Polymers have been extensively used to develop 3D scaffolds in the field of tissue engineering and consist of certain design requirements such as biocompatibility, structural properties, and varying porosity inside of complex geometries, all with the ultimate goal of incorporating living cells within the scaffold structure. In this work, we present the synthesis and material characterization of hybrid spools using polycaprolactone (PCL) as the base polymer. We demonstrate that a commercial 3D Fused Deposition Modeling printer such as MakerBot can be used to print 3D scaffolds using three types of polymer spools: PCL, PCL-poly lactic acid, and PCL-hydroxyapatite. Data derived from computer tomography can be used to develop hollow porous cages using PCL. Finally, we demonstrate that log-pile scaffolds are capable of being infused with a mixture of living cells and gelatin hydrogel and that high cellular viability is maintained throughout the printed structure. This work could be potentially useful in the treatment of patients with complex bone defects.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
LiuY, LimJ, TeohS-H. Review: development of clinically relevant scaffolds for vascularised bone tissue engineering. Biotechnol Adv, 2013; 31:688–705.
HutmacherDW.Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage. Biomaterials, 2000; 21:2529–2543.
4.
AtalaA.Engineering tissues, organs and cells. J Tissue Eng Regen Med, 2007; 1:83–96.
5.
Tarik ArafatM, GibsonI, LiX. State of the art and future direction of additive manufactured scaffolds-based bone tissue engineering. Rapid Prototyping J, 2014; 20:13–26.
6.
TrachtenbergJE, MountziarisPM, MillerJS, WettergreenM, KasperFK, MikosAG. Open‐source three‐dimensional printing of biodegradable polymer scaffolds for tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res Part A, 2014; 102:4326–4335.
7.
ChevalierE, ChuliaD, PougetC, VianaM. Fabrication of porous substrates: A review of processes using pore forming agents in the biomaterial field. J Pharm Sci, 2008; 97:1135–1154.
8.
PeltolaSM, MelchelsFP, GrijpmaDW, KellomäkiM. A review of rapid prototyping techniques for tissue engineering purposes. Ann Med, 2008; 40:268–280.
9.
BillietT, VandenhauteM, SchelfhoutJ, Van VlierbergheS, DubruelP. A review of trends and limitations in hydrogel-rapid prototyping for tissue engineering. Biomaterials, 2012; 33:6020–6041.
10.
WilliamsJM, AdewunmiA, SchekRM, FlanaganCL, KrebsbachPH, FeinbergSE, et al.Bone tissue engineering using polycaprolactone scaffolds fabricated via selective laser sintering. Biomaterials, 2005; 26:4817–4827.
11.
CookeMN, FisherJP, DeanD, RimnacC, MikosAG. Use of stereolithography to manufacture critical‐sized 3D biodegradable scaffolds for bone ingrowth. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 2003; 64:65–69.
12.
PatrícioT, DomingosM, GloriaA, D'AmoraU, CoelhoJ, BártoloP. Fabrication and characterisation of PCL and PCL/PLA scaffolds for tissue engineering. Rapid Prototyping J, 2014; 20:145–156.
13.
TuanHS, HutmacherDW. Application of micro CT and computation modeling in bone tissue engineering. Comp Aided Design, 2005; 37:1151–1161.
14.
WeiC, CaiL, SonawaneB, WangS, DongJ. High-precision flexible fabrication of tissue engineering scaffolds using distinct polymers. Biofabrication, 2012; 4:025009.
15.
HutmacherDW, SittingerM, RisbudMV. Scaffold-based tissue engineering: rationale for computer-aided design and solid free-form fabrication systems. Trends Biotechnol, 2004; 22:354–362.
16.
GratsonGM, García-SantamaríaF, LousseV, XuM, FanS, LewisJA, et al.Direct-write assembly of three-dimensional photonic crystals: conversion of polymer scaffolds to silicon hollow-woodpile structures. Adv Mater, 2006; 18:461–465.
17.
WangF, ShorL, DarlingA, KhalilS, SunW, GüçeriS, et al.Precision extruding deposition and characterization of cellular poly-ε-caprolactone tissue scaffolds. Rapid Prototyping J, 2004; 10:42–49.
18.
ParkSH, ParkDS, ShinJW, KangYG, KimHK, YoonTR, et al.Scaffolds for bone tissue engineering fabricated from two different materials by the rapid prototyping technique: PCL versus PLGA. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 2012; 23:2671–2678.
19.
BoseS, VahabzadehS, BandyopadhyayA. Bone tissue engineering using 3D printing. Mater Today, 2013; 16:496–504.
SomanP, ChungPH, ZhangAP, ChenS. Digital microfabrication of user‐defined 3D microstructures in cell‐laden hydrogels. Biotechnol Bioeng, 2013; 110:3038–3047.
22.
SunM, DownesS. Physicochemical characterisation of novel ultra-thin biodegradable scaffolds for peripheral nerve repair. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 2009; 20:1181–1192.
23.
ShorL, GüçeriS, WenX, GandhiM, SunW. Fabrication of three-dimensional polycaprolactone/hydroxyapatite tissue scaffolds and osteoblast-scaffold interactions in vitro. Biomaterials, 2007; 28:5291–5297.
24.
SwethaM, SahithiK, MoorthiA, SrinivasanN, RamasamyK, SelvamuruganN. Biocomposites containing natural polymers and hydroxyapatite for bone tissue engineering. Int J Biol Macromol, 2010; 47:1–4.
25.
RhoJ-Y, Kuhn-SpearingL, ZiouposP. Mechanical properties and the hierarchical structure of bone. Med Eng Phys, 1998; 20:92–102.
