Abstract
25 patients with cancer of unknown primary (CUP) were studied using PET-FDG. Whole-body-PET scans were performed based on previous morphological information. All patients underwent conventional diagnostic modalities prior to and after the PET-study. True positive results were obtained in 12/25 patients (48%) and the primary identified by PET was confirmed by further procedures. True negative results were obtained in 8/25 patients (32%) and no primary tumor was found by PET or other clinical investigations. False positive results were obtained in 5/25 patients (20%). No false negative results were obtained. In 11 patients having CT compared with PET the primary tumor was exclusively localized by PET in 8 patients (73%) and also by CT in 3 patients (27%); CT was unable to identify the tumor in 8/11 patients detected by PET. PET affected management and directed treatment in 11/25 patients (44%). The sensitivity of PET-FDG was 100%, specificity 61%. These observations demonstrate that PET-FDG is a highly sensitive method to detect CUP. Correctly classified patients in an early stage of disease may lead to benefit from a more targeted therapy with prolonged survival time. In cases of advanced disease PET might not decisively influence survival time.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.