Aldiss, B. , 1975, Billion Year Spree (London: Corgi Books), p. 26.
2.
Roszak, T. , 1976, The Monster and the Titan: science, knowledge and gnosis. Science and its Public: the Changing Relationship, edited by Gerald Holton and William A. Blanpied (Dordrecht: Reidel), pp. 17-32.
3.
Hindle, M., 1992, Introduction, to Shelley, M., Frankenstein (Harmondsworth: Penguin), p. xliii.
4.
Weart, S. , 1988, Nuclear Fear: A History of Images (Cambridge: Harvard University Press), p. 104-105.
5.
McCorduck, P. , 1979, Machines Who Think (San Francisco: W. H. Freeman).
6.
Lewin, R. , 1977, The mayor and the monster. New Scientist, 6 October, p. 16.
7.
Mendelsohn, E. , 1984, Frankenstein at Harvard: the public politics of recombinant DNA research. Transformation and Tradition in the Sciences: Essays in Honour of I. Bernard Cohen (Cambridge University Press), pp. 317-336.
8.
Tyler, A. , 1991, The Frankenstein factor. Weekend Guardian, 16 March pp. 8-9, 27.
9.
Wilkie, T. , 1993, Perilous Knowledge: The Human Genome Project and its Implications (London: Faber and Faber).
10.
Gaylin, W. , 1972, The Frankenstein myth becomes a reality. New York Times Magazine, 5 March, p. 12.
11.
Hammond, R. , 1986, The Modern Frankenstein (Poole: Blandford Press).
12.
Lavalley, A. , 1979, The stage and film children of Frankenstein. The Endurance of Frankenstein, edited by G. Levine and U. Knoepflmacher (Berkeley: University of California Press).
13.
Glut, D. , 1973, The Frankenstein Legend (New Jersey: Methuen).
14.
Ketterer, D. , 1978, Mary Shelley and science fiction: a select bibliography. Science Fiction Studies, 5, 172.
15.
Levine, G. , 1979, The ambiguous heritage of Frankenstein. The Endurance of Frankenstein, edited by G. Levine and U. Knoepflmacher (Berkeley: University of California Press).
16.
Smith, J.1992, Frankenstein: Case Studies in Contemporary Criticism (Boston: St Martin's Press).
17.
On Bacon see especially Keller, E., 1985, Baconian science: the arts of mastery and obedience. Reflections on Gender and Science (New Haven: Yale University Press), pp. 33-42
18.
Butler, M. , 1993, The first Frankenstein and radical science. Times Literary Supplement, 9 April, pp. 12-14. This is an edited version of Butler's introduction to the novel.
19.
Reiger, J. , 1974, Introduction to Shelley, M., Frankenstein (New York: Bobbs-Merrill).
20.
Toumey, C. , 1992, The moral character of mad scientists: a cultural critique of science. Science, Technology and Human Values, 17, 411-437.
21.
Tudor, A. , 1989, Monsters and Mad Scientists: a Cultural History of the Horror Movie (Oxford: Basil Blackwell), p. 85.
22.
Mazlish, B. , 1993, The Fourth Discontinuity: The Co-evolution of Humans and Machines (New Haven: Yale University Press), especially Chap. 2.
