36868
259.
SaxenaP, ShuklaP. A comprehensive review on fundamental properties and applications of poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF). Adv Compos Hybrid Mater, 2021; 4(1):8–26; doi: 10.1007/s42114-021-00217-0
260.
ZhouB, JiX, ShengY, et al.Mechanical and thermal properties of poly-ether ether ketone reinforced with CaCO3. Eur Polym J, 2004; 40(10):2357–2363; doi: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2004.05.019
261.
SinghS, PrakashC, RamakrishnaS. 3D printing of polyether-ether-ketone for biomedical applications. Eur Polym J, 2019; 114(February):234–248; doi: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2019.02.035
262.
VermaS, SharmaN, KangoS, et al.Developments of PEEK (polyetheretherketone) as a biomedical material: A focused review. Eur Polym J, 2021; 147(January):110295; doi: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2021.110295
263.
MocanuAC, MiculescuF, ConstantinescuAE, et al.Selection route of precursor materials in 3D printing composite filament development for biomedical applications. Materials (Basel), 2023; 16(6); doi: 10.3390/ma16062359
264.
LiX, CuiR, SunL, et al.3D-printed biopolymers for tissue engineering application. Int J Polym Sci, 2014; 2014:1–13; doi: 10.1155/2014/829145
265.
LakkalaP, MunnangiSR, BandariS, et al.Additive manufacturing technologies with emphasis on stereolithography 3D printing in pharmaceutical and medical applications: A review. Int J Pharm X, 2023; 5(January):100159; doi: 10.1016/j.ijpx.2023.100159
266.
Szymczyk-ZiółkowskaP, ŁabowskaMB, DetynaJ, et al.A review of fabrication polymer scaffolds for biomedical applications using additive manufacturing techniques. Biocybern Biomed Eng, 2020; 40(2):624–638; doi: 10.1016/j.bbe.2020.01.015
267.
RamanR, BashirR, Chapter6-. Stereolithographic 3D bioprinting for biomedical applications. In: Essentials of 3D biofabrication and translation (AtalaA, YooJJBT. E of 3D B and T. eds.) Academic Press: Boston, 2015, pp. 89–121; 10.1016/B978-0-12-800972-7.00006-2
268.
HanT, KunduS, NagA, et al.3D printed sensors for biomedical applications: A review. Sensors (Basel), 2019; 19(7); doi: 10.3390/s19071706
269.
LiN, KhanSB, ChenS, et al.Promising new horizons in medicine: Medical advancements with nanocomposite manufacturing via 3D Printing. Polymers (Basel), 2023; 15(20); doi: 10.3390/polym15204122
270.
RajR, DixitAR. Direct ink writing of carbon-doped polymeric composite ink: A review on its requirements and applications. 3D Print Addit Manuf, 2023; 10(4):828–854; doi: 10.1089/3dp.2021.0209
271.
DhavalikarP, LanZ, KarR, et al.1.4.8 - Biomedical applications of additive manufacturing. In: Biomaterials Science (WagnerWR, Sakiyama-ElbertSE, ZhangG eds) Academic Press, 2020, pp. 623–639; doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-816137-1.00040-4
272.
AlNA, KumarBK, DickensT. Field assisted additive manufacturing for polymers and metals : Materials and methods. Virtual and Physical Prototyping, 2023; 18(1); doi: 10.1080/17452759.2023.2256707
273.
WangX, XuS, ZhouS, et al.Topological design and additive manufacturing of porous metals for bone scaffolds and orthopaedic implants: A review. Biomaterials, 2016; 83:127–141; doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.01.012
274.
LuHH, El-AminSF, ScottKD, et al.Three-dimensional, bioactive, biodegradable, polymer-bioactive glass composite scaffolds with improved mechanical properties support collagen synthesis and mineralization of human osteoblast-like cells in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2003; 64(3):465–474; doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.10399
275.
AhmedJ, VarshneySK. Polylactides-chemistry, properties and green packaging technology: A review. Int J Food Prop, 2011; 14(1):37–58; doi: 10.1080/10942910903125284
276.
VaeziM, ChianrabutraS, MellorB, et al.Multiple material additive manufacturing - part 1: A review: This review paper covers a decade of research on multiple material additive manufacturing technologies which can produce complex geometry parts with different materials. Virtual Phys Prototyp, 2013; 8(1):19–50; doi: 10.1080/17452759.2013.778175
277.
CalìM, PascolettiG, GaetaM, et al.New filaments with natural fillers for FDM 3D printing and their applications in biomedical field. Procedia Manuf, 2020; 51(2019):698–703; doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.10.098
278.
RamezaniM, Mohd RipinZ. 4D printing in biomedical engineering: Advancements, challenges, and future directions. J Funct Biomater, 2023; 14(7); doi: 10.3390/jfb14070347
279.
SurmenHK, OrtesF, ArslanYZ. Fundamentals of 3D printing and its applications in biomedical engineering. Mater Horizons From Nat to Nanomater, 2020;(July):23–41; doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-5424-7_2
280.
AdilS, LazogluI. A review on additive manufacturing of carbon fiber-reinforced polymers: Current methods, materials, mechanical properties, applications and challenges. J Appl Polym Sci, 2023; 140(7):1–28; doi: 10.1002/app.53476
281.
ArifZU, KhalidMY, NorooziR, et al.Additive manufacturing of sustainable biomaterials for biomedical applications. Asian J Pharm Sci, 2023; 18(3):100812; doi: 10.1016/j.ajps.2023.100812
282.
IkramH, Al RashidA, KoçM. Additive manufacturing of smart polymeric composites: Literature review and future perspectives. Polym Compos, 2022; 43(9):6355–6380; doi: 10.1002/pc.26948
283.
