The UK National Consensus Conference on Plant Biotechnology

Abstract

We consider the consensus conference as a model for the incorporation of lay perspectives within the assessment of new sciences and technologies. A consensus is a forum in which a group of laypeople questions experts about a controversial scientific or technological subject, assesses the experts' responses, reaches a consensus about the subject, and reports its conclusions at a press conference. Following a brief description of the development of consensus conferences in Denmark, we review the organization and the outcome of the first UK National Consensus Conference on Plant Biotechnology (UKNCC). The UKNCC is currently the subject of a detailed evaluation. At this stage, we are principally concerned to provide practical information about the organization of the conference. However, we also offer a preliminary assessment of the potential significance of this novel approach for the public understanding of science.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Mayer, I. S. , 1993, Consensus conferences as an instrument for a European awareness workshop methodology. Development of Methodology for Awareness Initiatives and Workshops, Second Report (Apeldoorn, Netherlands: TNO Policy Research, TNO Centre for Technology and Policy Studies).

Hansen, L. , Timm, L. , and Ravn Olesen, B. , 1992, Consensus Conferences (Copenhagen: Danish Board of Technology).

The final documents of the Danish Consensus Conferences can be obtained from: The Danish Board of Technology, Antonigade 4, DK-1106 Copenhagen K.

See, for example, Eurobarometer 39.1, Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering: What Europeans think about it in 1993. Report written for the European Commission, Directorate-General Science, Research and Development, Unit XII/E/1: Biotechnologies.

Final Report, UK National Consensus Conference on Plant Biotechnology (London: Science Museum, 1994).

Doble, J. , 1995, Public opinion about issues characterized by technological complexity and scientific uncertainty. Public Understanding of Science, 4, 95-118.

Stewart, J. , Kendall, E. , and Coote, A. , 1994, Citizens' Juries (London: Institute for Public Policy Research).

Fishkin, J. S. , 1991, Democracy and Deliberation, New Directions for Democratic Reform (New Haven, London: Yale University Press).