This paper describes an initial evaluation of the “Science on the Underground” project in London, United Kingdom. The project uses posters based on concept cartoons to raise interest and awareness, provoke follow-up action and raise understanding of science amongst passengers. The nature of the concept cartoons is described. A number of data collection methods were used in the evaluation, including interview, observation, analysis of media coverage, and analysis of web site comments. The conclusions are that the project has led to an encouraging level of awareness of and interest in the project and a limited degree of follow-up action. Insufficient data are available to draw conclusions about the impact on public understanding of science.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
The Royal Society , The Public Understanding of Science (London: Royal Society, 1985).
2.
R. C. Laugksch and P. E. Spargo, “Construction of a paper-and-pencil Test of Basic Scientific Literacy based on selected literacy goals recommended by the American Association for the Advancement of Science,”Public Understanding of Science5 (1996): 331-359.
3.
J. Randall Crockett , “Training and development for informal science learning,”Public Understanding of Science6 (1997): 87-101.
4.
J. Meredith , R. Fortner, and G. Mullins, “Model of affective learning for nonformal science education facilities,”Journal of Research in Science Teaching34, no. 8 (1997): 805-818.
5.
G. Aikenhead , “Cultural assimilation in science classrooms: Border crossings and other solutions,”Studies in Science Education27 (1996): 1-52.
6.
J. Thomas , “Informed ambivalence: changing attitudes to the public understanding of science,” in Science Today, edited by R. Levinson and J. Thomas (London: Routledge, 1997), pp. 163-172.
7.
J. Hartman , “The popularization of science through citizen volunteers,”Public Understanding of Science6 (1997): 69-86.
8.
Thomas , “Informed ambivalence.”
9.
Thomas , “Informed ambivalence.”
10.
Hartman , “The popularization of science through citizen volunteers.”
11.
Jenkins , “Towards a functional public understanding of science.”
12.
Hartman , “The popularization of science through citizen volunteers.”
13.
G. Farmelo , “From big bang to damp squib,” in Science Today, edited by R. Levinson and J. Thomas (London: Routledge, 1997), pp. 175-191.
14.
TDI , Advertising on the Underground (London: TDI Advertising Ltd, 1997).
15.
J. Wilmshurst , The Fundamentals of Advertising (Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1985).
16.
R. Quayle , Ads on The Tube: Perceptions of advertising on The Underground (West Drayton, Middlesex: Robert Quayle Qualitative Research, 1998).
17.
Ibid.
18.
Farmelo , “From big bang to damp squib.”
19.
W. Wittrock , “Generative Science Teaching,” in The Content of Science, edited by P. Fensham, R. Gunstone and R. White (London: Falmer, 1994), pp. 29-38.
20.
M. Bourgery and G. Guimaraes, “Global ads: Say it with pictures,”Journal of European Business4, no. 5 (1993): 22-26.
21.
P. Messaris , Visual Persuasion: The Role of Images in Advertising (London: SAGE Publications, 1997).
22.
Ibid.
23.
B. Keogh and S. Naylor, Thinking About Science (set of A3 posters) (Sandbach: Millgate House, 1997).
24.
B. Keogh and S. Naylor, Starting Points for Science (Sandbach: Millgate House, 1997).
25.
B. Keogh , S. Naylor, and C. Wilson, “Concept cartoons: a new perspective on physics education,”Physics Education33, no. 4 (1998): 219-224.
26.
R. Driver , A. Squires, P. Rushworth, and V. Wood-Robinson, Making Sense of Secondary Science (London: Routledge, 1994).
27.
G. Posner , K. Strike, P. Hewson, and W. Gertzog, “Accommodation of a scientific conception: toward a theory of conceptual change,”Science Education66 (1982): 211-227.
28.
J. Solomon , “Social influences on the construction of pupils' understanding of science,”Studies in Science Education14 (1987): 63-82.
29.
Laytonet al. , Inarticulate Science? (cit. n. 3).
30.
A. Peacock , “An agenda for research on text material in primary science for second language learners of English in developing countries,”Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development16, no. 5 (1995): 389-401.
31.
Education Extra , Science on the Underground: An evaluation of the concept cartoon project by Education Extra (London: Education Extra, 1998).
32.
N. Denzin , The Research Act in Sociology: a theoretical introduction to sociological methods (London: The Butterworth Group, 1970).
33.
COPUS , So Did It Work? Evaluating public understanding of science events (London: Royal Society, n.d.).
34.
(London) Daily Mail, 3 March 1998, p. 35.
35.
TDI , Advertising on the Underground (cit. n. 14).
36.
“Clive James Show,” 8 March 1998, ITV.
37.
Farmelo , “From big bang to damp squib” (cit. n. 13).
38.
Meredithet al. , “Model of affective learning for nonformal science education facilities” (cit. n. 4).
39.
D. Hodson and J. Hodson, “From constructivism to social constructivism: a Vygotskian perspective on teaching and learning science,”School Science Review79, no. 289 (1998): 33-41.
40.
G. Delacôte , “The role of outside support media, video and museums,” in Growing Up with Science, edited by K. Harnqvist and A. Burgen (London: Jessica Kignsley, 1998), p. 181.
41.
Keogh and Naylor, “Concept cartoons” (cit. n. 25).
42.
Farmelo , “From big bang to damp squib” (cit. n. 13).