Criado-GonzalezM, Dominguez-AlfaroA, Lopez-LarreaN, et al.Additive manufacturing of conducting polymers: Recent advances, challenges, and opportunities. ACS Appl Polym Mater, 2021; 3(6):2865–2883; doi: 10.1021/acsapm.1c00252
284.
UchidaA, NadeSML, MccartneyER. The use of ceramics for bone replacement a comparative study of three different porous ceramics. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1984.
285.
BoivinG. The hydroxyapatite crystal : A closer look Page blanche pour conserver, en pdf, en vraies doubles. Medicographia, 2007; 29(2):126–132.
286.
BoccacciniAR, KeimS, MaR, et al.Electrophoretic deposition of biomaterials. J R Soc Interface, n.d; 7(Suppl 5); doi: 10.1098/rsif.2010.0156.focus
287.
OhS, OhN, ApplefordM, et al.Bioceramics for tissue engineering applications —A review. American J of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 2006; 2(2):49–56; doi: 10.3844/ajbbsp.2006.49.56
288.
ZhangM, PuX, ChenX, et al.In-vivo performance of plasma-sprayed CaO–MgO–SiO2-based bioactive glass-ceramic coating on Ti–6Al–4V alloy for bone regeneration. Heliyon, 2019; 5(11):e02824; doi: 10.1016/J.HELIYON.2019.E02824
289.
WangC, ChenS, YuQ, et al.Taking advantage of the disadvantage: employing the high aqueous instability of amorphous calcium carbonate to realize burst drug release within cancer cells. J Mater Chem B, 2020; 8(33):7558–2073; doi: 10.1039/c6tb02826h
290.
BoyjooY, PareekVK, LiuJ. Synthesis of micro and nano-sized calcium carbonate particles and their applications. J Mater Chem A, 2014; 2(35):14270–14288; doi: 10.1039/c4ta02070g
291.
Maleki DizajS, Barzegar-JalaliM, ZarrintanMH, et al.Calcium carbonate nanoparticles as cancer drug delivery system. Expert Opin Drug Deliv, 2015; 12(10):1649–1660; doi: 10.1517/17425247.2015.1049530
292.
RauschmannMA, WichelhausTA, StirnalV, et al.Nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite and calcium sulphate as biodegradable composite carrier material for local delivery of antibiotics in bone infections. Biomaterials, 2005; 26(15):2677–2684; doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.06.045
293.
LiangC, LiZ, YangD, et al.Synthesis of calcium phosphate/calcium sulphate powder. Mater Chem Phys, 2004; 88(2–3):285–289; doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2004.06.044
294.
SahuKK, ModiYK. Investigation on dimensional accuracy, compressive strength and measured porosity of additively manufactured calcium sulphate porous bone scaffolds. Mater Technol, 2021; 36(8):492–503; doi: 10.1080/10667857.2020.1774728
295.
ZahariMAA, LeeSP, KasimSR. Synthesis of calcium sulphate as biomaterial. AIP Conf Proc, 2020; 2267(September 2020):020081; doi: 10.1063/5.0015693
296.
BohnerM, TadierS, van GarderenN, et al.Synthesis of spherical calcium phosphate particles for dental and orthopedic applications. Biomatter, 2013; 3(2); doi: 10.4161/biom.25103
297.
RaynaudS, ChampionE, Bernache-AssollantD, et al.Calcium phosphate apatites with variable Ca/P atomic ratio I. Synthesis, characterisation and thermal stability of powders. Biomaterials, 2002; 23(4):1065–1072; doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00218-6
298.
ZengH, PathakJL, ShiY, et al.Indirect selective laser sintering-printed microporous biphasic calcium phosphate scaffold promotes endogenous bone regeneration via activation of ERK1/2 signaling. Biofabrication, 2020; 12(2):025032; doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ab78ed
299.
ReddyMV, PathakM. Sol-gel combustion synthesis of Ag doped CaSiO3: In vitro bioactivity, antibacterial activity and cytocompatibility studies for biomedical applications. Mater Technol, 2018; 33(1):38–47; doi: 10.1080/10667857.2017.1389050
300.
MeisztericsA, SinkóK. Sol-gel derived calcium silicate ceramics. Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem Eng Asp, 2008; 319(1–3):143–148; doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2007.08.021
301.
EngqvistH, EdlundS, Gómez-OrtegaG, et al.In vitro mechanical properties of a calcium silicate based bone void filler. Key Eng Mater, 2006; 309–311:829–832; doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.309-311.829
302.
SrinathP, Abdul AzeemP, Venugopal ReddyK. Review on calcium silicate-based bioceramics in bone tissue engineering. Int J Appl Ceram Technol, 2020; 17(5):2450–2464; doi: 10.1111/ijac.13577
303.
PilathadkaS, VahalováD, VosáhloT. The Zirconia: A new dental ceramic material. An overview. Prague Med Rep, 2007; 108(1):5–12.
304.
DeshmaneVG, AdewuyiYG. Synthesis of thermally stable, high surface area, nanocrystalline mesoporous tetragonal zirconium dioxide (ZrO2): Effects of different process parameters. Microporous Mesoporous Mater, 2012; 148(1):88–100; doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2011.07.012
305.
HuC, SunJ, LongC, et al.Synthesis of nano zirconium oxide and its application in dentistry. Nanotechnol Rev, 2019; 8(1):396–404; doi: 10.1515/ntrev-2019-0035
306.
SuominenJM, FrankbergEJ, VallittuPK, et al.Three-dimensional printing of zirconia: Characterization of early stage material properties. Biomater Investig Dent, 2019; 6(1):23–31; doi: 10.1080/26415275.2019.1640608
307.
AuerkariP. Mechanical and Physical Properties of Engineering Alumina Ceramics. VTT Tied - Valt Tek Tutkimusk; 1996;(1792).
308.
