In the field of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, developing cytocompatible 3D conductive scaffolds that mimic the native extracellular matrix is crucial for the engineering of excitable cells and tissues. In this study, a custom cryogenic extrusion 3D printer was developed, which afforded control over both the ink and printing surface temperatures. Using this approach, aqueous inks were printed into well-defined layers with high precision. A conductive hydrogel ink was developed from chitosan (CS) and edge-functionalised expanded graphene (EFXG). Different EFXG:CS ratios (between 60:40 and 80:20) were evaluated to determine both conductivity and printability. Using the novel customized cryogenic 3D printer, conductive structures of between 2 and 20 layers were produced, with feature sizes as small as 200 μm. The printed structures are mechanically robust and are electrically conducting. The highest Young's modulus and conductivity in a hydrated state were 2.6 MPa and ∼45 S/m, respectively. Cytocompatibility experiments reveal that the developed material supports NSC-34 mouse motor neuron-like cells in terms of viability, attachment, and proliferation. The distinctive mechanical and electrical properties of the 3D-printed structures would make them good candidates for the engineering of 3D-structured excitable cells. Moreover, this novel printing setup can be used to print other hydrogel-based inks with high precision and resolution.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
MagazA, LiX, GoughJ, et al.Graphene oxide and electroactive reduced graphene oxide-based composite fibrous scaffolds for engineering excitable nerve tissue. Mater Sci Eng C, 2021; 119:111632; doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2020.111632
2.
ZhangZ, KlausenL, ChenL, et al.Electroactive scaffolds for neurogenesis and myogenesis: Graphene-based nanomaterials. Small, 2018; 14(48):1801983; doi: 10.1002/smll.201801983
3.
NingL, SunH, LelongT, et al.3D bioprinting of scaffolds with living Schwann cells for potential nerve tissue engineering applications. Biofabrication, 2018; 10(3):035014; doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/aacd30
4.
ZhuK, ShinS, van KempenT, et al.Gold nanocomposite bioink for printing 3D cardiac constructs. Adv Funct Mater, 2017; 27(12); doi: 10.1002/adfm.201605352
5.
NavaeiA, SainiH, ChristensonW, et al.Gold nanorod-incorporated gelatin-based conductive hydrogels for engineering cardiac tissue constructs. Acta Biomater, 2016; 41:133–146; doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.05.027
6.
ShinS, ZihlmannC, AkbariM, et al.Reduced graphene oxide-GelMA hybrid hydrogels as scaffolds for cardiac tissue engineering. Small, 2016; 12(27):3677–3689; doi: 10.1002/smll.201600178
7.
FangY, ZhangT, ZhangL, et al.Biomimetic design and fabrication of scaffolds integrating oriented micro-pores with branched channel networks for myocardial tissue engineering. Biofabrication, 2019; 11(3):035004; doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ab0fd3
8.
ParkJ, ChoiJ, KimS, et al.Micropatterned conductive hydrogels as multifunctional muscle-mimicking biomaterials: Graphene-incorporated hydrogels directly patterned with femtosecond laser ablation. Acta Biomater, 2019; 97:141–153; doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.07.044
9.
DongR, ZhaoX, GuoB, et al.Biocompatible elastic conductive films significantly enhanced myogenic differentiation of myoblast for skeletal muscle regeneration. Biomacromolecules, 2017; 18(9):2808–2819; doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.7b00749
10.
AhadianS, Ramon-AzconJ, EstiliM, et al.Hybrid hydrogels containing vertically aligned carbon nanotubes with anisotropic electrical conductivity for muscle myofiber fabrication. Sci Rep, 2014; 4:4271; doi: 10.1038/srep04271
11.
EsrafilzadehD, JaliliR, StewartE, et al.High-performance multifunctional graphene-PLGA fibers: Toward biomimetic and conducting 3D scaffolds. Adv Funct Mater, 2016; 26(18):3105–3117; doi: 10.1002/adfm.201505304
12.
TutarR, MoteallehA, KhademhosseiniA, et al.Functional nanomaterials on 2D surfaces and in 3D nanocomposite hydrogels for biomedical applications. Adv Funct Mater, 2019; 29(46):1904344; doi: 10.1002/adfm.201904344
13.
QaziT, RaiR, BoccacciniA. Tissue engineering of electrically responsive tissues using polyaniline based polymers: A review. Biomaterials, 2014; 35(33):9068–9086; doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.07.020
14.
ZhaoG, QingH, HuangG, et al.Reduced graphene oxide functionalized nanofibrous silk fibroin matrices for engineering excitable tissues. NPG Asia Mater, 2018; 10(10):982–994; doi: 10.1038/s41427-018-0092-8
15.
MehraliM, ThakurA, PennisiC, et al.Nanoreinforced hydrogels for tissue engineering: Biomaterials that are compatible with load-bearing and electroactive tissues. Adv Mater, 2017; 29(8); doi: 10.1002/adma.201603612
16.
