O:09 Animal Models for Schizophrenia, Why do we Bother?
D. Eyles
Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research, School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia Email: Eyles@uq.edu.au
Aims The speaker will review the literature in a way that conveys to the clinical audience why we non-clinicians i.e. neuroscientists/animal behaviouralists/pharmacologists model the most human of all diseases in non-humans.
Methods The presenter will attempt to portray the most useful features of existing models i.e. how they relate to what we know about disease eitiology (construct validity); how accurately they reproduce the symptoms of the human disease (face validity) and ultimately how do they respond to therapeutic intervention (predictive validity).
Results Briefly the presenter will
List the contribution made to the field by the speakers at this symposia.
List what has been achieved internationally in this field.
Discuss what do we have left to do?
Conclusions Schizophrenia is multifactorial (multiple genes interact with multiple environments to create multiple phenotypes). Therefore any single animal model could never hope to explain so much variability. Animals, in particular the most commonly studied, rodents, most likely also do not experience schizophrenia. Despite this we have learned much about the fundamental processes that operate in how the brain develops, what genes affect the development and function of this organ; and what interventions spatially and temporally affect the way the animal brain works. The leap of faith that we as a research community (basic and clinical) make is that this research in animal brains can translate to processes governing these events in patients.
O:10 Modeling cognitive deficits in schizophrenia using rodents
T.H.J. Burne1,2
1
QCMHR, The Park Centre for Mental Health, Wacol QLD 4076, Australia.
2
Neurobiology Program, Institute for Cell and Molecular Therapies, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD 4111
Background Cognitive deficits in schizophrenia are seen across seven separate domains including working memory, attention/vigilance, verbal learning and memory, visual learning and memory, speed of processing, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. A number of behavioural tests are used in rodents to model the symptoms of schizophrenia, including prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle response (PPI), latent inhibition, tests of attention and associative learning, as well open field behaviour and maze learning. This presentation will provide an overview of the cognitive tests used in rodents and describe the extent to which different behavioural tests are incorporated in rodent models of schizophrenia.
Methods A literature search of research articles published between 1990–2005 incorporating rodent models of schizophrenia was performed. A pubmed search using schizophrenia and behaviour; and either mouse (178) or rat (525) was used. The studies were categorized according to the types of behavioural tests used. The behaviour tests were grouped into the following categories; motor activity, sensorimotor gating, and cognition. Tests of cognition were subdivided into working memory, attention (including latent inhibition), learning, executive function, problem solving and social interaction.
Results Most rodent models of schizophrenia used two behavioural tests; motor activity (46%) and PPI (21%). Behavioural tests of cognition were underrepresented in the literature; learning (19%), attention (13%), social interaction (7%), working memory (5%), executive function (0.4%) and problem solving (0%). There were relatively few cases of thorough behavioural phenotyping of animals.
Conclusions Behavioural paradigms modeling cognitive deficits seen in schizophrenia are underrepresented in animal models of schizophrenia. This is in part due to the challenge of modeling a complex disorder such as schizophrenia in a rodent. Although automated tests such as motor activity and PPI are amenable to pharmacological studies, a more holistic approach to modeling cognitive deficits in rodents is needed to best understand this multifactorial disease.
O:11 Prepulse Inhibition of the Startle Reflex in Patients Treated With Atypical Neuroleptics
M.T. Martin-Iverson∗1,3, K. Reid-Milligan3, J. Lee2
1
Centre for Clinical Research in Neuropsychiatry,
2
Graylands Hospital, &
3
School of Medicine & Pharmacology, University of Western Australia
Aims/Background To determine whether there are deficits in prepulse inhibition of the startle reflex (PPI) in patients with schizophrenia treated with atypical neuroleptics and if any such deficits are influenced by attention.
Methods A methodology based on dose-response analysis was used. Instead of a range of drug doses, a range of startling stimulus intensities were used (70–115 dB as sound pressure level), and the resulting response curve of the electromyographic signal from the orbicularis oculi muscle under the right eye was fitted to a sigmoid function with nonlinear regression. The abilities of a prepulse (10 dB above 70 dB white noise auditory background) to reduce the Rmax (the response magnitude maximum derived from the fitted curve) was evaluated, Each person (30 community controls and 20 patients suffering from schizophrenia and treated with atypical neuroleptics) was tested on the same day under two attentional conditions (“Attend” or “Ignore” the prepulse and startling stimuli) with the order counterbalanced.
Results Community controls exhibited clear inhibition of Rmax after a prepulse 100 ms prior to the startling stimuli under both attention conditions. Patients exhibited PPI of Rmax in the ignore condition, but not in the attend condition.
Conclusion Patients with schizophrenia treated with atypical neuroleptics show normal or disrupted PPI depending on the attention condition.
O:12 The somatosensory system and schizophrenia
L.A. Chahl∗, P. Newson, V.J. Carr
Neuroscience Institute of Schizophrenia and Allied Disorders and School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Newcastle, NSW 2308
Background Schizophrenia is widely accepted to be a neurodevelopmental disorder. Neuronal activity is a powerful stimulus to neuronal development. The possibility that the somatosensory system might be abnormal in schizophrenia was raised by observations that subjects with schizophrenia have reduced pain sensitivity and reduced niacin skin flare responses [1, 2]. Pain and flare responses are mediated by small diameter primary afferent neurons that are sensitive to capsaicin.
Aim The aim of the project was to determine whether deficit in somatosensory input via capsaicin-sensitive primary afferent neurons causes changes in rat brain similar to those seen in the brain of subjects with schizophrenia.
Methods Wistar rats under ice anaesthesia were treated on neonatal day 2 with capsaicin 50 mg/kg s.c. or vehicle. A lethal dose of sodium pentobarbitone was given at either 5–7 weeks [3] or 11–12 weeks of age. Brains were removed, fixed in formalin and coronal sections, 50 μm, cut and Nissl stained.
Results Neonatal capsaicin treatment resulted in reduced brain weight, reduced hippocampal and cross-sectional area, reduced cortical thickness and increased neuronal density in both immature and mature rats. Thus neonatal capsaicin treatment produced morphological changes in rat brain similar to those found in schizophrenia.
Conclusions The neonatal capsaicin treated rat might be a useful animal model of schizophrenia.