BediP, SinghR, AhujaIPS. Effect of SiC/Al2O3 particle size reinforcement in recycled LDPE matrix on mechanical properties of FDM feed stock filament. Virtual Phys Prototyp, 2018; 13(4):246–254; doi: 10.1080/17452759.2018.1496605
309.
KoliDK, AgnihotriG, PurohitR. A review on properties, behaviour and processing methods for Al- Nano Al 2 O 3 composites. Procedia Mater Sci, 2014; 6(Icmpc):567–589; doi: 10.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.072
310.
YiJ-h, SunY-y, GaoJ-F, et al.Synthesis of crystalline γ-Al2O3 with high purity. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China (English Ed), 2009; 19(5):1237–1242; doi: 10.1016/S1003-6326(08)60435-5
311.
ØdegaardKS, TorgersenJ, ElverumCW. Structural and biomedical properties of common additively manufactured biomaterials: A concise review. Metals, n.d; 10(12):1677; doi: 10.3390/met10121677
312.
NaharL, SarkerSD. Nanotechnology and oral health. Adv Nanotechnology-Based Drug Deliv Syst, 2022:155–176; doi: 10.1016/B978-0-323-88450-1.00014-4
313.
Turon-VinasM, AngladaM. Strength and fracture toughness of zirconia dental ceramics. Dent Mater, 2018; 34(3):365–375; doi: 10.1016/J.DENTAL.2017.12.007
314.
WillmannG, FrühHJ, PfaffHG. Wear characteristics of sliding pairs of zirconia (Y-TZP) for hip endoprostheses. Biomaterials, 1996; 17(22):2157–2162; doi: 10.1016/0142-9612(96)00042-7
315.
ZhengK, LiZ, LiaoW, et al.Friction and wear performance on ultrasonic vibration assisted grinding dental zirconia ceramics against natural tooth. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng, 2017; 39(3):833–843; doi: 10.1007/s40430-016-0531-9
316.
NoblesKP, JanorkarAV, WilliamsonRS. Surface modifications to enhance osseointegration–Resulting material properties and biological responses. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 2021; 109(11):1909–1923; doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.34835
317.
NakayamaY, SonohataM, KitajimaM, et al.Fragility fracture following total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci, 2022; 27(2):402–407; doi: 10.1016/J.JOS.2020.12.016
318.
LiN, LiuZ, LiuG, et al.TiO 2 nanocoatings with controllable crystal type and nanoscale topography on zirconia implants to accelerate bone formation. Bioinorg Chem Appl, 2022; 2022:8650659; doi: 10.1155/2022/8650659
319.
MatsushitaT, TakahashiH. Orthopedic applications of metallic biomaterials. Met Biomed Devices, 2019; 431–473; doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-102666-3.00017-1
320.
OgoseA, HottaT, KawashimaH, et al.Comparison of hydroxyapatite and beta tricalcium phosphate as bone substitutes after excision of bone tumors. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 2005; 72(1):94–101; doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.30136
321.
MortierA, LemaitreJ, RodriqueL, et al.Synthesis and thermal behavior of well-crystallized calcium-deficient phosphate apatite. J Solid State Chem, 1989; 78(2):215–219; doi: 10.1016/0022-4596(89)90099-6
322.
GaoT, AroHT, YlänenH, et al.Silica-based bioactive glasses modulate expression of bone morphogenetic protein-2 mRNA in Saos-2 osteoblasts in vitro. Biomaterials, 2001; 22(12):1475–1483; doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00288-X
323.
TakaokaT, OkumuraM, OhgushiH, et al.Histological and biochemical evaluation of osteogenic response in porous hydroxyapatite coated alumina ceramics. Biomaterials, 1996; 17(15):1499–1505; doi: 10.1016/0142-9612(96)89774-2
324.
LeeYK, HaYC, YooJJ, et al.Alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasty: A concise follow-up, at a minimum of ten years, of a previous report. J Bone Jt Surg Am, 2010; 92(8):1715–1719; doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.01019
325.
HuntMS. Development of carbon fibre/polysulphone orthopaedic implants. Mater Des, 1987; 8(2):113–119; doi: 10.1016/0261-3069(87)90117-8
326.
ScholzMS, BlanchfieldJP, BloomLD, et al.The use of composite materials in modern orthopaedic medicine and prosthetic devices: A review. Compos Sci Technol, 2011; 71(16):1791–1803; doi: 10.1016/J.COMPSCITECH.2011.08.017
BlockMS, HoffmanDR. A new device for absolute anchorage for orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1995; 107(3):251–258; doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70140-0
329.
GrossinD, MontónA, Navarrete-SegadoP, et al.A review of additive manufacturing of ceramics by powder bed selective laser processing (sintering/melting): Calcium phosphate, silicon carbide, zirconia, alumina, and their composites. Open Ceram, 2021; 5(February); doi: 10.1016/j.oceram.2021.100073
330.
WangJ. Recent research and prospect of 3D printing technology in the preparation of new ceramic materials. Highlights Sci Eng Technol, 2023; 52:376–380; doi: 10.54097/hset.v52i.9849
331.
DuW, RenX, MaC, et al.Binder jetting additive manufacturing of ceramics: a literature review. American Society of Mechanical Engineers; 2017; doi: 10.1115/IMECE2017-70344
332.
ZhangB, PeiX, SongP, et al.Porous bioceramics produced by inkjet 3D printing: Effect of printing ink formulation on the ceramic macro and micro porous architectures control. Compos Part B Eng, 2018; 155:112–121; doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.08.047
333.
KwonM, ChoiJH, KimJH, et al.Optimization of inorganic powder properties for manufacturing ceramic filter using binder jetting process. Addit Manuf, 2023; 70(December 2022):103564; doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2023.103564
334.
FengC, ZhangK, HeR, et al.Additive manufacturing of hydroxyapatite bioceramic scaffolds: Dispersion, digital light processing, sintering, mechanical properties, and biocompatibility. J Adv Ceram, 2020; 9(3):360–373; doi: 10.1007/s40145-020-0375-8
335.
