Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a permanent, irreversible dilation of the distal region of the aorta. Recent efforts have focused on improved AAA screening and biomechanics-based failure prediction. Idealized and patient-specific AAA phantoms are often employed to validate numerical models and imaging modalities. To produce such phantoms, the investment casting process is frequently used, reconstructing the 3D vessel geometry from computed tomography patient scans. In this study the alternative use of 3D printing to produce phantoms is investigated. The mechanical properties of flexible 3D-printed materials are benchmarked against proven elastomers. We demonstrate the utility of this process with particular application to the emerging imaging modality of ultrasound-based pulse wave imaging, a noninvasive diagnostic methodology being developed to obtain regional vascular wall stiffness properties, differentiating normal and pathologic tissue in vivo. Phantom wall displacements under pulsatile loading conditions were observed, showing good correlation to fluid–structure interaction simulations and regions of peak wall stress predicted by finite element analysis. 3D-printed phantoms show a strong potential to improve medical imaging and computational analysis, potentially helping bridge the gap between experimental and clinical diagnostic tools.
LederleFA. Ultrasonographic screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Intern Med, 2003; 139:516–522.
3.
ScottRAP, BridgewaterSG, AshtonHA. Randomized clinical trial of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in women. Br J Surg, 2002; 89:283–285.
4.
DarlingR, MessinaC, BrewsterD, et al. Autopsy study of unoperated abdominal aortic aneurysms. The case for early resection. Circulation, 1977; 56:11161–11164.
5.
LimetR, SakalihassanN, AlbertA. Determination of the expansion rate and incidence of rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg, 1991; 14:540–548.
6.
MackiewiczZ, MolskiS, SzpindaM, et al. Retroperitoneal rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Mal Vasc, 1998; 23:368–370.
7.
HakE, BalmR, EikelboomBC, et al. Abdominal aortic aneurysm screening: an epidemiological point of view. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 1996; 11:270–278.
8.
ThompsonS, AshtonH, GaoL, et al. Screening men for abdominal aortic aneurysm: 10 year mortality and cost effectiveness results from the randomised Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study. Br Med J, 2009; 338:b2307.
9.
ErnstCB. Abdominal aortic aneurysm. N Engl J Med, 1993; 328:1167–1172.
10.
DoyleBJ, MorrisLG, CallananA, et al. 3D reconstruction and manufacture of real abdominal aortic aneurysms: from CT scan to silicone model. J Biomech Eng, 2008; 130:034501.
11.
DoyleBJ, CloonanAJ, WalshMT, et al. Identification of rupture locations in patient-specific abdominal aortic aneurysms using experimental and computational techniques. J Biomech, 2010; 43:1408–1416.
12.
McGloughlinTM, DoyleBJ. New approaches to abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture risk assessment: engineering insights with clinical gain. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, 2010; 30:1687–1694.
13.
McGloughlinT. Biomechanics and Mechanobiology of Aneurysms. Springer, Berlin, 2011.
14.
HoskinsPR. Physical properties of tissues relevant to arterial ultrasound imaging and blood velocity measurement. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2007; 33:1527–1539.
15.
DoyleBJ, CorbettTJ, CallananA, et al. An experimental and numerical comparison of the rupture locations of an abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Endovasc Ther, 2009; 16:322–335.
16.
DoyleBJ, CorbettTJ, CloonanAJ, et al. Experimental modelling of aortic aneurysms: novel applications of silicone rubbers. Med Eng Phys, 2009; 31:1002–1012.
17.
VappouJ, LuoJ, KonofagouEE. Pulse wave imaging for noninvasive and quantitative measurement of arterial stiffness in vivo. Am J Hypertens, 2010; 23:393–398.
18.
KonofagouE, LeeW-N, LuoJ, et al. Physiologic cardiovascular strain and intrinsic wave imaging. Annu Rev Biomed Eng, 2011; 13:477–505.
19.
ShahmirzadiD, NarayananP, LiRX, et al. Mapping the longitudinal wall stiffness heterogeneities within intact canine aortas using Pulse Wave Imaging (PWI) ex vivo. J Biomech, 2013; 46:1866–1874.
20.
LiRX, LuoJ, BalaramSK, et al. Pulse wave imaging in normal, hypertensive and aneurysmal human aortas in vivo: a feasibility study. Phys Med Biol, 2013; 58:4549–4562.
21.
LiRX, QaqishWW, ShahmirzadiD, et al., Performance assessment and optimization of Pulse Wave Imaging (PWI) in ex vivo canine aortas and in vivo normal human arteries. Conference proceedings: Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society2012, pp. 3179–3182.
22.
ShahmirzadiD, LiRX, KonofagouEE. Pulse-wave propagation in straight-geometry vessels for stiffness estimation: theory, simulations, phantoms and in vitro findings. J Biomech Eng, 2012; 134:114502.
23.
LaheijR, Van MarrewijkC, ButhJ. Progress Report on the Procedural and Follow up Results of 3413 Patients who Received Stent-Graft Treatment for Infra-Renal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms for a Period of 6 Years. EUROSTAR Data Registry Centre, 2001.
24.
MorrisL. Thesis: Numerical and experimental investigation of mechanical factors in the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. University of Limerick, 2004.
25.
