Hydrogels are widely used materials due to their biocompatibility, their ability to mimic the hydrated and porous extracellular microenvironment, as well as their ability to tune both mechanical and biochemical properties. However, most hydrogels lack mechanical toughness, and shaping them into complicated three-dimensional (3D) structures remains challenging. In the past decade, tough and stretchable double-network hydrogels (DN gels) were developed for tissue engineering, soft robotics, and applications that require a combination of high-energy dissipation and large deformations. Although DN gels were processed into simple shapes by using conventional casting and molding methods, new 3D printing methods have enabled the shaping of DN gels into structurally complex 3D geometries. This review will describe the state-of-art technologies for shaping tough and stretchable DN gels into custom geometries by using conventional molding and casting, extrusion, and optics-based 3D printing, as well as the key challenges and future outlook in this field.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
LiJ, MooneyDJ. Designing hydrogels for controlled drug delivery. Nat Rev Mater, 2016; 1:16071.
HowardD, ButteryLD, ShakesheffKM, et al.Tissue engineering: strategies, stem cells and scaffolds. J Anat, 2008; 213:66–72.
4.
AhmedEM. Hydrogel: preparation, characterization, and applications: a review. J Adv Res, 2015; 6:105–121.
5.
MahinroostaM, Jomeh FarsangiZ, AllahverdiA, et al.Hydrogels as intelligent materials: a brief review of synthesis, properties and applications. Mater Today Chem, 2018; 8:42–55.
6.
MaitraJ, ShuklaVK. Cross-linking in hydrogels—a review. Am J Polym Sci, 2014; 4:25–31.
7.
OyenML. Mechanical characterisation of hydrogel materials. Int Mater Rev, 2014; 59:44–59.
8.
BillietT, VandenhauteM, SchelfhoutJ, et al.A review of trends and limitations in hydrogel-rapid prototyping for tissue engineering. Biomaterials, 2012; 33:6020–6041.
9.
ZhengJ. Fundamentals of double network hydrogels. J Mater Chem B, 2015; 3:3654–3676.
10.
GongJP. Why are double network hydrogels so tough?. Soft Matter, 2010; 6:2583–2590.
11.
RafieianS, MirzadehH, MahdaviH, et al.A review on nanocomposite hydrogels and their biomedical applications. IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron, 2019; 26:154–174.
12.
JiangL, LiuC, MayumiK, et al.Highly stretchable and instantly recoverable slide-ring gels consisting of enzymatically synthesized polyrotaxane with low host coverage. Chem Mater, 2018; 30:5013–5019.
13.
JiangF, HuangT, HeC, et al.Interactions affecting the mechanical properties of macromolecular microsphere composite hydrogels. J Phys Chem B, 2013; 117:13679–13687.
14.
ZhangHJ, LuoF, YeY, et al.Tough triblock copolymer hydrogels with different micromorphologies for medical and sensory materials. ACS Appl Polym Mater, 2019; 1:1948–1953.
15.
FujiiK, AsaiH, UekiT, et al.High-performance ion gel with tetra-PEG network. Soft Matter, 2012; 8:1756–1759.
16.
NonoyamaT, GongJP. Double-network hydrogel and its potential biomedical application: a review. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part H J Eng Med, 2015; 229:853–863.
17.
LiangZ, LiuC, LiL, et al.Double-network hydrogel with tunable mechanical performance and biocompatibility for the fabrication of stem cells- encapsulated fibers and 3D assemble. Sci Rep, 2016; 6:33462.
18.
GuZ, HuangK, LuoY, et al.Double network hydrogel for tissue engineering. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomedicine Nanobiotechnology, 2018; 10:1–15.
19.
YongmeiC, KunD, ZhenqiLIU, et al.Double network hydrogel with high mechanical strength: performance, progress and future perspective. Technol Sci, 2012; 55:2241–2254.
20.