FerrageL, BertrandG, LenormandP, et al.A review of the additive manufacturing (3DP) of bioceramics: Alumina, zirconia (PSZ) and hydroxyapatite. J Aust Ceram Soc, 2017; 53(1):11–20; doi: 10.1007/s41779-016-0003-9
336.
BannunahAM. Biomedical applications of zirconia-based nanomaterials: Challenges and future perspectives. Molecules, 2023; 28(14); doi: 10.3390/molecules28145428
337.
Buj-CorralI, Tejo-OteroA. 3D printing of bioinert oxide ceramics for medical applications. J Funct Biomater, 2022; 13(3); doi: 10.3390/jfb13030155
338.
DongD, SuH, LiX, et al.Microstructures and mechanical properties of biphasic calcium phosphate bioceramics fabricated by SLA 3D printing. J Manuf Process, 2022; 81:433–443; doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.07.016
339.
dos SantosVI, ChevalierJ, FredelMC, et al.Ceramics and ceramic composites for biomedical engineering applications via direct ink writing: Overall scenario, advances in the improvement of mechanical and biological properties and innovations. Mater Sci Eng R Rep, 2024; 161:100841; doi: 10.1016/j.mser.2024.100841
340.
KhanlarLN, RiosAS, TahmasebA, et al.Additive manufacturing of zirconia ceramic and its application in clinical dentistry: A review. Dent J (Basel), 2021; 9(9); doi: 10.3390/DJ9090104
341.
GalanteR, Figueiredo-PinaCG, SerroAP. Additive manufacturing of ceramics for dental applications: A review. Dent Mater, 2019; 35(6):825–846; doi: 10.1016/J.DENTAL.2019.02.026
342.
ZhangW, CottonC, SunJ, et al.Interfacial bonding strength of short carbon fiber/acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene composites fabricated by fused deposition modeling. Compos Part B Eng, 2018; 137:51–59; doi: 10.1016/J.COMPOSITESB.2017.11.018
343.
PutriTS, HayashiK, TsuruK, et al.Feasibility study on surface morphology regulation of β-tricalcium phosphate bone graft for enhancing cellular response. Ceram Int, 2022; 48(9):13395–13399; doi: 10.1016/J.CERAMINT.2022.02.200
344.
ChenY, LiW, ZhangC, et al.Recent developments of biomaterials for additive manufacturing of bone scaffolds. Adv Healthc Mater, 2020; 9(23):e2000724–e2000728; doi: 10.1002/adhm.202000724
345.
ZhouWY, LeeSH, WangM, et al.Selective laser sintering of porous tissue engineering scaffolds from poly(L-lactide)/carbonated hydroxyapatite nanocomposite microspheres. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 2008; 19(7):2535–2540; doi: 10.1007/s10856-007-3089-3
346.
Correa FilhoL, FuL, EngqvistH, et al.Wear performance of a novel silicon nitride ceramic for biomedical applications. Biomed Mater Devices, 2023; 1(2):990–999; doi: 10.1007/s44174-022-00061-w
347.
VaianiL, BoccaccioA, UvaAE, et al.Ceramic materials for biomedical applications: An overview on properties and fabrication processes. J Funct Biomater, 2023; 14(3); doi: 10.3390/jfb14030146
348.
SheikhZ, NayakVV, DaoodU, et al.3D printing methods for bioceramic-based scaffold fabrication for craniomaxillofacial bone tissue engineering. J Funct Biomater, 2024; doi: 10.20944/preprints202311.1884.v1
349.
GmeinerR, DeisingerU, SchönherrJ, et al.Additive manufacturing of bioactive glasses and silicate bioceramics. J Ceram Sci Technol, 2015; 6(2):75–86; doi: 10.4416/JCST2015-00001
350.
HardingA, PramanikA, BasakAK, et al.Application of additive manufacturing in the biomedical field- A review. Ann 3D Print Med, 2023; 10:100110; doi: 10.1016/j.stlm.2023.100110
351.
ThurberAE, OmenettoFG, KaplanDL. In vivo bioresponses to silk proteins. Biomaterials, 2015; 71:145–157; doi: 10.1016/J.BIOMATERIALS.2015.08.039
352.
MondalS, PalU. 3D hydroxyapatite scaffold for bone regeneration and local drug delivery applications. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol, 2019; 53:101131; doi: 10.1016/J.JDDST.2019.101131
353.
GarskaiteE, AlinauskasL, DrienovskyM, et al.Fabrication of a composite of nanocrystalline carbonated hydroxyapatite (cHAP) with polylactic acid (PLA) and its surface topographical structuring with direct laser writing (DLW). RSC Adv, 2016; 6(76):72733–72743; doi: 10.1039/c6ra11679e
354.
MassoumiB, SarvariR, AgbolaghiS. Biodegradable and conductive hyperbranched terpolymers based on aliphatic polyester, poly(D,L-lactide), and polyaniline used as scaffold in tissue engineering. Int J Polym Mater Polym Biomater, 2018; 67(13):808–821; doi: 10.1080/00914037.2017.1383248
355.
ShimJH, KimJY, ParkM, et al.Development of a hybrid scaffold with synthetic biomaterials and hydrogel using solid freeform fabrication technology. Biofabrication, 2011; 3(3):034102; doi: 10.1088/1758-5082/3/3/034102
356.
GendvilieneI, SimoliunasE, RekstyteS, et al.Assessment of the morphology and dimensional accuracy of 3D printed PLA and PLA/HAp scaffolds. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 2020; 104:103616; doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103616
357.
