Scientific literacy for all citizens: different concepts and contents

Abstract

In this article, three different descriptions of curricula for scientific literacy (SL) are summarized, compared, and critically reviewed from the point of view of their suitability for all citizens. Science for All Americans, a publication of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, envisages giving every citizen a thorough exposure to the world of science, technology, and mathematics; the report Towards Scientific Literacy, published by the International Institute for Adult Literacy Methods, recommends a phenomenological approach to science designed to make science useful for people in their daily lives; and a similar curriculum, Minimum Science for Everybody, published by a voluntary organization in India, provides a detailed alternative conceptual framework for SL in which community traditions and knowledge systems are interfaced with science.

The three reports are seen to differ from one another not only in respect of the contents of the curricula recommended, but also in their approaches, and the world views underlying these different approaches are brought out. It is suggested that SL curricula in both “developed” and “developing” countries be reviewed in the light of the ideas contained in all three reports in accordance with the needs and circumstances of the people. The article argues for the need to review the nature of science from the perspective of the common citizen.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

and “An Evaluation of Science and Mathematics Proficiency of Rural Students in Ranchi District, 1992” (unpublished).

reproduced partly in R. Popli and A. Sinha , Minimum Science for Everybody (India: Vikas Bharati Bishunpur, 1989).

and James R. Johnson , “Technology.”

G. Fourez , “Scientific Literacy, Societal Choices, and Ideologies,” in A. B. Champaigne et al. , eds., Scientific Literacy (Washington, D.C.: AAAS, 1989).

See, for example, The State of India's Environment, Statements of Shared Concern in the Centre for Science and Environment (CSE), (New Delhi: CSE, 1982 and 1984-85).

F. J. Thomas and A. S. Kindo , Towards Scientific Literacy (Tehran: International Institute for Adult Literacy Methods and Hulton Educational Publications, 1978).

Popli and Sinha , Minimum Science for Everybody.

Third World Network (TWN) , Modern Science in Crisis (Penang, Malaysia: TWN, 1988).

National Research Council , National Science Education Standards (Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1996).

10.

American Association for the Advancement of Science , Benchmarks for Science Literacy (New York: Oxford University Press, 1993).

11.

and Third Congress on Traditional Sciences and Technologies of India: Keynote Papers and Extended Abstracts (Varanasi: PPSTF, 1998).

12.

Narender K. Sehgal , Scientific Literacy and Culture: Minimum Science for Everyone (New Delhi: Vigyan Prasar, 1998).

13.

Rakesh Popli , “Common Man's Science and Its Role in Making General Science Education Meaningful,” paper presented at the International Workshop on the History of Science: Implications for Science Education, Mumbai, India, February 1999 (to be published in the conference proceedings).

14.

National Council for Educational Research and Training , Science Education for the First Ten Years of Schooling (New Delhi: NCERT, 1986).

15.

H. S. Bhola , “Science for All People: Some Educational Settings and Strategies for the Popularization of Science and Technology,” paper presented at the International Conference on the Popularization of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, September 1989.