DoyleBJ, CallananA, McGloughlinTM. A comparison of modelling techniques for computing wall stress in abdominal aortic aneurysms. BioMed Eng OnLine, 2007; 6.
26.
CorbettTJ, DoyleBJ, CallananA, et al. Engineering silicone rubbers for in vitro studies: creating AAA models and ILT analogues with physiological properties. J Biomech Eng, 2010; 132:011008.
27.
RaghavanML, VorpDA. Toward a biomechanical tool to evaluate rupture potential of abdominal aortic aneurysm: identification of a finite strain constitutive model and evaluation of its applicability. J Biomech, 2000; 33:475–482.
28.
FillingerMF, MarraSP, RaghavanML, et al. Prediction of rupture risk in abdominal aortic aneurysm during observation: wall stress versus diameter. J Vasc Surg, 2003; 37:724–732.
29.
RaghavanML, VorpDA, FederleMP, et al. Wall stress distribution on three-dimensionally reconstructed models of human abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg, 2000; 31:760–769.
30.
DoyleBJ, CallananA, WalshMT, et al. A finite element analysis rupture index (FEARI) as an additional tool for abdominal aortic aneurysm burst prediction. Vasc Dis Prev, 2009; 6:75–82.
31.
CloonanAJ, O'DonnellMR, LeeWT, et al. Spherical indentation of free-standing acellular extracellular matrix membranes. Acta Biomater, 2012; 8:262–273.
LuoJ, KonofagouE. A fast normalized cross-correlation calculation method for motion estimation. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control, 2010; 57:1347–1357.
34.
ShahmirzadiD, KonofagouEE. Detection of aortic wall inclusion using regional pulse wave propagation and velocity. Artery Res, 2012; 6:3.
35.
ShahmirzadiD, KonofagouEE. Quantification of arterial wall inhomogeneity size, distribution, and modulus contrast using FSI numerical pulse wave propagation. Artery Res, 2014 [Epub ahead of print] DOI: 10.1016/j.artres.2014.01.006.
36.
RaghavanML, KratzbergJ, Castro de TolosaEM, et al. Regional distribution of wall thickness and failure properties of human abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Biomech, 2006; 39:3010–3016.
37.
OláhA, HillborgH, VancsoGJ. Hydrophobic recovery of UV/ozone treated poly(dimethylsiloxane): adhesion studies by contact mechanics and mechanism of surface modification. Appl Surf Sci, 2005; 239:410–423.
38.
O'BrienT, MorrisL, O'DonnellM, et al. Injection-moulded models of major and minor arteries: the variability of model wall thickness owing to casting technique. Proc Inst Mech Eng H, 2005; 219:381–386.
39.
LaurentS, CockcroftJ, Van BortelL, et al. Expert consensus document on arterial stiffness: methodological issues and clinical applications. Eur Heart J, 2006; 27:2588–2605.
40.
ManciaG, De BackerG, DominiczakA, et al., 2007 ESH-ESC practice guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: ESH-ESC Task Force on the Management of Arterial Hypertension. J Hypertens, 2007; 25:1751–1762.
41.
MaierA, GeeMW, ReepsC, et al. Impact of calcifications on patient-specific wall stress analysis of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Biomech Model Mechanobiol, 2010; 9:511–521.
42.
DoyleBJ, HoskinsPR, McGloughlinTM. COMMENTARY: computational rupture prediction of AAAs: what needs to be done next?. J Endovasc Ther, 2011; 18:226–229.
43.
SchuurmanW, KhristovV, PotMW, et al. Bioprinting of hybrid tissue constructs with tailorable mechanical properties. Biofabrication, 2011; 3:021001.
44.
HockadayLA, KangKH, ColangeloNW, et al. Rapid 3D printing of anatomically accurate and mechanically heterogeneous aortic valve hydrogel scaffolds. Biofabrication, 2012; 4:035005.
45.
FedorovichNE, KuipersE, GawlittaD, et al. Scaffold porosity and oxygenation of printed hydrogel constructs affect functionality of embedded osteogenic progenitors. Tissue Eng Part A, 2011; 17:2473–2486.
46.
CohenDL, MaloneE, LipsonH, et al. Direct freeform fabrication of seeded hydrogels in arbitrary geometries. Tissue Eng, 2006; 12:1325–1335.
47.
BiglinoG, VerschuerenP, ZegelsR, et al. Rapid prototyping compliant arterial phantoms for in-vitro studies and device testing. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson, 2013; 15:2.
48.
SulaimanA, BousselL, TaconnetF, et al. In vitro non-rigid life-size model of aortic arch aneurysm for endovascular prosthesis assessment. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2008; 33:53–57.
49.
TamMD, LaycockSD, BrownJR, et al. 3D printing of an aortic aneurysm to facilitate decision making and device selection for endovascular aneurysm repair in complex neck anatomy. J Endovasc Ther, 2013; 20:863–867.
50.
SodianR, SchmaussD, SchmitzC, et al. 3-dimensional printing of models to create custom-made devices for coil embolization of an anastomotic leak after aortic arch replacement. Ann Thorac Surg, 2009; 88:974–978.
51.
BaeckK, LopesP, VerschuerenP. 3rd Joint Workshop on New Technologies for Computer/Robot Assisted Surgery, Verona, Italy, 2013.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