ZhangH, MaoX, DuZ, et al.Three dimensional printed macroporous polylactic acid/hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds for promoting bone formation in a critical-size rat calvarial defect model. Sci Technol Adv Mater, 2016; 17(1):136–148; doi: 10.1080/14686996.2016.1145532
358.
DubinenkoGE, ZinovievAL, BolbasovEN, et al.Preparation of poly(L-LACTIC acid)/hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds by fused deposit modeling 3D printing. Mater Today Proc, 2020; 22:228–234; doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.08.092
359.
NazeerMA, OnderOC, SevgiliI, et al.3D printed poly(lactic acid) scaffolds modified with chitosan and hydroxyapatite for bone repair applications. Mater Today Commun, 2020; 25:101515; doi: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.101515
360.
ZhangY, DongK, WangF, et al.Three dimensional macroporous hydroxyapatite/chitosan foam-supported polymer micelles for enhanced oral delivery of poorly soluble drugs. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces, 2018; 170(February):497–504; doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.06.053
361.
ElsayedH, ColomboP, BernardoE. Direct ink writing of wollastonite-diopside glass-ceramic scaffolds from a silicone resin and engineered fillers. J Eur Ceram Soc, 2017; 37(13):4187–4195; doi: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.05.021
FuS, LiuW, LiuS, et al.3D printed porous β-Ca2SiO4 scaffolds derived from preceramic resin and their physicochemical and biological properties. Sci Technol Adv Mater, 2018; 19(1):495–506; doi: 10.1080/14686996.2018.1471653
364.
ZhouT, ZhangL, YaoQ, et al.SLA 3D printing of high quality spine shaped β-TCP bioceramics for the hard tissue repair applications. Ceram Int, 2020; 46(6):7609–7614; doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.11.261
365.
TarafderS, BoseS. Polycaprolactone-coated 3D printed tricalcium phosphate scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: In vitro alendronate release behavior and local delivery effect on in vivo osteogenesis. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2014; 6(13):9955–9965; doi: 10.1021/am501048n
366.
HanemannT, SyperekD, NötzelD. 3D printing of ABS barium ferrite composites. Materials (Basel), 2020; 13(6):1–13; doi: 10.3390/ma13061481
367.
PenumakalaPK, SantoJ, ThomasA. A critical review on the fused deposition modeling of thermoplastic polymer composites. Compos Part B Eng, 2020; 201(May):108336; doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108336
368.
PrashanthaK, RogerF. Multifunctional properties of 3D printed poly(lactic acid)/graphene nanocomposites by fused deposition modeling. J Macromol Sci Part A Pure Appl Chem, 2017; 54(1):24–29; doi: 10.1080/10601325.2017.1250311
369.
CamineroMÁ, ChacónJM, García-PlazaE, et al.Additive manufacturing of PLA-based composites using fused filament fabrication: Effect of graphene nanoplatelet reinforcement on mechanical properties, dimensional accuracy and texture. Polymers (Basel), 2019; 11(5); doi: 10.3390/polym11050799
370.
CamargoJC, MachadoÁR, AlmeidaEC, et al.Mechanical properties of PLA-graphene filament for FDM 3D printing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2019; 103(5–8):2423–2443; doi: 10.1007/s00170-019-03532-5
371.
HajialiF, TajbakhshS, ShojaeiA. Fabrication and properties of polycaprolactone composites containing calcium phosphate-based ceramics and bioactive glasses in bone tissue engineering: A review. Polym Rev, 2018; 58(1):164–207; doi: 10.1080/15583724.2017.1332640
372.
ZeimaranE, PourshahrestaniS, DjordjevicI, et al.Bioactive glass reinforced elastomer composites for skeletal regeneration: A review. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 2015; 53:175–188; doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2015.04.035
373.
Polo-CorralesL, Latorre-EstevesM, Ramirez-VickJE. Scaffold design for bone regeneration. J Nanosci Nanotechnol, 2014; 14(1):15–56; doi: 10.1166/jnn.2014.9127
374.
PetrettaM, GambardellaA, BoiM, et al.Composite scaffolds for bone tissue regeneration based on PCL and Mg-containing bioactive glasses. Biology (Basel), 2021; 10(5):1–18; doi: 10.3390/biology10050398
375.
FombyP, CherlinAJ, HadjizadehA, et al.Stem cells and cell therapies in lung biology and diseases: Conference report. Ann Am Thorac Soc, 2010; 12(3):181–204; doi: 10.1002/term
376.
BorkarT, GoenkaV, JaiswalAK. Application of poly-ε-caprolactone in extrusion-based bioprinting. Bioprinting, 2021; 21:e00111; doi: 10.1016/j.bprint.2020.e00111
377.
ShimJH, WonJY, ParkJH, et al.Effects of 3D-printed polycaprolactone/β-tricalcium phosphate membranes on guided bone regeneration. Int J Mol Sci, 2017; 18(5); doi: 10.3390/ijms18050899
378.
KennyEK, GatelyNM, KillionJA, et al.Melt extruded bioresorbable polymer composites for potential regenerative medicine applications. Polym—Plast Technol Eng, 2016; 55(4):432–446; doi: 10.1080/03602559.2015.1098684
379.
NahavandizadehN, RezaeiM. Preparation of shape memory polyurethane/hydroxyapatite nanocomposite scaffolds by electrospinning method and investigation of their microstructure and physical-mechanical properties. Polym Technol Mater, 2020; 59(14):1562–1573; doi: 10.1080/25740881.2020.1757105
380.
LiY, YuZ, AiF, et al.Characterization and evaluation of polycaprolactone/hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds with extra surface morphology by cryogenic printing for bone tissue engineering. Mater Des, 2021; 205:109712; doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109712
381.
MirsalehiSA, KhavandiA, MirdamadiSH, et al.Synthesis of nano-HA and the effects on the mechanical properties of HA/UHMWPE nanocomposites. Adv Mater Process Technol, 2016; 2(2):209–219; doi: 10.1080/2374068X.2015.1127544
382.
