Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate measurements of thyroid volume by two different US methods and CT in a blinded design.
Material and Methods: Four observers evaluated 27 patients. Observer 1 used US and calculated thyroid volume based on recordings of cross-sections through the gland. Observer 2 used US and calculated the volume of each lobe as a rotation ellipsoid. Observers A and B used CT images and calculated thyroid volume based on recordings of cross-sections through the gland. All measurements were made twice.
Results: The median thyroid volume was 81 ml (range 7–470 ml) evaluated by CT. All three methods had fair reproducibility. When correlating the two different methods using US, an r of 0.837 was found. When correlating data from patients without intrathoracic goitre evaluated by US (Observer 1) and CT, r = 0.945. The method based on a rotation ellipsoid systematically produced smaller thyroid volumes than those of the cross-sectional method. Evaluation by US systematically produced smaller thyroid volumes than CT.
Conclusion: Calculation of thyroid volume based on US recordings of cross-sectional areas is a reproducible method in patients without substernal goitre extension. The US method calculating thyroid volume as a rotation ellipsoid is less reproducible, especially in large goitres. Measurement of thyroid volume using CT should be preferred in goitres with substernal extension.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.