GongJP, KatsuyamaY, KurokawaT, et al.Double-network hydrogels with extremely high mechanical strength. Adv Mater, 2003; 15:1155–1158.
21.
NakajimaT, SatoH, ZhaoY, et al.A universal molecular stent method to toughen any hydrogels based on double network concept. Adv Funct Mater, 2012; 22:4426–4432.
22.
LiuXJ, RenXY, GuanS, et al.Highly stretchable and tough double network hydrogels via molecular stent. Eur Polym J, 2015; 73:149–161.
23.
LinT, ShiM, HuangF, et al.One-pot synthesis of a double-network hydrogel electrolyte with extraordinarily excellent mechanical properties for a highly compressible and bendable flexible supercapacitor. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2018; 10:29684–29693.
24.
ChenP, WuR, WangJ, et al.One-pot preparation of ultrastrong double network hydrogels. J Polym Res, 2012; 19:1–4. DOI: 10.1007/s10965-012-9825-5.
25.
WeiJ, WangJ, SuS, et al.3D printing of an extremely tough hydrogel. RSC Adv, 2015; 5:81324–81329.
26.
LiuS, LiL. Ultrastretchable and self-healing double-network hydrogel for 3D printing and strain sensor. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2017; 9:26429–26437.
27.
WangLL, HighleyCB, YehY, et al.Three-dimensional extrusion bioprinting of single- and double-network hydrogels containing dynamic covalent crosslinks. J Biomed Mater Res Part A, 2018; 106A:865–875.
28.
SunJ, ZhaoX, IlleperumaWRK, et al.Highly stretchable and tough hydrogels. Nature, 2012; 489:133–136.
29.
DarnellMC, SunJ, MehtaM, et al.Biomaterials performance and biocompatibility of extremely tough alginate/polyacrylamide hydrogels. Biomaterials, 2013; 34:8042–8048.
30.
DengY, HuangM, SunD, et al.Dual physically cross-linked κ-carrageenan-based double network hydrogels with superior self-healing performance for biomedical application. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2018; 10:37544–37554.
31.
WuF, ChenL, WangY, et al.Tough and stretchy double-network hydrogels based on in situ interpenetration of polyacrylamide and physically cross-linked polyurethane. J Mater Sci, 2019; 54:12131–12144.
32.
DekoskyBJ, DormerNH, IngavleGC, et al.Hierarchically designed agarose and poly(ethylene glycol) interpenetrating network hydrogels for cartilage tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part C Methods, 2010; 16:1533–1542.
33.
LiJ, SuoZ, VlassakJJ. Stiff, strong, and tough hydrogels with good chemical stability. J Mater Chem B, 2014; 2:6708–6713.
34.
WeiD, YangJ, ZhuL, et al.Fully physical double network hydrogels with high strength, rapid self-recovery and self-healing performances. Polym Test, 2018; 69:167–174.
35.
ChenQ, WeiD, ChenH, et al.Simultaneous enhancement of stiffness and toughness in hybrid double-network hydrogels via the first, physically linked network. Macromolecules, 2015; 48:8003–8010.
36.
LinT, ShiM, HuangF, et al.One-pot synthesis of a double-network hydrogel electrolyte with extraordinarily excellent mechanical properties for a highly compressible and bendable flexible supercapacitor. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2018; 10:29684–29693.
37.
BalakrishnanB, JoshiN, JayakrishnanA, et al.Self-crosslinked oxidized alginate/gelatin hydrogel as injectable, adhesive biomimetic scaffolds for cartilage regeneration. Acta Mater, 2014; 10:3650–3663. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.04.031.
38.
RennerfeldtDA, RenthAN, TalataZ, et al.Tuning mechanical performance of poly (ethylene glycol) and agarose interpenetrating network hydrogels for cartilage tissue engineering. Biomaterials, 2013; 34:8241–8257.
39.
WengL, GouldstoneA, WuY, et al.Mechanically strong double network photocrosslinked hydrogels from N, N-dimethylacrylamide and glycidyl methacrylated hyaluronan. Biomaterials, 2008; 29:2153–2163.