Bin Md AnsariMH, Irwan Bin IbrahimMH. Thermal characteristic of waste-derived hydroxyapatite (HA) reinforced ultra high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) composites for fused deposition modeling (FDM) process. IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng, 2017; 165(1):012014; doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/165/1/012014
383.
Nommeots-NommA, LeePD, JonesJR. Direct ink writing of highly bioactive glasses. J Eur Ceram Soc, 2018; 38(3):837–844; doi: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.08.006
384.
GittardSD, NarayanRJ. Laser direct writing of micro- and nano-scale medical devices. Expert Rev Med Devices, 2010; 7(3):343–356; doi: 10.1586/erd.10.14
385.
JiangZ, DiggleB, TanML, et al.Extrusion 3D printing of polymeric materials with advanced properties. Adv Sci (Weinh), 2020; 7(17):2001379–2001332; doi: 10.1002/advs.202001379
386.
JinW, YuanL, LiangG, et al.Multifunctional cyclotriphosphazene/hexagonal boron nitride hybrids and their flame retarding bismaleimide resins with high thermal conductivity and thermal stability. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2014; 6(17):14931–14944; doi: 10.1021/am502364k
387.
ZhangY, NiuH, LiyunW, et al.Fabrication of thermally conductive polymer composites based on hexagonal boron nitride: Recent progresses and prospects. Nano Ex, 2021; 2(4):042002; doi: 10.1088/2632-959X/ac2f09
388.
ChoudharyR, VenkatramanSK, BulyginaI, et al.Impact of forsterite addition on mechanical and biological properties of composites. J Asian Ceram Soc, 2020; 8(4):1051–1065; doi: 10.1080/21870764.2020.1807695
389.
MondalS, HoangG, ManivasaganP, et al.Nano-hydroxyapatite bioactive glass composite scaffold with enhanced mechanical and biological performance for tissue engineering application. Ceram Int, 2018; 44(13):15735–15746; doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.05.248
390.
CamiloCC, FortulanCA, IkegamiRA, et al.Manufacturing of porous alumina scaffolds with bio-glass and HAp coating: Mechanical and in vitro evaluation. Key Eng Mater, 2009; 396–398(January):679–682; doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.396-398.679
391.
MansurHS, CostaHS. Nanostructured poly(vinyl alcohol)/bioactive glass and poly(vinyl alcohol)/chitosan/bioactive glass hybrid scaffolds for biomedical applications. Chem Eng J, 2008; 137(1):72–83; doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2007.09.036
392.
GaoW, SunL, ZhangZ, et al.Cellulose nanocrystals reinforced gelatin/bioactive glass nanocomposite scaffolds for potential application in bone regeneration. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed, 2020; 31(8):984–998; doi: 10.1080/09205063.2020.1735607
393.
GaoC, RahamanMN, GaoQ, et al.Robotic deposition and in vitro characterization of 3D gelatin-bioactive glass hybrid scaffolds for biomedical applications. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2013; 101(7):2027–2037; doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.34496
394.
VasitaR, KattiDS. Growth factor-delivery systems for tissue engineering: A materials perspective. Expert Rev Med Devices, 2006; 3(1):29–47; doi: 10.1586/17434440.3.1.29
395.
KimBS, YangSS, KimCS. Incorporation of BMP-2 nanoparticles on the surface of a 3D-printed hydroxyapatite scaffold using an ε-polycaprolactone polymer emulsion coating method for bone tissue engineering. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces, 2018; 170(May):421–429; doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.06.043
396.
ChenG, SunY, LuF, et al.A three-dimensional (3D) printed biomimetic hierarchical scaffold with a covalent modular release system for osteogenesis. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 2019; 104(May):109842; doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2019.109842
397.
ChindamoG, SapinoS, PeiraE, et al.Bone diseases: Current approach and future perspectives in drug delivery systems for bone targeted therapeutics. Nanomaterials (Basel), 2020; 10(5); doi: 10.3390/nano10050875
398.
WeinandC, PomerantsevaI, NevilleCM, et al.Hydrogel-β-TCP scaffolds and stem cells for tissue engineering bone. Bone, 2006; 38(4):555–563; doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2005.10.016
399.
WuX, LianQ, LiD, et al.Biphasic osteochondral scaffold fabrication using multi-material mask projection stereolithography. Rapid Prototyp J, 2019; 25(2):277–288; doi: 10.1108/RPJ-07-2017-0144
400.
LiuX, ChenX, RenJ, et al.Effects of nano-ZnO and nano-SiO2 particles on properties of PVA/xylan composite films. Int J Biol Macromol, 2019; 132:978–986; doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.03.088
401.
FieldingG, BoseS. SiO2 and ZnO dopants in three-dimensionally printed tricalcium phosphate bone tissue engineering scaffolds enhance osteogenesis and angiogenesis in vivo. Acta Biomater, 2013; 9(11):9137–9148; doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.07.009
402.
BeatriceCAG, ShimomuraKMB, BackesEH, et al.Engineering printable composites of poly (ε-polycaprolactone)/β-tricalcium phosphate for biomedical applications. Polym Compos, 2021; 42(3):1198–1213; doi: 10.1002/pc.25893
403.
NishidaY, DomuraR, SakaiR, et al.Fabrication of PLLA/HA composite scaffolds modified by DNA. Polymer (Guildf), 2015; 56:73–81; doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2014.09.063
404.
LiangY, ZhengX, ZhaiW, et al.3D PLLA/nano-hydroxyapatite scaffolds with hierarchical porous structure fabricated by low-temperature deposition manufacturing. J Wuhan Univ Technol-Mat Sci Edit, 2012; 27(2):265–269; doi: 10.1007/s11595-012-0450-2
405.
