School students' understanding of key ideas about radioactivity and ionizing radiation

Abstract

This paper looks in detail at the understanding of school students in the UK of fundamental ideas about radioactivity and ionizing radiation. An adequate grasp of basic ideas in this area of science would be widely seen as an essential element of functional `scientific literacy'. A written diagnostic test was developed and administered to a representative sample of 16 year old students (n = 144). Analysis of their responses corroborates the results of previous research in indicating the widespread use of an undifferentiated conception of radioactive material/radiation and suggests that many students may hold a conception of the process of absorption of radiation (including ionizing radiation) which is significantly different from the accepted science view. This may have important consequences for their reception and interpretation of media reports and other public information about phenomena involving radioactivity and radiation.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Thomas, G. , and Durant, J. R. , 1987, Why should we promote the public understanding of science? Scientific Literacy Papers (University of Oxford, Department of External Studies).

Millar, R. , and Wynne, B. , 1988, Public understanding of science: from contents to processes. International Journal of Science Education, 10 388-398.

Wynne, B. , 1990, The blind and the blissful. Guardian, 13 April, p.28.

Shapin, S. , 1992, Why the public ought to understand science-in-the-making. Public Understanding of Science, 1, 27-30.

Millar, R. , 1993, Science education and public understanding of science. ASE Science Teachers' Handbook: Secondary, edited by R. Hull (London: Simon and Schuster), pp. 357-374.

and Pfundt, H. , and Duit, R. , 1991, Bibliography. Students' Alternative Frameworks and Science Education (3rd edn) (Kiel: IPN).

Riesch, W., and Westphal, W., 1975, Modellhafte Schülervorstellungen zur Ausbreitung radioaktiver Strahlung, Der Physikunterricht, 9(4), 75-85.

Kaczmarek, R. , Bednarek, D. R. , and Wong, R. , 1987, Misconceptions of medical students about radiological physics. Health Physics, 52, 106-107.

and in Lijnse, P. L. et al. , 1990, Pupils' and mass-media ideas about radioactivity. International Journal of Science Education, 12, 67-78.

10.

Andersson, B. , 1986, The experiential gestalt of causation: a common core to students' preconceptions in science. European Journal of Science Education, 8, 155-171.

11.

Eijkelhof, H. M. C. , 1990, Radiation and Risk in Physics Education (Utrecht: CD-ß Press), pp. 92-94.

12.

Eijkelhof, H. , and Millar, R. , 1988, Reading about Chernobyl: the public understanding of radiation and radioactivity. School Science Review, 70(251), 35-41.

13.

The complete test and a slightly fuller account of the data analysis are provided in: Millar, R. , 1993, School Students' Understanding of Key Ideas about Radiation and Radioactivity, Science Educaton Research Paper 93/01 (Department of Educational Studies, University of York).

14.

Howell, D. C. , 1989, Fundamental Statistics for the Behavioural Sciences (2nd edn) (Boston, MA: PWS-Kent).

15.

Millar, R. , and Gill, J. S. , 1993, School Students' Understanding of Key Ideas about Radiation and Radioactivity: Separating Irradiation and Contamination, Science Education Research Paper 93/02 (Department of Educational Studies, University of York).

16.

Millar, R. , Eijkelhof, H. , and Klaassen, K. , 1990, Teaching about radioactivity and ionising radiation: an alternative approach. Physics Education, 25(6), 338-342.

17.

Millar, R. , and Milner, B. , 1991, Teaching and Learning about the Environment. Radiation and Radioactivity (University of York Science Education Group).