XuH, HolzwarthJ, YanY, et al.Conductive PPY/PDLLA conduit for peripheral nerve regeneration. Biomaterials, 2014; 35(1):225–235; doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.10.002
RibeiroM, FerrazM, MonteiroF, et al.Antibacterial silk fibroin/nanohydroxyapatite hydrogels with silver and gold nanoparticles for bone regeneration. Nanomedicine, 2017; 13(1):231–239; doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2016.08.026
19.
HeJ, XuF, DongR, et al.Electrohydrodynamic 3D printing of microscale poly (ϵ-caprolactone) scaffolds with multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Biofabrication, 2017; 9(1):015007; doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/aa53bc
20.
ShinS, FarzadR, TamayolA, et al.A bioactive carbon nanotube-based ink for printing 2D and 3D flexible electronics. Adv Mater, 2016; 28(17):3280–3289; doi: 10.1002/adma.201506420
21.
ChaudhuriB, BhadraD, MoroniL, et al.Myoblast differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells on graphene oxide and electrospun graphene oxide-polymer composite fibrous meshes: Importance of graphene oxide conductivity and dielectric constant on their biocompatibility. Biofabrication, 2015; 7(1):015009; doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/7/1/015009
22.
SayyarS, MurrayE, ThompsonB, et al.Processable conducting graphene/chitosan hydrogels for tissue engineering. J Mater Chem B, 2015; 3(3):481–490; doi: 10.1039/c4tb01636j
23.
DvirT, TimkoB, KohaneD, et al.Nanotechnological strategies for engineering complex tissues. Nat Nanotechnol, 2011; 6(1):13–22; doi: 10.1038/nnano.2010.246
24.
Yongbin ZhangA. Cytotoxicity effects of graphene and single-wall carbon nanotubes in neural phaeochromocytoma-derived PC12 cells. J Am Chem Soc, 2010; 4(6):3181–3186.
25.
LeT, KimY, YoonH. Electrical and electrochemical properties of conducting polymers. Polymers, 2017; 9(4):150; doi: 10.3390/polym9040150
26.
JakusA, SecorE, RutzA, et al.Three-dimensional printing of high-content graphene scaffolds for electronic and biomedical applications. ACS Nano, 2015; 9(4):4636–4648; doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5b01179
27.
LiN, ZhangQ, GaoS, et al.Three-dimensional graphene foam as a biocompatible and conductive scaffold for neural stem cells. Sci Rep, 2013; 3:1604; doi: 10.1038/srep01604
28.
DasS, SinghS, SinghV, et al.Oxygenated functional group density on graphene oxide: Its effect on cell toxicity. Part Part Syst Charact, 2013; 30(2):148–157; doi: 10.1002/ppsc.201200066
29.
MorimotoN, KuboT, NishinaY. Tailoring the oxygen content of graphite and reduced graphene oxide for specific applications. Sci Rep, 2016; 6:21715; doi: 10.1038/srep21715
30.
GuexL, SacchiB, PeuvotK, et al.Experimental review: Chemical reduction of graphene oxide (GO) to reduced graphene oxide (rGO) by aqueous chemistry. Nanoscale, 2017; 9(27):9562–9571; doi: 10.1039/c7nr02943h
31.
FangC, ZhangJ, ChenX, et al.Calculating the electrical conductivity of graphene nanoplatelet polymer composites by a monte carlo method. Nanomaterials, 2020; 10(6):1–15; doi: 10.3390/nano10061129
32.
OfficerD, WallaceG, JaliliR, et al.Dispersible Edge Functionalized Graphene Platelets, WO2020073081A1, University of Wollongong, Australia; 2020.
33.
FaisalS, RyderG, WalkerA, et al.Additive-Free Edge-Functionalised Graphene Dough. In Preparation, 2022.
34.
NatarajanJ, SanapalliB, BanoM, et al.Nanostructured lipid carriers of pioglitazone loaded collagen/chitosan composite scaffold for diabetic wound healing. Adv Wound Care, 2019; 8(10):499–513. doi: 10.1089/wound.2018.0831
35.
RevkovaV, GrebenikE, KalsinV, et al.Chitosan-g-oligo(L,L-lactide) copolymer hydrogel potential for neural stem cell differentiation. Tissue Eng Part A, 2020; 26(17):953–963; doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2019.0265
36.
PavoniM, LucheseC, TessaroI. Impact of acid type for chitosan dissolution on the characteristics and biodegradability of cornstarch/chitosan based films. Int J Biol Macromol, 2019; 138:693–703; doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.07.089
37.
MengQ, HeuzeyM, CarreauP. Hierarchical structure and physicochemical properties of plasticized chitosan. Biomacromolecules, 2014; 15(4):1216–1224; doi: 10.1021/bm401792u
38.
SearsN, DhavalikarP, WhitelyM, et al.Fabrication of biomimetic bone grafts with multi-material 3D printing. Biofabrication, 2017; 9(2):025020; doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/aa7077
39.
GaoQ, NiuX, ShaoL, et al.3D printing of complex GelMA-based scaffolds with nanoclay. Biofabrication, 2019; 11(3):035006; doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ab0cf6
40.