DelabardeC, PlummerCJG, BourbanP-E, et al.solidification behaviour of pLLA/nHA nanocomposites. Composites Science and Technology, 2010; 70(13):1813–1819.
406.
ShuaiC, YangB, PengS, et al.Development of composite porous scaffolds based on poly(lactide-co- glycolide)/nano-hydroxyapatite via selective laser sintering. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2013; 69(1–4):51–57; doi: 10.1007/s00170-013-5001-2
407.
JingX, MiHY, TurngLS. Comparison between PCL/hydroxyapatite (HA) and PCL/halloysite nanotube (HNT) composite scaffolds prepared by co-extrusion and gas foaming. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 2017; 72:53–61; doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.11.049
408.
ParmaksizM, ElçinAE, ElçinYM. Decellularized bovine small intestinal submucosa-PCL/hydroxyapatite-based multilayer composite scaffold for hard tissue repair. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 2019; 94(October 2018):788–797; doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2018.10.011
409.
HanawaT. Biofunctionalization of titanium for dental implant. Jpn Dent Sci Rev, 2010; 46(2):93–101; doi: 10.1016/J.JDSR.2009.11.001
410.
SooS, PalmerR, CurtisRV. Measurement of the setting and thermal expansion of dental investments used for the superplastic forming of dental implant superstructures. Dent Mater, 2001; 17(3):247–252; doi: 10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00078-6
411.
MünkerTJAG, van de VijfeijkenSECM, MulderCS, et al.CranioSafe Group. Effects of sterilization on the mechanical properties of poly(methyl methacrylate) based personalized medical devices. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 2018; 81:168–172; doi: 10.1016/J.JMBBM.2018.01.033
412.
ÖzcanM, AllahbeickaraghiA, DündarM. Possible hazardous effects of hydrofluoric acid and recommendations for treatment approach : A review. Clin Oral Investig, 2012; 16(1):15–23; doi: 10.1007/s00784-011-0636-6
413.
BatesMN. Mercury amalgam dental fillings: An epidemiologic assessment. Int J Hyg Environ Health, 2006; 209(4):309–316; doi: 10.1016/J.IJHEH.2005.11.006
414.
SpencerAJ. Dental amalgam and mercury in dentistry. Aust Dent J, 2000; 45(4):224–34.
415.
TiehMT, WaddellJN, ChoiJJE. Optical properties and color stability of denture teeth—A systematic review. J Prosthodont, 2022; 31(5):385–398; doi: 10.1111/jopr.13429
BatesJF, KnaptonAG. Metals and alloys in dentistry. Int Met Rev, 1977; 22(1):39–60; doi: 10.1179/imtr.1977.22.1.39
418.
ShabalovskayaSA. Physicochemical and biological aspects of Nitinol as a biomaterial. Int Mater Rev, 2001; 46(5):233–250; doi: 10.1179/095066001771048745
419.
DarwishLR, Al-QadyA, El-WakadMT, et al.Trends in 3D printing implants for medical and dental applications. Ref Modul Mater Sci Mater Eng, 2022; doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-820352-1.00236-4
420.
SchonauerC, TessitoreE, BarbagalloG, et al.The use of local agents: Bone wax, gelatin, collagen, oxidized cellulose. Eur Spine J, 2004; 13(Suppl 1):S89–S96; doi: 10.1007/s00586-004-0727-z
421.
ParekhM, RomanoV, HassaninK, et al.Biomaterials for corneal endothelial cell culture and tissue engineering. J Tissue Eng, 2021; 12:2041731421990536–2041731421990519; doi: 10.1177/2041731421990536
422.
O’ConnorJ, BorgesLA, DudaFP, et al.Bone density growth and the biomechanics of healthy and prosthetic femur. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng, 2017; 39(10):3743–3756; doi: 10.1007/s40430-017-0874-x
423.
ChaeS, ChoDW. Biomaterial-based 3D bioprinting strategy for orthopedic tissue engineering. Acta Biomater, 2023; 156:4–20; doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.08.004
424.
JiaZ, XuX, ZhuD, et al.Design, printing, and engineering of regenerative biomaterials for personalized bone healthcare. Prog Mater Sci, 2023; 134(January):101072; doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2023.101072
425.
KayaO, MiriogluA, OzkanC, et al.Reconstruction of critical size segmental femoral diaphyseal defects of New Zealand rabbits by using combined titanium mesh cage and induced membrane technique. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol, 2023; 33(3):629–637; doi: 10.1007/s00590-022-03330-y
426.
NiinomiM, NakaiM. Titanium-based biomaterials for preventing stress shielding between implant devices and bone. Int J Biomater, 2011; 2011:836587; doi: 10.1155/2011/836587
427.
GaneshVK, RamakrishnaK, GhistaDN. Biomechanics of bone-fracture fixation by stiffness-graded plates in comparison with stainless-steel plates. Biomed Eng Online, 2005; 4:46–15; doi: 10.1186/1475-925X-4-46
428.
YudaAW, SupriadiS, SaragihAS. Surface modification of Ti-alloy based bone implant by sandblasting. AIP Conf Proc, 2019; 2193(December):020015; doi: 10.1063/1.5139335
429.
MuthaiahVMS, IndrakumarS, SuwasS, et al.Surface engineering of additively manufactured titanium alloys for enhanced clinical performance of biomedical implants: A review of recent developments. Bioprinting, 2022; 25(August 2021):e00180; doi: 10.1016/j.bprint.2021.e00180
430.
ZhangJT, TancretF, BoulerJM. Fabrication and mechanical properties of calcium phosphate cements (CPC) for bone substitution. Mater Sci Eng C, 2011; 31(4):740–747; doi: 10.1016/J.MSEC.2010.10.014
431.