40.
IngavleGC, DormerNH, GehrkeSH, et al.Using chondroitin sulfate to improve the viability and biosynthesis of chondrocytes encapsulated in interpenetrating network (IPN) hydrogels of agarose and poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 2012; 23:157–170.
41.
LiaoIC, MoutosFT, EstesBT, et al.Composite three-dimensional woven scaffolds with interpenetrating network hydrogels to create functional synthetic articular cartilage. Adv Funct Mater, 2013; 23:5833–5839.
42.
YasudaK, KitamuraN, GongJP, et al.A novel double-network hydrogel induces spontaneous articular cartilage regeneration in vivo in a large osteochondral defect. Macromol Biosci, 2009; 9:307–316.
43.
YoshikawaK, KitamuraN, KurokawaT, et al.Hyaluronic acid enhances in vitro induction effects of synthetic PAMPSAnd PDMAAm hydrogels on chondrogenic differentiation of ATDC5 cells. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg, 2013; 29:e134–e135.
44.
BuY, ShenH, YangF, et al.Construction of tough, in situ forming double-network hydrogels with good biocompatibility. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2017; 9:2205–2212.
45.
ZhaoY, NakajimaT, YangJJ, et al.Proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans improve toughness of biocompatible double network hydrogels. Adv Mater, 2014; 26:436–442.
46.
BaeKH, WangLS, KurisawaM. Injectable biodegradable hydrogels: progress and challenges. J Mater Chem B, 2013; 1:5371–5388.
47.
PacelliS, PaolicelliP, PepiF, et al.Gellan gum and polyethylene glycol dimethacrylate double network hydrogels with improved mechanical properties. J Polym Res, 2014; 21:409.
AjiroH, WatanabeJ, AkashiM. Cell adhesion and proliferation on poly(N-vinylacetamide) hydrogels and double network approaches for changing cellular affinities. Biomacromolecules, 2008; 9:426–430.
50.
BakarichSE, GorkinR, PanhuisMIH, et al.4D printing with mechanically robust, thermally actuating hydrogels. Macromol Rapid Commun, 2015; 36:1211–1217.
51.
ZhangB, LiS, HingoraniH, et al.Highly stretchable hydrogels for UV curing based high-resolution multimaterial 3D printing. J Mater Chem B, 2018; 6:3246–3253.
52.
ChanHN, ShuY, TianQ, et al.Replicating 3D printed structures into hydrogels. Mater Horizons, 2016; 3:309–313.
53.
YangF, TadepalliV, WileyBJ. 3D printing of a double network hydrogel with a compression strength and elastic modulus greater than those of cartilage. ACS Biomater Sci Eng, 2017; 3:863–869.
54.
KunwarP, JanniniAVS, XiongZ, et al.High-resolution 3D printing of stretchable hydrogel structures using optical projection lithography. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2020; 12:1640–1649.
55.
NakajimaT, TakedomiN, KurokawaT, et al.A facile method for synthesizing free-shaped and tough double network hydrogels using physically crosslinked poly(vinyl alcohol) as an internal mold. Polym Chem, 2010; 1:693–697.
56.
SaitoJ, FurukawaH, KurokawaT, et al.Robust bonding and one-step facile synthesis of tough hydrogels with desirable shape by virtue of the double network structure. Polym Chem, 2011; 2:575–580.
57.
LiY, WangC, ZhangW, et al.Preparation and characterization of PAM/SA tough hydrogels reinforced by IPN technique based on covalent/ionic crosslinking. J Appl Polym Sci, 2015; 132:1–7.
58.
ChenQ, ZhuL, ZhaoC, et al.A robust, one-pot synthesis of highly mechanical and recoverable double network hydrogels using thermoreversible sol-gel polysaccharide. Adv Mater, 2013; 25:4171–4176.
59.