SangianD, JeiranikhamenehA, NaficyS, et al.Three-dimensional printed braided sleeves for manufacturing mcKibben artificial muscles. 3D Print Addit Manuf, 2019; 6(1):57–62; doi: 10.1089/3dp.2018.0103
41.
LiH, LiN, ZhangH, et al.Three-dimensional bioprinting of perfusable hierarchical microchannels with alginate and silk fibroin double cross-linked network. 3D Print Addit Manuf, 2020; 7(2):78–84; doi: 10.1089/3dp.2019.0115
42.
KuzmenkoV, KarabulutE, PernevikE, et al.Tailor-made conductive inks from cellulose nanofibrils for 3D printing of neural guidelines. Carbohydr Polym, 2018; 189:22–30; doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.01.097
LiJ, LiuX, CrookJ, et al.3D Printing of cytocompatible graphene/alginate scaffolds for mimetic tissue constructs. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2020, 8:824; doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00824
45.
KretzschmarN, LipponenS, KlarV, et al.Mechanical properties of ultraviolet-assisted paste extrusion and postextrusion ultraviolet-curing of three-dimensional printed biocomposites. 3D Print Addit Manuf, 2019; 6(3):127–137; doi: 10.1089/3dp.2018.0148
46.
AthukoralaS, TranT, BaluR, et al.3D printable electrically conductive hydrogel scaffolds for biomedical applications: A review. Polym Rev, 2021; 13(3):1–21; doi: 10.3390/polym13030474
47.
SpencerA, Shirzaei SaniE, SoucyJ, et al.Bioprinting of a cell-laden conductive hydrogel composite. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2019; 11(34):30518–30533; doi: 10.1021/acsami.9b07353
48.
DistlerT, BoccacciniA. 3D printing of electrically conductive hydrogels for tissue engineering and biosensors—A review. Acta Biomater, 2020; 101:1–13; doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.08.044
49.
PorterD, CohenA, KruegerP, et al.Additive manufacturing with ultraviolet curable silicones containing carbon black. 3D Print Addit Manuf, 2018; 5(1):73–86; doi: 10.1089/3dp.2017.0019
50.
LiaoC, Wu WCH, siehC, et al.Design and development of a novel frozen-form additive manufacturing system for tissue engineering applications. 3D Print Addit Manuf, 2016; 3(4):217–225; doi: 10.1089/3dp.2015.0042
AdamkiewiczM, RubinskyB. Cryogenic 3D printing for tissue engineering. Cryobiology, 2015; 71(3):518–521; doi: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2015.10.152
53.
TanZ, ParisiC, Di SilvioL, et al.Cryogenic 3D Printing of super soft hydrogels. Sci Rep, 2017; 7(1):16293; doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-16668-9
54.
ZhuC, HanT, DuossE, et al.Highly compressible 3D periodic graphene aerogel microlattices. Nat Commun, 2015; 6:6962; doi: 10.1038/ncomms7962
55.
KumarB, IsloorA, KumarG, et al.Nanohydroxyapatite reinforced chitosan composite hydrogel with tunable mechanical and biological properties for cartilage regeneration. Sci Rep, 2019; 9(1):15957; doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-52042-7
56.
TalebianS, MehraliM, RaadR, et al.Electrically conducting hydrogel graphene nanocomposite biofibers for biomedical applications. Front Chem, 2020; 8:88; doi: 10.3389/fchem.2020.00088
57.
SuntornnondR, TanE, AnJ, et al.A highly printable and biocompatible hydrogel composite for direct printing of soft and perfusable vasculature-like structures. Sci Rep, 2017; 7(1):16902; doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-17198-0
58.
LiQ, ZhangB, XueQ, et al.A systematic thermal analysis for accurately predicting the extrusion printability of alginate-gelatin-based hydrogel bioinks. Int J Bioprinting, 2021; 7(3):108–123; doi: 10.18063/ijb.v7i3.394
59.
JiangL, ChenD, WangZ, et al.Preparation of an electrically conductive graphene oxide/chitosan scaffold for cardiac tissue engineering. Appl Biochem Biotechnol, 2019; 188(4):952–964; doi: 10.1007/s12010-019-02967-6
60.
WarrenH, GatelyR, O'BrienP, et al.Electrical conductivity, impedance, and percolation behavior of carbon nanofiber and carbon nanotube containing gellan gum hydrogels. J Polym Sci B Polym Phys, 2014; 52(13):864–871; doi: 10.1002/polb.23497
61.
LiuQ, ShiQ, WangH, et al.Laser irradiated self-supporting and flexible 3-dimentional graphene-based film electrode with promising electrochemical properties. RSC Adv, 2015; 5(58):47074–47079; doi: 10.1039/c5ra08431h
62.
ZhengC, LuK, LuY, et al.A stretchable, self-healing conductive hydrogels based on nanocellulose supported graphene towards wearable monitoring of human motion. Carbohydr Polym, 2020; 250:116905; doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116905
63.
SharmaB, ShekharS, GautamS, et al.Dynamic shear rheology behavior and long term stability kinetics of reduced graphene oxide filled poly (vinyl alcohol) biofilm. Polym Test, 2018; 69:583–592; doi: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.06.019
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