GaoC, FengP, PengS, et al.Carbon nanotube, graphene and boron nitride nanotube reinforced bioactive ceramics for bone repair. Acta Biomater, 2017; 61:1–20; doi: 10.1016/J.ACTBIO.2017.05.020
432.
KaurG, KumarV, BainoF, et al.Mechanical properties of bioactive glasses, ceramics, glass-ceramics and composites: State-of-the-art review and future challenges. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 2019; 104:109895; doi: 10.1016/J.MSEC.2019.109895
433.
NeiraIS, Kolen’koYV, LebedevOI, et al.Rational synthesis of a nanocrystalline calcium phosphate cement exhibiting rapid conversion to hydroxyapatite. Mater Sci Eng C, 2009; 29(7):2124–2132; doi: 10.1016/J.MSEC.2009.04.011
434.
HoppCD, LandMF. Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dentistry considerations for ceramic inlays in posterior teeth: A review. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent, 2013; 5(5):21–32; doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S42016
435.
MatthewIR, FrameJW. Policy of consultant oral and maxillofacial surgeons towards removal of miniplate components after jaw fracture fixation: Pilot study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 1999; 37(2):110–112; doi: 10.1054/BJOM.1997.0084
436.
LotzJC, GerhartTN, HayesWC. Mechanical properties of metaphyseal bone in the proximal femur. J Biomech, 1991; 24(5):317–329; doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(91)90350-V
437.
PrasadhS, KrishnanAV, LimCYH, et al.Titanium versus magnesium plates for unilateral mandibular angle fracture fixation: biomechanical evaluation using 3-dimensional finite element analysis. J Mater Res Technol, 2022; 18:2064–2076; doi: 10.1016/J.JMRT.2022.03.111
438.
AlsallaH, HaoL, SmithC. Fracture toughness and tensile strength of 316L stainless steel cellular lattice structures manufactured using the selective laser melting technique. Mater Sci Eng A, 2016; 669:1–6; doi: 10.1016/J.MSEA.2016.05.075
439.
LeongKF, CheahCM, ChuaCK. Solid freeform fabrication of three-dimensional scaffolds for engineering replacement tissues and organs. Biomaterials, 2003; 24(13):2363–2378; doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00030-9
440.
AkmalJS, SalmiM, MäkitieA, et al.Implementation of industrial additive manufacturing: Intelligent implants and drug delivery systems. J Funct Biomater, 2018; 9(3); doi: 10.3390/jfb9030041
441.
KelleyDJ, FarhoudM, MeyerandME, et al.Creating physical 3D stereolithograph models of brain and skull. PLoS One, 2007; 2(10):e1119–e5; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001119
442.
LouvrierA, MartyP, BarrabéA, et al.How useful is 3D printing in maxillofacial surgery? J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2017; 118(4):206–212; doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2017.07.002
443.
VukicevicM, MosadeghB, MinJK, et al.Cardiac 3D printing and its future directions. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 2017; 10(2):171–184; doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.12.001
444.
NoorN, ShapiraA, EdriR, et al.3D printing of personalized thick and perfusable cardiac patches and hearts. Adv Sci (Weinh), 2019; 6(11):1900344; doi: 10.1002/advs.201900344
445.
Tran-GiaJ, SchlöglS, LassmannM. Design and fabrication of kidney phantoms for internal radiation dosimetry using 3D printing technology. J Nucl Med, 2016; 57(12):1998–2005; doi: 10.2967/jnumed.116.178046
446.
YooSS. 3D-printed biological organs: Medical potential and patenting opportunity. Expert Opin Ther Pat, 2015; 25(5):507–511; doi: 10.1517/13543776.2015.1019466
447.
Diaz-GomezL, Gonzalez-PradaI, MillanR, et al.3D printed carboxymethyl cellulose scaffolds for autologous growth factors delivery in wound healing. Carbohydr Polym, 2022; 278:118924; doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118924
448.
BertoliniM, RossoniM, ColomboG. Additive manufacturing of a compliant multimaterial heart model. CADandA, 2022; 19(6):1162–1170; doi: 10.14733/cadaps.2022.1162-1170
449.
WakeN, RosenkrantzAB, HuangR, et al.Patient-specific 3D printed and augmented reality kidney and prostate cancer models: Impact on patient education. 3D Print Med, 2019; 5(1):4; doi: 10.1186/s41205-019-0041-3
450.
KaramanD, WillerthSM. Utilizing additive manufacturing to produce organ mimics and imaging phantoms. 2023; 58–72.
451.
SinghG, ChandaA. Mechanical properties of whole-body soft human tissues: A review. Biomed Mater, 2021; 16(6); doi: 10.1088/1748-605X/ac2b7a
452.
JanmohammadiM, NourbakhshMS. Recent advances on 3D printing in hard and soft tissue engineering. Int J Polym Mater Polym Biomater, 2020; 69(7):449–466; doi: 10.1080/00914037.2019.1581196
453.
RanebennurR, ThirumaleshwarS, SomareddyHK, et al.Development of automated quality assurance systems for pharmaceutical manufacturing: A review. J Coastal Life Med, 2023; 11.
454.
FernandesV, MatosF, OliveiraJP, et al.Identifying strategic opportunities through the development of a roadmap for additive manufacturing: The example of Portugal. Heliyon, 2023; 9(9):e19672; doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19672
455.
JardiniAL, LarosaMA, MacedoMF, et al.Improvement in cranioplasty: Advanced prosthesis biomanufacturing. Procedia CIRP, 2016; 49:203–208; doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2015.11.017
456.
WenP, VoshageM, JauerL, et al.Laser additive manufacturing of Zn metal parts for biodegradable applications: Processing, formation quality and mechanical properties. Mater Des, 2018; 155(2017):36–45; doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.05.057
457.
YeQ, HeG. In-situ formed graded microporous structure in titanium alloys and its effect on the mechanical properties. Mater Des, 2015; 83:295–300; 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.06.066