GeG, ZhangY, ShaoJ, et al.Stretchable, transparent, and self-patterned hydrogel-based pressure sensor for human motions detection. Adv Funct Mater, 2018; 28:1–8.
60.
NingL, ChenX. A brief review of extrusion-based tissue scaffold bio-printing. Biotechnol J, 2017; 12:1–16. DOI: 10.1002/biot.201600671.
61.
OzbolatIT, HospodiukM. Current advances and future perspectives in extrusion-based bioprinting. Biomaterials, 2016; 76:321–343.
62.
NaghiehS, SarkerM, IzadifarM, et al.Dispensing-based bioprinting of mechanically-functional hybrid scaffolds with vessel-like channels for tissue engineering applications—a brief review. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 2018; 78:298–314.
63.
BakarichSE, BeirneS, WallaceG, et al.Extrusion printing of ionic–covalent entanglement hydrogels with high toughness. J Mater Chem B, 2013; 1:4939–4946.
64.
HongS, SycksD, ChanHF, et al.3D printing of highly stretchable and tough hydrogels into complex, cellularized structures. Adv Mater, 2015; 27:4035–4040.
65.
ChimeneD, PeakCW, GentryJL, et al.Nanoengineered ionic-covalent entanglement (NICE) bioinks for 3D bioprinting. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2018; 10:9957–9968.
66.
GuoZ, XiaJ, MiS, et al.Mussel-inspired naturally derived double-network hydrogels and their application in 3D printing: from soft, injectable bioadhesives to mechanically strong hydrogels. ACS Biomater Sci Eng, 2020; 6:1798–1808.
67.
HsiehCT, HsuSH. Double-network polyurethane-gelatin hydrogel with tunable modulus for high-resolution 3D bioprinting. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2019; 11:32746–32757.
68.
TeoMY, RavichandranN, KimN, et al.Direct patterning of highly conductive PEDOT:PSS/ionic liquid hydrogel via microreactive inkjet printing. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2019; 11:37069–37076.
69.
TumblestonJR, ShirvanyantsD, ErmoshkinN, et al.Continuous liquid interface production of 3D objects. Science (80-), 2015; 347:1349–1352.
70.
KunwarP, HassinenJ, BautistaG, et al.Direct laser writing of photostable fluorescent silver nanoclusters in polymer films. ACS Nano, 2014; 8:11165–11171.
71.
SunHB, KawataS. Two-photon photopolymerization and 3D lithographic microfabrication. Adv Polym Sci, 2004; 170:169–273.
72.
XiongZ, LiuH, TanX, et al.Diffraction analysis of digital micromirror device in maskless photolithography system. J Micro Nanolithogr MEMS MOEMS, 2014; 13:043016.
73.
KunwarP, TurquetL, HassinenJ, et al.Holographic patterning of fluorescent microstructures comprising silver nanoclusters. Opt Mater Express, 2016; 6:697–698.
74.
KunwarP, HassinenJ, BautistaG, et al.Sub-micron scale patterning of fluorescent silver nanoclusters using low-power laser. Sci Rep, 2016; 6:6–11.
75.
XiongZ, LiH, KunwarP, et al.Femtosecond laser induced densification within cell-laden hydrogels results in cellular alignment. Biofabrication, 2019; 11:1–11. DOI: 10.1088/1758-5090/ab0f8b.
76.
KunwarP, XiongZ, McloughlinST, et al.Oxygen-permeable films for continuous additive, subtractive, and hybrid additive/subtractive manufacturing. 3D Print Addit Manuf, 2020; 7:216–221.
77.
GrigoryanB, PaulsenSJ, CorbettDC, et al.Multivascular networks and functional intravascular topologies within biocompatible hydrogels. Science (80-), 2019; 364:458–464.
78.
SamorezovJE, MorlockCM, AlsbergE. Dual ionic and photo-crosslinked alginate hydrogels for micropatterned spatial control of material properties and cell behavior. Bioconjug Chem, 2015; 26:1339–1347.
